Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2021; 11(6); doi: 10.3390/ani11061629

Spontaneous Behaviors of Post-Orchiectomy Pain in Horses Regardless of the Effects of Time of Day, Anesthesia, and Analgesia.

Abstract: This prospective and longitudinal study aimed to identify spontaneous post-orchiectomy pain behaviors in horses regardless of the effects of anesthesia, analgesia, and recording time of day. Twenty-four horses divided into four groups were submitted to: inhalation anesthesia only (GA), or combined with previous analgesia (GAA), or orchiectomy under pre (GCA), or postoperative (GC) analgesia. The data obtained from the subtraction of frequency and/or duration of 34 behaviors recorded during seven 60-min time-points in the 24 h after the anesthesia from those recorded in the mirrored time-points in the 24 h before the anesthesia (delta) were compared over time and among groups by Friedman and Kruskal-Wallis tests, respectively (p < 0.05). Time of day influenced the behaviors of walk, look out the window, rest the pelvic limb, and rest standing still. The only pain-related behaviors were decreased mirrored proportional differences in time spent drinking, and eating, and increased mirrored proportional differences in the frequency or duration of look at the wound, retract the pelvic limb, expose the penis, and look at the back of the stall. In conclusion, confounding factors rather than pain may influence several suggestive pain-related behaviors documented in the literature.
Publication Date: 2021-05-31 PubMed ID: 34072875PubMed Central: PMC8230028DOI: 10.3390/ani11061629Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study aims to understand pain behaviors in horses after removal of testicles (orchiectomy) and to discover how factors like the time of day, anaesthesia, and pain relief (analgesia) impact these behaviors.

Research design and methods

  • The researchers conducted a prospective and longitudinal study. This means they planned the study before it took place and followed the horses over a period of time after the surgery.
  • They divided the twenty-four horses into four groups, each receiving different treatments. One group had inhalation anesthesia only (GA); another had it combined with previous analgesia or pain relief (GAA); the third had orchiectomy under preoperative analgesia or pain relief before surgery (GCA), and the last had orchiectomy under postoperative analgesia or pain relief after surgery (GC).
  • Horse behaviors were recorded during seven 60-minute intervals over a 24-hour period after anesthesia, with the behavior in the same time period before the anesthesia used as the comparison point. Data obtained from the subtraction of the after- and before-anaesthesia observations (“delta”) was collected for each of the 34 behaviors monitored.

Results and conclusions

  • The results indicated that several behaviors were influenced by the time of day. These include the frequency or length of time horses spent walking, looking out the window, resting their pelvic limb and standing still.
  • The only pain-related behaviors observed were decreases in time spent drinking, eating, and increases in the frequency or duration of behaviors like looking at the wound, retracting the pelvic limb, exposing the penis, and looking at the back of the stall.
  • The researchers concluded that other factors, rather than pain, may influence several behaviors that are often associated with pain, such as standing still. This suggests that we need to consider other explanations for certain behaviors observed after surgery, rather than just attributing them to pain.

Implications and impact of the study

  • This study contributes to our understanding of how horses behave after orchiectomy and the factors which influence those behaviors. This can help veterinarians and animal caregivers to provide better post-surgery care for the horses.
  • While further research is needed, the indications that behaviors such as standing still, looking at the wound or looking at the back of the stall may be affected by factors other than pain could affect how post-surgery pain and distress in horses are assessed and managed.

Cite This Article

APA
Trindade PHE, Taffarel MO, Luna SPL. (2021). Spontaneous Behaviors of Post-Orchiectomy Pain in Horses Regardless of the Effects of Time of Day, Anesthesia, and Analgesia. Animals (Basel), 11(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061629

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 6

Researcher Affiliations

Trindade, Pedro Henrique Esteves
  • Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Sao Paulo State 18618-681, Brazil.
Taffarel, Marilda Onghero
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, Maringa State University (UEM), Parana State 87502-970, Brazil.
Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro
  • Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Sao Paulo State 18618-681, Brazil.

Grant Funding

  • 0000 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • 10/08967-0 / Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the study was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 56 references
  1. Andersen P.H., Gleerup K.B., Wathan J., Coles B., Kjellström H., Broomé S., Lee Y.J., Rashid M., Sonder C., Resenberg E.. Can a machine learn to see horse pain? An interdisciplinary approach towards automated decoding of facial expressions of pain in the horse.. Measuring Behavior 2018-11th International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research, Proceedings of Measuring Behavior, Manchester, UK, 6–8 June 2018.
  2. Guedes A.. Pain management in horses.. Vet. Clin. North. Am. Equine Pract. 2017;33:181–211.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2016.11.006pubmed: 28325179google scholar: lookup
  3. Dugdale A.H.A.. Progress in equine pain assessment?. Vet. J. 2014;200:210–211.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.03.012pubmed: 24698668google scholar: lookup
  4. Wagner A.E.. Effects of stress on pain in horses and incorporating pain scales for equine practice.. Vet. Clin. North. Am. Equine Pract. 2010;26:481–492.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2010.07.001pubmed: 21056295google scholar: lookup
  5. Sutton G.A., Dahan R., Turner D., Paltiel O.. A behaviour-based pain scale for horses with acute colic: Scale construction.. Vet. J. 2013;196:394–401.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.10.008pubmed: 23141961google scholar: lookup
  6. Sutton G.A., Atamna R., Steinman A., Mair T.S.. Comparison of three acute colic pain scales: Reliability, validity and usability.. Vet. J. 2019;246:71–77.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2019.01.004pubmed: 30902193google scholar: lookup
  7. VanDierendonck M.C., van Loon J.P.A.M.. Monitoring acute equine visceral pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP): A validation study.. Vet. J. 2016;216:175–177.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.08.004pubmed: 27687948google scholar: lookup
  8. Sutton G.A., Paltiel O., Soffer M., Turner D.. Validation of two behaviour-based pain scales for horses with acute colic.. Vet. J. 2013;197:646–650.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.04.007pubmed: 23993390google scholar: lookup
  9. Sutton G.A., Sutton G.A., Bar L., Sutton G.. Evaluation of pain in horses refinement and revalidation of the Equine Acute Abdominal Pain Scale (EAAPS). Isr J. Vet. Med. 2016;71:15–23.
  10. Graubner C., Gerber V., Doherr M., Spadavecchia C.. Clinical application and reliability of a post abdominal surgery pain assessment scale (PASPAS) in horses.. Vet. J. 2011;188:178–183.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.04.029pubmed: 20627635google scholar: lookup
  11. Pritchett L.C., Ulibarri C., Roberts M.C., Schneider R.K., Sellon D.C.. Identification of potential physiological and behavioral indicators of postoperative pain in horses after exploratory celiotomy for colic.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003;80:31–43.
  12. van Loon J.P.A.M., Van Dierendonck M.C.. Monitoring acute equine visceral pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP): A scale-construction study.. Vet. J. 2015;206:356–364.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.08.023pubmed: 26526526google scholar: lookup
  13. van Loon J.P.A.M., Back W., Hellebrekers L.J., van Weeren P.R.. Application of a composite pain scale to objectively monitor horses with somatic and visceral pain under hospital conditions.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2010;30:641–649.
  14. Sellon D.C., Roberts M.C., Blikslager A.T., Ulibarri C., Papich M.G.. Effects of continuous rate intravenous infusion of butorphanol on physiologic and outcome variables in horses after celiotomy.. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2004;18:555–563.
  15. Van Loon J.P.A.M., Jonckheer-Sheehy V.S.M., Back W., René van Weeren P., Hellebrekers L.J.. Monitoring equine visceral pain with a composite pain scale score and correlation with survival after emergency gastrointestinal surgery.. Vet. J. 2014;200:109–115.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.01.003pubmed: 24491373google scholar: lookup
  16. Lawson A.L., Opie R.R., Stevens K.B., Knowles E.J., Mair T.S.. Application of an equine composite pain scale and its association with plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone concentrations and serum cortisol concentrations in horses with colic.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2020;32:20–27.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13143google scholar: lookup
  17. Pehkonen J., Karma L., Raekallio M.. Behavioral signs associated with equine periapical infection in cheek teeth.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2019;77:144–150.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.03.005pubmed: 31133309google scholar: lookup
  18. Taffarel M.O., Luna S.P.L., de Oliveira F.A., Cardoso G.S., de Moura Alonso J., Pantoja J.C., Brondani J.T., Love E., Taylor P., White K.. Refinement and partial validation of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in horses.. BMC Vet. Res. 2015;11:1–12.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0395-8pmc: PMC4393617pubmed: 25888751google scholar: lookup
  19. Dalla Costa E., Minero M., Lebelt D., Stucke D., Canali E., Leach M.C.. Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a pain assessment tool in horses undergoing routine castration.. PLoS ONE 2014;9.
  20. Price J., Catriona S., Welsh E.M., Waran N.K.. Preliminary evaluation of a behaviour-based system for assessment of post-operative pain in horses following arthroscopic surgery.. Vet. Anaesth Analg. 2003;30:124–137.
  21. van Loon J.P.A.M., Van Dierendonck M.C.. Pain assessment in horses after orthopaedic surgery and with orthopaedic trauma.. Vet. J. 2019;246:85–91.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2019.02.001pubmed: 30902195google scholar: lookup
  22. Bussières G., Jacques C., Lainay O., Beauchamp G., Leblond A., Cadoré J.-L., Desmaizières M., Cuvelliez S.G., Troncy E.. Development of a composite orthopaedic pain scale in horses.. Res. Vet. Sci. 2008;85:294–306.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2007.10.011pubmed: 18061637google scholar: lookup
  23. Lindegaard C., Thomsen M.H., Larsen S., Andersen P.H.. Analgesic efficacy of intra-articular morphine in experimentally induced radiocarpal synovitis in horses.. Vet. Anaesth Analg. 2010;37:171–185.
  24. Dutton D.W., Lashnits K.J., Wegner K.. Managing severe hoof pain in a horse using multimodal analgesia and a modified composite pain score.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2009;21:37–43.
    doi: 10.2746/095777308X382669google scholar: lookup
  25. Raekallio M., Taylor P.M., Bloomfield M.. A comparison of methods for evaluation of pain and distress after orthopaedic surgery in horses.. J. Vet. Anaesth. 1997;24:17–20.
  26. Gleerup K.B., Lindegaard C.. Recognition and quantification of pain in horses: A tutorial review.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2016;28:47–57.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12383google scholar: lookup
  27. Torcivia C., McDonnell S.. In-person caretaker visits disrupt ongoing discomfort behavior in hospitalized equine orthopedic surgical patients.. Animals 2020;10:210.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10020210pmc: PMC7070845pubmed: 32012670google scholar: lookup
  28. Gleerup K.B., Forkman B., Lindegaard C., Andersen P.H.. An equine pain face.. Vet. Anaesth Analg. 2015;42:103–114.
    doi: 10.1111/vaa.12212pmc: PMC4312484pubmed: 25082060google scholar: lookup
  29. Luna S.P.L., de Araújo A.L., da Nóbrega Neto P.I., Brondani J.T., de Oliveira F.A., Azerêdo LM dos S., Telles F.G., Trindade P.H.E.. Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS). PLoS ONE 2020;15:e0233552.
  30. Silva N.E.O.F., Trindade P.H.E., Oliveira A.R., Taffarel M.O., Moreira M.A.P., Denadai R., Rocha P.B., Luna S.P.L.. Validation of the Unesp-Botucatu composite scale to assess acute postoperative abdominal pain in sheep (USAPS). PLoS ONE 2020;15.
  31. Descovich K.A., Wathan J., Leach M.C., Buchanan-Smith H.M., Flecknell P., Farningham D., Vick S.J.. Facial expression: An under-utilized tool for the assessment of welfare in mammals.. Altex 2017:409–429.
    doi: 10.14573/altex.1607161pubmed: 28214916google scholar: lookup
  32. Mcdonnell S.M.. Is it psychological, physical, or both?. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners; Seattle, WA, USA. 3−7 December 2005; pp. 231–238.
  33. Dodds L., Knight L., Allen K., Murrell J.. The effect of postsurgical pain on attentional processing in horses.. Vet. Anaesth Analg. 2017;44:933–942.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.07.010pubmed: 28821424google scholar: lookup
  34. Hall C., Randle H., Pearson G., Preshaw L., Waran N.. Assessing equine emotional state.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018;205:183–193.
  35. Gigliuto C., De Gregori M., Malafoglia V., Raffaeli W., Compagnone C., Visai L., Petrini P., Avanzini M.A., Muscoli C., Viganò J.. Pain assessment in animal models: Do we need further studies?. J. Pain Res. 2014;7:227–236.
    doi: 10.2147/JPR.S59161pmc: PMC4020878pubmed: 24855386google scholar: lookup
  36. Ashley F.H., Waterman-Pearson A.E., Whay H.R.. Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: Application to clinical practice and future studies.. Equine Vet. J. 2005;37:565–575.
    doi: 10.2746/042516405775314826pubmed: 16295937google scholar: lookup
  37. Pinho R.H., Leach M.C., Minto B.W., Rocha F.D.L., Luna S.P.L.. Postoperative pain behaviours in rabbits following orthopaedic surgery and effect of observer presence.. PLoS ONE 2020;15:e0240605.
  38. McDonnell S.. The Equid Ethogram: A Practical Field Guide to Horse Behaviour. Volume 1.. Eclipse Press; Lexington, KY, USA: 2003. pp. 39–58.
  39. Taffarel M.O., Luna S.P.L., Cardoso G.S., de Oliveira F.A., de Moura Alonso J., Gozalo-Marcilla M.. Preemptive Analgesia, including morphine, does not affect recovery quality and times in either pain-free horses or horses undergoing orchiectomy.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;48:82–85.
  40. Searle D., Dart A.J., Dart C.M., Hodgson D.R.. Equine castration: Review of anatomy, approaches, techniques and complications in normal, cryptorchid and monorchid horses.. Aust Vet. J. 1999;77:428–434.
  41. Torcivia C., Mcdonnell S.. Equine discomfort ethogram.. Animals 2020;11:1–24.
    pmc: PMC7931104pubmed: 33672338
  42. Martin P., Bateson P.P.G.. Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide.. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1993.
  43. Steagall P., Luna S., Taylor P., Humm K.F.T.. Neurological, respiratory, bahavioural and endocrine effects of tail docking in newborn dogs submitted to epidural anesthesia.. Ars Vet. 2009;25:58–062.
  44. Valbrun L.P., Zvonarev V.. The opioid system and food intake: Use of opiate antagonists in treatment of binge eating disorder and abnormal eating behavior.. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2020;12:41–63.
    doi: 10.14740/jocmr4066pmc: PMC7011935pubmed: 32095174google scholar: lookup
  45. Bailey P.A., Hague B.A., Davis M., Major M.D., Zubrod C.J., Brakenhoff J.E.. Incidence of post-anesthetic colic in non-fasted adult equine patients.. Can. Vet. J. 2016;57:1263.
    pmc: PMC5109629pubmed: 27928173
  46. Brondani J.T., Mama K.R., Luna S.P.L., Wright B.D., Niyom S., Ambrosio J., Vogel P.R., Padovani C.R.. Validation of the English version of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cats.. BMC Vet. Res. 2013;9:1–15.
    doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-143pmc: PMC3722032pubmed: 23867090google scholar: lookup
  47. de Oliveira F.A., Luna S.P.L., do Amaral J.B., Rodrigues K.A., Sant’Anna A.C., Daolio M., Brondani J.T.. Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu unidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cattle.. BMC Vet. Res. 2014;10:1–14.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0200-0pmc: PMC4172785pubmed: 25192598google scholar: lookup
  48. Streiner D.L., Norman G.R., Cairney J.. Health Measurement Scales—A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use.. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2015.
    doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqp179google scholar: lookup
  49. Devine E.P., Kukanich B., Beard W.L.. Pharmacokinetics of intramuscularly administered morphine in horses.. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2013;243:105–112.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.243.1.105pubmed: 23786198google scholar: lookup
  50. Klaus A., Schlingloff Y., Kleinitz U., Bottcher M., Hapke H.J.. Pharmacokinetic study of dipyrone metabolite 4-MAA in the horse and possible implications for doping control.. J. Vet. Pharmacol Ther. 1997;20:204–208.
  51. Toutain P.L., Autefage A., Legrand C., Alvinerie M.. Plasma concentrations and therapeutic efficacy of phenylbutazone and flunixin meglumine in the horse: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling.. J. Vet. Pharmacol Ther. 1994;17:459–469.
  52. Leach M.C., Allweiler S., Richardson C., Roughan J.V., Narbe R., Flecknell P.A.. Behavioural effects of ovariohysterectomy and oral administration of meloxicam in laboratory housed rabbits.. Res. Vet. Sci. 2009;87:336–347.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.02.001pubmed: 19303122google scholar: lookup
  53. Duncan P.. Determinants of the use of habitat by horses in a Mediterranean Wetland.. J Anim Ecol. 1983;52:93.
    doi: 10.2307/4590google scholar: lookup
  54. Melgaard D.T., Korsgaard T.S., Thoefner M.S., Petersen M.R., Pedersen H.G.. Moody mares—Is ovariectomy a solution?. Animals 2020;10:1210.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10071210pmc: PMC7401554pubmed: 32708618google scholar: lookup
  55. Bulens A., Van Beirendonck S., Van Thielen J., Driessen B.. The enriching effect of non-commercial items in stabled horses.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2013;143:46–51.
  56. Forkman B., Boissy A., Meunier-Salaün M.C., Canali E., Jones R.B.. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses.. Physiol. Behav. 2007.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.03.016pubmed: 18046784google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 13 times.
  1. Lascelles BDX, Barratt D, Basran PS, Brown DC, Coetzee JF, Gill M, Hutchinson MR, Johnson C, Luna SPL, Mohapatra DP, Oshinsky ML, Robertson S, Ruberman CF, Smith ER, Zhang Q. Advancing outcome measure development and analytical approaches: Pain in Animals Workshop 2023. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2025;6:1615862.
    doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1615862pubmed: 40919438google scholar: lookup
  2. da Silva NEOF, Trindade PHE, da Silva GV, de Oliveira FA, Taffarel MO, de Lima MT, Tomacheuski RM, Rosa GDS, Alves ALG, Luna SPL. Clinical validation of the Unesp-Botucatu acute pain scale in sheep undergoing orthopedic surgery. PLoS One 2025;20(5):e0323132.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323132pubmed: 40354487google scholar: lookup
  3. Pivato GM, da Silva GV, Peres BG, Luna SPL, Pairis-Garcia MD, Trindade PHE. Proposing a short version of the Unesp-Botucatu pig acute pain scale using a novel application of machine learning technique. Sci Rep 2025 Feb 28;15(1):7161.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91551-6pubmed: 40021814google scholar: lookup
  4. Hall C, Kay R. Living the good life? A systematic review of behavioural signs of affective state in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) and factors relating to quality of life. Part 2: Horse-human interactions. Anim Welf 2024;33:e41.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.41pubmed: 39469043google scholar: lookup
  5. Jodzio D, DeNotta S, Plummer C, Sanchez C. Pain scoring systems in hospitalized horses with ocular disease. J Vet Intern Med 2024 Jan-Feb;38(1):388-397.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16933pubmed: 37982362google scholar: lookup
  6. Fonseca MW, Trindade PHE, Pinho RH, Justo AA, Tomacheuski RM, Silva NEOFD, Gonçalves HC, Luna SPL. Development and Validation of the Unesp-Botucatu Goat Acute Pain Scale. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jun 28;13(13).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13132136pubmed: 37443934google scholar: lookup
  7. Vullo C, Crupi R, Di Paola R, Cuzzocrea S, Gugliandolo E, Biondi V, Catone G. Intratesticular Versus Intrafunicular Lidocaine to Reduce Perioperative Nociception and Immunological Response in Ponies Undergoing Field Castration. Vet Sci 2022 Nov 28;9(12).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9120664pubmed: 36548825google scholar: lookup
  8. Trindade PHE, Mello JFSR, Silva NEOF, Luna SPL. Improving Ovine Behavioral Pain Diagnosis by Implementing Statistical Weightings Based on Logistic Regression and Random Forest Algorithms. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 26;12(21).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12212940pubmed: 36359065google scholar: lookup
  9. Carvalho JRG, Trindade PHE, Conde G, Antonioli ML, Funnicelli MIG, Dias PP, Canola PA, Chinelatto MA, Ferraz GC. Facial Expressions of Horses Using Weighted Multivariate Statistics for Assessment of Subtle Local Pain Induced by Polylactide-Based Polymers Implanted Subcutaneously. Animals (Basel) 2022 Sep 13;12(18).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12182400pubmed: 36139260google scholar: lookup
  10. Haddad Pinho R, Luna SPL, Esteves Trindade PH, Augusto Justo A, Santilli Cima D, Werneck Fonseca M, Watanabe Minto B, Del Lama Rocha F, Miller A, Flecknell P, Leach MC. Validation of the rabbit pain behaviour scale (RPBS) to assess acute postoperative pain in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). PLoS One 2022;17(5):e0268973.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268973pubmed: 35617348google scholar: lookup
  11. Broomé S, Ask K, Rashid-Engström M, Haubro Andersen P, Kjellström H. Sharing pain: Using pain domain transfer for video recognition of low grade orthopedic pain in horses. PLoS One 2022;17(3):e0263854.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263854pubmed: 35245288google scholar: lookup
  12. Lemonnier LC, Thorin C, Meurice A, Dubus A, Touzot-Jourde G, Couroucé A, Leroux AA. Comparison of Flunixin Meglumine, Meloxicam and Ketoprofen on Mild Visceral Post-Operative Pain in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 21;12(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12040526pubmed: 35203234google scholar: lookup
  13. Barreto da Rocha P, Driessen B, McDonnell SM, Hopster K, Zarucco L, Gozalo-Marcilla M, Hopster-Iversen C, Esteves Trindade PH, Gonzaga da Rocha TK, Taffarel MO, Alonso BB, Schauvliege S, Luna SPL. A critical evaluation for validation of composite and unidimensional postoperative pain scales in horses. PLoS One 2021;16(8):e0255618.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255618pubmed: 34352001google scholar: lookup