Analyze Diet
Research in veterinary science2026; 212; 106415; doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2026.106415

Oxidative stress markers in different age ranges of healthy horses.

Abstract: Oxidative stress results from an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants, impairing cellular functions and contributing to diseases and aging. Despite the growing interest in oxidative stress, studies specifically evaluating the influence of age on laboratory and oxidative stress parameters in clinically healthy horses remain limited. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the influence of age on laboratory and oxidative stress parameters in clinically healthy horses. A total of 152 clinically healthy horses (80 females and 72 males) were selected, including young horses aged 3 to 48 months (n = 50), adult horses aged 96 to 168 months (n = 76), and elderly horses aged 240 to 360 months (n = 26). Complete blood count, biochemical profile and assessment of oxidative stress were conducted using specific methodologies: total antioxidant capacity (TAC), total oxidant capacity (TOC), and the antioxidants uric acid and albumin. TAC was determined by the inhibition of ABTS cation reduction alone (TAC-ABTS), or in the presence of peroxidase (TAC-ABTS+HRP), ferric reducing antioxidant power (TAC-FRAP), and cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (TAC-CUPRAC). Data were analyzed using ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test, and differences were considered significant when P < 0.05. Young horses showed higher values for red blood cells (RBC), white blood cells (WBC), lymphocytes, monocytes, and platelets than adult and aged horses, as well as higher uric acid and TAC-CUPRAC values than aged horses. In contrast, young horses exhibited lower mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and TAC-ABTS+HRP values than adult and aged horses. Adult horses, in turn, exhibited lower AST values and creatinine values, accompanied by higher red blood cell distribution width (RDW), compared with young horses. Age-related alterations in laboratory parameters, particularly oxidative stress biomarkers, were observed in clinically healthy horses. Collectively, these findings suggest that age should be considered when interpreting these parameters and emphasize the importance of evaluating multiple biomarkers for a more comprehensive characterization of redox status.
Publication Date: 2026-09-20 PubMed ID: 42772045DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2026.106415Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated how age affects oxidative stress markers and routine laboratory parameters in clinically healthy horses across different age groups.
  • Researchers measured oxidative stress biomarkers alongside blood and biochemical profiles in young, adult, and elderly horses to understand age-related changes.

Background

  • Oxidative stress occurs when there is an imbalance between oxidants (molecules that can cause cellular damage) and antioxidants (molecules that neutralize oxidants), leading to cellular dysfunction.
  • This imbalance is linked to aging and various diseases.
  • Despite its importance, few studies have examined how age influences oxidative stress and laboratory parameters specifically in healthy horses.

Study Objectives

  • To evaluate the influence of age on oxidative stress markers and standard laboratory blood tests within a population of clinically healthy horses.
  • To identify how these parameters vary between young, adult, and elderly horse groups.

Methods

  • A total of 152 clinically healthy horses were enrolled, including:
    • Young horses: 3 to 48 months old (n=50)
    • Adult horses: 96 to 168 months old (n=76)
    • Elderly horses: 240 to 360 months old (n=26)
  • Samples were analyzed for:
    • Complete blood count (CBC) – including red/white blood cells, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets, and related indices like MCV and RDW.
    • Biochemical profile focusing on enzymes and metabolites such as AST and creatinine.
    • Oxidative stress status through measurement of:
      • Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC), determined by multiple assays:
        • TAC-ABTS (inhibition of ABTS cation reduction alone)
        • TAC-ABTS+HRP (in presence of peroxidase)
        • TAC-FRAP (Ferric reducing antioxidant power)
        • TAC-CUPRAC (Cupric reducing antioxidant capacity)
      • Total Oxidant Capacity (TOC)
      • Antioxidants like uric acid and albumin
  • Statistical analysis:
    • Used ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test for group comparisons.
    • Significance was set at P < 0.05.

Key Findings

  • Young horses (3-48 months):
    • Had higher counts of red blood cells (RBC), white blood cells (WBC), lymphocytes, monocytes, and platelets than adult and elderly horses.
    • Showed higher uric acid concentrations and greater TAC-CUPRAC values compared to elderly horses, indicating stronger antioxidant capability in this assay.
    • Exhibited lower mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and lower TAC-ABTS+HRP values than the other age groups, suggesting some age-dependent variation in antioxidant capacity depending on the method used.
  • Adult horses (96-168 months):
    • Showed lower AST (aspartate aminotransferase) and creatinine values compared to young horses, indicating potentially better liver and kidney markers.
    • Had higher red blood cell distribution width (RDW) than young horses, reflecting variation in red blood cell size which may relate to age or physiological status.
  • Elderly horses (240-360 months):
    • Generally exhibited lower antioxidant markers (such as uric acid and TAC-CUPRAC) compared to young horses, indicating reduced antioxidant defense with aging.
    • Had oxidative parameters that varied significantly from the other age groups, highlighting age-related oxidative stress changes.

Conclusions and Implications

  • There are clear, measurable changes in both standard blood parameters and oxidative stress markers across different age groups in healthy horses.
  • Young horses tend to have higher blood cell counts and greater antioxidant capacity in some assays, while elderly horses show signs of diminished antioxidant defenses.
  • Adult horses display distinct biochemical profiles different from young and aged groups, implying physiological changes with maturity.
  • Age must be taken into account when interpreting oxidative stress and laboratory test results in horses, as normal reference ranges and biomarker levels shift with age.
  • Evaluating multiple oxidative stress biomarkers rather than relying on a single measurement provides a more comprehensive understanding of redox status in horses and likely in other species.
  • This research contributes valuable baseline data for veterinary clinical assessments and furthers our understanding of aging and oxidative biology in equine health.

Cite This Article

APA
de Brito Souza LMR, Carrasco LMC, Vasconcelos LA, de Campos Lopes LE, Bosculo MRM, Montechiesi DF, de Almeida BFM. (2026). Oxidative stress markers in different age ranges of healthy horses. Res Vet Sci, 212, 106415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2026.106415

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2661
NlmUniqueID: 0401300
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 212
Pages: 106415
PII: S0034-5288(26)00369-3

Researcher Affiliations

de Brito Souza, Luma Maria Rovina
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Roque Quagliato Veterinary Hospital, University Center of the Integrated Faculties of Ourinhos (Unifio), Ourinhos, São Paulo State, Brazil.
Carrasco, Livia Maria Camussi
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Roque Quagliato Veterinary Hospital, University Center of the Integrated Faculties of Ourinhos (Unifio), Ourinhos, São Paulo State, Brazil.
Vasconcelos, Laura Arduino
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Roque Quagliato Veterinary Hospital, University Center of the Integrated Faculties of Ourinhos (Unifio), Ourinhos, São Paulo State, Brazil.
de Campos Lopes, Laryssa Eduarda
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Roque Quagliato Veterinary Hospital, University Center of the Integrated Faculties of Ourinhos (Unifio), Ourinhos, São Paulo State, Brazil.
Bosculo, Maria Rachel Melo
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Roque Quagliato Veterinary Hospital, University Center of the Integrated Faculties of Ourinhos (Unifio), Ourinhos, São Paulo State, Brazil.
Montechiesi, Daniela Fernandez
  • Autonomous Veterinary Doctor, Ourinhos, São Paulo State, Brazil.
de Almeida, Breno Fernando Martins
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Roque Quagliato Veterinary Hospital, University Center of the Integrated Faculties of Ourinhos (Unifio), Ourinhos, São Paulo State, Brazil; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University (FMVA-Unesp), Araçatuba, São Paulo State, Brazil. Electronic address: breno.fernando@unifio.edu.br.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any other financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of this paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.