Analyze Diet
The Journal of experimental biology1996; 199(Pt 5); 1133-1146; doi: 10.1242/jeb.199.5.1133

Strain-rate-dependent mechanical properties of the equine hoof wall.

Abstract: The mechanical properties of fully hydrated equine hoof wall were examined at various loading rates in compact tension (CT) fracture, tensile and three-point bending dynamic tests to determine possible effects of hoof wall viscoelasticity on fracture toughness and tensile parameters. Four cross-head rates were used in CT tests: 1.7 x 10(-5), 1.7 x 10 (-3), 1.7 x 10(-2) and 2.5ms-1; four strain rates were used in tensile tests: 1.6 x 10(-3), 3.2 x 10(-2), 0.33 and 70s(-1). Speeds for the highest test rates were achieved using a large, custom-built impact pendulum. Bending test frequencies ranged from 0.04 to 200 Hz. In CT tests, both the initial modulus Ei and the stress intensity factor K rose with increasing strain rate (from 0.38 to 0.76 GPa for Ei and from 0.71 to 1.4 MN m-3/2 for K), whereas the fracture toughness parameter J remained constant at 12kJm-2. All tensile parameters except ultimate strain were sensitive to strain rate. Ei, total energy to breakage and maximum stress rose with increasing strain rate from 0.28 to 0.85 GPa, from 5.4 to 9.7 MJm-3 and from 17 to 31 MPa, respectively. Data from low-amplitude dynamic tests agreed well with Ei trends from CT and tensile tests. Direction of crack growth differed through the thickness of the wall, the pattern of which resembled a trilaminar ply. Although scanning electron microscopic examination of fracture surfaces revealed a decreasing pseudo-ductile behaviour with increasing strain rate, and ultimate tensile parameters are positively affected, equine hoof wall viscoelasticity does not appear to compromise fracture toughness at high strain rates.
Publication Date: 1996-05-01 PubMed ID: 8786334DOI: 10.1242/jeb.199.5.1133Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research studies how the mechanical properties of horse hooves react under different loading rates to understand if the hoof wall’s viscoelasticity affects its ability to withstand fractures and tension. Results showed that most tensile parameters, except ultimate strain, were sensitive to strain rate and the toughness against fractures remained unchanged, even at high strain rates.

Research Objective and Methods

  • The study aimed to understand the impact of different loading rates on the mechanical properties of the equine hoof wall, particularly their effect on fracture toughness and tensile parameters.
  • The hoof walls of horses were subjected to different loading rates in a compact tension (CT) fracture, tensile, and three-point bending dynamic tests.
  • The tests were conducted using four cross-head rates in CT tests and four strain rates in tensile tests.

Tests and Findings

  • In CT tests, both the initial modulus (Ei) and the stress intensity factor (K) increased as the strain rate went up.
  • The fracture toughness parameter (J) remained constant, irrespective of the level of strain rate.
  • In tensile tests, all parameters, excluding the ultimate strain, were sensitive to the rate of strain. The Ei, total energy required to break, and maximum stress all increased along with the strain rate.
  • Results from low-amplitude dynamic tests matched the Ei trends observed from CT and tensile tests.

Microscopic Examination and Final Observations

  • Through the depth of the hoof wall, the direction of crack growth varied, presenting a trilaminar ply-like pattern.
  • Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) inspections of fracture surfaces showed a decrease in pseudo-ductile behavior with an increasing rate of strain.
  • Despite these findings, the study concluded that the viscoelasticity of the equine hoof wall doesn’t seem to negatively affect its fracture toughness, even at high strain rates.

The research provides an in-depth understanding of how the mechanical properties of horse hooves respond under different levels of strain. While most parameters showed sensitivity to the strain rate, the toughness of the hoof against fractures remained unchanged. These findings could be vital in understanding potential treatments or protective methods for the hooves of equines in different sporting or work environments.

Cite This Article

APA
Kasapi MA, Gosline JM. (1996). Strain-rate-dependent mechanical properties of the equine hoof wall. J Exp Biol, 199(Pt 5), 1133-1146. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.199.5.1133

Publication

ISSN: 0022-0949
NlmUniqueID: 0243705
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 199
Issue: Pt 5
Pages: 1133-1146

Researcher Affiliations

Kasapi, M A
  • Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Gosline, J M

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Biomechanical Phenomena
    • Extremities / physiology
    • Fractures, Bone
    • Horses
    • Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
    • Stress, Mechanical
    • Tensile Strength

    Citations

    This article has been cited 5 times.
    1. Ferreira CMC, Simões BD, Marques EAS, Carbas RJC, da Silva LFM. Exploring Adhesive Performance in Horseshoe Bonding Through Advanced Mechanical and Numerical Analysis. Biomimetics (Basel) 2024 Dec 24;10(1).
      doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10010002pubmed: 39851718google scholar: lookup
    2. Lazarus BS, Chadha C, Velasco-Hogan A, Barbosa JDV, Jasiuk I, Meyers MA. Engineering with keratin: A functional material and a source of bioinspiration. iScience 2021 Aug 20;24(8):102798.
      doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102798pubmed: 34355149google scholar: lookup
    3. Al-Agele R, Paul E, Taylor S, Watson C, Sturrock C, Drakopoulos M, Atwood RC, Rutland CS, Menzies-Gow N, Knowles E, Elliott J, Harris P, Rauch C. Physics of animal health: on the mechano-biology of hoof growth and form. J R Soc Interface 2019 Jun 28;16(155):20190214.
      doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0214pubmed: 31238833google scholar: lookup
    4. Suenaga H, Furukawa KS, Suzuki Y, Takato T, Ushida T. Bone regeneration in calvarial defects in a rat model by implantation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell spheroids. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2015 Nov;26(11):254.
      doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5591-3pubmed: 26449444google scholar: lookup
    5. Liang X, Adie SG, John R, Boppart SA. Dynamic spectral-domain optical coherence elastography for tissue characterization. Opt Express 2010 Jun 21;18(13):14183-90.
      doi: 10.1364/OE.18.014183pubmed: 20588552google scholar: lookup