Analyze Diet
Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS2016; 19(2); 183-197; doi: 10.1080/10888705.2015.1121816

Show Horse Welfare: The Viewpoints of Judges, Stewards, and Show Managers.

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of the current state of stock-type show horse welfare based on the perceptions of show officials and to identify potential means of preventing and intervening in compromises to show horse welfare. Thirteen horse show officials, including judges, stewards, and show managers, were interviewed. Findings revealed the officials had an incomplete understanding of nonhuman animal welfare and a high level of concern regarding the public's perception of show horse welfare. The officials attributed most of the frequently observed compromises to show horse welfare to (a) novices', amateurs', and young trainers' lack of experience or expertise, and (b) trainers' and owners' unrealistic expectations and prioritization of winning over horse welfare. The officials emphasized a need for distribution of responsibility among associations, officials, and individuals within the industry. Although the officials noted recent observable positive changes in the industry, they emphasized the need for continued improvements in equine welfare and greater educational opportunities for stakeholders.
Publication Date: 2016-01-08 PubMed ID: 26742585DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2015.1121816Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research revolves around the welfare of stock-type show horses and the perceptions of show officials, such as judges, stewards, and, managers about it. It further suggests possible ways to anticipate and handle issues compromising horse welfare in these shows.

Research Methodology

  • The study aimed to enhance understanding about the stock-type show horse welfare and how it is perceived by officials part of such shows.
  • Thirteen officials involved in these shows, inclusive of judges, stewards, and show managers, were selected for interviews.
  • These interviews were designed to comprehend their viewpoint about animal welfare, their concerns around public perception, and their insights into the causes for frequently noted compromises to horse welfare in these shows.

Findings

  • Results of the interviews demonstrated that officials’ understanding of non-human animal welfare was incomplete; however, they expressed a high level of caution regarding public perceptions of show horse welfare.
  • According to the officials, most of the issues challenging the horse welfare in show events are due to inexperience or lack of expertise of novices, amateurs, and young trainers, and unrealistic expectations of trainers and owners who prioritize winning over welfare of the horses.

Proposed Solutions

  • The interviewed officials stressed upon the need for sharing responsibility among associations, officials, and individuals involved in the show horse industry to ensure better horse welfare.
  • The officials have seen noticeable progress in the industry in recent times but think that the industry still requires significant improvements in horse welfare.
  • According to the officials, there must be increased educational opportunities for all stakeholders in the industry to understand and prioritize horse welfare.

Cite This Article

APA
Voigt M, Hiney K, Croney C, Waite K, Borron A, Brady C. (2016). Show Horse Welfare: The Viewpoints of Judges, Stewards, and Show Managers. J Appl Anim Welf Sci, 19(2), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2015.1121816

Publication

ISSN: 1532-7604
NlmUniqueID: 9804404
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 19
Issue: 2
Pages: 183-197

Researcher Affiliations

Voigt, Melissa
  • a Department of Youth Development and Agricultural Education , Purdue University.
Hiney, Kristina
  • b Department of Animal Science , Oklahoma State University.
Croney, Candace
  • c Center for Animal Welfare Science, Purdue University.
Waite, Karen
  • d Department of Animal Science , Michigan State University.
Borron, Abigail
  • a Department of Youth Development and Agricultural Education , Purdue University.
Brady, Colleen
  • a Department of Youth Development and Agricultural Education , Purdue University.

MeSH Terms

  • Animal Welfare / standards
  • Animals
  • Attitude
  • Horses
  • Humans

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.