Abstract: Peritonitis is life-threatening, and limited information exists regarding outcomes and predictors of survival. Objective: To report short- and long-term outcomes in horses diagnosed with peritonitis and identify factors associated with survival. Methods: Retrospective observational. Methods: Data were obtained for horses admitted to a UK referral hospital between 2010 and 2024 diagnosed with peritonitis (peritoneal fluid nucleated cell count >10 × 10/L). Short- and long-term morbidity and mortality were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with short-term survival based on data available at admission (Model 1) and at the time of second abdominocentesis (Model 2). Results: Peritonitis was diagnosed in 123 horses. Overall, short-term survival was 74% (91/123) with better outcomes in primary (90%, 66/73) versus secondary peritonitis (50%, 25/50). Surgery was performed in 31 cases, with short-term survival of 48% (15/31). In model 1, horses with higher heart rates (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86-0.95, p < 0.001) and sanguinous peritoneal fluid (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.65, p = 0.01) were significantly less likely to survive to hospital discharge. Survival was better in ponies vs. horses (OR 8.30, 95% CI 1.42-48.60, p = 0.02), and if rectal examination was normal (OR 8.25, 95% CI 1.80-37.85, p = 0.007). In Model 2, increased heart rate was the best predictor of reduced survival (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.94, p < 0.001). Survival to 30, 90, and 365 days was 98% (n = 50/51), 93% (n = 42/45), and 88% (n = 35/40), respectively. A third of horses developed complications following hospital discharge (predominantly colic and pyrexia), usually within 90 days of hospital admission. Peritonitis recurred in 6 horses. Conclusions: Retrospective study from a single hospital population. Conclusions: The prognosis for primary peritonitis is better than secondary peritonitis. Heart rate is a good predictor of short-term survival at admission and time of repeat abdominocentesis.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This study analyzed outcomes of horses with peritonitis admitted to a UK hospital to identify factors that predict survival.
The research found that heart rate and certain clinical signs were key predictors of short-term survival, with better outcomes for primary peritonitis compared to secondary peritonitis.
Background and Objective
Peritonitis is a severe and potentially fatal inflammation of the abdominal lining in horses.
There has been limited data on survival outcomes and predictors of survival in equine peritonitis cases.
The study aimed to report both short- and long-term survival and to identify clinical factors associated with outcomes in affected horses.
Methods
Retrospective observational study using data from horses diagnosed with peritonitis at a UK referral hospital from 2010 to 2024.
Diagnosis required a peritoneal fluid nucleated cell count over 10 × 10⁹/L.
Short- and long-term morbidity and mortality were collected and analyzed.
Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of short-term survival using two models:
Model 1 used data available at admission.
Model 2 used data available at the time of a second abdominal fluid sample (abdominocentesis).
Results
123 horses diagnosed with peritonitis were included in the analysis.
Overall short-term survival rate was 74% (91 out of 123 horses survived to hospital discharge).
Survival was substantially better in primary peritonitis cases (90%) compared to secondary peritonitis (50%).
31 horses underwent surgery, with only 48% short-term survival post-operation.
Model 1 predictors of decreased survival at admission:
Higher heart rates (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.90): each increased beat per minute decreases survival odds.
Ponies had significantly better survival odds than horses (OR 8.30).
Normal rectal examination findings correlated with improved survival (OR 8.25).
Model 2 results (at second abdominocentesis) reaffirmed increased heart rate as the strongest predictor of poor survival (OR 0.89).
Long-term survival rates post-discharge were high:
98% survival at 30 days.
93% survival at 90 days.
88% survival at 1 year (365 days).
About one-third of horses developed complications after hospital discharge, mainly colic and fever, typically within 90 days of admission.
Peritonitis recurrence was rare, occurring in 6 horses.
Conclusions and Clinical Implications
The prognosis for primary peritonitis is substantially better than for secondary peritonitis.
Heart rate is a reliable and easily measured clinical indicator for predicting short-term survival at both admission and after initial treatment.
Clinical findings such as rectal exam results and the nature of abdominal fluid also contribute important prognostic information.
Despite a life-threatening illness, most horses that survive to hospital discharge have favorable long-term outcomes.
Monitoring for complications is important within the first 3 months post-discharge to manage and mitigate risks effectively.
The findings can help veterinarians triage cases, inform owners, and guide treatment decisions in equine peritonitis management.
Limitations include the retrospective design and data from a single referral center, which may impact generalizability.
Cite This Article
APA
Kopec EK, Carslake H, Archer DC, Morris B, Wilson A.
(2026).
Predicting outcomes in equine peritonitis: Multivariable analysis of admission and post-admission data from a UK hospital population.
Equine Vet J.
https://doi.org/10.1002/evj.70339
Peroni JF. Diagnosis and treatment of peritonitis and hemoperitoneum.. The equine acute abdomen. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley‐Blackwell; 2017. p. 361–375.
Southwood LL, Russell G. The use of clinical findings in the identification of equine peritonitis cases that respond favorably to medical therapy.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2007;17(4):382–390.
Lawson AL, Mair TS, Fairburn A, Sherlock CE, Archer DC, Carslake HB. Evaluation of a protocol for a modified fast localised abdominal sonography of horses (FLASH) admitted for colic. Equine Vet J 2021;53(S55):6.
Hillyer MH, Wright CJ. Peritonitis in the horse. Equine Vet Educ 1997;9(3):136–142.
Corley K, Stephen J. In: Corley K, Stephen J, editors. The equine hospital manual. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2008.
StataCorp. Stata stasticial software; Release 19. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2025.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007;147(8):573–577.
Dahoo I, Martin W, Stryhm H. Logistic regression. 2009. p. 865–915.
Isgren CM. Improving clinical outcomes via responsible antimicrobial use in horses. Equine Vet Educ 2022;34(9):482–492.
Lundberg S. Peritonitis in horses—a retrospective study of 69 cases admitted to a university hospital during a ten year period. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural sciences; 2014.
Van Den Boom R, Butler CM, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh‐Oosterbaan MM. The usability of peritoneal lactate concentration as a prognostic marker in horses with severe colic admitted to a veterinary teaching hospital. Equine Vet Educ 2010;22(8):420–425.