Abstract: If untreated, caecal impaction may progress to rupture of the caecum and reports of long-term outcome for horses undergoing surgery for caecal impaction are required. Objective: To describe short- and long-term complication rates for horses undergoing surgery for caecal impaction in an otherwise life-threatening gastrointestinal condition. Methods: Case records were reviewed for horses undergoing surgery for caecal impaction. Horses were included in the study if an abnormally large, fluid-distended or feed-impacted caecum was the primary diagnosis at surgery and excluded if the caecum had already ruptured upon opening the abdomen, necessitating euthanasia. Short-term follow-up data were obtained from clinical records; and included complications, repeat celiotomy and survival to discharge. Long-term survival was defined as survival for >1 year post operatively. Long-term follow-up data were obtained through telephone interviews with owners and referring veterinary surgeons. Survival, occurrence of post operative colic and subsequent use of the horse were recorded. Results: Twenty horses underwent surgery for caecal impaction: 16 horses underwent caecal bypass (typhlotomy and removal of caecal contents, ileal transection followed by ileocolostomy); 3 underwent typhlotomy alone; and one horse underwent typhlotomy followed by a second procedure where caecal bypass was performed. Five horses (25%) were admitted for colic evaluation with primary caecal impactions, in 10/20 (50%) of cases the impaction was secondary to previous orthopaedic surgery and in 5/20 (25%) caecal impaction was identified at repeat celiotomy following a previous colic surgery. Sixty-five percent (13/20) of horses survived to discharge; 11/13 (85%) of horses discharged survived long term; 100% (3/3) horses that received typhlotomy alone were discharged and survived long term. Conclusions: The prognosis following caecal impaction surgery is fair, if the horse survives to discharge then prognosis for long-term survival is good. Conclusions: Surgery for caecal impaction carries a fair prognosis for a potentially life threatening disease, in particular where caecal dysfunction is suspected.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study looks into the outcomes of 20 horses that underwent surgery for the serious gastrointestinal condition called caecal impaction. The results could increase understanding of short and long-term complications of the surgery and point towards a fair prognosis for horses who survive the operation.
Study Objective and Methods
The aim of the study was to describe the short and long-term complication rates in horses undergoing surgery for caecal impaction, which can advance to caecum rupture if ignored.
The research was based on retrospective analysis of case records of horses that had surgery due to an unusually large caecum that was fluid-distended or impacted with feed.
The cases with already ruptured caecum requiring euthanasia were not included in the study.
Past clinical records provided the data for short-term follow-up, highlighting complications, repeat celiotomy (surgical incision into the abdominal cavity), and survival until discharge.
Long-term survival was defined as if a horse survived more than a year after the operation.
Data regarding long-term follow-up was gathered through telephone interviews with horse owners and the referring veterinary surgeons, and information on survival rates, post-operative colic and subsequent usage of the horse was recorded.
Results of the Surgery
Out of twenty horses that had surgery for caecal impaction, sixteen of them underwent caecal bypass, while three horses only had typhlotomy, and one horse had a two-step procedure involving typhlotomy and caecal bypass.
Five horses, or 25%, had primary caecal impactions; and in half of the cases, the impaction occurred after an orthopaedic surgery. Another 25% were identified with caecal impaction at a repeat celiotomy following previous colic surgery.
About 65% of the horses survived until discharge, out of which 85% survived for the long term.
Notably, all three horses who had only the typhlotomy without caecal bypass survived until discharge and in the long term.
Conclusions Drawn from the Study
The results suggest a fair prognosis following caecal impaction surgery. If a horse survives until discharge, the future survival rates are considered to be good.
The research concludes that surgery for caecal impaction carries a decent prognosis for a potentially life-threatening disease, particularly when caecal dysfunction is suspected.
Cite This Article
APA
Smith LC, Payne RJ, Boys Smith SJ, Bathe AP, Greet TR.
(2010).
Outcome and long-term follow-up of 20 horses undergoing surgery for caecal impaction: a retrospective study (2000-2008).
Equine Vet J, 42(5), 388-392.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00087.x