Parasite control methods used by horse owners: factors predisposing to the development of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes.
Abstract: One hundred and fifty horse owners, primarily private owners and riding schools, replied to a questionnaire concerning the practices they used to control parasites. Twenty-seven had experienced a parasite problem. Faecal samples from 188 horses selected at random showed that worm control practices were generally successful; however, many owners were not following recommendations for slowing the development of resistant parasites. In 1996, 86 per cent of the owners were using either three or two classes of anthelmintic a year, and they used a median of six doses with a range from one to 11. Approximately half the owners, more commonly owners of up to five horses, picked up their horses' faeces at least once a week, but these owners also used more doses of anthelmintic a year than owners who did not pick up faeces. One-third of the owners manually removed Gasterophilus species eggs from the horses' hairs, but 94 per cent of them also used ivermectin. Many owners treated specifically for Anoplocephala species, cyathostome larvae and Gasterophilus species, and these owners were the most likely to use three classes of anthelmintic a year. One-hundred-and-seven owners replied to a second questionnaire asking for information about the factors that influenced their anthelmintic control practices. Many owners, particularly private owners, were not influenced by the cost of the anthelmintic. For the timing and frequency of treatment, and the choice of drug, owners were most influenced by advertisements, magazine articles and veterinary surgeons. In two magazines aimed at horse owners, the brands of drugs most frequently advertised were the brands most commonly used by the owners, and articles in the magazines recommended the use of three classes of drug per year. These results are discussed in relation to their influence on the development of anthelmintic-resistant nematodes.
Publication Date: 2000-07-11 PubMed ID: 10887995DOI: 10.1136/vr.146.17.487Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research article explores parasite control practices among horse owners and how these may contribute to the development of anthelmintic resistance in parasites. It was found that most owners were successful at controlling worms, but many were not following recommendations to slow down the development of resistance.
Survey of Horse Owner Practices
- The study began with a questionnaire distributed to 150 horse owners, including private owners and riding schools. Out of these, 27 had experienced problems with parasites.
- In addition to the survey, faecal samples from 188 randomly selected horses were examined to see the effectiveness of the worm control practices.
Anthelmintic Use Among Horse Owners
- The survey revealed that in 1996, most of the surveyed horse owners were using either two or three classes of anthelmintic drugs per year, with a median usage of six doses, ranging from one to 11.
- It was found that around half the horse owners, particularly those owning up to five horses, picked up their horses’ faeces at least weekly. However, these owners also used more anthelmintic doses annually than those who did not pick up faeces.
Specific Treatment Practices
- Specific practices included the manual removal of Gasterophilus species eggs from the horses’ hairs by one third of the owners. However, 94% of these horse owners also made use of ivermectin.
- The most frequent treatments were targeted at Anoplocephala species, cyathostome larvae and Gasterophilus species, and the owners practicing this were more likely to use all three types of anthelmintic in a year.
Factors Influencing Anthelmintic Control Practices
- Further inquiry into the factors affecting the horse owners’ parasite control practices revealed that for many, particularly private owners, cost of the drugs was not a deciding factor.
- The timing and frequency of treatment and the choice of drugs were influenced largely by advertisements, magazine articles and advice from veterinary surgeons.
- The study discovered a correlation between the drug brand names advertised in two horse owner-oriented magazines and the drugs most commonly used by the horse owners. It was also found that the magazines recommended the use of three classes of drugs per year.
Implications for Anthelmintic Resistance
- The information gathered from this study is analyzed in the context of its potential effects on the emergence of anthelmintic-resistant parasites.
- The practices of using multiple drug classes per year, not following dosing recommendations, targeting specific parasites and being influenced by non-scientific sources for information could potentially contribute to the development of drug resistance in parasites.
Cite This Article
APA
Lloyd S, Smith J, Connan RM, Hatcher MA, Hedges TR, Humphrey DJ, Jones AC.
(2000).
Parasite control methods used by horse owners: factors predisposing to the development of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes.
Vet Rec, 146(17), 487-492.
https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.146.17.487 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge.
MeSH Terms
- Animal Husbandry / methods
- Animals
- Anthelmintics / pharmacology
- Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
- Diptera
- Drug Resistance
- Feces / parasitology
- Horse Diseases / prevention & control
- Horses
- Humans
- Nematoda / drug effects
- Nematode Infections / prevention & control
- Nematode Infections / veterinary
- Ownership
- Parasitic Diseases, Animal / prevention & control
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- United Kingdom
Citations
This article has been cited 13 times.- Hedberg Alm Y, Tydén E, Martin F, Lernå J, Halvarsson P. Farm size and biosecurity measures associated with Strongylus vulgaris infection in horses. Equine Vet J 2025 May;57(3):703-711.
- Nielsen MK, Slusarewicz P, Kuzmina TA, Denwood MJ. US-wide equine strongylid egg count data demonstrate seasonal and regional trends. Parasitology 2024 May;151(6):579-586.
- Osterman-Lind E, Hedberg Alm Y, Hassler H, Wilderoth H, Thorolfson H, Tydén E. Evaluation of Strategies to Reduce Equine Strongyle Infective Larvae on Pasture and Study of Larval Migration and Overwintering in a Nordic Climate. Animals (Basel) 2022 Nov 10;12(22).
- Boelow H, Krücken J, Thomas E, Mirams G, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Comparison of FECPAK(G2), a modified Mini-FLOTAC technique and combined sedimentation and flotation for the coproscopic examination of helminth eggs in horses. Parasit Vectors 2022 May 12;15(1):166.
- Dauparaitė E, Kupčinskas T, Hoglund J, Petkevičius S. A Survey of Control Strategies for Equine Small Strongyles in Lithuania. Helminthologia 2021 Sep;58(3):225-232.
- Kaspar A, Pfister K, Nielsen MK, Silaghi C, Fink H, Scheuerle MC. Detection of Strongylus vulgaris in equine faecal samples by real-time PCR and larval culture - method comparison and occurrence assessment. BMC Vet Res 2017 Jan 11;13(1):19.
- Schneider S, Pfister K, Becher AM, Scheuerle MC. Strongyle infections and parasitic control strategies in German horses - a risk assessment. BMC Vet Res 2014 Nov 12;10:262.
- Hinney B, Wirtherle NC, Kyule M, Miethe N, Zessin KH, Clausen PH. A questionnaire survey on helminth control on horse farms in Brandenburg, Germany and the assessment of risks caused by different kinds of management. Parasitol Res 2011 Dec;109(6):1625-35.
- Nielsen MK. Restrictions of anthelmintic usage: perspectives and potential consequences. Parasit Vectors 2009 Sep 25;2 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7.
- Traversa D, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Demeler J, Milillo P, Schürmann S, Barnes H, Otranto D, Perrucci S, di Regalbono AF, Beraldo P, Boeckh A, Cobb R. Anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomin populations from horse yards in Italy, United Kingdom and Germany. Parasit Vectors 2009 Sep 25;2 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2.
- Corning S. Equine cyathostomins: a review of biology, clinical significance and therapy. Parasit Vectors 2009 Sep 25;2 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1.
- Lind EO, Rautalinko E, Uggla A, Waller PJ, Morrison DA, Höglund J. Parasite control practices on Swedish horse farms. Acta Vet Scand 2007 Sep 26;49(1):25.
- Peregrine AS, McEwen B, Bienzle D, Koch TG, Weese JS. Larval cyathostominosis in horses in Ontario: an emerging disease?. Can Vet J 2006 Jan;47(1):80-2.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists