FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / PLoS One / Still beyond a chance: Distribution of faults in elite show-...
PloS one2022; 17(3); e0264615; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264615

Still beyond a chance: Distribution of faults in elite show-jumping horses.

Abstract: This study aimed to identify factors that can influence show-jumping performance during top level competitions in the Western European League (2017/2018, CSI5*). The performance data of 144 riders and 222 horses were obtained from video records (FEI TV/ website). Riders with horses achieved a total of 9114 jumping-efforts over 320 obstacles including oxers (n = 142), oxers with water (n = 15), triple bars (n = 6), verticals (n = 136), verticals with water (n = 14) and walls (n = 7). Obstacles in the first round (FR) or in jump off (JO) were standing either as single (n = 6290) or as a combination of two or three fences in a row (n = 2824). The overall fault rate (dropping the pole or refusal/run-out to jump) was 7.85%. The probability of a fault increased with the rank of the fence in the course of FR (F (1, 7649) = 5.29, P < 0.0001, GzLMM; PROC GLIMMIX, SAS). The highest probability of a fault (F (5, 7649) = 2.51, P < 0.03) in FR was found on the vertical obstacle with water (0.125 ± 0.021, LSMEAN ± standard error) while the lowest was on the triple bar (0.037 ± 0.015) and wall (0.048 ± 0.020). Riders who completed more starts in previous competitions achieved a lower fault rate (F (1, 7649) = 6.17, P < 0.02) in FR as well as in JO (F (1, 931) = 7.05, P < 0.01). The probability of faults in JO decreased with a higher speed (F (1, 931) = 6.66, P < 0.01) but there was no significant correlation between the speed in JO and FR in individual horses (r = 0.26, P < 0.01). More faults were found on the fences within combinations in both rounds (FR, JO). The highest probability of faults was found on the first fence (FR 0.095 ± 0.016; JO 0.043 ± 0.008) or second fence (JO 0.055 ± 0.020) of the double combination compared to the least probability of faults on single obstacles (FR 0.057 ± 0.007, F (5, 7649) = 5.29, P < 0.0001; JO 0.100 ± 0.027, F (1, 931) = 3.39, P < 0.04). Other tested factors did not affect show-jumping performance. Some faults are still more likely and not random in a show-jumping course, therefore, the appropriate training focus can improve performance and safety in competitions.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-03-16 PubMed ID: 35294454PubMed Central: PMC8926200DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264615Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research aimed to decipher factors that influence the performance of show-jumping horses at elite level competitions, using data from the Western European League’s 2017/2018 season’s performance videos. The findings indicated that the likelihood of faults increased with the rank of the fence in the course and more faults occurred on fences within combinations. It was also revealed that riders with more previous competition experiences had a lower fault rate.

Study Design and Participants

  • The study utilized performance data from 144 riders and 222 horses, totaling 9114 jumping efforts over 320 obstacles.
  • Data was extracted from video records available on the FEI TV/ website. Obstacles varied, comprising of oxers, oxers with water, triple bars, verticals, verticals with water, and walls.
  • The obstacles during the first round of the competition or the “jump off” round were either single, or combinations of two to three fences in a row.

Faults and Probabilities

  • The overall rate of faults — such as a horse dropping the pole or refusing to jump — was found to be 7.85%.
  • The likelihood of a fault was discovered to increase with the rank of the fence in the course during the first round.
  • The performance data indicated that the highest chance of a fault occurring was on the vertical obstacle with water, whereas lowest was on the triple bar and wall.

Influence of Experience and Speed

  • The study found that riders who have completed more starts in previous competitions achieved a lesser fault rate.
  • In the “jump off” round, the likelihood of faults decreased with increased speed.
  • However, there was no significant connection established between the speed in the first round and “jump off” round in individual horses.

Faults in Combination Fences

  • More faults were noted on the fences within combination in both competition rounds.
  • The first fence, or second fence of the double combination seemed to pose the highest chance of faults, compared to single obstacles.

Implications and Conclusions

  • The researchers concluded that various factors, including obstacle type and rider experience, have considerable influence on show-jumping performance.
  • Some kinds of faults are not random but more likely to happen in a show-jumping course. Therefore, adopting an appropriate training focus can enhance performance and safety in competitions.

Cite This Article

APA
Ničová K, Bartošová J. (2022). Still beyond a chance: Distribution of faults in elite show-jumping horses. PLoS One, 17(3), e0264615. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264615

Publication

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 17
Issue: 3
Pages: e0264615

Researcher Affiliations

Ničová, Klára
  • Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Bartošová, Jitka
  • Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Probability
  • Sports
  • Water

Conflict of Interest Statement

Authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

This article includes 36 references
  1. Dressage rules 26th edition, (2019).
  2. Jumping Rules, 26th edition, (2019).
  3. Viklund Å, Thorén Hellsten E, Näsholm A, Strandberg E, Philipsson J. Genetic parameters for traits evaluated at field tests of 3- and 4-year-old Swedish Warmblood horses. Animal 2008;2(12):1832–41.
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731108003030pubmed: 22444090google scholar: lookup
  4. Górecka-Bruzda A, Chruszczewski MH, Jezierski T, Murphy J. Behaviour-related traits of Polish sport horse stallions participating in 100-day performance tests. Livestock Science 2011;136(2):207–15.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.09.014google scholar: lookup
  5. Wejer J, Lendo I, Lewczuk D. The Effect of Training on the Jumping Parameters of Inexperienced Warmblood Horses in Free Jumping. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2013;33(6):483–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.07.009google scholar: lookup
  6. Lewczuk D, Ducro B. Repeatability of free jumping parameters on tests of different duration. Livestock Science 2012;146(1):22–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.02.016google scholar: lookup
  7. Allen MS, Greenlees I, Jones M. An investigation of the five-factor model of personality and coping behaviour in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences 2011;29(8):841–50.
    doi: 10.1080/02640414.2011.565064pubmed: 21500081google scholar: lookup
  8. Visser EK, Van Reenen CG, Engel B, Schilder MBH, Barnveld A, Blokhuis HJ. The association between performance in show-jumping and personality traits earlier in life. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003;82.
    doi: 10.1016/s0168-1591(03)00083-2google scholar: lookup
  9. Lloyd AS, Martin JE, Bornett-Gauci HLI, Wilkinson RG. Horse personality: Variation between breeds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2008;112(3):369–83.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.08.010google scholar: lookup
  10. Carere C, Maestripieri D. Introduction: animal personalities: who cares and why?. Animal Personalities: University of Chicago Press 2013. p. 1–10.
  11. Koenen EPC, Aldridge LI, Philipsson J. An overview of breeding objectives for warmblood sport horses. Livestock Production Science 2004;88(1):77–84.
    doi: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2003.10.011google scholar: lookup
  12. König von Borstel U, Glißman C. Alternatives to Conventional Evaluation of Rideability in Horse Performance Tests: Suitability of Rein Tension and Behavioural Parameters. PLOS ONE 2014;9(1):e87285.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087285pmc: PMC3906164pubmed: 24489890google scholar: lookup
  13. McBride SD, Mills DS. Psychological factors affecting equine performance. BMC Veterinary Research 2012;8(1):180.
    doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-180pmc: PMC3514365pubmed: 23016987google scholar: lookup
  14. Valera M, Bartolomé E, Sánchez MJ, Molina A, Cook N, Schaefer A. Changes in Eye Temperature and Stress Assessment in Horses During Show Jumping Competitions. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2012;32(12):827–30.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.03.005google scholar: lookup
  15. Byström A, Stalfelt A, Egenvall A, Von Peinen K, Morgan K, Roepstorff L. Influence of girth strap placement and panel flocking material on the saddle pressure pattern during riding of horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 2010;42(s38):502–9.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00173.xpubmed: 21059052google scholar: lookup
  16. McLean AN, Christensen JW. The application of learning theory in horse training. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2017;190:18–27.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.020google scholar: lookup
  17. Williams J, Tabor G. Rider impacts on equitation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2017;190:28–42.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.019google scholar: lookup
  18. Górecka-Bruzda A, Kosińska I, Jaworski Z, Jezierski T, Murphy J. Conflict behavior in elite show jumping and dressage horses. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2015;10(2):137–46.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2014.10.004google scholar: lookup
  19. Christensen JW, Munk R, Hawson L, Palme R, Larsen T, Egenvall A. Rider effects on horses’ conflict behaviour, rein tension, physiological measures and rideability scores. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2021;234:105184.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105184google scholar: lookup
  20. Sauer FJ, Hermann M, Ramseyer A, Burger D, Riemer S, Gerber V. Effects of breed, management and personality on cortisol reactivity in sport horses. PLOS ONE 2019;14(12):e0221794.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221794pmc: PMC6886778pubmed: 31790402google scholar: lookup
  21. Marlin D, Williams J. Faults in international showjumping are not random. Comparative Exercise Physiology 2020;16(3):235–41.
    doi: 10.3920/cep190069google scholar: lookup
  22. Stachurska A, Pięta M, Nesteruk E. Which obstacles are most problematic for jumping horses?. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2002;77(3):197–207.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00042-4google scholar: lookup
  23. Murray JK, Singer ER, Morgan KL, Proudman CJ, French NP. Memory decay and performance-related information bias in the reporting of scores by event riders. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2004;63(3):173–82.
    doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.02.005pubmed: 15158569google scholar: lookup
  24. Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ. Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2005;28(4):575–88.
    doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05000105pubmed: 16209828google scholar: lookup
  25. Weber CD, Nguyen AR, Lefering R, Hofman M, Hildebrand F, Pape HC. Blunt injuries related to equestrian sports: results from an international prospective trauma database analysis. International Orthopaedics 2017;41(10):2105–12.
    doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3592-1pubmed: 28801837google scholar: lookup
  26. Rorvang MV, Christensen JW. Attenuation of fear through social transmission in groups of same and differently aged horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2018;209:41–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.10.003google scholar: lookup
  27. Patterson M, Doyle J, Cahill E, Caulfield B, Persson UM. Quantifying show jumping horse rider expertise using IMUs. 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 2010 31 Aug.-4 Sept. 2010.
    pubmed: 21095894
  28. Hasler RM, Gyssler L, Benneker L, Martinolli L, Schötzau A, Zimmermann H. Protective and risk factors in amateur equestrians and description of injury patterns: A retrospective data analysis and a case-control survey. Journal of trauma management & outcomes 2011;5(1):1–8.
    doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-5-4pmc: PMC3042925pubmed: 21294862google scholar: lookup
  29. Murray JK, Singer ER, Morgan KL, Proudman CJ, French NP. Risk factors for cross-country horse falls at one-day events and at two-/three-day events. The Veterinary Journal 2005;170(3):318–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.05.003pubmed: 15953741google scholar: lookup
  30. Clayton HM. Time-motion analysis of show jumping competitions. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 1996;16(6):262–6.
    doi: 10.1016/S0737-0806(96)80195-Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  31. Art T, Amory H, Desmecht D, Lekeux P. Effect of show jumping on heart rate, blood lactate and other plasma biochemical values. Equine Veterinary Journal 1990;22(S9):78–82.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1990.tb04740.xpubmed: 9259812google scholar: lookup
  32. Lewczuk D. Towards the best young horse performance–variability of behavior and performance related traits in Polish warmbloods during years 2002–2017. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2020.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2020.08.005google scholar: lookup
  33. Place N, McGowan C, Lamb S, Schanbacher B, McGowan T, Walsh D. Seasonal variation in serum concentrations of selected metabolic hormones in horses. Journal of veterinary internal medicine 2010;24(3):650–4.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0500.xpubmed: 20384949google scholar: lookup
  34. Murphy J, Sutherland A, Arkins S. Idiosyncratic motor laterality in the horse. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2005;91(3):297–310.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.001google scholar: lookup
  35. Byström A, Clayton H, Hernlund E, Rhodin M, Egenvall A. Equestrian and biomechanical perspectives on laterality in the horse. Comp Exerc Physiol 2020;16:35–45.
  36. Santamaría S, Bobbert MF, Back W, Barneveld A, van Weeren PR. Effect of early training on the jumping technique of horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2005;66(3):418–24.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.418pubmed: 15822585google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.