Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record2026; doi: 10.1002/vetr.70804

The effect of romifidine on endoscopic grading of laryngeal function in horses.

Abstract: To our knowledge, the effect of sedation with romifidine on the grading of laryngeal function in horses has not been studied. Our objective was to examine the effects of romifidine on the grading of laryngeal function and the cross-sectional area of the rima glottis (CSARG). Methods: Ten horses underwent three endoscopic examinations of the larynx: once while unsedated (group R1), once after being sedated with romifidine (0.04 mg/kg intravenously; group R2) and once again, while still sedated, after receiving a repeat dose of romifidine (0.08 mg/kg intravenously, total dose; group R3). The recorded examinations were randomised and examined by three blinded reviewers who graded laryngeal function. The CSARG was measured from still images obtained during peak inspiration. Results: Sedation had no significant effect on the endoscopic laryngeal function grade assigned. There was no statistical difference in CSARG between Groups R1 and R2 (p = 0.164). Significant reduction in CSARG was noted between Groups R1 and R3 (p < 0.001) and Groups R2 and R3 (p = 0.045). Conclusions: The low number of horses examined may have resulted in the analyses being insufficiently powered. As such, the findings should be interpreted cautiously. Conclusions: A dose of 0.04 mg/kg romifidine administered intravenously had no significant effect on horses' laryngeal function grade and CSARG.
Publication Date: 2026-05-22 PubMed ID: 42170716DOI: 10.1002/vetr.70804Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated how sedation with romifidine, a sedative drug, affects the assessment of laryngeal (voice box) function in horses using endoscopy.
  • The researchers aimed to determine if romifidine influences the grading of laryngeal function or the physical measurement of the rima glottis (the opening of the vocal cords) during breathing.

Background

  • Laryngeal function in horses is important for breathing and performance, and it is commonly assessed via endoscopy.
  • Romifidine is a sedative used in veterinary medicine, but its effect on the evaluation of laryngeal function had not been studied prior to this research.
  • Understanding whether sedation interferes with diagnostic accuracy is critical for proper clinical evaluation.

Objectives

  • To examine how sedation with differing doses of romifidine affects endoscopic grading of laryngeal function in horses.
  • To analyze whether the cross-sectional area of the rima glottis (CSARG), a key measurement indicating airway patency, changes under sedation.

Methods

  • Ten horses were selected and underwent three separate laryngeal endoscopic examinations:
    • Group R1: While unsedated (control baseline).
    • Group R2: After intravenous administration of 0.04 mg/kg of romifidine.
    • Group R3: After a repeat dose totaling 0.08 mg/kg intravenous romifidine, still sedated.
  • The order of recorded examinations was randomized to reduce bias.
  • Three independent reviewers, blinded to treatment groups, graded the laryngeal function based on the endoscopic videos.
  • Measurements of the cross-sectional area of the rima glottis (CSARG) were taken from still frames at peak inspiration (the moment when the airway is most open).

Results

  • There was no significant change in the endoscopic grading of laryngeal function between unsedated horses (R1) and those sedated with the initial romifidine dose (R2).
  • The CSARG showed no statistical difference between groups R1 (no sedation) and R2 (0.04 mg/kg romifidine), indicating the low dose did not alter the size of the airway opening significantly.
  • However, a significant reduction in CSARG was noted when comparing:
    • Group R1 (no sedation) and Group R3 (higher dose 0.08 mg/kg romifidine).
    • Group R2 (lower dose 0.04 mg/kg) and Group R3 (higher dose 0.08 mg/kg).
  • This means that the higher dose of romifidine slightly decreased the effective airway opening.

Conclusions

  • The study suggests that a low dose of romifidine (0.04 mg/kg intravenously) does not significantly influence the clinical grading of laryngeal function or airway size in horses.
  • Higher sedation levels (0.08 mg/kg total dose) may reduce the cross-sectional area of the airway, potentially impacting assessments.
  • The small sample size (only ten horses) may have limited the statistical power, so findings should be interpreted with caution.
  • These results imply that low-dose romifidine can be used without major concern for altering laryngeal function assessment, but higher doses may affect measurement outcomes.

Implications for Veterinary Practice

  • Veterinarians can consider using low-dose romifidine sedation when conducting laryngeal endoscopy without fearing interference with grading accuracy.
  • Caution is warranted when higher doses of romifidine are used, as sedation may influence airway measurements.
  • Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm these findings and better understand sedation impacts on laryngeal function evaluation.

Cite This Article

APA
Murphy C, Baglioni M, Lepage OM, Schumacher J, Kelleher L, Burke J, Gangl M. (2026). The effect of romifidine on endoscopic grading of laryngeal function in horses. Vet Rec. https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.70804

Publication

ISSN: 2042-7670
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Murphy, Catherine
  • Centre of Equine Health, École Nationale Vétérinaire de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, University of Lyon, Marcy L'Étoile, France.
Baglioni, Matteo
  • Centre of Equine Health, École Nationale Vétérinaire de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, University of Lyon, Marcy L'Étoile, France.
Lepage, Olivier M
  • Centre of Equine Health, École Nationale Vétérinaire de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, University of Lyon, Marcy L'Étoile, France.
Schumacher, James
  • Centre of Equine Health, École Nationale Vétérinaire de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, University of Lyon, Marcy L'Étoile, France.
Kelleher, Lucy
  • Centre of Equine Health, École Nationale Vétérinaire de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, University of Lyon, Marcy L'Étoile, France.
Burke, Joseph
  • Centre of Equine Health, École Nationale Vétérinaire de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, University of Lyon, Marcy L'Étoile, France.
Gangl, Monika
  • Centre of Equine Health, École Nationale Vétérinaire de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, University of Lyon, Marcy L'Étoile, France.

References

This article includes 26 references
  1. Higgins AJ, Snyder JR, editors. The equine manual E‐book. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier; 2013.
  2. Folgmann MS, Stock KF, Feige K, Delling U. Clinical findings of candidate stallions presented for licensing at all German Warmblood horse‐breeding associations in 2018–2020. Equine Vet J 2025;57(6):1584–1591.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14474google scholar: lookup
  3. Norm G Ducharme, Jon Cheetham. 26 ‐ Abnormalities of the upper airway. In: Hinchcliff KW, Kaneps AJ, Geor RJ, editors. Equine sports medicine and surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2014. p. 549–6.
  4. Ellis KL, Contino EK, Nout‐Lomas YS. Poor performance in the horse: diagnosing the non‐orthopaedic causes. Equine Vet Educ 2023;35:208–224.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13712google scholar: lookup
  5. Almonte H, Schumacher J, Johnson CR, Berk JT, Bell RP. Effect of a combination of butorphanol and detomidine on endoscopic assessment of laryngeal function in Thoroughbred yearlings. Vet Rec 2022;190(9):e1483.
    doi: 10.1002/vetr.1483google scholar: lookup
  6. Stick JA, Peloso JG, Morehead JP, Lloyd J, Eberhart S, Padungtod P. Endoscopic assessment of airway function as a predictor of racing performance in Thoroughbred yearlings: 427 cases (1997–2000). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;219:962–7.
  7. Dixon PM, McGorum BC, Railton DI. Clinical and endoscopic evidence of progression in 152 cases of equine recurrent laryngeal neuropathy (RLN). Equine Vet J 2002;34:29–34.
  8. Stick JA, Prange T. Respiratory system. In: Auer JA, Stick JA, editors. Equine surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2018.
  9. Lane JG. Recurrent laryngeal neuropathy. In: Railton D, editor. Proceedings of the fifteenth Bain‐Fallon memorial lectures. Glen Huntly, Victoria: Australian Equine Veterinary Association; 1993. p. 173–192.
  10. Dixon PM, Robinson E, Wade JF. Havemeyer Foundation Monograph Series No. 11. In: Proceedings of a workshop on equine recurrent laryngeal neuropathy. Stratford‐upon‐Avon, England: Havemeyer Foundation; 2004. p. 93–7.
  11. Kelly PG, Reardon RJM, Johnston MS, Pollock PJ. Comparison of dynamic and resting endoscopy of the upper portion of the respiratory tract in 57 Thoroughbred yearlings. Equine Vet J 2013;45:700–4.
  12. Lane JG, Bladon B, Little DRM, Naylor JRJ, Franklin SH. Dynamic obstructions of the equine upper respiratory tract. Part 2: Comparison of endoscopic findings at rest and during high‐speed treadmill exercise of 600 Thoroughbred racehorses. Equine Vet J 2006;38(5):401–408.
  13. Hardwick JL, Ahern BJ, Crawford KL, Allen KJ, Franklin SH. Yearling laryngeal function in Thoroughbreds that underwent a laryngoplasty differs from controls. Equine Vet J 2025;57(2):431–440.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14110google scholar: lookup
  14. Parkin TDH, Brown J, Macdonald EB. Occupational risks of working with horses: a questionnaire survey of equine veterinary surgeons. Equine Vet Educ 2018;30:200–5.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12891google scholar: lookup
  15. Arche RM, Lindsay WA, Duncan ID. A comparison of techniques to enhance the evaluation of equine laryngeal function. Equine Vet J 1991;23:104–107.
  16. Ducharme NG, Hackett RP, Fubini SL, Erb HN. The reliability of endoscopic examination in the assessment of arytenoid cartilage movement in horses. Part II: Influence of the side of examination, reexamination, and sedation.. Vet Surg 1991;20:180–4.
  17. Lindegaard C, Husted L, Ullum H, Fjeldborg J. Sedation with detomidine and acepromazine influences the endoscopic evaluation of laryngeal function in horses.. Equine Vet J 2010;39:553–6.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407x204177google scholar: lookup
  18. Tattersalls. 2025 Tattersalls Sales—Repository: a secure online facility for the centralised viewing of pre‐sale x‐rays and video endoscopies. Newmarket (UK): Tattersalls; 2025. Accessed October 13, 2025. https://secure.tattersalls.com:8443/4DCGI/Sale/Documentation/WSD01493.pdf
  19. Hackett RP, Ducharme NG, Fubini SL, Erb HN. The reliability of endoscopic examination in assessment of arytenoid cartilage movement in horses. Part I: Subjective and objective laryngeal evaluation.. Vet Surg 1991;20:174–9.
  20. Leutton JL, Lumsden JM. Dynamic respiratory endoscopic findings pre‐ and post‐laryngoplasty in Thoroughbred race‐horses.. Equine Vet J 2014;47(5):531–6.
  21. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.. Biochem Med 2012;22(3):276–282.
  22. Collins N, Milne E, Hahn C, Dixon P. Correlation of the Havemeyer endoscopic laryngeal grading system with histopathological changes in equine cricoarytenoideus dorsalis muscles.. Ir Vet J 2009;62:334–8.
  23. Barakzai SZ, Dixon PM. Correlation of resting and exercising endoscopic findings for horses with dynamic laryngeal collapse and palatal dysfunction.. Equine Vet J 2011;43:18–23.
  24. McLellan J, Plevin S. Evaluation of videoendoscopic examinations of arytenoid function in the 2‐year‐old Thoroughbred: can we all agree?. Equine Vet J 2019;51:364.
  25. Perkins JD, Salz RO, Schumacher J, Livesey L, Piercy RJ, Barakzai SZ. Variability of resting endoscopic grading for assessment of recurrent laryngeal neuropathy in horses.. Equine Vet J 2009;41(4):342–6.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409x423073google scholar: lookup
  26. Hardwick J, Ahern B, Franklin S. A first step towards objective grading of equine laryngeal function.. Vet J 2024;308:106259.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.