Abstract: Long before the concept of social license to operate came to the forefront of equestrian sports, veterinarians have always had a responsibility to advocate for the welfare of the horse. For performance horses this often means helping to ensure that the horse is performing positively and comfortably for its intended use. A horse that is struggling to perform at an optimal level may be doing so for a multitude of reasons, but regardless of the underlying cause, it often presents as any number of behavioral issues. This review explores various underlying physical causes of behavioral issues in performance horses in order to highlight the fact that most “behavioral issues” are not behavioral at all.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Most horses labeled as “misbehaving” are actually communicating discomfort or pain, and this review argues that so‑called behavioral problems in performance horses are usually rooted in physical issues. It summarizes likely medical causes, how to diagnose them, and welfare-centered management to restore comfort and performance.
What the review asks and why it matters
Clarifies whether undesirable behaviors in performance horses are truly behavioral or more often signs of pain, illness, or equipment-related discomfort.
Emphasizes the veterinarian’s responsibility to safeguard welfare by recognizing pain-related behaviors and preventing punitive or suppressive training responses that mask problems.
Connects accurate diagnosis and humane management to the sport’s social license to operate, underscoring transparency and horse-first decision-making.
Key message of the review
Most performance-limiting “behaviors” are pain- or discomfort-related rather than willful disobedience, and effective resolution depends on identifying and treating the underlying physical cause.
Interdisciplinary assessment—veterinarian, farrier, saddler, physiotherapist, and qualified trainer/behavior professional—is central to accurate diagnosis and lasting improvement.
Common “behavioral” signs that often indicate physical problems
Reluctance to go forward, balking, napping, or rushing: frequently linked to musculoskeletal pain, back/sacroiliac issues, or poorly fitting tack.
Bucking, rearing, bolting: associated with thoracolumbar pain, kissing spines, sacroiliac disease, gastric pain, or sudden respiratory compromise.
Refusal to jump, stopping, run-outs, jumping “flat,” or rushing fences: forelimb or hoof pain, suspensory disease, saddle fit issues, vision or airway problems.
Girthiness, ear pinning on saddling, tail swishing, hock “bunny hopping,” crookedness: back pain, ulcers, ill-fitting saddle, hock or stifle pathology.
Stumbling, toe-dragging, poor transitions, asymmetry in canter leads: distal limb pain, neurologic deficits, sacroiliac or lumbosacral pain.
Spookiness, anxiety, reluctance in specific environments: ocular disease, noise sensitivity with airway compromise, prior pain-associated contexts.
Behavior change around breeding season or handling: reproductive tract pain or tumors (e.g., ovarian granulosa-theca cell tumor), sheath/penile pain, urinary issues.
Oral and dental problems: sharp enamel points, hooks, ulcers, fractured teeth, bit-induced lesions, wolf teeth or retained caps.
Tack and equipment: saddle width/shape and panel pressure, bridging or rocking saddles, girth design/pressure, bit type/fit, bridle and noseband tightness, martingale or auxiliary device misuse.
Hoof care and shoeing: long toes/low heels, mediolateral imbalance, shoeing intervals, inappropriate shoe or pad selection for the workload and footing.
Reproductive and urinary tract pain: ovarian pathology, endometritis, prostatic or sheath issues, kidney/bladder discomfort presenting as aversion or irritability.
Rider, training, and workload factors: rider imbalance or asymmetry, inconsistent or contradictory aids, overfacing fences, rapid workload changes, inadequate warm-up or conditioning.
Environment and management: limited turnout, social isolation, high-starch diets, infrequent forage, unsuitable footing, transport and competition stressors.
Recommended diagnostic approach
Thorough history: onset, triggers (girthing, mounting, specific gaits, arenas, fences), progression, prior injuries, changes in management, diet, shoeing, tack, or rider.
Behavioral characterization: precise description and video of the behavior in-hand, on the lunge, and under saddle; note context, intensity, and consistency.
Comprehensive physical and lameness exam: conformation, palpation/pressure reactivity, dynamic assessment on straight lines and circles, flexion tests, ridden evaluation when safe.
Analgesic and diagnostic anesthesia trials: response to NSAIDs or nerve/joint blocks to localize pain generators.
Oral and tack assessment: dental exam with sedation and speculum; professional saddle fit evaluation; bit, bridle, and noseband fit checks; pressure and symmetry assessment.
Hoof evaluation: balance metrics, solar depth, mediolateral symmetry, shoe type and wear patterns aligned to discipline and footing.
Airway and respiratory testing: resting and overground dynamic endoscopy where indicated; evaluation for asthma/IAD and EIPH management.
Neurologic and ocular exams: cranial nerve and proprioception testing; slit-lamp and fundic exams for vision deficits.
Rider and training review: assessment by a qualified coach; consider trial with a different rider to separate rider effects from horse discomfort.
Multidisciplinary case conference: integrate findings across veterinary, farriery, saddle fitting, physiotherapy, and training perspectives.
Management and treatment principles
Treat the primary cause: targeted medical therapy (e.g., omeprazole for ulcers, intra-articular therapies for synovitis, neuropathic pain strategies for headshaking), dental correction, respiratory surgery when appropriate, rehabilitation protocols for musculoskeletal pain.
Correct contributing factors: adjust saddle and girth fit, modify bit/bridle and loosen nosebands, rebalance feet and revise shoeing schedules, optimize diet with forage-first and lower starch where indicated.
Rehabilitation and conditioning: progressive loading plans, physiotherapy and manual therapy, core and topline development, pole and hill work, rest periods matched to tissue healing timelines.
Training modifications: clear, consistent aids; avoid overfacing; build confidence; reward-based methods; remove gadgets that mask pain; reintroduce complexity gradually after pain resolution.
Environment and welfare improvements: increased turnout and social contact, predictable routines, suitable footing, transport and competition stress mitigation.
Monitor and reassess: objective outcome measures (lameness scores, rein tension metrics, rider symmetry data), regular rechecks, willingness to alter discipline or retire if comfort cannot be restored.
Implications for welfare and social license
Recognizing pain-related behavior reduces punitive responses and supports ethical training and competition practices.
Transparent, evidence-based management strengthens public trust and the sport’s social license by prioritizing the horse’s comfort and agency.
Education of owners, riders, and officials about pain indicators and tack fit is essential to prevent normalizing subtle distress signs.
Limits of the evidence and research gaps
Many associations between behaviors and pathologies are supported by clinical experience and observational studies rather than randomized trials.
Need for standardized behavior descriptors, objective pain metrics under saddle, and validated tools for saddle/bridle pressure assessment.
Further work on rider-horse interaction, rein tension thresholds, and discipline-specific risk profiles will refine prevention and treatment.
Practical takeaways
Assume pain or discomfort first when a performance horse “misbehaves,” and investigate systematically before labeling a behavior as training-related.
Do not suppress behaviors with harsher equipment or stronger aids; identify and address the root cause with a multidisciplinary team.
Small changes—better saddle fit, hoof balance, forage access, rider symmetry—often produce large improvements in behavior and performance.
When in doubt, pause competition goals, provide rest and diagnostics, and be prepared to modify the horse’s job to protect welfare.
Cite This Article
APA
Contino EK.
(2025).
The “misbehaving” performance horse: is it ever behavioral?
J Equine Vet Sci, 105420.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105420
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado USA. Electronic address: erin.contino@colostate.edu.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of competing interest There are no conflict of interests to declare.