Analyze Diet
Clinical pediatrics1998; 37(8); 477-481; doi: 10.1177/000992289803700803

Rabies prophylaxis following the feeding of a rabid pony.

Abstract: A survey was performed to identify people who were exposed to a rabid pony and determine whether or not they received rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). Sixty-one visitors who came in contact with the rabid pony were identified. These visitors heard about the rabid pony via the news media. Forty-five visitors were exposed during the 2 weeks before the pony died. Thirty-two of these 45 visitors received PEP. Thirty-one visitors had or may have had saliva contact to an open wound or mucosa and all 31 received PEP. Fourteen visitors had no saliva contact to a wound or mucosa and one received PEP. Sixteen visitors were exposed before the pony was potentially shedding rabies virus and one received PEP. No visitor was bitten by the pony. Most of the persons 31/33 (94%) who received PEP had an exposure for which PEP was indicated. Nonbite transmission of rabies is discussed.
Publication Date: 1998-09-08 PubMed ID: 9729702DOI: 10.1177/000992289803700803Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper uses a survey to explore the use of Rabies Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) in the instance of human contact with a rabid pony.

Survey Methodology and Participants

  • The researchers conducted a survey, the purpose of which was to identify individuals who had come into contact with a pony infected with rabies.
  • They identified a total of 61 visitors who had interactions with the pony before its death.
  • Most of these visitors were made aware of the pony’s condition through various news media platforms.

Infection Potential and PEP Administration

  • Of the 61 visitors, 45 were found to have been exposed to the rabid pony two weeks prior to its death.
  • From this subset of 45 visitors, 32 received PEP as a preventative measure against any potential development of rabies.
  • In total, 31 visitors were identified as having had or possibly having had exposure to the pony’s saliva in an open wound or on their mucosa. All of them received PEP.
  • Contrarily, 14 visitors had no contact with the pony’s saliva. Yet, one individual still received PEP.
  • Before the pony started shedding the rabies virus, 16 visitors were exposed to it. Only one of these individuals was given PEP.
  • Importantly, none of the visitors were bitten by the pony, an act commonly associated with rabies transmission.

Conclusions and Further Discussion

  • Finally, the researchers drew the conclusion that the majority of those who received PEP (31 out of 33, or 94%) had had an exposure situation where PEP application was an appropriate response.
  • The researchers also discussed the phenomenon of non-bite rabies transmission, suggesting that the presence of the virus isn’t exclusively transmitted through bite injuries.

Cite This Article

APA
Feder HM, Nelson RS, Cartter ML, Sadre I. (1998). Rabies prophylaxis following the feeding of a rabid pony. Clin Pediatr (Phila), 37(8), 477-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/000992289803700803

Publication

ISSN: 0009-9228
NlmUniqueID: 0372606
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 37
Issue: 8
Pages: 477-481

Researcher Affiliations

Feder, H M
  • Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington 06030, USA.
Nelson, R S
    Cartter, M L
      Sadre, I

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Horses
        • Humans
        • Rabies / immunology
        • Rabies / transmission
        • Rabies / virology
        • Rabies virus / isolation & purification
        • Zoonoses / etiology
        • Zoonoses / virology

        References

        This article includes 38 references

        Citations

        This article has been cited 2 times.
        1. Kropich-Grant JN, Wiley KE, Manyweathers J, Thompson KR, Brookes VJ. Communication Interventions and Assessment of Drivers for Hendra Virus Vaccination Uptake. Vaccines (Basel) 2023 May 4;11(5).
          doi: 10.3390/vaccines11050936pubmed: 37243040google scholar: lookup
        2. Lankau EW, Montgomery JM, Tack DM, Obonyo M, Kadivane S, Blanton JD, Arvelo W, Jentes ES, Cohen NJ, Brunette GW, Marano N, Rupprecht CE. Exposure of US travelers to rabid zebra, Kenya, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis 2012 Jul;18(7):1202-4.
          doi: 10.3201/eid1807.120081pubmed: 22709948google scholar: lookup