Analyze Diet
Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine2025; 47; e005824; doi: 10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm005824

Retrospective five-year study of equine casuistry in a Colombian perinatology center.

Abstract: A retrospective study was conducted at the Foal Care Equine Perinatology Center in Colombia from October 2017 to May 2023. The goal was to analyze the most frequent pathologies, as well as assess the sexes, ages, and breeds of the patients, with an emphasis on the perinatal population. Out of 945 clinical histories, 776 pertained to perinatology. Survival rates were calculated, and a descriptive analysis was performed. The overall survival rate for neonates was 73.6%, with females constituting 57% of the neonatal patients. The most prevalent breed among mares and neonates was the Creole Colombian Horse. Neonatal maladjustment accounted for 39.34% of the neonatal cases, and regarding the affected systems, there was a common multisystemic presentation (71.40%). Of the 341 foals admitted for neonatal adaptation, 72 were clones (with a survival rate of 76.39%), while 269 were non-clones (with a survival rate of 72.49%). A total of 202 mares (88.98%) were hospitalized for pregnancy monitoring, while 25 mares (11.02%) were brought to the perinatology center to treat dystocia or other reproductive pathologies. The most frequent diagnosis among mares was placentitis (73.68%). This study noted an increase in survival rates over time, which was associated with improvements in protocols and the acquisition of new medical equipment. The survival rates observed in this study are consistent with those reported in previous research. The collected data indicate that foaling occurs year-round in Colombia since the country experiences no distinct seasons. Studies with larger sample sizes are suggested, as well as periodical analysis of casuistry in the equine neonatology field, to improve the clinical management of patients and enhance productivity in the horse breeding industry.
Publication Date: 2025-05-30 PubMed ID: 40453164PubMed Central: PMC12124761DOI: 10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm005824Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This five-year review from a Colombian equine perinatology center describes which conditions were most common in foals and mares and how often patients survived. Neonatal survival was about 74%, neonatal maladjustment was the leading diagnosis, and outcomes improved over time alongside protocol and equipment upgrades.

What the study set out to answer and why it matters

  • Objective: Identify the most frequent perinatal pathologies in a dedicated equine center, describe patient sex, age, and breed distributions, and quantify survival—especially among neonates.
  • Rationale: Knowing the local “casuistry” (case mix and frequencies) supports better protocols, resource allocation, and counseling for breeders, and enables benchmarking against published survival rates in equine neonatology.

Study design and setting

  • Design: Retrospective review of clinical records over 5 years and 8 months (October 2017–May 2023).
  • Setting: Foal Care Equine Perinatology Center, Colombia; a specialized referral facility focused on mares in late gestation/parturition and neonatal foals.
  • Data set: 945 clinical histories, of which 776 were perinatology cases (mares around foaling and neonatal foals).
  • Analysis: Descriptive statistics with calculation of survival rates and trends over time.

Patient population overview

  • Neonates: Overall survival 73.6%; females represented 57% of neonatal patients.
  • Breeds: The Creole Colombian Horse predominated among mares and neonates, reflecting local breeding demographics.
  • Mares: Most admissions were for pregnancy monitoring; a minority presented for dystocia or other reproductive problems.

Key neonatal findings

  • Dominant diagnosis: Neonatal maladjustment syndrome (NMS) accounted for 39.34% of neonatal cases.
  • System involvement: Multisystemic presentations were common (71.40%), indicating concurrent involvement of multiple organ systems (e.g., neurologic, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal), which typically necessitates comprehensive supportive care.
  • Survival context: The 73.6% neonatal survival aligns with previously reported rates from equine referral centers, supporting external validity.
  • Sex distribution: A modest female predominance (57%) may reflect herd breeding composition, referral patterns, or random variation rather than a biological survival advantage.

Cloned versus non-cloned foals

  • Cohort: 341 foals admitted for neonatal adaptation support included 72 clones and 269 non-clones.
  • Outcomes: Survival was 76.39% in clones and 72.49% in non-clones—an absolute difference of roughly 3.9 percentage points.
  • Interpretation: The small survival difference suggests broadly comparable outcomes when both groups receive specialized perinatal care; however, case selection, referral timing, and intensive monitoring for cloned foals may influence results.

Key mare findings

  • Admission purpose: 202 mares (88.98%) were hospitalized for pregnancy monitoring; 25 mares (11.02%) for dystocia or other reproductive pathologies.
  • Most frequent mare diagnosis: Placentitis (73.68%), a leading cause of late-gestation compromise, prematurity/dysmaturity, and neonatal sepsis risk.
  • Clinical implication: Vigilant surveillance and timely treatment of placentitis can reduce perinatal morbidity and improve foal viability.

Trends over time and quality of care

  • Improvement: Survival rates increased over the study period, attributed to protocol refinement and acquisition of new medical equipment.
  • Plausible contributors (as commonly reported in equine neonatal care): Standardized triage and sepsis screening, earlier referral, enhanced respiratory support and oxygen delivery, improved fluid/vasopressor strategies, judicious antimicrobial use, point-of-care ultrasonography, and better nutritional support; the study specifically notes protocol and equipment upgrades but does not itemize them.
  • Operational takeaway: Iterative protocol audits and investments in critical care tools can translate into measurable outcome gains in neonatal equine medicine.

Understanding neonatal maladjustment syndrome (NMS)

  • Definition: A peripartum neurologic dysfunction often linked to hypoxic-ischemic injury and neurosteroid dysregulation; colloquially “dummy foal” syndrome.
  • Typical features: Absent/delayed suckle, disorientation, abnormal mentation, recumbency, and variable respiratory or gastrointestinal compromise.
  • Why it dominates the caseload: NMS is common in referral neonatology and frequently coexists with sepsis, prematurity, or placental disease, which explains the high multisystemic involvement observed.

Year-round foaling in a tropical context

  • Observation: Foaling occurs across all months in Colombia due to the absence of distinct seasons.
  • Implications: Continuous staffing and resource readiness are required; surveillance, vaccination, and breeding management protocols should be designed for steady, year-round demand rather than seasonal peaks.

How these findings fit with prior literature

  • Concordant outcomes: Neonatal survival near 70–75% matches reported ranges from equine referral centers internationally.
  • Common diagnoses: NMS and placental disorders (especially placentitis) are consistently among the leading perinatal problems in horses globally.
  • Multisystem illness: High rates of comorbid organ dysfunction are typical in critically ill foals and predict the need for comprehensive, protocol-driven care.

Strengths and limitations

  • Strengths: Large single-center perinatology cohort; explicit tracking of survival over time; inclusion of cloned foals provides a useful comparator subgroup.
  • Limitations: Retrospective design, single-center referral bias, incomplete standardization of case definitions across years, and limited granularity on illness severity or causes of death.
  • Generalizability: Strongest for similar referral settings and tropical breeding systems; applicability to field cases or non-referral populations may be limited.

Practical takeaways for clinicians and breeders

  • Prioritize surveillance and early treatment for placentitis to improve foal outcomes.
  • Expect NMS as a leading diagnosis; prepare multidisciplinary neonatal support (airway/oxygenation, glucose and fluid management, antimicrobials when indicated, nursing care, and controlled neurosteroid weaning strategies where appropriate).
  • Plan staffing, supplies, and ICU capacity for steady, year-round foaling rather than seasonal surges.
  • Standardize perinatal protocols and invest in critical care equipment; track outcomes to drive continuous quality improvement.

Future research directions

  • Expand sample sizes via multicenter registries to refine survival benchmarks and risk-adjusted outcomes.
  • Collect prospectively standardized data on illness severity, timing of referral, and specific treatments to identify modifiable mortality risks.
  • Evaluate protocol components and equipment additions with before–after or stepped-wedge designs to quantify their independent impact on survival.
  • Study long-term outcomes (growth, athletic performance) in survivors, including cloned versus non-cloned foals.

Cite This Article

APA
Parra MT, Ayala MSF. (2025). Retrospective five-year study of equine casuistry in a Colombian perinatology center. Braz J Vet Med, 47, e005824. https://doi.org/10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm005824

Publication

ISSN: 2527-2179
NlmUniqueID: 9918435088106676
Country: Brazil
Language: English
Volume: 47
Pages: e005824
PII: e005824

Researcher Affiliations

Parra, Melissa Tovar
  • Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Universidad de la Salle, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ayala, Martha Susana Franco
  • Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Programa de Doctorado en Salud Animal, Bogotá, Colombia.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Conflict of interests: MTP – No conflict of interest. MSFA – No conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 34 references
  1. Abraham M, Bauquier J. Causes of equine perinatal mortality. Veterinary Journal (London, England: 1997) 2021;273:105675.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2021.105675pubmed: 34148598google scholar: lookup
  2. Bazzano M, Giudice E, Di Pietro S, Piccione G. Vital parameters in newborn thoroughbred foals during the first week of life. International Journal of Anesthesiology & Research 2014;2(2):27–30.
  3. Bedenice D, Avila B, Paradis M R. Comparative evaluation of clinical findings and prognostic outcome parameters in hospitalized, critically ill neonatal foals and crias. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care (San Antonio, Tex.) 2021;31(5):619–628.
    doi: 10.1111/vec.13093pubmed: 34324773google scholar: lookup
  4. Bohlin A, Saegerman C, Hoeberg E, Sånge A, Nostell K, Durie I, Husted L, Öhman A, van Galen G. Evaluation of the foal survival score in a danish‐swedish population of neonatal foals upon hospital admission. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 2019;33(3):1507–1513.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15487pmc: PMC6524090pubmed: 31004404google scholar: lookup
  5. Borchers A, Wilkins P A, Marsh P M, Axon J E, Read J, Castagnetti C, Pantaleon L, Clark C, Qura’n L, Belgrave R, Trachsel D, Levy M, Bedenice D, Saulez M N, Boston R C. Association of admission l‐lactate concentration in hospitalised equine neonates with presenting complaint, periparturient events, clinical diagnosis and outcome: A prospective multicentre study. Equine Veterinary Journal 2012;44(s41):57–63.
  6. Cardona A J, Martínez M M, Maza A L. Casuística Clínica Más frecuente en el servicio ambulatorio de grandes animales de la universidad de córdoba, Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal Recia 2017;9(1):66–72.
  7. Carrick J B, Perkins N R, Zalucki M P. Causes of abortion in Australia (2005-2012) - Proportion of cases due to Equine Amnionitis and Foetal Loss (EAFL). Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2014;34(1):212–214.
  8. Castagnetti C, Veronesi M C. Prognostic factors in the sick neonatal foal. Veterinary Research Communications 2008;32(Suppl 1):87–91.
    doi: 10.1007/s11259-008-9097-zpubmed: 18686000google scholar: lookup
  9. Chavatte-Palmer P, Lee R, Bertolini M, Jammes H, Schmidt M, Callesen H. Pregnancy and Neonatal Care of SCNT Animals. Principles of Cloning 2014;pp. 107–126. Chap. 9.
  10. Cortez J V, Hardwicke K, Cuervo-Arango J, Grupen C G. Cloning horses by somatic cell nuclear transfer: Effects of oocyte source on development to foaling. Theriogenology 2023;203:99–108.
  11. Cruz R K S, Alfonso A, Souza F F, Oba E, Padovani C R, Ramos P R R, Lourenço M L, Chiacchio S B. Evaluation of neonatal vitality and blood glucose, lactate and cortisol concentrations in foals of the Paint Horse Breed. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 2017;37(8):891–896.
  12. Daza Medina C M, Franco Ayala M S. Parámetros clínicos Como indicadores de pronóstico de supervivencia en Potros Neonatos hospitalizados en un centro de neonatología de la Sabana de Bogotá. Revista Medicina Veterinaria 2023;(47):e1458.
    doi: 10.19052/mv.vol1.iss47.5google scholar: lookup
  13. Daza Medina C M, Franco Ayala M S, Martínez Rodríguez D A. Indicadores de pronóstico para la supervivencia de Potros Neonatos Hospitalizados en la Sabana de Bogotá: Análisis de gases sanguíneos, electrolitos y Metabolitos. Revista Medicina Veterinaria 2023:e1461.
    doi: 10.19052/mv.vol1.iss47.6google scholar: lookup
  14. Dembek K A, Hurcombe S D, Frazer M L, Morresey P R, Toribio R E. Development of a likelihood of survival scoring system for hospitalized equine neonates using generalized boosted regression modeling. PLoS One 2014;9(10):e109212.
  15. Ellerbrock M, Wehrend A. Morbidität und Mortalität von Stute und Fohlen nach dystokie – eine literaturübersicht. Tierärztliche Praxis. Ausgabe G, Grosstiere/Nutztiere 2023;51(5):314–326.
    doi: 10.1055/a-2180-2182pubmed: 37956674google scholar: lookup
  16. Franco Ayala M S, Oliver Espinosa O J. Estudio de la morbilidad, Mortalidad y de enfermedades en potros de Caballo Criollo colombiano durante los 30 primeros días de vida en la Sabana de Bogotá. Revista Medicina Veterinaria 2015;1(30):67–82.
    doi: 10.19052/mv.3611google scholar: lookup
  17. Franco S, Oliver O J. Disease characterization in cloned foals in Colombia, the effect of placental pathologies on the success and survival of cloned foals from two different cell lines. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine 2024;61:e211804.
  18. Franco S, Oliver-Espinosa O J. Risk factors affecting morbidity and mortality of Colombian paso fino foals during their first month of life. SSRN 2021:1–17.
    doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3974395google scholar: lookup
  19. Giguère S, Weber E J, Sanchez L C. Factors associated with outcome and gradual improvement in survival over time in 1065 equine neonates admitted to an Intensive Care Unit. Equine Veterinary Journal 2015;49(1):45–50.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12536pubmed: 26538009google scholar: lookup
  20. Giles R, Donahue J, Hong C, Tuttle P, Petrites-Murphy M, Poonacha K, Roberts A, Tramontin R, Smith B, Swerczed T. Causes of abortion, stillbirth, and perinatal death in horses: 3,527 cases (1986-1991). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1993;203(8):1170–1175.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.1993.203.08.1170pubmed: 8244867google scholar: lookup
  21. Graßl M, Ulrich T, Wehrend A. Inzidenz und Letalität Häufiger neonataler Erkrankungen beim Fohlen Während der ersten 10 Tage Post Natum in Einer Veterinärklinik. Tierärztliche Praxis. Ausgabe G, Grosstiere/Nutztiere 2017;45(5):357–361.
    doi: 10.15653/TPG-161102pubmed: 28905977google scholar: lookup
  22. Hoffman A M, Staempfli H R, Willan A. Prognostic variables for survival of neonatal foals under Intensive Care. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 1992;6(2):89–95.
  23. Hong C, Donahue J, Giles R, Petrites-Murphy M, Poonacha K, Roberts A, Smith B, Tramontin R, Tuttle P, Swerczed T. Equine abortion and stillbirth in central Kentucky during 1988 and 1989 foaling seasons. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 1993;5(4):560–566.
    doi: 10.1177/104063879300500410pubmed: 8286455google scholar: lookup
  24. Johnson A K, Hinrichs K. Neonatal care and management of foals derived by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.) 2015;1330:189–201.
    doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2848-4_16pubmed: 26621599google scholar: lookup
  25. Johnson A K, Clark-Price S, Choi Y H, Harman D L, Hinrichs K. Physical and clinicopathologic findings in foals derived by use of somatic cell nuclear transfer: 14 cases (2004-2008). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2010;236(9):983–990.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.236.9.983pubmed: 20433399google scholar: lookup
  26. Juffo G D, Antoniassi N A B, Bassuino D M, Gomes D C, Snel G G M, Pavarini S P, Dreimeier D. Causes of abortion, stillbirth, and perinatal mortality in horses. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 2022;42:e06808.
  27. Lyle‐Dugas J, Giguère S, Mallicote M F, Mackay R J, Sanchez L C. Factors associated with outcome in 94 hospitalized foals diagnosed with neonatal encephalopathy. Equine Veterinary Journal 2016;49(2):207–210.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12553pubmed: 26728952google scholar: lookup
  28. McKenzie III H C. Disorders of foals. Equine Internal Medicine 2018;pp. 1365–1459.
  29. Pantaleon L. Why measuring outcomes is important in health care. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 2019;33(2):356–362.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15458pmc: PMC6430924pubmed: 30784125google scholar: lookup
  30. Rohrbach B W, Buchanan B R, Drake J M, Andrews F M, Bain F T, Byars D T, Bernard W V, Furr M O, Paradis M R, Lawler J, Giguère S, Dunkel B. Use of a multivariable model to estimate the probability of discharge in hospitalized foals that are 7 days of age or less. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2006;228(11):1748–1756.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.228.11.1748pubmed: 16740076google scholar: lookup
  31. Saulez M N, Gummow B, Slovis N M, Byars T D, Frazer M, MacGillivray K, Bain F T. Admission clinicopathological data, length of stay, cost and mortality in an equine Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 2007;78(3):153–157.
    doi: 10.4102/jsava.v78i3.308pubmed: 18237039google scholar: lookup
  32. Silva A A, Vilalobos E M, Lara M C C, Nassar A F, Piatti R M, Castro V, Pinheiro E S, Carvalho A F, Del Fava C. Causes of equine abortion, stillbirth, and perinatal mortality in Brazil. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 2020;87:e0092020.
  33. Ujueta Rodríguez S S. Análisis de la casuística equina del área de grandes animales de la clínica veterinaria U.D.C.A, Bogotá, Colombia. Revista U.D.C.A. Actualidad & Divulgacion Cientifica 2019;22(1):e1219.
  34. Wilkins P A. Prognostic indicators for survival and athletic outcome in critically ill neonatal foals. The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Equine Practice 2015;31(3):615–628.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2015.09.006pubmed: 26612751google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.