Analyze Diet
Preventive veterinary medicine2020; 183; 105135; doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105135

“Prevention is the biggest success”: Barriers and enablers to personal biosecurity in the thoroughbred breeding industry.

Abstract: Employees in the equine industry are at occupational risk of zoonoses such as Hendra virus and equine chlamydiosis through exposure to infected materials. This study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of the views and experiences of employees, and the key drivers of infection control and personal biosecurity (PB) practices in the Thoroughbred breeding industry. Methods: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted in 2018 in New South Wales, Australia using interviews (9) and small group discussions (7). The 29 participants included veterinarians, veterinary nurses, foaling staff, stud managers and laboratory personnel working in a range of equine medicine settings. Interviews and focus groups were recorded, transcribed and analysed manually by at least two members of the research team. An iterative approach was used to derive themes. Results: Five main themes emerged: (i) greater awareness of current and emerging infectious risks promotes use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE); (ii) currently available PPE is not comfortable, practical or well-suited to equine reproductive work in Australia's hot climate; (iii) creating supportive environments for PB reduces risk of exposure to infectious materials; (iv) strong leadership is required to implement sustainable change in workplace culture and practices; and (v) policy and economic factors play an important role in adopting biosecurity (BS) and PB measures in the workplace. Personnel working in the Australian Thoroughbred breeding industry face unique zoonotic risks in a challenging physical environment. A qualitative approach provided rich insights into social and physical factors motivating BS and PB in this occupational group. There is an opportunity for collaboration between Public Health services and industry partners to develop and implement strategies most likely to be effective in ensuring consistent uptake of PB measures in the workplace.
Publication Date: 2020-09-15 PubMed ID: 32961422DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105135Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research in this article investigated the key influencer’s of safety practices in the thoroughbred horse breeding industry and found that policy, leadership, and environmental factors, among others, were influential. Furthermore, it identified that workers in this field face unique risks related to infectious diseases in a physically challenging environment.

Research Methodology

  • The study was an exploratory qualitative one conducted in 2018 in the Australian state of New South Wales.
  • The researchers used interviews (9 in total) and small group discussions (7 in total) as their methods of collecting data
  • A diverse group of 29 participants from different positions within the equine medical industry was interviewed, including veterinarians, vet nurses, foaling staff, stud managers, and lab personnel.
  • All interviews and group discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analysed by at least two members of the research team
  • The research team used an iterative approach to derive the themes from their collected data.

Results of Research

  • The study identified five main themes or conclusions related to personal biosecurity (PB) and infection control practices in the thoroughbred breeding industry.
  • Greater awareness of the current and potential future infectious risks promoted the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).
  • The study found that the currently available PPE was not comfortable or practical, especially considering Australia’s hot climate.
  • Supportive environments for Personal Biosecurity (PB) help reduce the risk of exposure to infectious materials.
  • The study emphasized the need for strong and effective leadership to implement sustainable changes in the workplace culture and practices related to infection control and PB.
  • Policy and economic factors were found to play an important role in adopting biosecurity and PB measures in this workplace. This could include proper governance, financial feasibility, and official regulations and guidelines.

Conclusions

  • The research concluded that personnel in the Australian Thoroughbred breeding industry face unique zoonotic risks in a challenging physical environment.
  • The qualitative approach provided rich insights into both social and physical factors inspiring the uptake of Biosecurity and PB in this occupational group.
  • Opportunities exist for collaboration between the public health services and the industry partners in developing and implementing strategies that would be effective in consistently implementing PB measures at work.

Cite This Article

APA
Taylor K, Thomas S, Mendez D, Chicken C, Carrick J, Heller J, Durrheim D. (2020). “Prevention is the biggest success”: Barriers and enablers to personal biosecurity in the thoroughbred breeding industry. Prev Vet Med, 183, 105135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105135

Publication

ISSN: 1873-1716
NlmUniqueID: 8217463
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 183
Pages: 105135
PII: S0167-5877(19)30694-4

Researcher Affiliations

Taylor, Kathryn
  • University of Newcastle, Australia; Hunter New England Local Health District, Australia. Electronic address: kathryn.taylor1@health.nsw.gov.au.
Thomas, Susan
  • University of Newcastle, Australia; Hunter New England Local Health District, Australia.
Mendez, Diana
  • James Cook University, Australia.
Chicken, Catherine
  • Scone Equine Centre, Australia.
Carrick, Joan
  • Equine Specialist Consulting, Australia.
Heller, Jane
  • Charles Sturt University, Australia.
Durrheim, David
  • University of Newcastle, Australia; Hunter New England Local Health District, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Animal Husbandry / statistics & numerical data
  • Animals
  • Breeding
  • Communicable Disease Control / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Horse Diseases / psychology
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • New South Wales
  • Professional Competence
  • Veterinarians / psychology
  • Young Adult
  • Zoonoses / prevention & control
  • Zoonoses / psychology

Citations

This article has been cited 7 times.
  1. Knox A, Zerna G, Beddoe T. Current and Future Advances in the Detection and Surveillance of Biosecurity-Relevant Equine Bacterial Diseases Using Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP). Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 18;13(16).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13162663pubmed: 37627456google scholar: lookup
  2. Thompson K, Taylor J, Mendez D, Chicken C, Carrick J, Durrheim DN. Willingness to adopt personal biosecurity strategies on thoroughbred breeding farms: Findings from a multi-site pilot study in Australia's Hunter Valley. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:1017452.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1017452pubmed: 36590817google scholar: lookup
  3. Macleay CM, Carrick J, Shearer P, Begg A, Stewart M, Heller J, Chicken C, Brookes VJ. A Scoping Review of the Global Distribution of Causes and Syndromes Associated with Mid- to Late-Term Pregnancy Loss in Horses between 1960 and 2020. Vet Sci 2022 Apr 13;9(4).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9040186pubmed: 35448683google scholar: lookup
  4. Rimayanti R, Khairullah AR, Mustofa I, Utomo B, Lestari TD, Utama S, Akintunde AO, Mulyati S, Hernawati T, Dawood AQ, Riady G, Khan IU, Rasad SD, Moses IB. Hidden menace: Understanding the devastating consequences of dourine disease in horses. Open Vet J 2025 Sep;15(9):3931-3942.
    doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2025.v15.i9.2pubmed: 41200335google scholar: lookup
  5. Arshad A, Reif AH, Cavalleri JV, Desvars-Larrive A. Zoonotic pathogens in equids in Central Europe: a systematic review. BMC Vet Res 2025 Jul 8;21(1):451.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04915-5pubmed: 40629389google scholar: lookup
  6. White J, Thompson K, Talwar J, Durrheim DN. The importance of qualitative social science research for informed public health policy at local and national levels: insights from a local health district in New South Wales, Australia. Front Public Health 2025;13:1575188.
    doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1575188pubmed: 40416664google scholar: lookup
  7. Nyokabi NS, Phelan L, Lindahl JF, Berg S, Muunda E, Mihret A, Wood JLN, Moore HL. Exploring veterinary students' awareness and perception of zoonoses risks, infection control practices, and biosecurity measures in Ethiopia. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1385849.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1385849pubmed: 39044741google scholar: lookup