FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Appl Environ Microbiol / Serotype Diversity and Antimicrobial Resistance among Salmon...
Applied and environmental microbiology2018; 84(13); doi: 10.1128/AEM.02829-17

Serotype Diversity and Antimicrobial Resistance among Salmonella enterica Isolates from Patients at an Equine Referral Hospital.

Abstract: Although Salmonella enterica can produce life-threatening colitis in horses, certain serotypes are more commonly associated with clinical disease. Our aim was to evaluate the proportional morbidity attributed to different serotypes, as well as the phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of Salmonella isolates from patients at an equine referral hospital in the southern United States. A total of 255 Salmonella isolates was obtained from clinical samples of patients admitted to the hospital between 2007 and 2015. Phenotypic resistance to 14 antibiotics surveilled by the U.S. National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System was determined using a commercially available panel. Whole-genome sequencing was used to identify serotypes and genotypic AMR. The most common serotypes were Salmonella enterica serotype Newport (18%), Salmonella enterica serotype Anatum (15.2%), and Salmonella enterica serotype Braenderup (11.8%). Most (n = 219) of the isolates were pansusceptible, while 25 were multidrug resistant (≥3 antimicrobial classes). Genes encoding beta-lactam resistance, such as blaCMY-2, blaSHV-12, blaCTX-M-27, and blaTEM-1B, were detected. The qnrB2 and aac(6')-Ib-cr genes were present in isolates with reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. Genes encoding resistance to gentamicin (aph(3')-Ia, aac(6')-IIc), streptomycin (strA and strB), sulfonamides (sul1), trimethoprim (dfrA), phenicols (catA), tetracyclines [tet(A) and tet(E)], and macrolides [ere(A)] were also identified. The main predicted incompatibility plasmid type was I1 (10%). Core genome-based analyses revealed phylogenetic associations between isolates of common serotypes. The presence of AMR Salmonella in equine patients increases the risk of unsuccessful treatment and causes concern for potential zoonotic transmission to attending veterinary personnel, animal caretakers, and horse owners. Understanding the epidemiology of Salmonella in horses admitted to referral hospitals is important for the prevention, control, and treatment of salmonellosis.IMPORTANCE In horses, salmonellosis is a leading cause of life-threatening colitis. At veterinary teaching hospitals, nosocomial outbreaks can increase the risk of zoonotic transmission, lead to restrictions on admissions, impact hospital reputation, and interrupt educational activities. The antimicrobials most often used in horses are included in the 5th revision of the World Health Organization's list of critically important antimicrobials for human medicine. Recent studies have demonstrated a trend of increasing bacterial resistance to drugs commonly used to treat Salmonella infections. In this study, we identify temporal trends in the distribution of Salmonella serotypes and their mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance; furthermore, we are able to determine the likely origin of several temporal clusters of infection by using whole-genome sequencing. These data can be used to focus strategies to better contain the dissemination and enhance the mitigation of Salmonella infections and to provide evidence-based policies and guidelines to steward antimicrobial use in veterinary medicine.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2018-06-18 PubMed ID: 29678910PubMed Central: PMC6007101DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02829-17Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study investigated how different strains of Salmonella enterica affect horses and their resistance to antibiotics. The study looked at bacteria samples from horses treated at a specialist hospital in the southern United States over an eight-year period. The researchers found differences in how common particular serotypes (strains) were, and also in their resistance to different antibiotics. They also looked at the genetic make-up of the bacteria, which could indicate their resistance to drugs.

Research Methodology

  • The study was conducted over an 8-year timeline(from 2007 to 2015), collecting around 255 Salmonella enterica samples from horses in a specialized equine hospital in southern U.S.
  • The team assessed how resistant the bacteria were to a range of 14 antibiotics currently monitored by the U.S National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, using a commercially available panel.
  • They then analyzed the samples through whole-genome sequencing to identify the various serotypes included and their genetic resistance factors.

Key Findings

  • Serotypes Newport, Anatum, and Braenderup were identified as the most common among the collected samples.
  • The great majority of the samples (219) were classified as pansusceptible, meaning they were susceptible to many antibiotics, while a small number (25) were resistant to multiple drugs (≥3 antimicrobial classes).
  • Several different genes that contribute to antibiotic resistance were detected, including those contributing resistance to common antibiotics like beta-lactam, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, streptomycin, sulfonamides, trimethoprim, phenicols, tetracyclines, and macrolides.
  • Genome analyses also indicated a phylogenetic link between isolates of common serotypes, suggesting a shared evolutionary history.

Implications of the Study

  • The study highlights concern about antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in equine patients that can lead to ineffective treatment and increase the risk of human infection (zoonotic transmission) for those who are in contact with these horses – veterinarians, animal caretakers, and horse owners.
  • Understanding the prevalence and distribution of various Salmonella enterica serotypes, as well as their resistance to antibiotics, is crucial in preventing, controlling, and treating salmonellosis in horses.
  • The findings are also important for defining strategies to limit infection spread and improve mitigation; they can also help in formulating evidence-based policies and guidelines for the effective use of antibiotics in veterinary medicine.

Cite This Article

APA
Leon IM, Lawhon SD, Norman KN, Threadgill DS, Ohta N, Vinasco J, Scott HM. (2018). Serotype Diversity and Antimicrobial Resistance among Salmonella enterica Isolates from Patients at an Equine Referral Hospital. Appl Environ Microbiol, 84(13). https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02829-17

Publication

Applied and environmental microbiology
ISSN: 1098-5336
NlmUniqueID: 7605801
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 84
Issue: 13

Researcher Affiliations

Leon, I M
  • Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Lawhon, S D
  • Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Norman, K N
  • Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Threadgill, D S
  • Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Ohta, N
  • Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Vinasco, J
  • Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Scott, H M
  • Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA hmscott@cvm.tamu.edu.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Bacterial Proteins / genetics
  • Bacterial Proteins / metabolism
  • Ciprofloxacin / pharmacology
  • DNA, Bacterial / genetics
  • DNA, Bacterial / isolation & purification
  • Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial / genetics
  • Genes, Bacterial
  • Horses / microbiology
  • Hospitals, Teaching
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Phylogeny
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Salmonella Infections, Animal / diagnosis
  • Salmonella Infections, Animal / drug therapy
  • Salmonella enterica / drug effects
  • Salmonella enterica / genetics
  • Serotyping
  • United States
  • Whole Genome Sequencing

References

This article includes 68 references
  1. Chapman AM. Characterizing Salmonella fecal shedding among racehorses in Louisiana. 2006.
  2. Astorga R, Arenas A, Tarradas C, Mozos E, Zafra R, Perez J. Outbreak of peracute septicaemic salmonellosis in horses associated with concurrent Salmonella enteritidis and Mucor species infection. Vet Rec 155:240–242.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.155.8.240pubmed: 15384508google scholar: lookup
  3. Steneroden KK, Van Metre DC, Jackson C, Morley PS. Detection and control of a nosocomial outbreak caused by Salmonella Newport at a large animal hospital. J Vet Intern Med 24:606–616.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0484.xpubmed: 20337913google scholar: lookup
  4. Feary DJ, Hassel DM. Enteritis and colitis in horses. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 22:437–479, ix.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2006.03.008pubmed: 16882483google scholar: lookup
  5. Oliver OE, Stampfli H. Acute diarrhea in the adult horse: case example and review. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 22:73–84.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2005.12.008pubmed: 16627106google scholar: lookup
  6. Cummings KJ, Perkins GA, Khatibzadeh SM, Warnick LD, Aprea VA, Altier C. Antimicrobial resistance trends among Salmonella isolates obtained from horses in the northeastern United States (2001–2013). Am J Vet Res 77:505–513.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.77.5.505pubmed: 27111018google scholar: lookup
  7. Dargatz DA, Traub-Dargatz JL. Multidrug-resistant Salmonella and nosocomial infections. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 20:587–600.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2004.07.008pubmed: 15519820google scholar: lookup
  8. CDC. National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System for Enteric Bacteria (NARMS): 2014 human isolates surveillance report. 2016.
  9. Hernandez JA, Long MT, Traub-Dargatz JL, Besser TE. Salmonellosis, p 321.e4–333.e4. 2014.
  10. Bergholz TM, Moreno Switt AI, Wiedmann M. Omics approaches in food safety: fulfilling the promise?. Trends Microbiol 22:275–281.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.01.006pmc: PMC4016976pubmed: 24572764google scholar: lookup
  11. Hendriksen RS, Leekitcharoenphon P, Lukjancenko O, Lukwesa-Musyani C, Tambatamba B, Mwaba J, Kalonda A, Nakazwe R, Kwenda G, Jensen JD, Svendsen CA, Dittmann KK, Kaas RS, Cavaco LM, Aarestrup FM, Hasman H, Mwansa JC. Genomic signature of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolates related to a massive outbreak in Zambia between 2010 and 2012. J Clin Microbiol 53:262–272.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.02026-14pmc: PMC4290967pubmed: 25392358google scholar: lookup
  12. Leekitcharoenphon P, Nielsen EM, Kaas RS, Lund O, Aarestrup FM. Evaluation of whole genome sequencing for outbreak detection of Salmonella enterica. PLoS One 9:e87991.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087991pmc: PMC3913712pubmed: 24505344google scholar: lookup
  13. Pedersen K, Sorensen G, Lofstrom C, Leekitcharoenphon P, Nielsen B, Wingstrand A, Aarestrup FM, Hendriksen RS, Baggesen DL. Reappearance of Salmonella serovar Choleraesuis var. Kunzendorf in Danish pig herds. Vet Microbiol 176:282–291.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.01.004pubmed: 25703158google scholar: lookup
  14. Schott HC II, Ewart SL, Walker RD, Dwyer RM, Dietrich S, Eberhart SW, Kusey J, Stick JA, Derksen FJ. An outbreak of salmonellosis among horses at a veterinary teaching hospital. J Am Vet Med Assoc 218:1152–1159, 1100.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2001.218.1152pubmed: 11318368google scholar: lookup
  15. Dallap Schaer BL, Aceto H, Rankin SC. Outbreak of salmonellosis caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Newport MDR-AmpC in a large animal veterinary teaching hospital. J Vet Intern Med 24:1138–1146.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0546.xpubmed: 20584143google scholar: lookup
  16. Zhang S, Yin Y, Jones MB, Zhang Z, Deatherage Kaiser BL, Dinsmore BA, Fitzgerald C, Fields PI, Deng X. Salmonella serotype determination utilizing high-throughput genome sequencing data. J Clin Microbiol 53:1685–1692.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.00323-15pmc: PMC4400759pubmed: 25762776google scholar: lookup
  17. Robertson J, Yoshida C, Kruczkiewicz P, Nadon C, Nichani A, Taboada EN, Nash JHE. Comprehensive assessment of the quality of Salmonella whole genome sequence data available in public sequence databases using the Salmonella in silico Typing Resource (SISTR). Microb Genom .
    doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000151pmc: PMC5857378pubmed: 29338812google scholar: lookup
  18. NCBI. Genome assembly and annotation report: Salmonella enterica. 2018.
  19. Fu S, Octavia S, Tanaka MM, Sintchenko V, Lan R. Defining the core genome of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium for genomic surveillance and epidemiological typing. J Clin Microbiol 53:2530–2538.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.03407-14pmc: PMC4508408pubmed: 26019201google scholar: lookup
  20. Ellington MJ, Ekelund O, Aarestrup FM, Canton R, Doumith M, Giske C, Grundman H, Hasman H, Holden MTG, Hopkins KL, Iredell J, Kahlmeter G, Köser CU, MacGowan A, Mevius D, Mulvey M, Naas T, Peto T, Rolain JM, Samuelsen Ø, Woodford N. The role of whole genome sequencing in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria: report from the EUCAST Subcommittee. Clin Microbiol Infect 23:2–22.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.11.012pubmed: 27890457google scholar: lookup
  21. Salipante SJ, Hall BG. Determining the limits of the evolutionary potential of an antibiotic resistance gene. Mol Biol Evol 20:653–659.
    doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg074pubmed: 12679553google scholar: lookup
  22. Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644.
    doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261pmc: PMC3468078pubmed: 22782487google scholar: lookup
  23. Jia B, Raphenya AR, Alcock B, Waglechner N, Guo P, Tsang KK, Lago BA, Dave BM, Pereira S, Sharma AN, Doshi S, Courtot M, Lo R, Williams LE, Frye JG, Elsayegh T, Sardar D, Westman EL, Pawlowski AC, Johnson TA, Brinkman FSL, Wright GD, McArthur AG. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D566–D573.
    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1004pmc: PMC5210516pubmed: 27789705google scholar: lookup
  24. Zankari E, Allesoe R, Joensen KG, Cavaco LM, Lund O, Aarestrup FM. PointFinder: a novel web tool for WGS-based detection of antimicrobial resistance associated with chromosomal point mutations in bacterial pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:2764–2768.
    doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx217pmc: PMC5890747pubmed: 29091202google scholar: lookup
  25. Treangen TJ, Ondov BD, Koren S, Phillippy AM. The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol 15:524.
    doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0524-xpmc: PMC4262987pubmed: 25410596google scholar: lookup
  26. Foley SL, Zhao S, Walker RD. Comparison of molecular typing methods for the differentiation of Salmonella foodborne pathogens. Foodborne Pathog Dis 4:253–276.
    doi: 10.1089/fpd.2007.0085pubmed: 17883310google scholar: lookup
  27. Gilmour MW, Graham M, Reimer A, Van Domselaar G. Public health genomics and the new molecular epidemiology of bacterial pathogens. Public Health Genomics 16:25–30.
    doi: 10.1159/000342709pubmed: 23548714google scholar: lookup
  28. Ernst NS, Hernandez JA, MacKay RJ, Brown MP, Gaskin JM, Nguyen AD, Giguere S, Colahan PT, Troedsson MR, Haines GR, Addison IR, Miller BJ. Risk factors associated with fecal Salmonella shedding among hospitalized horses with signs of gastrointestinal tract disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc 225:275–281.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2004.225.275pubmed: 15323386google scholar: lookup
  29. Vetro Widenhouse TS. Equine salmonellosis—molecular epidemiology of clinical isolates and the effect of antibiotics on the cecal microenvironment with particular reference to short-chain fatty acids and the Salmonella plasmid virulence (spv) genes. 2004.
  30. Rychlik I, Gregorova D, Hradecka H. Distribution and function of plasmids in Salmonella enterica. Vet Microbiol 112:1–10.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.10.030pubmed: 16303262google scholar: lookup
  31. Castellanos LR, Donado-Godoy P, León M, Clavijo V, Arevalo A, Bernal JF, Timmerman AJ, Mevius DJ, Wagenaar JA, Hordijk J. High heterogeneity of Escherichia coli sequence types harbouring ESBL/AmpC genes on IncI1 plasmids in the Colombian poultry chain. PLoS One 12:e0170777.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170777pmc: PMC5268450pubmed: 28125687google scholar: lookup
  32. Bortolaia V, Guardabassi L, Trevisani M, Bisgaard M, Venturi L, Bojesen AM. High diversity of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli isolates from Italian broiler flocks. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:1623–1626.
    doi: 10.1128/AAC.01361-09pmc: PMC2849389pubmed: 20100875google scholar: lookup
  33. Carattoli A. Plasmids and the spread of resistance. Int J Med Microbiol 303:298–304.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.02.001pubmed: 23499304google scholar: lookup
  34. Phan MD, Wain J. IncHI plasmids, a dynamic link between resistance and pathogenicity. J Infect Dev Ctries 2:272–278.
    pubmed: 19741288
  35. Fredericq P. Colicins and colicinogenic factors. Symp Soc Exp Biol 12:104–122.
    pubmed: 13580865
  36. Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 31:3350–3352.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383pmc: PMC4595904pubmed: 26099265google scholar: lookup
  37. Barr BS, Waldridge BM, Morresey PR, Reed SM, Clark C, Belgrave R, Donecker JM, Weigel DJ. Antimicrobial-associated diarrhoea in three equine referral practices. Equine Vet J 45:154–158.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00595.xpubmed: 22779907google scholar: lookup
  38. Zhao S, McDermott PF, White DG, Qaiyumi S, Friedman SL, Abbott JW, Glenn A, Ayers SL, Post KW, Fales WH, Wilson RB, Reggiardo C, Walker RD. Characterization of multidrug resistant Salmonella recovered from diseased animals. Vet Microbiol 123:122–132.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.03.001pubmed: 17400409google scholar: lookup
  39. van Duijkeren E, Wannet WJB, Heck MEOC, van Pelt W, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Smit JAH, Houwers DJ. Sero types, phage types and antibiotic susceptibilities of Salmonella strains isolated from horses in The Netherlands from 1993 to 2000. Vet Microbiol 86:203–212.
    doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00007-Xpubmed: 11900955google scholar: lookup
  40. Nikaido H. Multidrug resistance in bacteria. Annu Rev Biochem 78:119–146.
    doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.082907.145923pmc: PMC2839888pubmed: 19231985google scholar: lookup
  41. Magnet S, Courvalin P, Lambert T. Activation of the cryptic aac(6′)-Iy aminoglycoside resistance gene of Salmonella by a chromosomal deletion generating a transcriptional fusion. J Bacteriol 181:6650–6655.
    pmc: PMC94128pubmed: 10542165
  42. Chandler PM, Krishnapillai V. Phenotypic properties of R factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: R factors readily transferable between Pseudomonas and the Enterobacteriaceae. Genet Res 23:239–250.
    doi: 10.1017/S0016672300014890pubmed: 4215690google scholar: lookup
  43. Thanassi DG, Cheng LW, Nikaido H. Active efflux of bile salts by Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 179:2512–2518.
    doi: 10.1128/jb.179.8.2512-2518.1997pmc: PMC178997pubmed: 9098046google scholar: lookup
  44. Webber MA, Piddock LJV. The importance of efflux pumps in bacterial antibiotic resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 51:9–11.
    doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg050pubmed: 12493781google scholar: lookup
  45. Oethinger M, Kern WV, Jellen-Ritter AS, McMurry LM, Levy SB. Ineffectiveness of topoisomerase mutations in mediating clinically significant fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli in the absence of the AcrAB efflux pump. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:10–13.
    doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.1.10-13.2000pmc: PMC89620pubmed: 10602715google scholar: lookup
  46. Papich MG. Antimicrobial therapy for gastrointestinal diseases. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 19:645–663.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2003.08.009pubmed: 14740761google scholar: lookup
  47. WHO. Integrated surveillance of antimicrobial resistance—guidance from a WHO advisory group. 2013.
  48. McDermott PF, Tyson GH, Kabera C, Chen Y, Li C, Folster JP, Ayers SL, Lam C, Tate HP, Zhao S. Whole-genome sequencing for detecting antimicrobial resistance in nontyphoidal Salmonella. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:5515–5520.
    doi: 10.1128/AAC.01030-16pmc: PMC4997858pubmed: 27381390google scholar: lookup
  49. Phuc Nguyen MC, Woerther P-L, Bouvet M, Andremont A, Leclercq R, Canu A. Escherichia coli as reservoir for macrolide resistance genes. Emerg Infect Dis 15:1648–1650.
    doi: 10.3201/eid1510.090696pmc: PMC2866414pubmed: 19861064google scholar: lookup
  50. White DGPD, Alekshun MN, McDermott PF, Levy SB. Frontiers in antimicrobial resistance: a tribute to Stuart B. Levy. 2005.
  51. Gustafsson A. Antibiotic associated diarrhea in horses. 2004.
  52. Weese JS, Staempfli HR, Prescott JF. Isolation of environmental Clostridium difficile from a veterinary teaching hospital. J Vet Diagn Invest 12:449–452.
    doi: 10.1177/104063870001200510pubmed: 11021433google scholar: lookup
  53. O'Brien TF. Emergence, spread, and environmental effect of antimicrobial resistance: how use of an antimicrobial anywhere can increase resistance to any antimicrobial anywhere else. Clin Infect Dis 34:S78–S84.
    doi: 10.1086/340244pubmed: 11988877google scholar: lookup
  54. Matagne A, Misselyn-Bauduin AM, Joris B, Erpicum T, Granier B, Frere JM. The diversity of the catalytic properties of class A beta-lactamases. Biochem J 265:131–146.
    doi: 10.1042/bj2650131pmc: PMC1136623pubmed: 2302162google scholar: lookup
  55. Dominguez JE, Gutkind GO, Di Conza JA, Mercado EC. Occurrence of plasmidic AmpC β-lactamase in a Salmonella Typhimurium isolate of equine origin: first report of CMY-2 in animals in Argentina. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 3:315–316.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2015.09.006pubmed: 27842885google scholar: lookup
  56. Gentry-Weeks C, Hutcheson HJ, Kim LM, Bolte D, Traub-Dargatz J, Morley P, Powers B, Jessen M. Identification of two phylogenetically related organisms from feces by PCR for detection of Salmonella spp. J Clin Microbiol 40:1487–1492.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1487-1492.2002pmc: PMC140337pubmed: 11923378google scholar: lookup
  57. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests; approved standard—twelfth edition. 2015.
  58. CDC. 2012–2013 integrated report data tables. 2013.
  59. Ohta N, Norman KN, Norby B, Lawhon SD, Vinasco J, den Bakker H, Loneragan GH, Scott HM. Population dynamics of enteric Salmonella in response to antimicrobial use in beef feedlot cattle. Sci Rep 7:14310.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14751-9pmc: PMC5662634pubmed: 29085049google scholar: lookup
  60. Inouye M, Dashnow H, Raven LA, Schultz MB, Pope BJ, Tomita T, Zobel J, Holt KE. SRST2: rapid genomic surveillance for public health and hospital microbiology labs. Genome Med 6:90.
    doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0090-6pmc: PMC4237778pubmed: 25422674google scholar: lookup
  61. Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, Gurevich A, Korobeynikov A, Lapidus A, Prjibelsky A, Pyshkin A, Sirotkin A, Sirotkin Y, Stepanauskas R, McLean J, Lasken R, Clingenpeel SR, Woyke T, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. Assembling genomes and mini-metagenomes from highly chimeric reads. 2013 p 158–170.
  62. Babraham Bioinformatics. FastQC/0.11.6-Java-1.8.0. 2018.
  63. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086pmc: PMC3624806pubmed: 23422339google scholar: lookup
  64. Carattoli A, Zankari E, Garcia-Fernandez A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Moller Aarestrup F, Hasman H. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903.
    doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14pmc: PMC4068535pubmed: 24777092google scholar: lookup
  65. Rambaut A. FigTree v1.4.2. Molecular evolution, phylogenetics and epidemiology. 2009.
  66. Nguyen SV, Harhay DM, Bono JL, Smith TP, Fields PI, Dinsmore BA, Santovenia M, Kelley CM, Wang R, Bosilevac JM, Harhay GP. Complete and closed genome sequences of 10 Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Anatum isolates from human and bovine sources. Genome Announc 4:e00447-16.
    doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00447-16pmc: PMC4891638pubmed: 27257192google scholar: lookup
  67. Rankin SC, Aceto H, Cassidy J, Holt J, Young S, Love B, Tewari D, Munro DS, Benson CE. Molecular characterization of cephalosporin-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Newport isolates from animals in Pennsylvania. J Clin Microbiol 40:4679–4684.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.12.4679-4684.2002pmc: PMC154621pubmed: 12454172google scholar: lookup
  68. Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37:360–363.
    pubmed: 15883903
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.