Analyze Diet
Preventive veterinary medicine2016; 131; 48-59; doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.07.005

Quantitative analysis of the probability of introducing equine encephalosis virus (EEV) into The Netherlands.

Abstract: Equine encephalosis is a midge-borne viral disease of equines caused by equine encephalosis virus (EEV, Orbivirus, Reoviridae), and closely related to African horse sickness virus (AHSV). EEV and AHSV share common vectors and show similar transmission patterns. Until now EEV has caused outbreaks in Africa and Israel. This study aimed to provide insight in the probability of an EEV outbreak in The Netherlands caused by infected vectors or hosts, the contribution of potential source areas (risk regions) to this probability, and the effectiveness of preventive measures (sanitary regimes). A stochastic risk model constructed for risk assessment of AHSV introduction was adapted to EEV. Source areas were categorized in risk regions (high, low, and very low risk) based on EEV history and the presence of competent vectors. Two possible EEV introduction pathways were considered: importation of infected equines and importation of infected vectors along with their vertebrate hosts. The probability of EEV introduction (PEEV) was calculated by combining the probability of EEV release by either pathway and the probability of EEV establishment. The median current annual probability of EEV introduction by an infected equine was estimated at 0.012 (90% uncertainty interval 0.002-0.020), and by an infected vector at 4.0 10(-5) (90% uncertainty interval 5.3 10(-6)-2.0 10(-4)). Equines from high risk regions contributed most to the probability of EEV introduction with 74% on the EEV introduction by equines, whereas low and very low risk regions contributed 18% and 8%, respectively. International movements of horses participating in equestrian events contributed most to the probability of EEV introduction by equines from high risk regions (86%), but also contributed substantially for low and very low risk regions with 47% and 56%. The probability of introducing EEV into The Netherlands is much higher than the probability of introducing AHSV with equines from high risk countries contributing most. The introduction by an infected equine is the most likely pathway. Control measures before exportation of equines showed to have a strong mitigating effect on the probability of EEV introduction. The risk of EEV outbreaks should be taken into account when altering these import regulations.
Publication Date: 2016-07-07 PubMed ID: 27544251DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.07.005Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study focuses on analyzing the chances of introducing the Equine encephalosis virus (EEV) into The Netherlands, a disease commonly observed in Africa and Israel. It investigates the potential sources of the virus, its transmission methods, and the efficiency of preventive measures.

Overview of the Study

In the study, a previously constructed stochastic risk model for assessing the risk of introducing African horse sickness virus (AHSV) was adapted for EEV since the two diseases share common vectors and show similar transmission patterns. The researchers divided the potential source areas of the virus into high, low, and very low-risk regions, based on the history of EEV and the presence of vectors competent in carrying the disease.

Possible Routes of Virus Introduction

The study considered two possible channels for EEV to enter The Netherlands:

  • The importation of infected equines, or horses.
  • The importation of infected vectors, such as midges, with a focus on those accompanying their vertebrate hosts.

Calculation of Risk of Virus Introduction

The probability of introducing the virus, termed PEEV, was derived through combining the probabilities of the virus being released via the two potential pathways, and the likelihood of the virus getting established following its introduction.

Findings of the Study

Based on calculations:

  • The median annual probability of virus introduction by an infected equine was estimated at 0.012, and 4.0 x 10(-5) by an infected vector.
  • Horses from high-risk regions contributed most significantly (74%) to the probability of virus introduction, followed by those from low-risk regions (18%) and very low-risk regions (8%).
  • Horses participating in international equestrian events were identified to contribute most to the virus introduction from the high-risk regions, and also significantly from low and very low-risk regions.

Comparison with African Horse Sickness Virus (AHSV)

The study concluded that the probability of introducing EEV into The Netherlands is much higher than that of introducing AHSV. Among the two potential pathways for virus introduction, infected equines were identified as the most likely source.

Effect of Control Measures

The study found that control measures taken before the exportation of equines, such as mandatory disease testing and quarantine, significantly reduced the chances of introducing the virus.

Implications of the Study

The researchers suggest that the probable risk of EEV outbreaks should be considered when altering import regulations, due to the potentially high probability of introducing the virus under existing controls.

Cite This Article

APA
Fischer EAJ, Martínez López EP, De Vos CJ, Faverjon C. (2016). Quantitative analysis of the probability of introducing equine encephalosis virus (EEV) into The Netherlands. Prev Vet Med, 131, 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.07.005

Publication

ISSN: 1873-1716
NlmUniqueID: 8217463
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 131
Pages: 48-59

Researcher Affiliations

Fischer, Egil Andreas Joor
  • Central Veterinary Institute, Part of Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 65, 8200AB Lelystad, The Netherlands; Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 7, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: e.a.j.fischer@uu.nl.
Martínez López, Evelyn Pamela
  • Central Veterinary Institute, Part of Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 65, 8200AB Lelystad, The Netherlands.
De Vos, Clazien J
  • Central Veterinary Institute, Part of Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 65, 8200AB Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Faverjon, Céline
  • Central Veterinary Institute, Part of Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 65, 8200AB Lelystad, The Netherlands; INRA UR346 Animal Epidemiology, Vetagrosup, F-69280 Marcy l'Etoile, France. Electronic address: celine.faverjon@vetagro-sup.fr.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horse Diseases / transmission
  • Horse Diseases / virology
  • Horses
  • Netherlands
  • Orbivirus
  • Probability
  • Reoviridae Infections / transmission
  • Reoviridae Infections / veterinary
  • Reoviridae Infections / virology
  • Risk Factors