The influence of various confounding factors on mechanical nociceptive thresholds in the donkey.
Abstract: To evaluate a mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) testing device in the donkey, and to investigate the influence of potential confounders on MNTs generated. Methods: Prospective, randomised. Methods: Sixteen castrated male donkeys aged 4-9 years, weighing 105-170 kg. Methods: Mechanical nociceptive thresholds were measured using an actuator with three pins placed on the dorsal aspect of the distal limb, connected to a force meter. The pins (surface area 15 mm(2) ) were extruded onto the limb by pressurising an air-filled syringe, until the MNT force (when foot-lift was observed) or 25 N (cut-off force) was reached. Effect on MNT of presence of a companion donkey, the limb tested, rate of application of force, testing location, level of distraction, ambient temperature and hair cover at the test site was evaluated. Long and short-term repeatability of MNT was assessed. Data were analysed using general linear models and Mann-Whitney U tests, p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Increasing the rate of force application significantly increased the mean ± SD MNT from 9.2 ± 2.0 N when applied at 0.4 N sec(-1) to 10.6 ± 2.1 N when applied at 1.2 N sec(-1) (p = 0.001). No other factors significantly influenced MNT. Mean MNT remained stable over a 3 week period, however MNTs were significantly (p = 0.006) higher (12.8 ± 3.0 N cf 10.3 ± 1.9 N) after a 12 month interval. Conclusions: When designing studies measuring MNT in donkeys, rate of application of force must be standardised. Donkeys' MNTs have good short-term stability suggesting this technique is appropriate for short-term analgesiometry studies; however variability of MNTs over the long-term is greater.
© 2014 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia.
Publication Date: 2014-02-27 PubMed ID: 24576142DOI: 10.1111/vaa.12132Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research evaluates a mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) testing device in donkeys and investigates the influence of several confounders on MNT. The study found that the application rate of force must be standardized in MNT studies in donkeys and indicated a good short-term stability with greater long-term variability.
Study Methods and Participants
- The study involved a set of sixteen castrated male donkeys that were aged between 4-9 years and weighed between 105-170 kg.
- Mechanical nociceptive thresholds were measured using a device consisting of an actuator with three pins placed on the upper side of the donkey’s lower leg and connected to a force meter.
- The pins were forced onto the limb by pressurizing an air-filled syringe until the MNT force was reached or a 25 N cut-off force was hit. The MNT force recognized is the force at which a foot lift is observed.
- The influence of several factors was studied including the presence of a companion donkey, the limb being tested, the rate of application of force, the testing location, the level of distraction, the ambient room temperature, and hair cover at the test site.
- The long and short-term repeatability of MNT was also taken into consideration. The data were analyzed using general linear models and Mann-Whitney U tests with p < 0.05 considered as significant.
Study Findings
- The results showed that increasing the rate of force application significantly increased the mean MNT. The average MNT increased from 9.2 ± 2.0 N when applied at 0.4 N sec(-1) to 10.6 ± 2.1 N when applied at 1.2 N sec(-1).
- None of the other factors (presence of companion donkey, limb tested, testing location, level of distraction, ambient temperature, hair cover at the test site) significantly influenced the MNT.
- On the issue of stability, the mean MNT remained stable over a 3 week period, but it was significantly higher after a 12-month interval.
Study Conclusions
- From this study, it was concluded that when designing studies measuring MNT in donkeys, the rate of application of force needs to be standardized.
- The research suggested that this technique is appropriate for short-term analgesiometry studies due to the good stability of donkeys’ MNTs in the short-term. However, there was significant variability of MNTs over the long-term.
Cite This Article
APA
Grint NJ, Beths T, Yvorchuk K, Taylor PM, Dixon M, Whay HR, Murrell JC.
(2014).
The influence of various confounding factors on mechanical nociceptive thresholds in the donkey.
Vet Anaesth Analg, 41(4), 421-429.
https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12132 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, UK.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Equidae
- Male
- Pain Measurement / veterinary
- Pain Threshold
- Pressure / adverse effects
- Time Factors
Citations
This article has been cited 5 times.- Mayaki AM, Abdul Razak IS, Adzahan NM, Mazlan M, Rasedee A. Clinical assessment and grading of back pain in horses.. J Vet Sci 2020 Nov;21(6):e82.
- Haussler KK. Pressure Algometry for the Detection of Mechanical Nociceptive Thresholds in Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Nov 24;10(12).
- Johnson C. Research Tools for the Measurement of Pain and Nociception.. Animals (Basel) 2016 Nov 11;6(11).
- Kaka U, Chen HC, Goh YM, Abubakar AA, Fakurazi S, Ebrahimi M. Validation of a modified algometer to measure mechanical nociceptive thresholds in awake dogs.. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:375421.
- Harris LK, Murrell JC, van Klink EG, Whay HR. Influence of experimental protocol on response rate and repeatability of mechanical threshold testing in dogs.. Vet J 2015 Apr;204(1):82-7.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists