Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2006; 38(2); 158-163; doi: 10.2746/042516406776563314

The risk of a horse-and-rider partnership falling on the cross-country phase of eventing competitions.

Abstract: Fatalities resulting from horse falls occurring during the cross-country phase of eventing competitions initiated epidemiological investigation of the risk factors associated with horse falls. Objective: To identify variables that increased or decreased the risk of a horse fall during the cross-country phase of an eventing competition. Methods: Data were collected from randomly selected British Eventing competitions held in Great Britain during 2001 and 2002. Data were obtained for 173 cases (jumping efforts resulting in a fall of the horse-and-rider partnership) and 503 matched controls (jumping efforts not resulting in a fall). The risk of falling was modelled using conditional logistic regression. Results: An increased risk of a horse fall was associated with jumping into or out of water; taking off from good-to-soft, soft or heavy ground; fences with a drop landing; nonangled fences with a spread > or =2 m; and angled fences. Other risk factors included riders who knew that they were in the lead within the competition before the cross-country phase; an inappropriate speed of approach to the fence (too fast or too slow); horse-and-rider partnerships that had not incurred refusals at earlier fences; and riders who received cross-country tuition. Conclusions: This study has identified modifiable course- and fence-level risk factors for horse falls during the cross-country phase of eventing competitions. The risk of horse and rider injury at eventing competitions should be reduced by 3 simple measures; maintaining good to firm take-off surfaces at fences, reducing the base spread of fences to <2 m and reducing the use of fences at which horses are required to jump into or out of water. Risk reduction arising from course and fence modification needs to be confirmed by intervention studies. Conclusions: Knowledge of factors that increase or decrease the risk of a horse fall can be used by UK governing bodies of the sport to reduce the risk of horse falls on the cross-country phase of eventing competitions, and reduce the risk of horse and rider injuries and fatalities. As one in 3 horses that fall injure themselves and one in 100 horse falls results in fatality to the horse, we suggest that immediate consideration is given to these recommendations.
Publication Date: 2006-03-16 PubMed ID: 16536386DOI: 10.2746/042516406776563314Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research examines the risk factors associated with horse-and-rider falls during the cross-country phase of eventing competitions, and offers insights on how to minimize these risks to reduce injuries and fatalities.

Objectives and Methods

The primary objective of this study was to identify the variables that increase or decrease the risk of horse-and-rider falls in such competitions. The researchers collected and analysed data from British Eventing competitions that took place in Great Britain during 2001 and 2002. The data pertained to 173 cases of falls and 503 cases where falls did not occur, and the risk was modelled using conditional logistic regression.

  • The cases for the study were selected at random to minimize bias.
  • A specific statistical technique, conditional logistic regression, was utilised to examine the relative contributions of multiple factors that could increase the risk of a horse fall.

Results and Identified Risk Factors

The research findings indicate an increased risk of a horse fall when:

  • Horses were jumping into or out of water.
  • The ground was good-to-soft, soft or heavy.
  • The fences featured a drop landing.
  • The non-angled fences had a spread of 2 meters or more, and angled fences in general.
  • The riders knew they were leading in the competition before the cross-country phase.
  • The speed of approach to the fence was either too fast or too slow.
  • The horse-and-rider pairing had not had refusals at previous fences.
  • The riders had received cross-country tuition.

Conclusions and Recommendations

The study suggests that the risk of horse falls could be reduced by taking three measures:

  • Ensuring that ground conditions at the take-off surfaces at fences are maintained as ‘good to firm’.
  • Reducing fence spreads to less than 2 meters.
  • Minimizing the use of fences that require horses to jump into or out of water.

These recommendations aim to enhance the safety of such competitions, by reducing the risk of horses and riders getting injured. The researchers also called for further studies to validate these interventions. They emphasized the urgency of these measures by stating that one in three horse falls results in injury, and one in 100 horse falls results in horse fatalities. The insights provided in this study can be used by event authorities to improve the design of cross-country courses, thus reducing potential risks.

Cite This Article

APA
Murray JK, Singer ER, Morgan KL, Proudman CJ, French NP. (2006). The risk of a horse-and-rider partnership falling on the cross-country phase of eventing competitions. Equine Vet J, 38(2), 158-163. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516406776563314

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 38
Issue: 2
Pages: 158-163

Researcher Affiliations

Murray, J K
  • Epidemiology Group, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, Chester High Road, Neston, South Wirral CH64 7TE, UK.
Singer, E R
    Morgan, K L
      Proudman, C J
        French, N P

          MeSH Terms

          • Accidental Falls
          • Animals
          • Athletic Injuries / epidemiology
          • Athletic Injuries / veterinary
          • Case-Control Studies
          • Horses / injuries
          • Humans
          • Logistic Models
          • Physical Conditioning, Animal
          • Prospective Studies
          • Risk Factors
          • Safety
          • Sports
          • Time Factors

          Citations

          This article has been cited 5 times.
          1. Cameron-Whytock HA, O'Brien D, Lewis V, Parkin T, Bennet ED. Equine fatalities in equestrian eventing. Equine Vet J 2025 Sep;57(5):1387-1394.
            doi: 10.1111/evj.14529pubmed: 40371753google scholar: lookup
          2. Dyson S, Pollard D. Application of the Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram to Horses Competing in British Eventing 90, 100 and Novice One-Day Events and Comparison with Performance. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 25;12(5).
            doi: 10.3390/ani12050590pubmed: 35268159google scholar: lookup
          3. von Pfeil DJ, Liska WD, Nelson S Jr, Mann S, Wakshlag JJ. A survey on orthopedic injuries during a marathon sled dog race. Vet Med (Auckl) 2015;6:329-339.
            doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S88276pubmed: 30101118google scholar: lookup
          4. O'Brien D. Look Before You Leap: What Are the Obstacles to Risk Calculation in the Equestrian Sport of Eventing?. Animals (Basel) 2016 Feb 16;6(2).
            doi: 10.3390/ani6020013pubmed: 26891334google scholar: lookup
          5. DeAraugo J, McLaren S, McManus P, McGreevy PD. Improving the Understanding of Psychological Factors Contributing to Horse-Related Accident and Injury: Context, Loss of Focus, Cognitive Errors and Rigidity. Animals (Basel) 2016 Feb 15;6(2).
            doi: 10.3390/ani6020012pubmed: 26891333google scholar: lookup