Analyze Diet
Parasitology research2019; 118(10); 2877-2883; doi: 10.1007/s00436-019-06423-6

The importance of anthelmintic efficacy monitoring: results of an outreach effort.

Abstract: Anthelmintic resistance in equine cyathostomin parasites is widespread. A surveillance-based parasite control program using fecal egg counts (FECs) and fecal egg count reduction tests (FECRTs) to decrease anthelmintic use and monitor treatment efficacy is recommended. The purpose of this study was to examine shifts in equine parasite control program management practices via a short course presented by the Penn State Extension, and to highlight how data collected from these programs is useful for monitoring anthelmintic efficacy on a large scale. Horse owners were enrolled after participating in a short course and filled out questionnaire surveys about their parasite management programs pre and post study, horse information, and farm information. FECs were performed at three time points, and horses above a 300 strongyle eggs per gram cut-off were treated with pyrantel pamoate, fenbendazole, or ivermectin. Two weeks post-treatment, FECRTs were performed to determine treatment efficacy, which included 29 farms with 513 individual treatments. Prior to the study, only 30.6% of farms used FECs, but after the study, 97.3% of farms said they would use FECs in the future. Horses were given an average of 4.1 anthelmintic treatments per year before the study, and post study 89.2% of farms were able to reduce the number of anthelmintic treatments used. Fenbendazole was effective on zero farms, pyrantel pamoate on 7.4% of farms, and ivermectin on 92.9% of farms. This outreach project helped generate information about anthelmintic efficacy levels, causing a shift in practices on participating farms, and collected useful anthelmintic resistance data.
Publication Date: 2019-08-17 PubMed ID: 31422463DOI: 10.1007/s00436-019-06423-6Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study shows the transformation of equine parasitic control practices following an educational program that emphasized the importance of monitoring the effectiveness of deworming medications. The researchers found that the participating horse owners successfully reduced the amount of deworming medications used on the farm, while also discovering the resistance level of three common deworming drugs.

Context and Methodology

  • The research evaluated the effects of an educational program organized by the Penn State Extension designed to teach horse owners about fecal egg counts (FECs) and fecal egg count reduction tests (FECRTs), which are used to monitor the efficacy of deworming treatments and the presence of resistant worm species in horses.
  • Participating horse owners were subjected to a survey both pre and post study to understand their parasitic control practices and to collect data about their horses and farms. FECs were performed at three time points.
  • Only those horses that had a strongyle egg count of over 300 per gram in their feces were treated with one of three common anthelmintic (deworming) drugs, namely pyrantel pamoate, fenbendazole, or ivermectin. The efficacy of these treatments was then evaluated via FECRTs two weeks post-treatment.

Results and Implications

  • Before participating in the educational program, only 30.6% of the farms utilized FECs. Following the program, 97.3% of farms expressed an intention to use FECs moving forward. This shows the effectiveness of education in transforming existing practices.
  • Additionally, participating farms were able to reduce the average number of deworming treatments given to their horses from 4.1 per year to less following the study. This reduction is directly related to the increased adoption of FECs, which enables farmers to treat only those horses that require it, rather than administering general prophylactic treatments.
  • Analysis of the efficacy of the three anthelmintic drugs demonstrated widespread resistance, especially against fenbendazole (which worked on zero farms) and pyrantel pamoate (effective only on 7.4% of farms). Ivermectin was found to be the most effective treatment, working on 92.9% of farms.
  • The massive collected data on anthelmintic resistance is a crucial contribution to the scientific community’s understanding of anthelmintic resistance levels, which is important to guide evidence-based recommendations for equine parasitic control.

Cite This Article

APA
Cain JL, Foulk D, Jedrzejewski E, Stofanak H, Nielsen MK. (2019). The importance of anthelmintic efficacy monitoring: results of an outreach effort. Parasitol Res, 118(10), 2877-2883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06423-6

Publication

ISSN: 1432-1955
NlmUniqueID: 8703571
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 118
Issue: 10
Pages: 2877-2883

Researcher Affiliations

Cain, Jennifer L
  • M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. jennifer.cain@uky.edu.
Foulk, Donna
  • Penn State Extension, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Jedrzejewski, Edward
  • Department of Animal Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Stofanak, Heather
  • Penn State Extension, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Nielsen, Martin K
  • M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Antinematodal Agents / therapeutic use
  • Drug Resistance / drug effects
  • Farms
  • Feces / parasitology
  • Fenbendazole / therapeutic use
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology
  • Horses
  • Ivermectin / therapeutic use
  • Parasite Egg Count / veterinary
  • Pyrantel Pamoate / therapeutic use
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

References

This article includes 19 references
  1. Vet Parasitol. 1999 Aug 31;85(2-3):113-21; discussion 121-2, 215-25
    pubmed: 10485358
  2. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2004 Sep 15;225(6):903-10
    pubmed: 15485051
  3. Can Vet J. 2006 Jan;47(1):80-2
    pubmed: 16536234
  4. Parasit Vectors. 2009 Sep 25;2 Suppl 2:S2
    pubmed: 19778463
  5. Vet Parasitol. 2010 Oct 29;173(3-4):349-52
    pubmed: 20675055
  6. Vet Parasitol. 2010 Nov 24;174(1-2):77-84
    pubmed: 20850927
  7. Vet Parasitol. 2012 Dec 21;190(3-4):461-6
    pubmed: 22877828
  8. Parasit Vectors. 2014 Jan 24;7:48
    pubmed: 24460700
  9. Vet Parasitol. 2014 Mar 17;201(1-2):1-8
    pubmed: 24485565
  10. Equine Vet J. 2015 Nov;47(6):694-700
    pubmed: 25196091
  11. Int J Parasitol. 2015 Mar;45(4):237-42
    pubmed: 25592965
  12. Vet Parasitol. 2015 Nov 30;214(1-2):139-43
    pubmed: 26518644
  13. Vet Parasitol. 2016 Mar 15;218:93-7
    pubmed: 26872934
  14. Int J Parasitol. 2018 Feb;48(2):97-105
    pubmed: 29050919
  15. Vet Parasitol. 2018 Jan 30;250:45-51
    pubmed: 29329623
  16. Vet Parasitol. 2018 Aug 15;259:53-60
    pubmed: 30056984
  17. Vet Parasitol. 2018 Aug 15;259:6-12
    pubmed: 30056985
  18. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2018 Dec;14:25-31
    pubmed: 31014733
  19. Equine Vet J. 1995 Mar;27(2):127-30
    pubmed: 7607145

Citations

This article has been cited 7 times.
  1. Hamad MH, Jitsamai W, Chinkangsadarn T, Ngangam TS, Wattanapornpilom T, Naraporn D, Ouisuwan S, Taweethavonsawat P. Prevalence, risk factors, and species diversity of strongylid nematodes in domesticated Thai horses: insights from ITS-2 rDNA metabarcoding. Parasitol Res 2024 Dec 17;123(12):410.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-024-08438-0pubmed: 39688721google scholar: lookup
  2. Macdonald SL, Abbas G, Ghafar A, Gauci CG, Bauquier J, El-Hage C, Tennent-Brown B, Wilkes EJA, Beasley A, Jacobson C, Cudmore L, Carrigan P, Hurley J, Beveridge I, Hughes KJ, Nielsen MK, Jabbar A. Egg reappearance periods of anthelmintics against equine cyathostomins: The state of play revisited. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2023 Apr;21:28-39.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2022.12.002pubmed: 36543048google scholar: lookup
  3. Nielsen MK. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: Current status and emerging trends. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2022 Dec;20:76-88.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2022.10.005pubmed: 36342004google scholar: lookup
  4. Dauparaitė E, Kupčinskas T, Hoglund J, Petkevičius S. A Survey of Control Strategies for Equine Small Strongyles in Lithuania. Helminthologia 2021 Sep;58(3):225-232.
    doi: 10.2478/helm-2021-0031pubmed: 34934386google scholar: lookup
  5. Dauparaitė E, Kupčinskas T, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Petkevičius S. Anthelmintic resistance of horse strongyle nematodes to ivermectin and pyrantel in Lithuania. Acta Vet Scand 2021 Jan 25;63(1):5.
    doi: 10.1186/s13028-021-00569-zpubmed: 33494770google scholar: lookup
  6. Scala A, Tamponi C, Sanna G, Predieri G, Dessì G, Sedda G, Buono F, Cappai MG, Veneziano V, Varcasia A. Gastrointestinal Strongyles Egg Excretion in Relation to Age, Gender, and Management of Horses in Italy. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 3;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122283pubmed: 33287298google scholar: lookup
  7. Sazmand A, Bahari A, Papi S, Otranto D. Parasitic diseases of equids in Iran (1931-2020): a literature review. Parasit Vectors 2020 Nov 19;13(1):586.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04472-wpubmed: 33213507google scholar: lookup