Analyze Diet
The Journal of experimental biology1985; 115; 263-282; doi: 10.1242/jeb.115.1.263

The role of compliance in mammalian running gaits.

Abstract: The running gaits used by both bipedal and quadrupedal animals are reviewed and contrasted. At high speeds, bipeds use both ordinary running, in which the legs move opposite one another, and hopping. Quadrupeds generally use the trot or its variations at moderate speeds, and first the canter and then the gallop as speed increases. Running in both bipeds and quadrupeds generally involves at least one aerial phase per stride cycle, but certain perturbations to running including running in circles, running under enhanced gravity, running on compliant surfaces and running with increased knee flexion (Groucho running) can reduce the aerial phase, even to zero. A conceptual model of running based on the idea that an animal rebounds from the ground like a resonant mass-spring system may be used to compare the various gaits. The model makes specific predictions which show that galloping is generally faster than cantering, pronking or trotting, and requires lower peak vertical forces on the legs while also giving a smoother ride. Even so, trotting might be preferred to galloping at low and moderate speeds for the same reason that normal running is preferred to Groucho running-the more compliant gait offers a smoother ride and lower vertical ground-reaction forces on the feet, but this can only be obtained at a high cost of increased metabolic power.
Publication Date: 1985-03-01 PubMed ID: 4031769DOI: 10.1242/jeb.115.1.263Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study explores the different running gaits used by bipedal and quadrupedal animals, and how several factors including the running environment and knee flexion may influence these gaits. The researchers use a mathematical model to explain why certain gaits are preferred over others depending on the speed and context.

Understanding Different Animal Gaits

  • The paper discusses the running gaits of both bipedal animals (such as humans and birds) and quadrupedal animals (like horses and dogs).
  • It explains how bipeds use ordinary running, where the legs move in opposition, and hopping when moving at high speeds.
  • In contrast, quadrupeds use different running gaits — a trot for moderate speeds and a canter or gallop for faster speeds.

How Shall Gait Be Affected

  • The research discusses how conditions like running in circles, running under increased gravity, on soft surfaces, or with increased knee bending (referred to as ‘Groucho running’) can decrease the aerial phase in running.
  • The concept of an aerial phase is explained as an off-the-ground period during running, which can even be reduced to no aerial time under certain conditions.

A Mathematical Model for Understanding Gaits

  • The researchers have introduced a mathematical model to compare different animal gaits.
  • This model compares various running patterns by viewing an animal as a mass-spring system, focusing on how the animal rebounds off the ground during running.

Improved Commuting

  • The model predicted that galloping is generally faster than other gaits like cantering, pronking or trotting, and it demands lower peak vertical leg forces, which may offer a more comfortable ride to the animal.
  • Despite these advantages, the research suggests that for slow to moderate speeds, trotting might be preferred over galloping. The same logic applies to bipedal runners who prefer normal running over Groucho running.
  • The study suggests that these more compliant gaits offer smoother movement and lower vertical ground reaction on the feet. However, they also increase metabolic power costs.

Cite This Article

APA
McMahon TA. (1985). The role of compliance in mammalian running gaits. J Exp Biol, 115, 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.115.1.263

Publication

ISSN: 0022-0949
NlmUniqueID: 0243705
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 115
Pages: 263-282

Researcher Affiliations

McMahon, T A

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Compliance
    • Gait
    • Horses
    • Humans
    • Muscles / physiology
    • Running

    Citations

    This article has been cited 23 times.
    1. Díaz-Martínez I, Navarro-Lorbés P, Isasmendi E, Páramo A, Gascó-Lluna F, Torices A, Ruiz J, Viera LI, Sáez-Benito P, Farlow J, Leonardi G, Pereda-Suberbiola X, Citton P. Footprint morphology sheds light on running strategies in non-avian theropods. Sci Rep 2026 Jan 7;15(1):44217.
      doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-31361-ypubmed: 41501252google scholar: lookup
    2. Cross SRR, Marmol-Guijarro AC, Bates KT, Marrin JC, Tickle PG, Rose KA, Codd JR. Testing the form-function paradigm: body shape correlates with kinematics but not energetics in selectively-bred birds. Commun Biol 2024 Jul 24;7(1):900.
      doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06592-wpubmed: 39048787google scholar: lookup
    3. Andrada E, Hildebrandt G, Witte H, Fischer MS. Positioning of pivot points in quadrupedal locomotion: limbs global dynamics in four different dog breeds. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023;11:1193177.
      doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1193177pubmed: 37485325google scholar: lookup
    4. Choi J. Multi-Phase Joint-Angle Trajectory Generation Inspired by Dog Motion for Control of Quadruped Robot. Sensors (Basel) 2021 Sep 24;21(19).
      doi: 10.3390/s21196366pubmed: 34640686google scholar: lookup
    5. Dick TJM, Clemente CJ, Punith LK, Sawicki GS. Series elasticity facilitates safe plantar flexor muscle-tendon shock absorption during perturbed human hopping. Proc Biol Sci 2021 Mar 31;288(1947):20210201.
      doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0201pubmed: 33726594google scholar: lookup
    6. Kashiri N, Abate A, Abram SJ, Albu-Schaffer A, Clary PJ, Daley M, Faraji S, Furnemont R, Garabini M, Geyer H, Grabowski AM, Hurst J, Malzahn J, Mathijssen G, Remy D, Roozing W, Shahbazi M, Simha SN, Song JB, Smit-Anseeuw N, Stramigioli S, Vanderborght B, Yesilevskiy Y, Tsagarakis N. An Overview on Principles for Energy Efficient Robot Locomotion. Front Robot AI 2018;5:129.
      doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00129pubmed: 33501007google scholar: lookup
    7. Clites TR, Arnold AS, Singh NM, Kline E, Chen H, Tugman C, Billadeau B, Biewener AA, Herr HM. Goats decrease hindlimb stiffness when walking over compliant surfaces. J Exp Biol 2019 May 23;222(Pt 10).
      doi: 10.1242/jeb.198325pubmed: 31085599google scholar: lookup
    8. Miller CE, Johnson LE, Pinkard H, Lemelin P, Schmitt D. Limb phase flexibility in walking: a test case in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Front Zool 2019;16:5.
      doi: 10.1186/s12983-019-0299-8pubmed: 30820237google scholar: lookup
    9. Vincent JA, Gabriel HM, Deardorff AS, Nardelli P, Fyffe REW, Burkholder T, Cope TC. Muscle proprioceptors in adult rat: mechanosensory signaling and synapse distribution in spinal cord. J Neurophysiol 2017 Nov 1;118(5):2687-2701.
      doi: 10.1152/jn.00497.2017pubmed: 28814636google scholar: lookup
    10. Righetti L, Nylén A, Rosander K, Ijspeert AJ. Kinematic and Gait Similarities between Crawling Human Infants and Other Quadruped Mammals. Front Neurol 2015;6:17.
      doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00017pubmed: 25709597google scholar: lookup
    11. Fukuoka Y, Habu Y, Fukui T. A simple rule for quadrupedal gait generation determined by leg loading feedback: a modeling study. Sci Rep 2015 Feb 2;5:8169.
      doi: 10.1038/srep08169pubmed: 25639661google scholar: lookup
    12. Hreljac A, Imamura R, Escamilla RF, Casebolt J, Sison M. Preferred and energetically optimal transition speeds during backward human locomotion. J Sports Sci Med 2005 Dec;4(4):446-54.
      pubmed: 24501559
    13. Hreljac A, Imamura RT, Escamilla RF, Edwards WB. When does a gait transition occur during human locomotion?. J Sports Sci Med 2007;6(1):36-43.
      pubmed: 24149222
    14. Aoi S, Katayama D, Fujiki S, Tomita N, Funato T, Yamashita T, Senda K, Tsuchiya K. A stability-based mechanism for hysteresis in the walk-trot transition in quadruped locomotion. J R Soc Interface 2013 Apr 6;10(81):20120908.
      doi: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0908pubmed: 23389894google scholar: lookup
    15. Ren L, Hutchinson JR. The three-dimensional locomotor dynamics of African (Loxodonta africana) and Asian (Elephas maximus) elephants reveal a smooth gait transition at moderate speed. J R Soc Interface 2008 Feb 6;5(19):195-211.
      doi: 10.1098/rsif.2007.1095pubmed: 17594960google scholar: lookup
    16. Warden SJ, Creaby MW, Bryant AL, Crossley KM. Stress fracture risk factors in female football players and their clinical implications. Br J Sports Med 2007 Aug;41 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i38-43.
      doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.037804pubmed: 17584950google scholar: lookup
    17. Bishop M, Fiolkowski P, Conrad B, Brunt D, Horodyski M. Athletic footwear, leg stiffness, and running kinematics. J Athl Train 2006 Oct-Dec;41(4):387-92.
      pubmed: 17273463
    18. Daley MA, Felix G, Biewener AA. Running stability is enhanced by a proximo-distal gradient in joint neuromechanical control. J Exp Biol 2007 Feb;210(Pt 3):383-94.
      doi: 10.1242/jeb.02668pubmed: 17234607google scholar: lookup
    19. Daley MA, Biewener AA. Running over rough terrain reveals limb control for intrinsic stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006 Oct 17;103(42):15681-6.
      doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601473103pubmed: 17032779google scholar: lookup
    20. Karamanidis K, Arampatzis A, Brüggemann GP. Adaptational phenomena and mechanical responses during running: effect of surface, aging and task experience. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006 Oct;98(3):284-98.
      doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0277-7pubmed: 16932968google scholar: lookup
    21. Lee DV, Meek SG. Directionally compliant legs influence the intrinsic pitch behaviour of a trotting quadruped. Proc Biol Sci 2005 Mar 22;272(1563):567-72.
      doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.3014pubmed: 15817430google scholar: lookup
    22. Rubenson J, Heliams DB, Lloyd DG, Fournier PA. Gait selection in the ostrich: mechanical and metabolic characteristics of walking and running with and without an aerial phase. Proc Biol Sci 2004 May 22;271(1543):1091-9.
      doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2702pubmed: 15293864google scholar: lookup
    23. Cavagna GA, Franzetti P, Heglund NC, Willems P. The determinants of the step frequency in running, trotting and hopping in man and other vertebrates. J Physiol 1988 May;399:81-92.
      doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017069pubmed: 3404473google scholar: lookup