Analyze Diet
The Journal of experimental biology1999; 202(Pt 5); 543-552; doi: 10.1242/jeb.202.5.543

The development of microcracking and failure in bone depends on the loading mode to which it is adapted.

Abstract: During locomotion, the anterior cortex of the equine radius is loaded predominantly in tension, the posterior predominantly in compression. The anterior cortex is relatively strong in tension, the posterior in compression. We investigated the pattern of failure of specimens from the two cortices using laser scanning confocal microscopy. All specimens were loaded in four-point bending to increasingly higher loads. We quantified the amount of diffuse microcracking on the tensile side of these specimens by observing the amount of light emitted under laser illumination. The amount of light emitted agreed well with subjective estimates of the amount of microcracking. Tensile microcracks first appeared at a strain of approximately 0.004, and all specimens showed considerable growth in microcrack density once the tensile strain had passed approximately 0.008. In specimens from the posterior cortex, there was little compressive microcracking, and such cracks as were present were small and diffuse. These specimens failed on the tensile side first. In specimens from the anterior cortex, compression cracks were more numerous, longer and less diffuse, and specimens failed initially in compression. The patterns of failure in the bone tissues of the two cortices are what would be expected assuming they were adapted to the mode of loading to which they are usually subjected.
Publication Date: 1999-02-04 PubMed ID: 9929457DOI: 10.1242/jeb.202.5.543Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores how the development of microcracking and failure in bone varies depending on the mode of loading it undergoes, with a focus on the equine radius bone.

Research Methodology

  • Specimens from two cortices of the equine radius bone – anterior (front) and posterior (back) – were analyzed. While the anterior cortex is mainly loaded in tension, the posterior is predominantly loaded in compression.
  • The researchers used laser scanning confocal microscopy to examine the pattern of failure in the cortical specimens.
  • All the specimens were subjected to four-point bending at increasingly higher loads.

Microcracking Quantification

  • The researchers quantified the extent of diffuse microcracking on the tensile side of the specimens by observing the amount of light emitted under laser illumination.
  • The results from this light-emission method corresponded well with subjective estimates of the amount of microcracking.
  • In the experiments, tensile microcracks started appearing at a strain of about 0.004, with a significant increase in microcrack density beyond the tensile strain of approximately 0.008.

Specimen Failures and Differences

  • Contrary to the anterior samples, the specimens from the posterior cortex showed only minimal compressive microcracking. These tiny, diffuse cracks caused the specimens to fail first on the tensile side.
  • In the anterior cortex specimens, they found more numerous, longer, and less diffuse compression cracks. These specimens initially failed in compression.

Findings and Conclusions

  • The failure patterns in both anterior and posterior tissues were consistent with their adapted loading modes. Thus, the anterior tissue (adapted to tension) first fails under compression, while the posterior tissue (adapted to compression) first fails under tension.
  • These outcomes support the idea that bone tissues develop microcracks and fail in ways based on the loading conditions to which they are typically exposed.

Cite This Article

APA
Reilly GC, Currey JD. (1999). The development of microcracking and failure in bone depends on the loading mode to which it is adapted. J Exp Biol, 202(Pt 5), 543-552. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.202.5.543

Publication

ISSN: 0022-0949
NlmUniqueID: 0243705
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 202
Issue: Pt 5
Pages: 543-552

Researcher Affiliations

Reilly, G C
  • Department of Biology, University of York, PO Box 373, York YO10 5YW, UK. jdc1@york.ac.uk
Currey, J D

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Bone and Bones / injuries
    • Bone and Bones / physiology
    • Compressive Strength
    • Horses
    • Locomotion
    • Microscopy, Confocal
    • Radius / injuries
    • Radius / physiology
    • Stress, Mechanical
    • Tensile Strength

    Citations

    This article has been cited 28 times.
    1. Mandair GS, Bigelow EMR, Viswanathan G, Ward FS, Patton DM, Schlecht SH, Jepsen KJ, Kohn DH. Region-specific associations among tissue-level mechanical properties, porosity, and composition in human male femora.. J Biomech 2022 Jun;139:111144.
    2. Yan Y, Meng X, Qu C. Modeling of Bimodular Bone Specimen under Four-Point Bending Fatigue Loading.. Materials (Basel) 2022 Jan 8;15(2).
      doi: 10.3390/ma15020474pubmed: 35057192google scholar: lookup
    3. Voulgaris K, Varkoulis A, Zaoutsos S, Stratakis A, Vafidis D. Mechanical defensive adaptations of three Mediterranean sea urchin species.. Ecol Evol 2021 Dec;11(24):17734-17743.
      doi: 10.1002/ece3.8247pubmed: 35003635google scholar: lookup
    4. Meng X, Qu C, Fu D, Qu C. Effects of Fatigue Damage on the Microscopic Modulus of Cortical Bone Using Nanoindentation.. Materials (Basel) 2021 Jun 12;14(12).
      doi: 10.3390/ma14123252pubmed: 34204688google scholar: lookup
    5. Sanz-Herrera JA, Mora-Macías J, Ayensa-Jiménez J, Reina-Romo E, Doweidar MH, Domínguez J, Doblaré M. Data-Driven Computational Simulation in Bone Mechanics.. Ann Biomed Eng 2021 Jan;49(1):407-419.
      doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02550-9pubmed: 32681405google scholar: lookup
    6. Nguyen JT, Barak MM. Secondary osteon structural heterogeneity between the cranial and caudal cortices of the proximal humerus in white-tailed deer.. J Exp Biol 2020 Jun 11;223(Pt 11).
      doi: 10.1242/jeb.225482pubmed: 32366689google scholar: lookup
    7. Ryvkin M, Slesarenko V, Cherkaev A, Rudykh S. Fault-tolerant elastic-plastic lattice material.. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2020 Jan 10;378(2162):20190107.
      doi: 10.1098/rsta.2019.0107pubmed: 31760907google scholar: lookup
    8. Watad A, Bridgewood C, Russell T, Marzo-Ortega H, Cuthbert R, McGonagle D. The Early Phases of Ankylosing Spondylitis: Emerging Insights From Clinical and Basic Science.. Front Immunol 2018;9:2668.
      doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02668pubmed: 30505307google scholar: lookup
    9. Bradfield J. Identifying animal taxa used to manufacture bone tools during the Middle Stone Age at Sibudu, South Africa: Results of a CT-rendered histological analysis.. PLoS One 2018;13(11):e0208319.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208319pubmed: 30496272google scholar: lookup
    10. Skedros JG, Su SC, Knight AN, Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN. Advancing the deer calcaneus model for bone adaptation studies: ex vivo strains obtained after transecting the tension members suggest an unrecognized important role for shear strains.. J Anat 2019 Jan;234(1):66-82.
      doi: 10.1111/joa.12905pubmed: 30411344google scholar: lookup
    11. Winters M, Burr DB, van der Hoeven H, Condon KW, Bellemans J, Moen MH. Microcrack-associated bone remodeling is rarely observed in biopsies from athletes with medial tibial stress syndrome.. J Bone Miner Metab 2019 May;37(3):496-502.
      doi: 10.1007/s00774-018-0945-9pubmed: 30066165google scholar: lookup
    12. Mayya A, Praveen P, Banerjee A, Rajesh R. Splitting fracture in bovine bone using a porosity-based spring network model.. J R Soc Interface 2016 Nov;13(124).
      doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0809pubmed: 27903786google scholar: lookup
    13. Wolfram U, Schwiedrzik J. Post-yield and failure properties of cortical bone.. Bonekey Rep 2016;5:829.
      doi: 10.1038/bonekey.2016.60pubmed: 27579166google scholar: lookup
    14. Seref-Ferlengez Z, Kennedy OD, Schaffler MB. Bone microdamage, remodeling and bone fragility: how much damage is too much damage?. Bonekey Rep 2015;4:644.
      doi: 10.1038/bonekey.2015.11pubmed: 25848533google scholar: lookup
    15. Stock SR. The Mineral-Collagen Interface in Bone.. Calcif Tissue Int 2015 Sep;97(3):262-80.
      doi: 10.1007/s00223-015-9984-6pubmed: 25824581google scholar: lookup
    16. Yang PF, Sanno M, Ganse B, Koy T, Brüggemann GP, Müller LP, Rittweger J. Torsion and antero-posterior bending in the in vivo human tibia loading regimes during walking and running.. PLoS One 2014;9(4):e94525.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094525pubmed: 24732724google scholar: lookup
    17. Mayya A, Banerjee A, Rajesh R. Mammalian cortical bone in tension is non-Haversian.. Sci Rep 2013;3:2533.
      doi: 10.1038/srep02533pubmed: 23982482google scholar: lookup
    18. Trębacz H, Zdunek A, Cybulska J, Pieczywek P. Effects of fatigue on microstructure and mechanical properties of bone organic matrix under compression.. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2013 Mar;36(1):43-54.
      doi: 10.1007/s13246-013-0185-1pubmed: 23393006google scholar: lookup
    19. Huang H, Richards M, Bedair T, Fields HW, Palomo JM, Johnston WM, Kim DG. Effects of orthodontic treatment on human alveolar bone density distribution.. Clin Oral Investig 2013 Dec;17(9):2033-40.
      doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0906-ypubmed: 23262643google scholar: lookup
    20. Skedros JG, Sybrowsky CL, Anderson WE, Chow F. Relationships between in vivo microdamage and the remarkable regional material and strain heterogeneity of cortical bone of adult deer, elk, sheep and horse calcanei.. J Anat 2011 Dec;219(6):722-33.
    21. Chapurlat RD, Delmas PD. Bone microdamage: a clinical perspective.. Osteoporos Int 2009 Aug;20(8):1299-308.
      doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0899-9pubmed: 19291343google scholar: lookup
    22. Doube M, Wiktorowicz-Conroy A, Christiansen P, Hutchinson JR, Shefelbine S. Three-dimensional geometric analysis of felid limb bone allometry.. PLoS One 2009;4(3):e4742.
      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004742pubmed: 19270749google scholar: lookup
    23. Leng H, Dong XN, Wang X. Progressive post-yield behavior of human cortical bone in compression for middle-aged and elderly groups.. J Biomech 2009 Mar 11;42(4):491-7.
    24. Dong XN, Guda T, Millwater HR, Wang X. Probabilistic failure analysis of bone using a finite element model of mineral-collagen composites.. J Biomech 2009 Feb 9;42(3):202-9.
    25. Vashishth D. Small animal bone biomechanics.. Bone 2008 Nov;43(5):794-7.
      doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.06.013pubmed: 18672104google scholar: lookup
    26. Hazenberg JG, Taylor D, Lee TC. The role of osteocytes and bone microstructure in preventing osteoporotic fractures.. Osteoporos Int 2007 Jan;18(1):1-8.
      doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0222-ypubmed: 16972016google scholar: lookup
    27. Wang X, Qian C. Prediction of microdamage formation using a mineral-collagen composite model of bone.. J Biomech 2006;39(4):595-602.
    28. Boyde A. The real response of bone to exercise.. J Anat 2003 Aug;203(2):173-89.