Analyze Diet
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2001; 218(4); 522-525; doi: 10.2460/javma.2001.218.522

Postexposure rabies prophylaxis protocol for domestic animals and epidemiologic characteristics of rabies vaccination failures in Texas: 1995-1999.

Abstract: To determine whether postexposure rabies prophylaxis (PEP) in domestic animals, as mandated by the state of Texas, has continued to be effective and to evaluate PEP and preexposure rabies vaccination failures from 1995 through 1999. Methods: Retrospective study. Methods: 830 unvaccinated domestic animals (621 dogs, 78 horses, 71 cats, and 60 cattle) that received PEP and 4 animals (3 dogs and 1 horse) that had preexposure rabies vaccination failure. Methods: Zoonotic incident case reports from 1995 through 1999 were reviewed for information regarding unvaccinated domestic animals that received PEP according to state protocol after exposure to a rabid animal; reports were also reviewed for information regarding preexposure rabies vaccination failures. The PEP recommendations were to immediately vaccinate the animal against rabies, isolate the animal for 90 days, and administer booster vaccinations during the third and eighth weeks of the isolation period. Rabies vaccines used in the PEP protocol were administered via the route prescribed by the USDA. Results: From 1995 through 1999, 830 animals received PEP; 4 failures were recorded. Additionally, 4 preexposure rabies vaccination failures were recorded. Conclusions: Results of this study indicate that an effective PEP protocol for unvaccinated domestic animals exposed to rabies includes immediate vaccination against rabies, a strict isolation period of 90 days, and administration of booster vaccinations during the third and eighth weeks of the isolation period. This PEP schedule has proven to be effective for control of rabies in domestic animals.
Publication Date: 2001-03-07 PubMed ID: 11229502DOI: 10.2460/javma.2001.218.522Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper explores the effectiveness of postexposure rabies prophylaxis (PEP) in domestic animals in Texas from 1995 to 1999. It also evaluates instances where PEP and preexposure rabies vaccinations failed.

Objective

The article’s main objective is to assess the effectiveness of the PEP protocol for domestic animals and to analyze any failures of the PEP and preexposure rabies vaccination.

Methods

  • The research adopted a retrospective study methodology utilizing case reports from 1995 to 1999.
  • The focus was on 830 unvaccinated domestic animals which received PEP and 4 animals with preexposure rabies vaccination failure.
  • The PEP recommended immediate vaccination, isolation for 90 days, and administration of booster shots during the third and eighth week of isolation.

Results

  • Out of 830 animals treated with PEP during 1995-1999, there were only 4 recorded instances of PEP failure.
  • Additionally, 4 instances of preexposure vaccination failure were reported.

Conclusions

  • The results of the study corroborate the effectiveness of the current PEP protocol being employed for unvaccinated domestic animals in Texas which consists of an immediate vaccination, a 90-day isolation period and a series of booster vaccinations within the isolation duration.
  • The protocol, despite the few recorded failures, proves to be an effective way to manage and control rabies in domestic animals in Texas.

Cite This Article

APA
Wilson PJ, Clark KA. (2001). Postexposure rabies prophylaxis protocol for domestic animals and epidemiologic characteristics of rabies vaccination failures in Texas: 1995-1999. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 218(4), 522-525. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2001.218.522

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 218
Issue: 4
Pages: 522-525

Researcher Affiliations

Wilson, P J
  • Texas Department of Health, Zoonosis Control Division, Austin 78756, USA.
Clark, K A

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Animals, Domestic
    • Cat Diseases / epidemiology
    • Cat Diseases / prevention & control
    • Cats
    • Cattle
    • Cattle Diseases / epidemiology
    • Cattle Diseases / prevention & control
    • Dog Diseases / epidemiology
    • Dog Diseases / prevention & control
    • Dogs
    • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
    • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
    • Horses
    • Immunization, Secondary / veterinary
    • Rabies / epidemiology
    • Rabies / prevention & control
    • Rabies / veterinary
    • Rabies Vaccines / administration & dosage
    • Retrospective Studies
    • Texas / epidemiology
    • Treatment Failure
    • Vaccination / veterinary
    • Zoonoses / virology

    Citations

    This article has been cited 1 times.
    1. Redvers N, Kamalabadi YM, Carroll D, Essar MY, El Omrani O. Community Engagement Within the Evaluation of Public Policies for Zoonotic Spillover Prevention: A Secondary Matrix Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2025 May 18;22(5).
      doi: 10.3390/ijerph22050797pubmed: 40427911google scholar: lookup