Analyze Diet
Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine2025; 47; e008224; doi: 10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm008224

Objective lameness assessment of 235 horses undergoing lameness examination in Brazil: A retrospective study.

Abstract: Lameness, which arises from functional or structural changes in the limbs or axial skeleton, causes asymmetry in the movement of the equine head and/or pelvis. This study aimed to investigate the lameness patterns of horses that underwent lameness examination or monitoring during the years 2016 to 2020. This retrospective study used data from the lameness examination, evaluated using an objective assessment with body-mounted wireless inertial sensors. The lameness examination comprised clinical history, static inspection, palpation, gait evaluation (for which the animals were equipped with a wireless inertial sensor system), flexion tests, lunging examination, diagnostic anesthetic blocks, and imaging examinations. Based on objective assessment data, the condition of lameness, limb with primary lameness, type of lameness, intensity, and location of lameness were determined. Of the 235 animals included in this study, 93,6% presented lameness. Of the animals with lameness, 59,5% had forelimb lameness and 40,5% had hindlimb lameness. The most frequent lameness condition was primary lameness in one limb and secondary lameness in the other. Impact lameness was the most frequent type in both the forelimb and hindlimb. Moderate-to-severe lameness was the most frequent level of intensity. Regarding the lameness location, in the forelimb, the distal region was the most affected, while in the hindlimb, the proximal lower region was the most affected. We conclude that forelimb lameness is more frequent in horses examined in southern Brazil and mainly affects the distal limb region. A claudicação, decorrente de alterações funcionais ou estruturais dos membros ou do esqueleto axial, causa assimetria no movimento da cabeça e/ou pelve equina. O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar os padrões de claudicação de um grupo de cavalos apresentados para exame ou monitoramento de claudicação, durante os anos de 2016 a 2020. Este estudo retrospectivo utilizou dados do exame de claudicação, avaliados por meio de avaliação objetiva com sensores inerciais sem fio montados no corpo. O exame de claudicação consistiu em história clínica, inspeção estática, palpação, avaliação da marcha (para a qual os animais foram equipados com um sistema de sensor inercial sem fio), testes de flexão, exame de avanço, bloqueios anestésicos diagnósticos e exames de imagem. Com base nos dados da avaliação objetiva, foram determinados a condição de claudicação, o membro com claudicação primária, o tipo de claudicação, a intensidade e a localização da claudicação. Dos 235 animais incluídos no estudo, 93,6% apresentaram claudicação. Dos casos de claudicação, 59,5% apresentaram claudicação de membro anterior e 40,5% de membro posterior. De acordo com a condição de claudicação, a mais frequente foi a claudicação primária em um membro e secundária no outro. A claudicação de impacto foi o tipo mais frequente, tanto no membro anterior quanto no membro posterior. A claudicação moderada a grave foi o nível de intensidade mais frequente. Quanto à localização da claudicação, no membro anterior, a região distal foi a mais acometida, e no membro posterior, a região proximal inferior foi a mais acometida. Concluímos que a claudicação de membro anterior é mais frequente em equinos examinados no sul do Brasil, acometendo principalmente a região distal do membro.
Publication Date: 2025-05-22 PubMed ID: 40417262PubMed Central: PMC12101475DOI: 10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm008224Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article focuses on studying lameness patterns of horses in Brazil from 2016 to 2020. The researchers found that out of 235 inspected horses, 93.6% exhibited lameness, with the forelimb being the most affected area.

Study Overview

  • A total of 235 horses, which exhibited symptoms of lameness between 2016 and 2020, were involved in this research study conducted in southern Brazil.
  • The assessment of lameness involved a detailed examination that included a clinical history review, static inspection, palpation, and gait evaluation using a body-mounted wireless inertial sensor system.
  • The researchers also performed flexion tests, lunging examination, diagnostic anesthetic blocks, and imaging examinations.

Results of the Study

  • Out of the total horses examined, an alarming 93.6% presented with symptoms of lameness.
  • When the location of lameness was investigated, a majority 59.5% showed lameness in the forelimb, whereas 40.5% exhibited lameness in the hindlimb.
  • The most frequently observed lameness condition was primary lameness in one limb, coupled with secondary lameness in the other limb.
  • Looking at the type of lameness, impact lameness was the most common in both the forelimb and hindlimb.
  • The severity of lameness was weighed, and moderate to severe lameness was most frequently observed.
  • In terms of specific location within the limbs, the distal region in the forelimb was most affected, while the proximal lower region in the hindlimb had the highest incidence of lameness.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded that lameness, specifically in the forelimb, is a common condition among horses examined in southern Brazil.
  • The distal region of the affected limb was identified as the most impacted area. Further awareness and immediate addressing of this health concern in horses are necessitated.

Cite This Article

APA
Rodrigues APDC, Pozzobon R, De Bastiani G, De La Côrte FD, Azevedo MDS. (2025). Objective lameness assessment of 235 horses undergoing lameness examination in Brazil: A retrospective study. Braz J Vet Med, 47, e008224. https://doi.org/10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm008224

Publication

ISSN: 2527-2179
NlmUniqueID: 9918435088106676
Country: Brazil
Language: English
Volume: 47
Pages: e008224

Researcher Affiliations

Rodrigues, Ana Paula da Costa
  • Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Animal, Setor de Clínica e Cirurgia de Grandes Animais, UNIPAMPA, Uruguaiana, RS, Brazil.
Pozzobon, Ricardo
  • Departamento de Clínicas de Grandes Animais, UFSM, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
De Bastiani, Grasiela
  • Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
De La Côrte, Flávio Desessards
  • Departamento de Clínicas de Grandes Animais, UFSM, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Azevedo, Marcos da Silva
  • Setor de Clínica e Cirurgia de Grandes animais, UNIPAMPA, Uruguaiana, RS, Brazil.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Conflict of interests: No competing interests have been declared.

References

This article includes 35 references
  1. Abreu H. C. D., De La Côrte F. D., Brass K. E., Pompermayer E., Luz T. R. R. D., Gasperi D. D.. Claudicação em cavalos Crioulos atletas. Ciência Rural 2011;41:2114–2119.
  2. Azevedo M. S., De La Côrte F. D., Brass K. E., Gallio M., Dau S. L., Pozzobon R., Lopes M. A. F., Lopes L. F. D.. Impact or push-off lameness presentation is not altered by the type of track surface where horses are trotted. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 2015;67(6):1475–1482.
    doi: 10.1590/1678-4162-8454google scholar: lookup
  3. Baccarin R. Y. A., Moraes A. P. L., Veiga A. C. R., Fernandes W. R., Amaku M., Silva L. C. L. C., Hagen S. C. F.. Relationship between clinical and radiography examination for equine osteoarthritis diagnosis. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science 2012;49(1):73–81.
  4. Baxter G. M., Stashak T. S., Keegan K. G.. Examination for lameness: History, visual exam, and conformation. Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses 7th. John Wiley & Sons; 2020; pp. 67–188.
  5. Beeman G. M.. Conformation of the Horse: Relationship of form to function. Proceedings of the AAEP Annual Convention 2008; pp. 1–5.
  6. Broster C. E., Burn C. C., Barr A. R. S., Whay H. R.. The range and prevalence of pathological abnormalities associated with lameness in working horses from developing countries. Equine Veterinary Journal 2009;41(5):474–481.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X373907pubmed: 19642408google scholar: lookup
  7. Canto L. S., De La Corte F. D., Brass K. E., Ribeiro M. D.. Frequency of hoof balance problems in training crioulo horses. Brazilian Journal Veterinary Research Animal Science, São Paulo 2006;43(4):489–495.
  8. Dabareiner R. M., Cohen N. D., Carter G. K., Nunn S., Moyer W.. Musculoskeletal problems associated with lameness and poor performance among horses used for barrel racing: 118 cases (2000–2003). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2005;227(10):1646–1650.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.227.1646pubmed: 16313045google scholar: lookup
  9. Dyson S., Greve L.. Subjective gait assessment of 57 sports horses in normal work: A comparison of the response to flexion tests, movement in hand, on the lunge and ridden. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2016;38:1–7.
  10. Johnson S. A., Donnell J. R., Donnell A. D., Frisbie D. D.. Retrospective analysis of lameness localisation in Western Performance Horses: A ten‐year review. Equine Veterinary Journal 2021;53(6):1150–1158.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13397pubmed: 33617019google scholar: lookup
  11. Keegan K. G.. Evidence-based lameness detection and quantification. The Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 2007;23(2):403–423.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2007.04.008pubmed: 17616320google scholar: lookup
  12. Keegan K. G.. The Biomechanics of Multiple Limb Lameness: Separating Secondary from Compensatory. 2022 Apr 28.
  13. Keegan K. G., Kramer J., Yonezawa Y., Maki H., Pai P. F., Dent E. V., Kellerman T. E., Wilson D. A., Reed S. K.. Assessment of repeatability of a wireless, inertial sensor–based lameness evaluation system for horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2011;72(9):1156–1163.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.72.9.1156pubmed: 21879972google scholar: lookup
  14. Keegan K. G., Yonezawa Y., Pai P. F., Wilson D. A., Kramer J.. Evaluation of a sensor-based system of motion analysis for detection and quantification of forelimb and hind limb lameness in horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2004;65(5):665–670.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.665pubmed: 15141889google scholar: lookup
  15. Kelmer G., Keegan K. G., Kramer J., Wilson D. A., Pai F. P., Singh P.. Computer assisted kinematic evaluation of induced compensatory movements resembling lameness in horses trotting on a treadmill. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2005;66(4):646–655.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.646pubmed: 15900946google scholar: lookup
  16. Kramer J., Keegan K. G., Kelmer G., Wilson D. A.. Objective determination of pelvic movement during hind limb lameness by use of a signal decomposition method and pelvic height differences. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2004;65(6):741–747.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.741pubmed: 15198212google scholar: lookup
  17. Maliye S., Marshall J. F.. Objective assessment of the compensatory effect of clinical hind limb lameness in horses: 37 cases (2011–2014). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2016;249(8):940–944.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.249.8.940pubmed: 27700267google scholar: lookup
  18. Maliye S., Voute L. C., Marshall J. F.. Naturally-occurring forelimb lameness in the horse results in significant compensatory load redistribution during trotting. The Veterinary Journal 2015;204(2):208–213.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.03.005pubmed: 25862395google scholar: lookup
  19. McCracken M. J., Kramer J., Keegan K. G., Lopes M., Wilson D. A., Reed S. K., LaCarrubba A., Rasch M.. Comparison of an inertial sensor system of lameness quantification with subjective lameness evaluation. Equine Veterinary Journal 2012;44(6):652–656.
  20. Menarim B. C., Machado V. M. V., Alvarez L. E. C., Carneiro R., Busch L., Vulcano L. C.. Radiographic abnormalities in barrel racing horses with lameness referable to the metacarpophalangeal joint. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2012;32(4):216–221.
  21. Moreira I. L., Campebell R. C., Teixeira-Neto A. R., Câmara A. C. L.. Orthopedic injury in 156 equids in Federal District, Midwestern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine 2019;41(1):e095619.
  22. Moyer W. A., Carter G. K.. Examination of the Equine Foot. Equine Podiatry Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007; pp. 112–127.
  23. Mora-Carreno M., Briones R., Galecio J. S., Parra D., Rosenfeld C., Schmeisser A., Menarim B.. Main musculoskeletal injuries associated with lameness in Chilean Rodeo horses. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria 2014;46(3):419–424.
  24. Murray R. C., Walters J. M., Snart H., Dyson S. J., Parkin T. D.. Identification of risk factors for lameness in dressage horses. The Veterinary Journal 2010;184(1):27–36.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.020pubmed: 19369100google scholar: lookup
  25. Naeini A. T., Niak B. T.. Field study of the prevalence of lameness in horses in three provinces of Iran. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 2005;25(3):140–142.
  26. Nagy A., Dyson S. J., Murray J. K.. Veterinary problems of endurance horses in England and Wales. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2017;140:45–52.
  27. Noble J. K.. Lameness in the western pleasure horse. 47th Annual American Association of Equine Practitioners Convention Proceedings 2001; pp. 12–14.
  28. Rossdale P. D., Hopes R., Digby N. J., offord K.. Epidemiological study of wastage among racehorses 1982 and 1983. The Veterinary Record 1985;116(3):66–69.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.116.3.66pubmed: 3976145google scholar: lookup
  29. Schumacher J., Schumacher J., Schramme M., Moyer W.. Review of mistakes that can be made when interpreting the results of diagnostic analgesia during a lameness examination. Proceedings of the AAEP Annual Convention 2014; pp. 83–92.
  30. Scott M.. Musculoskeletal injuries in nonracing quarter horses. The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Equine Practice 2008;24(1):133–152.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2007.11.006pubmed: 18314040google scholar: lookup
  31. Seitzinger A. H., Traub-Dargatz J. L., Kane A. J., Kopral C. A., Morley P. S., Garber L. P., Hill G. W.. A comparison of the economic costs of equine lameness, colic, and equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM). Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics 2000; pp. 1–3.
  32. Swor T. M., Dabareiner R. M., Honnas C. M., Cohen N. D., Black J. B.. Musculoskeletal problems associated with lameness and poor performance in cutting horses: 200 cases (2007–2015). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2019;254(5):619–625.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.254.5.619pubmed: 30779625google scholar: lookup
  33. Reed S. K., Kramer J., Thombs L., Pitts J. B., Wilson D. A., Keegan K. G.. Comparison of results for body-mounted inertial sensor assessment with final lameness determination in 1,224 equids. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2020;256(5):590–599.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.256.5.590pubmed: 32068513google scholar: lookup
  34. Tank D. P., Bhatt R. H., Dodia V. D., Vadalia J. V., Padaliya N. R.. Epidemiological status of lameness in horses: A retrospective study. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2020;9(9):681–687.
  35. Tipa N., Júnior. Cavalo Crioulo registra avanço no território brasileiro em 2019. Associação Brasileira de Criadores de Cavalos Crioulos 2018 Jan.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.