Analyze Diet
Open veterinary journal2024; 14(8); 1801-1807; doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i8.8

The prognostic importance of physiological and biochemical parameters in horses afflicted with colic.

Abstract: Colic, a primary cause of illness and death in horses, necessitates the development of improved prognostic tools. Unassigned: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of physiological and biochemical parameters in horses suffering from colic. Unassigned: A comprehensive clinical evaluation of 117 horses included assessment of heart rate, mucous membranes, capillary refill time, rectal temperature, respiratory rate, gut motility, reflux, and limb pulse strength. Unassigned: Stomach reflux, absence of gut noises, and increased heart rate (mean increase of 12 bpm) strongly correlate with a poor prognosis. Prolonged capillary refill time (mean increase of 3 seconds), rectal temperature (over 38.5°C), elevated packed cell volume (mean increase of 4%), and blood lactate levels (mean increase of 5 mmol/l) underscore the significance of these markers. Notably, blood lactate ( < 0.001), gut noises ( < 0.05), and heart rate ( < 0.001) demonstrate the highest predictive significance based on statistical analysis. Unassigned: Future research should investigate the prognostic potential of additional parameters and assess the impact of recommended treatments on colic prognosis. This data-driven study emphasizes the critical role of early recognition and thorough assessment in colic cases, offering vital insights into improving equine healthcare and mitigating mortality rates.
Publication Date: 2024-08-31 PubMed ID: 39308735PubMed Central: PMC11415896DOI: 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i8.8Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research aimed to understand the significance of various physiological and biochemical markers in predicting the outcomes or prognosis in horses suffering from colic, a common equine illness.

Objectives of the Study

  • The researchers intended to evaluate the prognostic significance of multiple physiological and biochemical parameters in horses afflicted with colic.
  • The study aimed to contribute towards the development of improved diagnostic and prognostic tools for colic in horses.

Methods and Parameters

  • A total of 117 horses suffering from colic were clinically evaluated in the study.
  • The parameters assessed were heart rate, mucous membranes, capillary refill time, rectal temperature, respiratory rate, gut motility, reflux, and limb pulse strength.

Key Findings

  • Stomach reflux, absence of gut noises, and an increased heart rate were found to strongly correlate with a poor prognosis in horses with colic.
  • Capillary refill time (mean increase of 3 seconds), rectal temperature (over 38.5°C), elevated packed cell volume (mean increase of 4%), and blood lactate levels (mean increase of 5 mmol/l) were recognized as significant markers for prognosis.
  • Among the tested parameters, blood lactate levels, gut noises, and heart rate demonstrated the highest predictive significance based on the statistical analysis.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The findings underscored physiological and biochemical parameters’ critical role in early recognition and assessment of colic cases.
  • Further research is recommended to explore the prognostic potential of additional parameters and how different treatment methods impact colic prognosis.
  • The insights derived from this study might help improve equine healthcare standards and reduce mortality rates associated with colic.

Significance

  • This study provides a valuable foundation for understanding the prognostic implications of physiological and biochemical parameters in either managing or predicting the prognosis of horses afflicted with colic.
  • The results have potential research implications in improving diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies for effectively managing colic in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Mickevičienė I, Mikalauskienė D, Miknienė Z. (2024). The prognostic importance of physiological and biochemical parameters in horses afflicted with colic. Open Vet J, 14(8), 1801-1807. https://doi.org/10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i8.8

Publication

ISSN: 2218-6050
NlmUniqueID: 101653182
Country: Libya
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 8
Pages: 1801-1807

Researcher Affiliations

Mickevičienė, Indrė
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LUHS), Veterinary Academy (VA), Large Animal Clinic, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Mikalauskienė, Donata
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LUHS), Veterinary Academy (VA), Large Animal Clinic, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Miknienė, Zoja
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LUHS), Veterinary Academy (VA), Large Animal Clinic, Kaunas, Lithuania.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Colic / veterinary
  • Colic / blood
  • Colic / mortality
  • Colic / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / blood
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / physiopathology
  • Prognosis
  • Male
  • Female
  • Heart Rate / physiology
  • Respiratory Rate / physiology
  • Lactic Acid / blood
  • Body Temperature / physiology
  • Gastrointestinal Motility / physiology
  • Biomarkers / blood

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 27 references
  1. Bihonegn T, Bekele F. Colic in equine: a review article.. Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. 2018;5(5):185–195.
  2. Bland S.D. Equine colic: a review of the equine hindgut and colic.. Vet. Sci. Dev. 2016;6(1):48–51.
  3. Bowden A, England G.C.W, Brennan M.L, Mair T.S, Furness W.A, Freeman S.L, Burford J.H. Indicators of ‘critical’ outcomes in 941 horses seen ‘out-of-hours’ for colic.. Vet. Rec. 2020;187:492–494.
    pubmed: 32719081
  4. Cook V.L, Hassel D.M. Evaluation of the colic in horses: decision for referral.. Vet. Clin. North Am. Equine Pract. 2014;30(2):383–398.
    pubmed: 25016497
  5. Curtis L, Burford J.H, Thomas J.S.M, Curran M.L, Bayes T.C, England G.C.W, Freeman S.L. Prospective study of the primary evaluation of 1016 horses with clinical signs of abdominal pain by veterinary practitioners, and the differentiation of critical and non-critical cases.. Acta Vet. Scand. 2015;57(1):1–12.
    pmc: PMC4596518pubmed: 26444675
  6. Egenvall A, Penell J, Bonnett B.N, Blix J, Pringle J. Demographics and costs of colic in Swedish horses.. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2008;22(4):1029–1037.
    pubmed: 18647160
  7. Farrell A, Kersh K, Liepman R, Dembek K.A. Development of a colic scoring system to predict outcome in horses.. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021;8:1–8.
    pmc: PMC8531487pubmed: 34692803
  8. Freeman D.E. Fifty years of colic surgery.. Equine Vet. J. 2018;50(4):423–435.
    pubmed: 29405434
  9. Henderson I.S.F. Diagnostic and prognostic use of L-lactate measurement in equine practice.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2013;25(9):468–475.
  10. Ihler C.F, Venger J.L, Skjerve E. Evaluation of clinical and laboratory variables as prognostic indicators in hospitalised gastrointestinal colic horses.. Acta Vet. Scand. 2004;45(1–2):109–118.
    pmc: PMC1820986pubmed: 15535091
  11. Jennings K.M, Curtis L, Burford J.H, Freeman S.L. Prospective survey of veterinary practitioners’ primary assessment of equine colic: clinical features, diagnoses, and treatment of 120 cases of large colon impaction.. BMC Vet. Res. 2014;10(Suppl. 1):1–10.
    pmc: PMC4123044pubmed: 25238179
  12. Kos V.K, Kramaric P, Brloznik M. Packed cell volume and heart rate to predict medical and surgical cases and their short-term survival in horses with gastrointestinal-induced colic.. Can. Vet. J. 2022;63(4):365–372.
    pmc: PMC8922377pubmed: 35368402
  13. Leblond A, Villard I, Leblond L. A retrospective evaluation of the causes of death of 448 insured french horses in 1995.. Vet. Res. Commun. 2000;24:85–102.
    pubmed: 10720095
  14. Proudman C.J, Dugdale A.H, Senior J.M, Edwards G.B, Smith J.E, Leuwer M.L, French N.P. Pre-operative and anaesthesia-related risk factors for mortality in equine colic cases.. Vet. J. 2006;171(1):89–97.
    pubmed: 16427585
  15. Radcliffe R.M, Divers T.J, Fletcher D.J, Mohammed H, Kraus M.S. Evaluation of L-lactate and cardiac troponin I in horses undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care. 2012;22(3):313–319.
    pubmed: 22702437
  16. Smanik L.E, Moser D.K, Rothers K.P, Hackett E.S. Serial venous lactate measurement following gastrointestinal surgery in horses.. J. Vet. Sci. 2022;23(5):1–8.
    pmc: PMC9523334pubmed: 36038187
  17. Spadari A, Gialletti R, Gandini M, Valle E, Cerullo A, Cavallini D, Bertoletti A, Rinnovati R, Forni G, Scilimati N, Giusto G. Short-term survival and postoperative complications rates in horses undergoing colic surgery: a multicentre study.. Animals 2023;13(6):1–15.
    pmc: PMC10044551pubmed: 36978647
  18. Straticò P, Varasano V, Palozzo A, Guerri G, Celani G, Revelant O, Petrizzi L. Retrospective study on risk factors and short-term outcome of horses referred for colic from 2016 to 2022.. Vet. Sci. 2022;9(10):1–19.
    pmc: PMC9607141pubmed: 36288158
  19. Sutton G.A, Ertzman-Ginsburg R, Steinman A, Milgram J. Initial investigation of mortality rates and prognostic indicators in horses with colic in Israel: a retrospective study.. Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:482–488.
    pubmed: 19642409
  20. Taschetto P.M, Pradella G.D, Berlingieri M.A, Leiria P.A.T, Skupien J.A, Lübeck I, Duarte C.A. Using peritoneal and blood lactate as predictor of condition type, surgical referral and prognosis in equine colic cases.. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2023;75(4):591–598.
  21. Tennent-Brown B.S, Wilkins P.A, Lindborg S, Russell G, Boston R.C. Sequential plasma lactate concentrations as prognostic indicators in adult equine emergencies.. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2010;24(1):198–205.
    pubmed: 19925572
  22. Thoefner M.B, Ersbøll A.K, Hesselholt M. Prognostic indicators in a Danish hospital-based population of colic horses.. Equine Vet. J. Suppl. 2000;32:11–18.
    pubmed: 11202376
  23. Tinker M.K, White N.A, Lessard P, Thatcher C.D, Pelzer K.D, Davis B, Carmel D.K. Prospective study of equine colic incidence and mortality.. Equine Vet. J. 1997;29(6):448–53.
    pubmed: 9413717
  24. van der Linden M.A, Laffont C.M, Sloet van O.-O.M. Prognosis in equine medical and surgical colic.. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2003;17(3):343–348.
    pubmed: 12774977
  25. Worku Y, Wondimagegn W, Aklilu N, Assefa Z, Gizachew A. Equine colic: clinical epidemiology and associated risk factors in and around Debre Zeit.. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2017;49(5):959–965.
    pubmed: 28401328
  26. Wormstrand B.H, Ihler C.F, Diesen R, Krontveit R.I. Surgical treatment of equine colic—a retrospective study of 297 surgeries in Norway 2005-2011.. Acta Vet. Scand. 2014;56(1):12–18.
    pmc: PMC4077634pubmed: 24934123
  27. Yamout S.Z, Nieto J.E, Beldomenico P.M, Dechant J.E, leJeune S, Snyder J.R. Peritoneal and plasma d-lactate concentrations in horses with colic.. Vet. Surg. 2011;40(7):817–824.
    pubmed: 21815898

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.