Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2026; 13; 1827412; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2026.1827412

Semi-extensive management system drives lower prevalence of equine orodental disorders.

Abstract: The prevalence of orodental disorders in horses kept under different management systems is lacking. More detailed knowledge is needed to support targeted therapeutic and prophylactic approaches, as these conditions play a crucial role in maintaining equine health and welfare. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of orodental disorders in horses raised, kept, and fed under extensive, semi-extensive, or intensive management systems. Unassigned: Sixty-nine clinically healthy adult crossbred horses with no history of dental treatment were examined, with 23 horses included in each study group previously maintained under three different management systems. All horses underwent a clinical evaluation, and an orodental examination was performed under standing sedation. Unassigned: Incisors ( = 0.013), premolar and molar diastemata ( < 0.001), as well as irregular incisors ( = 0.001), occurred more frequently in horses kept under extensive systems. Horses in the intensive system showed a higher prevalence of oral mucosal ulcers ( = 0.001) and excessive transverse ridges in premolars and molars ( = 0.016). Only dorsal curvature malocclusion was more common in horses managed under semi-extensive systems ( = 0.018). No differences were observed in the overall number of orodental alterations among the systems. Unassigned: We concluded that management systems are associated with the frequency and severity of dental abnormalities, with the semi-extensive system showing a lower incidence and severity than the others.
Publication Date: 2026-08-18 PubMed ID: 42682374PubMed Central: PMC13529456DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2026.1827412Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigates how different horse management systems—extensive, semi-extensive, and intensive—affect the prevalence of orodental (mouth and teeth) disorders in horses.
  • The key finding is that horses kept in a semi-extensive management system showed fewer and less severe orodental problems compared to those in extensive or intensive systems.

Introduction and Study Purpose

  • Orodental disorders are significant for horse health and welfare, but there is limited data on how common these problems are under various horse management practices.
  • The study’s goal was to fill this knowledge gap by comparing the rates of orodental issues in horses raised, kept, and fed under three types of management systems: extensive, semi-extensive, and intensive.

Management Systems Defined

  • Extensive system: Likely involves horses living in natural or semi-natural conditions with less human intervention in feeding and care.
  • Semi-extensive system: A mix of natural grazing and controlled feeding or management, providing a balance between freedom and human oversight.
  • Intensive system: Horses are kept in more controlled environments with significant human intervention, often involving stabling and managed feeding regimens.

Methodology

  • Sixty-nine clinically healthy adult crossbred horses were selected for the study, divided equally into three groups of 23 horses each, corresponding to the three management systems.
  • None of the horses had a history of dental treatment, ensuring that prior interventions did not confound results.
  • A clinical evaluation combined with orodental examinations was performed on all horses under standing sedation for accurate assessment without distress.

Key Findings—Differences in Orodental Disorders

  • Extensive system horses:
    • More frequent issues with incisors (p-value = 0.013).
    • Higher incidence of premolar and molar diastemata (gaps between teeth) with strong significance (p < 0.001).
    • More irregular incisors (p = 0.001), indicating uneven tooth shape or alignment.
  • Intensive system horses:
    • Increased prevalence of oral mucosal ulcers (p = 0.001), likely from harder feeding surfaces or dental wear.
    • More frequent excessive transverse ridges on premolars and molars (p = 0.016), which can interfere with correct chewing.
  • Semi-extensive system horses:
    • Only the dorsal curvature malocclusion (abnormal upper surface curvature of teeth) was more common in this group (p = 0.018).
  • Overall number of dental alterations: No significant differences were observed between the groups, indicating the types of abnormalities vary by system rather than total count.

Interpretation and Conclusion

  • The type of management system influences not just the presence but the specific types of dental disorders that horses develop, suggesting management practices have a direct impact on oral health.
  • The semi-extensive management system was associated with fewer and less severe dental problems overall compared to extensive and intensive systems.
  • This implies that a balanced management approach that combines natural grazing with some degree of controlled feeding and care may promote better dental health in horses.
  • Understanding these associations helps inform better therapeutic and preventive dental care tailored to the management style, improving equine health and welfare.

Cite This Article

APA
Kunz JR, Peres Mendes R, Granella MCS, Hartl B, de Souza AF, Fonteque JH, Kau-Strebinger S. (2026). Semi-extensive management system drives lower prevalence of equine orodental disorders. Front Vet Sci, 13, 1827412. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2026.1827412

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 13
Pages: 1827412
PII: 1827412

Researcher Affiliations

Kunz, João Ricardo
  • Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, Brazil.
Peres Mendes, Rubens
  • Departamento de Cirurgia, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Granella, Milena Carol Sbrussi
  • Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, Brazil.
Hartl, Bettina
  • Unit of Morphology, Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
de Souza, Anderson Fernando
  • Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, Brazil.
Fonteque, Joandes Henrique
  • Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, Brazil.
Kau-Strebinger, Silvio
  • Unit of Morphology, Department of Biological Sciences and Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 32 references

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.