Analyze Diet
Journal of vector ecology : journal of the Society for Vector Ecology2007; 31(2); 262-265; doi: 10.3376/1081-1710(2006)31[262:rotdtd]2.0.co;2

Response of Tabanidae (Diptera) to different natural attractants.

Abstract: The response of female tabanids to natural attractants was studied in the Monjoros Forest along the Nature Park Kopacki rit in eastern Croatia. Tabanids were caught in canopy traps baited with either aged cow, horse, sheep, or pig urine and also in unbaited traps. Tabanids were collected in a significantly higher numbers in traps baited with natural attractants compared to unbaited traps. The number of females of Tabanus bromius, Tabanus maculicornis, Tabanus tergestinus, and Hybomitra bimaculata collected from canopy traps baited with cow urine and traps baited with other natural attractants differed significantly. Females of Haematopota pluvialis were also collected more frequently in canopy traps baited with aged cow urine than in those with aged horse urine, but this difference was not significant. However, the number of females of Haematopota pluvialis collected from canopy traps baited with other natural attractants (sheep and pig urine) differed significantly when compared with aged cow urine baited traps. Canopy traps baited with aged cow urine collected significantly more Tabanus sudeticus than did traps baited with aged pig urine. Finally, the aged cow urine baited canopy traps collected 51 times more tabanids than unbaited traps, while aged horse, aged sheep, and aged pig urine baited traps collected 36, 30, and 22 times as many tabanids, respectively, than unbaited traps.
Publication Date: 2007-01-26 PubMed ID: 17249343DOI: 10.3376/1081-1710(2006)31[262:rotdtd]2.0.co;2Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigates how female tabanids, a type of fly, are attracted to different natural substances, particularly various types of aged animal urine. The researchers discovered that traps baited with these natural attractants caught significantly more tabanids than unbaited traps, with aged cow urine proving to be the most effective bait.

Study Location and Procedure

  • The research was conducted in the Monjoros Forest, located near the Nature Park Kopacki rit in Eastern Croatia.
  • Researchers collected tabanids by setting up canopy traps with different kinds of bait. The bait used were aged urine from cows, horses, sheep, and pigs. Unbaited traps were also set up for comparison.

Results and Findings

  • Traps baited with natural attractants collected significantly higher numbers of tabanids than the unbaited traps highlighting the efficacy of natural attractants in trapping tabanids.
  • The most effective bait was aged cow urine, followed by horse, sheep, and pig urine.
  • Different types of tabanids showed varying preferences for the different baits. The number of females of particular tabanid species, such as Tabanus bromius, Tabanus maculicornis, Tabanus tergestinus, and Hybomitra bimaculata, collected from traps baited with cow urine differed significantly from those drawn to other natural attractants.
  • For the species Haematopota pluvialis, more were collected in canopy traps baited with aged cow urine than those with aged horse urine, but this difference was not significant. However, when compared with traps baited with sheep and pig urine, the difference was statistically significant.
  • For the species Tabanus sudeticus, aged cow urine caught significantly more flies than aged pig urine.
  • Overall, the aged cow urine traps collected 51 times more tabanids than the unbaited traps. The other attractants, namely, horse, sheep, and pig urine, were also considerably more successful than the unbaited traps, attracting 36, 30, and 22 times as many tabanids, respectively.

Conclusion

  • This study concluded that certain natural attractants, particularly aged cow urine, are significantly more effective than unbaited traps at attracting and collecting female tabanids.
  • The effectiveness can vary depending on the species of tabanids. For example, cow urine was more appealing to certain species of tabanids compared to others.

Cite This Article

APA
Krcmar S, Mikuska A, Merdić E. (2007). Response of Tabanidae (Diptera) to different natural attractants. J Vector Ecol, 31(2), 262-265. https://doi.org/10.3376/1081-1710(2006)31[262:rotdtd]2.0.co;2

Publication

ISSN: 1081-1710
NlmUniqueID: 9512496
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 31
Issue: 2
Pages: 262-265

Researcher Affiliations

Krcmar, Stjepan
  • Department of Biology, JJ Strossmayer University, Lj. Gaja 6, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia.
Mikuska, Alma
    Merdić, Enrih

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Appetitive Behavior / physiology
      • Cattle / urine
      • Diptera / physiology
      • Female
      • Horses / urine
      • Insect Control / methods
      • Sheep / urine
      • Swine / urine
      • Urine / physiology

      Citations

      This article has been cited 3 times.
      1. Gutiérrez-Expósito D, Ortega-Mora LM, Ara V, Marco I, Lavín S, Carvajal-Valilla J, Morales A, Álvarez-García G. Absence of antibodies specific to Besnoitia spp. in European sheep and goats from areas in Spain where bovine besnoitiosis is endemic. Parasitol Res 2017 Jan;116(1):445-448.
        doi: 10.1007/s00436-016-5311-zpubmed: 27815735google scholar: lookup
      2. Krčmar S. Preliminary list of horse flies (Diptera, Tabanidae) of Serbia. Zookeys 2011;(117):73-82.
        doi: 10.3897/zookeys.117.1328pubmed: 21998507google scholar: lookup
      3. Hawkes WL, Menz MHM, Wotton KR. Lords of the flies: dipteran migrants are diverse, abundant and ecologically important. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2025 Aug;100(4):1635-1659.
        doi: 10.1111/brv.70017pubmed: 40165599google scholar: lookup