The risk of a horse-and-rider partnership falling on the cross-country phase of eventing competitions.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
The research examines the risk factors associated with horse-and-rider falls during the cross-country phase of eventing competitions, and offers insights on how to minimize these risks to reduce injuries and fatalities.
Objectives and Methods
The primary objective of this study was to identify the variables that increase or decrease the risk of horse-and-rider falls in such competitions. The researchers collected and analysed data from British Eventing competitions that took place in Great Britain during 2001 and 2002. The data pertained to 173 cases of falls and 503 cases where falls did not occur, and the risk was modelled using conditional logistic regression.
- The cases for the study were selected at random to minimize bias.
- A specific statistical technique, conditional logistic regression, was utilised to examine the relative contributions of multiple factors that could increase the risk of a horse fall.
Results and Identified Risk Factors
The research findings indicate an increased risk of a horse fall when:
- Horses were jumping into or out of water.
- The ground was good-to-soft, soft or heavy.
- The fences featured a drop landing.
- The non-angled fences had a spread of 2 meters or more, and angled fences in general.
- The riders knew they were leading in the competition before the cross-country phase.
- The speed of approach to the fence was either too fast or too slow.
- The horse-and-rider pairing had not had refusals at previous fences.
- The riders had received cross-country tuition.
Conclusions and Recommendations
The study suggests that the risk of horse falls could be reduced by taking three measures:
- Ensuring that ground conditions at the take-off surfaces at fences are maintained as ‘good to firm’.
- Reducing fence spreads to less than 2 meters.
- Minimizing the use of fences that require horses to jump into or out of water.
These recommendations aim to enhance the safety of such competitions, by reducing the risk of horses and riders getting injured. The researchers also called for further studies to validate these interventions. They emphasized the urgency of these measures by stating that one in three horse falls results in injury, and one in 100 horse falls results in horse fatalities. The insights provided in this study can be used by event authorities to improve the design of cross-country courses, thus reducing potential risks.
Cite This Article
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Epidemiology Group, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, Chester High Road, Neston, South Wirral CH64 7TE, UK.
MeSH Terms
- Accidental Falls
- Animals
- Athletic Injuries / epidemiology
- Athletic Injuries / veterinary
- Case-Control Studies
- Horses / injuries
- Humans
- Logistic Models
- Physical Conditioning, Animal
- Prospective Studies
- Risk Factors
- Safety
- Sports
- Time Factors
Citations
This article has been cited 5 times.- Cameron-Whytock HA, O'Brien D, Lewis V, Parkin T, Bennet ED. Equine fatalities in equestrian eventing. Equine Vet J 2025 Sep;57(5):1387-1394.
- Dyson S, Pollard D. Application of the Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram to Horses Competing in British Eventing 90, 100 and Novice One-Day Events and Comparison with Performance. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 25;12(5).
- von Pfeil DJ, Liska WD, Nelson S Jr, Mann S, Wakshlag JJ. A survey on orthopedic injuries during a marathon sled dog race. Vet Med (Auckl) 2015;6:329-339.
- O'Brien D. Look Before You Leap: What Are the Obstacles to Risk Calculation in the Equestrian Sport of Eventing?. Animals (Basel) 2016 Feb 16;6(2).
- DeAraugo J, McLaren S, McManus P, McGreevy PD. Improving the Understanding of Psychological Factors Contributing to Horse-Related Accident and Injury: Context, Loss of Focus, Cognitive Errors and Rigidity. Animals (Basel) 2016 Feb 15;6(2).