Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2000; 32(4); 287-294; doi: 10.2746/042516400777032237

The forelimb in walking horses: 1. Kinematics and ground reaction forces.

Abstract: Video (60 Hz) and force (2000 Hz) data were collected from 5 sound horses during walking. Forelimb data were analysed for 8 strides (4 left, 4 right) per horse to determine sagittal plane kinematics and ground reaction forces (GRFs). The results suggested that brachial rotation was responsible for protraction and retraction of the limb as a whole, while rotations of the scapula and antebrachium elevated the distal limb during breakover and early swing then lowered it in preparation for ground contact. The coffin joint was flexed maximally at the time of peak longitudinal braking force, which occurred during breakover of the contralateral forelimb. The metacarpus was vertical at 28% stride. This was considerably earlier than the change from a braking to a propulsive longitudinal force (34% stride), which coincided with maximal extension of the fetlock joint. The longitudinal propulsive force peaked just after contact of the contralateral forelimb. During the swing phase the joints distal to the shoulder showed a single flexion cycle that peaked at 76% stride at the carpus, 81% stride at the fetlock and 84% stride at the elbow and coffin joints. The coffin and shoulder joints began to extend in the terminal swing phase and continued to extend through ground contact and early stance. The results provide normative data that will be applied in detecting changes in kinematics and ground reaction forces that are associated with specific lamenesses.
Publication Date: 2000-08-22 PubMed ID: 10952376DOI: 10.2746/042516400777032237Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates the forelimb movements and ground reaction forces of a horse during walking, concluding that the rotation of different parts of the limb results in elevation and lowering of the limb for ground contact and that the movements of the forelimb vary throughout different phases of a stride.

Objective of the Study

  • The goal of this research was to analyse the forelimb movements and ground reaction forces (GRFs) of a walking horse, with the eventual aim of using this normative data to detect changes in kinematics and GRFs linked to specific lamenesses in horses.

Methodology of the Study

  • The researchers used video (60Hz) and force (2000Hz) data gathered from five horses to evaluate the walking pattern of the horses.
  • The team focused on eight strides for each horse (four left and four right) to gain a comprehensive understanding of the horse’s locomotion.

Key Findings and Conclusions

  • The study found that the rotation of the brachium (essentially the “arm” part of the horse, from shoulder to elbow) controls the protraction (forward) and retraction (backward) movements of the limb.
  • The scapula (shoulder blade) and antebrachium (forearm, elbow to knee equivalent in human anatomy) rotations increase the distance of the limb from the ground during breakover and early swing, and later lower it for ground contact.
  • The coffin joint, which corresponds roughly to a human’s knuckle joint at the base of the fingers, flexes most when the opposing forelimb is at the breakover phase of its stride, which is when the braking force is the strongest.
  • The study also points out that the changeover from braking to propulsion force in the stride happens later than when the metacarpus (similar to the human hand from wrist to knuckles) is vertical, coinciding with the maximal extension of the fetlock joint (similar to the human finger joints).
  • In the swing phase, the horse’s joints exhibit a single flexion cycle that peaked sequentially at the carpus (wrist equivalent), fetlock, elbow and coffin joints. The coffin and shoulder joints began to extend towards the end of the swing phase and continued to do so through ground contact and early stance.
  • This study’s results offer valuable information about the natural mechanics of a horse’s walk and may be used in future efforts to identify lameness within horses based on changes in their walking patterns.

Cite This Article

APA
Hodson E, Clayton HM, Lanovaz JL. (2000). The forelimb in walking horses: 1. Kinematics and ground reaction forces. Equine Vet J, 32(4), 287-294. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516400777032237

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 32
Issue: 4
Pages: 287-294

Researcher Affiliations

Hodson, E
  • Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824, USA.
Clayton, H M
    Lanovaz, J L

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Biomechanical Phenomena
      • Forelimb / physiology
      • Horses / physiology
      • Stress, Mechanical
      • Walking / physiology
      • Weight-Bearing

      Citations

      This article has been cited 14 times.
      1. Crecan CM, Peștean CP. Inertial Sensor Technologies-Their Role in Equine Gait Analysis, a Review. Sensors (Basel) 2023 Jul 11;23(14).
        doi: 10.3390/s23146301pubmed: 37514599google scholar: lookup
      2. Parmentier JIM, Bosch S, van der Zwaag BJ, Weishaupt MA, Gmel AI, Havinga PJM, van Weeren PR, Braganca FMS. Prediction of continuous and discrete kinetic parameters in horses from inertial measurement units data using recurrent artificial neural networks. Sci Rep 2023 Jan 13;13(1):740.
        doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27899-4pubmed: 36639409google scholar: lookup
      3. Pagliara E, Marenchino M, Antenucci L, Costantini M, Zoppi G, Giacobini MDL, Bullone M, Riccio B, Bertuglia A. Fetlock Joint Angle Pattern and Range of Motion Quantification Using Two Synchronized Wearable Inertial Sensors per Limb in Sound Horses and Horses with Single Limb Naturally Occurring Lameness. Vet Sci 2022 Aug 25;9(9).
        doi: 10.3390/vetsci9090456pubmed: 36136672google scholar: lookup
      4. Weihmann T. The Smooth Transition From Many-Legged to Bipedal Locomotion-Gradual Leg Force Reduction and its Impact on Total Ground Reaction Forces, Body Dynamics and Gait Transitions. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021;9:769684.
        doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.769684pubmed: 35186911google scholar: lookup
      5. Hatrisse C, Macaire C, Sapone M, Hebert C, Hanne-Poujade S, De Azevedo E, Marin F, Martin P, Chateau H. Stance Phase Detection by Inertial Measurement Unit Placed on the Metacarpus of Horses Trotting on Hard and Soft Straight Lines and Circles. Sensors (Basel) 2022 Jan 18;22(3).
        doi: 10.3390/s22030703pubmed: 35161452google scholar: lookup
      6. Sapone M, Martin P, Ben Mansour K, Chateau H, Marin F. The Protraction and Retraction Angles of Horse Limbs: An Estimation during Trotting Using Inertial Sensors. Sensors (Basel) 2021 May 30;21(11).
        doi: 10.3390/s21113792pubmed: 34070859google scholar: lookup
      7. Egenvall A, Engström H, Byström A. Kinematic effects of the circle with and without rider in walking horses. PeerJ 2020;8:e10354.
        doi: 10.7717/peerj.10354pubmed: 33240661google scholar: lookup
      8. Sapone M, Martin P, Ben Mansour K, Château H, Marin F. Comparison of Trotting Stance Detection Methods from an Inertial Measurement Unit Mounted on the Horse's Limb. Sensors (Basel) 2020 May 25;20(10).
        doi: 10.3390/s20102983pubmed: 32466104google scholar: lookup
      9. Devillers N, Janvier E, Delijani F, Méthot S, Dick KJ, Zhang Q, Connor L. Effect of Slat and Gap Width of Slatted Concrete Flooring on Sow Gait Using Kinematics Analysis. Animals (Basel) 2019 Apr 30;9(5).
        doi: 10.3390/ani9050206pubmed: 31052233google scholar: lookup
      10. Hagen J, Kojah K, Geiger M. Correlations between the equine metacarpophalangeal joint angulation and toe conformation in statics. Open Vet J 2018;8(1):96-103.
        doi: 10.4314/ovj.v8i1.15pubmed: 29721438google scholar: lookup
      11. Hyun SH, Ryew CC. Motor ability of forelimb both on- and off-riding during walk and trot cadence of horse. J Exerc Rehabil 2016 Feb;12(1):60-5.
        doi: 10.12965/jer.160278pubmed: 26933662google scholar: lookup
      12. Finno CJ, Stevens C, Young A, Affolter V, Joshi NA, Ramsay S, Bannasch DL. SERPINB11 frameshift variant associated with novel hoof specific phenotype in Connemara ponies. PLoS Genet 2015 Apr;11(4):e1005122.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005122pubmed: 25875171google scholar: lookup
      13. Brown NA, Pandy MG, Kawcak CE, McIlwraith CW. Force- and moment-generating capacities of muscles in the distal forelimb of the horse. J Anat 2003 Jul;203(1):101-13.
      14. Faulkner JE, Joostens Z, Broeckx BJG, Hauspie S, Mariën T, Vanderperren K. Follow-Up Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Sagittal Groove Disease of the Equine Proximal Phalanx Using a Classification System in 29 Non-Racing Sports Horses. Animals (Basel) 2023 Dec 21;14(1).
        doi: 10.3390/ani14010034pubmed: 38200766google scholar: lookup