Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2007; 39(2); 129-135; doi: 10.2746/042516407x170085

Suitability of biocompost as a bedding material for stabled horses: respiratory hygiene and management practicalities.

Abstract: Bedding material in stables has an important influence on air hygiene and information on the suitability of biocompost and wood shavings is incomplete. Objective: To compare the suitability and benefit of biocompost and wood shavings as bedding in horse stables and to determine key air factors for the evaluation of the potential impact of these materials on respiratory health. Methods: The study was conducted in a naturally ventilated stable with 4 horses. Air hygiene parameters were measured 24 h/day for 7 days with each bedding type: ammonia (NH3), inhalable and respirable dust, endotoxins, colony forming units (CFU) of total mesophilic bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes and thermophilic actinomycetes. Both bedding materials were analysed for general chemical composition, particle size distribution and natural microbial content. The animals' behaviour was monitored by video cameras, and their health and cleanliness status determined by clinical and visual examination. Results: Concentrations of NH3, dust, endoxins and fungi were significantly higher during the monitoring period with wood shavings than with biocompost. In contrast concentrations of mesophilic bacteria, mesophilic actinomycetes and thermophilic actinomycetes microbial pollutants were highest with biocompost. The water content of bulk biocompost was considerably higher than that of wood shavings. Particles < or = 0.4 mm were not detectable in bulk wood shavings. The concentration of thermophilic actinomycetes by weight in raw biocompost was 639 times higher than in raw wood shavings. No significant differences were observed in the time spent by the horses lying down. The biocompost material tended to adhere more intensively to the animals' hair coat. Horses showed no clinical signs indicating any adverse effects of the biocompost material during the trials. Conclusions: Biocompost cannot be recommended as bedding material for horses in stables, because the concentration of thermophilic actinomycetes and other agents that elicit and maintain recurrent airway obstructions was significantly higher with biocompost than with wood shavings. To ensure the well-being of horses, any new bedding material must be tested very carefully before it is introduced to the market.
Publication Date: 2007-03-24 PubMed ID: 17378441DOI: 10.2746/042516407x170085Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article is a study that compares the use of biocompost and wood shavings as bedding for stabled horses, with a focus on the impact of both materials on air hygiene and respiratory health.

Objective of the Research

The main aim of this research was to compare biocompost and wood shavings as bedding materials in horse stables. The comparison took into account various factors influencing air hygiene to evaluate the potential impact of these materials on the horses’ respiratory health.

Methods

  • The study was carried out in a naturally ventilated stable with four horses.
  • Various parameters of air hygiene were measured 24 hours a day for seven days with both types of bedding. The hygiene parameters included ammonia (NH3), dust, endotoxins, and different bacteria and fungal populations.
  • Both bedding materials were also analyzed for their chemical composition, particle size, and natural microbial content.
  • The behavior of the horses was monitored using video cameras, and their health status was determined by clinical examination.

Results

  • Higher concentrations of ammonia, dust, endotoxins and fungi were found with the use of wood shavings as bedding.
  • Oppositely, biocompost bedding had higher concentrations of mesophilic bacteria, actinomycetes, and thermophilic actinomycetes – pollutants known to cause and sustain recurrent airway obstructions in horses.
  • Water content was found to be considerably higher in bulk biocompost as compared to wood shavings.
  • The number of thermophilic actinomycetes by weight in raw biocompost was found to be 639 times higher than in raw wood shavings.
  • The horses’ lying down time remained unchanged irrespective of the bedding used.
  • Biocompost was observed to stick more intensively to the horse’s hair coat, though no negative clinical signs were observed from using biocompost during the trials.

Conclusions

The researchers concluded that biocompost is not suitable as a bedding material for horses in stables due to the significantly higher concentration of pollutants that cause and sustain respiratory problems in horses. Despite a higher concentration of some pollutants in wood shavings, the presence of respiratory-impacting pollutants was lesser. Therefore, it was emphasized that rigorous testing is needed before introducing any new bedding material in the market to ensure the well-being of horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Seedorf J, Schröder M, Köhler L, Hartung J. (2007). Suitability of biocompost as a bedding material for stabled horses: respiratory hygiene and management practicalities. Equine Vet J, 39(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516407x170085

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 39
Issue: 2
Pages: 129-135

Researcher Affiliations

Seedorf, J
  • Institute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Behaviour of Farm Animals, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 17p, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
Schröder, M
    Köhler, L
      Hartung, J

        MeSH Terms

        • Air / analysis
        • Air Microbiology
        • Air Pollution, Indoor / analysis
        • Animal Husbandry / methods
        • Animals
        • Dust / analysis
        • Endotoxins / analysis
        • Female
        • Floors and Floorcoverings
        • Fungi / isolation & purification
        • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
        • Horses
        • Hygiene
        • Male
        • Particle Size
        • Respiratory Tract Diseases / prevention & control
        • Respiratory Tract Diseases / veterinary
        • Wood

        Citations

        This article has been cited 4 times.
        1. Kic P, Wohlmuthová M. The Indoor Environment at the University Equestrian Facility in the Autumn Semester: A Case Study. Animals (Basel) 2025 Nov 18;15(22).
          doi: 10.3390/ani15223322pubmed: 41302030google scholar: lookup
        2. Masebo NT, Benedetti B, Mountricha M, Lee L, Padalino B. A Literature Review on Equine Bedding: Impacts on Horse and Human Welfare, Health, and the Environment. Animals (Basel) 2025 Mar 5;15(5).
          doi: 10.3390/ani15050751pubmed: 40076033google scholar: lookup
        3. Mańkowska A, Witkowska D. The Most Common Environmental Risk Factors for Equine Asthma-A Narrative Review. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jul 14;14(14).
          doi: 10.3390/ani14142062pubmed: 39061524google scholar: lookup
        4. Rodzyń I, Karpińska K, Bis-Wencel H, Wlazło Ł, Ossowski M, Strzelec K, Jaguszewski S, Nowakowicz-Dębek B. Exposure to chemical pollutants and biological aerosol in indoor facilities for recreational and sport horses. BMC Vet Res 2024 Feb 28;20(1):78.
          doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-03930-2pubmed: 38413934google scholar: lookup