Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record1977; 100(22); 465-468; doi: 10.1136/vr.100.22.465

The outbreak of equine influenza in England: January 1976.

Abstract: Equine influenza type 2 infections occurred in the Newmarket areas in January 1976. The disease did not spread to any extent and while this may have been due to recent vaccination it was found that not all vaccinated horses were fully protected. The virus involved showed some antigenic drift from the prototype strain A/equine/Miami/1/63 (Heq 2 Neq 2).
Publication Date: 1977-05-28 PubMed ID: 17942DOI: 10.1136/vr.100.22.465Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study focuses on an outbreak of equine influenza type 2 that occurred in Newmarket in 1976. The paper discusses potential reasons why the disease did not spread extensively and notes that vaccinated horses did not necessarily show full protection against the virus, which showed some antigenic drift from the standard strain.

Context and Purpose of the Study

  • The researchers undertook this study to investigate an outbreak of equine influenza type 2 that happened in Newmarket in January 1976.
  • The study aimed to understand why the disease did not spread widely despite the outbreak and why vaccinated horses still got infected.
  • One of the main objectives of the study was to identify any differences between the virus involved in the outbreak and the standard equine influenza type 2 strain, known as A/equine/Miami/1/63 (Heq 2 Neq 2).

Findings and Observations

  • The study found that not all horses that had been vaccinated against equine influenza had complete protection from the virus. Despite being vaccinated, some horses still got infected during the outbreak.
  • The researchers observed that the disease did not spread to a significant degree. Although they suggest that the recent vaccination could be a reason, it does not fully explain this limited spread due to the fact that even vaccinated horses fell ill.
  • Further research revealed that the virus involved in this particular outbreak showed some antigenic drift from the prototype strain A/equine/Miami/1/63 (Heq 2 Neq 2). Antigenic drift refers to small changes in the genes of influenza viruses that happen continually over time as the virus replicates. This could be the reason why the vaccinated horses did not have complete immunity and got infected.

Significance and Implications of the Study

  • This study adds to the understanding of equine influenza. By focusing on a particular outbreak and the response to it, the researchers were able to provide insights into how the disease spreads and its relationship with the vaccination.
  • The findings on the antigenic drift of the virus are particularly important. They could explain why the vaccine did not offer full protection, contributing to knowledge on how vaccines can be made more effective in the future.
  • The study also highlights the importance of continuous research into equine influenza and its strains, as well as the need for developing and updating vaccines in response to antigenic drift.

Cite This Article

APA
Thomson GR, Mumford JA, Spooner PR, Burrows R, Powell DG. (1977). The outbreak of equine influenza in England: January 1976. Vet Rec, 100(22), 465-468. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.100.22.465

Publication

ISSN: 0042-4900
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 100
Issue: 22
Pages: 465-468

Researcher Affiliations

Thomson, G R
    Mumford, J A
      Spooner, P R
        Burrows, R
          Powell, D G

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Antigens, Viral / analysis
            • Disease Outbreaks / veterinary
            • England
            • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
            • Horse Diseases / immunology
            • Horses
            • Influenza A virus / immunology
            • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / epidemiology
            • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / immunology
            • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / veterinary
            • Seasons

            Citations

            This article has been cited 6 times.
            1. Numberger D, Dreier C, Vullioud C, Gabriel G, Greenwood AD, Grossart HP. Recovery of influenza A viruses from lake water and sediments by experimental inoculation. PLoS One 2019;14(5):e0216880.
              doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216880pubmed: 31091283google scholar: lookup
            2. Ye J, Xu Y, Harris J, Sun H, Bowman AS, Cunningham F, Cardona C, Yoon KJ, Slemons RD, Wan XF. Mutation from arginine to lysine at the position 189 of hemagglutinin contributes to the antigenic drift in H3N2 swine influenza viruses. Virology 2013 Nov;446(1-2):225-9.
              doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.08.004pubmed: 24074585google scholar: lookup
            3. Lewis NS, Daly JM, Russell CA, Horton DL, Skepner E, Bryant NA, Burke DF, Rash AS, Wood JL, Chambers TM, Fouchier RA, Mumford JA, Elton DM, Smith DJ. Antigenic and genetic evolution of equine influenza A (H3N8) virus from 1968 to 2007. J Virol 2011 Dec;85(23):12742-9.
              doi: 10.1128/JVI.05319-11pubmed: 21937642google scholar: lookup
            4. Goto H, Shimizu K, Taya Y, Noda H, Tokunaga T. Antibody responses of horses to equine influenza viruses during a postepizootic period in Japan. Can J Comp Med 1982 Jan;46(1):27-32.
              pubmed: 7074415
            5. Burrows R, Denyer M. Antigenic properties of some equine influenza viruses. Arch Virol 1982;73(1):15-24.
              doi: 10.1007/BF01341723pubmed: 6181759google scholar: lookup
            6. Endo A, Pecoraro R, Sugita S, Nerome K. Evolutionary pattern of the H 3 haemagglutinin of equine influenza viruses: multiple evolutionary lineages and frozen replication. Arch Virol 1992;123(1-2):73-87.
              doi: 10.1007/BF01317139pubmed: 1550498google scholar: lookup