FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2026; doi: 10.1002/ar.70143

Three-dimensional anatomical description of the microarchitecture of the distal sesamoid bone in healthy and navicular syndrome-affected horses by computed microtomography.

Abstract: Navicular syndrome (NS) is a chronic, degenerative condition of the equine thoracic limb that compromises the distal sesamoid bone (DSB) and associated structures responsible for stabilization and load absorption during locomotion. Although historically attributed to vascular alterations, its etiology is now recognized as biomechanical, characterized by chronic overload of the deep digital flexor tendon. Conventional diagnostic techniques-radiography, scintigraphy, and ultrasonography-lack the sensitivity and precision required to detect early microarchitectural alterations. This study aimed to evaluate changes in the trabecular microarchitecture of the DSB in horses with and without NS using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and to explore its diagnostic potential. Samples from eight horses (NS group, n = 4; Not affected group (control), n = 4) were analyzed. Micro-CT images were processed to obtain parameters such as bone volume, relative density, trabecular thickness and separation, porosity, and connectivity. Group comparisons were performed using nonparametric tests and Pearson correlation analyses to explore internal structural relationships. Correlations between groups were then compared using Fisher's Z test. Horses with NS exhibited lower bone volume, trabecular density, thickness, and connectivity, alongside increased trabecular separation, porosity, and anisotropy compared to controls. In healthy horses, strong positive correlations between volume and density, and inverse relationships with trabecular fragmentation, indicated an elevated, well-connected architecture. By contrast, affected horses displayed deteriorated microarchitecture with compensatory trabecular consolidation, reduced trabecular numbers, and a more cylindrical structure-signifying pathological adaptation. Two correlations differed significantly between groups, underscoring disease-induced microstructural reorganization. Micro-CT effectively identified navicular syndrome-specific microarchitectural changes not detectable with conventional methods, yielding quantifiable metrics (thickness, separation, and porosity) that may serve as early diagnostic and monitoring biomarkers. These findings justify broader studies with larger sample sizes and longitudinal designs to validate clinical applicability.
© 2026 American Association for Anatomy.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2026-01-20 PubMed ID: 41559897DOI: 10.1002/ar.70143Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated the microarchitectural changes in the distal sesamoid bone of horses affected by navicular syndrome using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).
  • The research identified specific bone structure alterations linked to the disease, suggesting micro-CT as a promising tool for early diagnosis and monitoring of navicular syndrome.

Background

  • Navicular Syndrome (NS): A chronic degenerative disease in the forelimbs of horses characterized by damage to the distal sesamoid bone (DSB) and supporting structures.
  • Etiology: Previously thought to be caused by vascular issues, current understanding points to biomechanical causes, especially chronic overload of the deep digital flexor tendon.
  • Diagnostic Challenges: Traditional imaging modalities such as radiography, scintigraphy, and ultrasonography lack the sensitivity to detect early microarchitectural changes in the DSB associated with NS.

Research Objective

  • To assess and compare the microscopic bone structure (microarchitecture) of the distal sesamoid bone in healthy horses and those with navicular syndrome.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) in detecting subtle bone changes related to navicular syndrome.

Methodology

  • Sample: Distal sesamoid bone samples collected from eight horses (four with NS and four healthy controls).
  • Imaging Technique: Micro-CT scanning used to create detailed 3D images of bone microarchitecture.
  • Parameters Measured:
    • Bone volume
    • Relative bone density
    • Trabecular thickness (thickness of tiny bone struts inside the bone)
    • Trabecular separation (space between trabeculae)
    • Porosity (degree of bone void spaces)
    • Connectivity (how well trabeculae interconnect)
    • Anisotropy (directional dependence of trabecular architecture)
  • Data Analysis: Nonparametric tests for group comparisons and correlation analyses (Pearson and Fisher’s Z tests) to assess internal structural relationships and differences between groups.

Key Findings

  • Structural Differences in NS Horses:
    • Reduced bone volume, trabecular density, thickness, and connectivity compared to controls.
    • Increased trabecular separation, porosity, and anisotropy, indicating a more disorganized bone structure.
  • Microarchitectural Patterns in Healthy Horses:
    • Strong positive correlations between bone volume and density.
    • Inverse relationships between these variables and trabecular fragmentation, indicating a robust, well-connected bone structure.
  • Microarchitectural Patterns in NS-Affected Horses:
    • Evidence of microarchitectural deterioration with pathological bone adaptation.
    • Compensatory trabecular consolidation but fewer trabeculae overall.
    • Trabeculae exhibited a more cylindrical structure, reflecting mechanical adaptation to abnormal stress.
  • Disease-Specific Correlation Changes:
    • Two internal microarchitecture correlations were significantly different between healthy and NS groups.
    • This suggests NS induces reorganization of bone microstructure.

Significance and Implications

  • Diagnostic Potential: Micro-CT can detect microarchitectural changes in the distal sesamoid bone that conventional methods miss, offering quantifiable metrics like trabecular thickness, separation, and porosity.
  • Early Detection and Monitoring: These microarchitectural parameters could act as biomarkers for early diagnosis and tracking the progression of navicular syndrome in horses.
  • Future Research: The study recommends larger scale and longitudinal studies to better validate the ability of micro-CT to detect disease progression and evaluate clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

  • This study provides a detailed 3D assessment of distal sesamoid bone microarchitecture differences between healthy and navicular syndrome-affected horses using micro-CT.
  • The findings highlight specific structural degradations caused by NS and demonstrate micro-CT’s superior sensitivity to these changes compared to conventional imaging methods.
  • This approach holds promise for improving clinical diagnosis and management of navicular syndrome in equine patients.

Cite This Article

APA
Salinas P, Vergara MA, Tapia D. (2026). Three-dimensional anatomical description of the microarchitecture of the distal sesamoid bone in healthy and navicular syndrome-affected horses by computed microtomography. Anat Rec (Hoboken). https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.70143

Publication

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)
ISSN: 1932-8494
NlmUniqueID: 101292775
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Salinas, Paulo
  • Laboratory of Animal & Experimental Morphology, Institute of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
Vergara, Matías A
  • Laboratory of Animal & Experimental Morphology, Institute of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
  • MSc. Program in Biological Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
Tapia, Danae
  • Laboratory of Animal & Experimental Morphology, Institute of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
  • MSc. Program in Biological Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.

References

This article includes 37 references
  1. Abidin AZ, Jameson J, Molthen R, Wismüller A. Classification of micro‐CT images using 3D characterization of bone canal patterns in human osteogenesis imperfecta. Proceedings of SPIE 10134, 1013413.
    doi: 10.1117/12.2254421google scholar: lookup
  2. Bart Z, Wallace J. Microcomputed tomography applications in bone and mineral research. Advances in Computed Tomography 2(3), 121–127.
    doi: 10.4236/act.2013.23021google scholar: lookup
  3. Bassage LH, Ross MW. Diagnostic analgesia. In M. W. Ross & S. J. Dyson (Eds.), Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the horse (2nd ed., pp. 100–135).
  4. Bentley VA, Sample SJ, Livesey MA, Scollay MC, Radtke CL, Frank JD, Kalscheur VL, Muir P. Morphologic changes associated with functional adaptation of the navicular bone of horses. Journal of Anatomy 211(5), 662–672.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00800.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  5. Blunden A, Dyson S, Murray R, Schramme M. Histopathology in horses with chronic palmar foot pain and age‐matched controls. Part 1: Navicular bone and related structures. Equine Veterinary Journal 38(1), 15–22.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406775374298google scholar: lookup
  6. Buie HR, Campbell GM, Klinck RJ, MacNeil JA, Boyd SK. Automatic segmentation of cortical and trabecular compartments based on a dual threshold technique for in vivo micro‐CT bone analysis. Bone 41(4), 505–515.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.07.007google scholar: lookup
  7. Colles CM, Hickman J. The arterial supply of the navicular bone and its variations in navicular disease. Equine Veterinary Journal 9(3), 150–154.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1977.tb04009.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  8. Diedenhofen B, Musch J. Cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLoS One 10(3), e0121945.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121945google scholar: lookup
  9. Ducrocq M, Kamus L, Richard H, Beauchamp G, Janvier V, Laverty S. Micro‐computed tomography reveals high‐density mineralised protrusions and microstructural lesions in equine stifle joint articular cartilage. Equine Veterinary Journal 57(1), 203–216.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14100google scholar: lookup
  10. Dyson S. Can lameness be graded reliably?. Equine Veterinary Journal 43(4), 379–382.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00391.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  11. Dyson S. Radiological interpretation of the navicular bone. Equine Veterinary Education 23(2), 73–87.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2010.00168.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  12. Dyson S, Murray R, Schramme M, Blunden T. Current concepts of navicular disease. Equine Veterinary Education 23(1), 27–39.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2010.00172.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  13. García‐Aznar JM, Nasello G, Hervas‐Raluy S, Pérez MÁ, Gómez‐Benito MJ. Multiscale modeling of bone tissue mechanobiology. Bone 151, 116032.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116032google scholar: lookup
  14. Graham S, Solano M, Sutherland‐Smith J, Sato AF, Maranda L. Diagnostic sensitivity of bone scintigraphy for equine stifle disorders. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 56(1), 96–102.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12184google scholar: lookup
  15. Guha I, Klintström B, Klintström E, Zhang X, Smedby Ö, Moreno R, Saha PK. A comparative study of trabecular bone micro‐structural measurements using different CT modalities. Physics in Medicine and Biology 65(23).
    doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abc367google scholar: lookup
  16. Hambli R. Micro‐CT finite element model and experimental validation of trabecular bone damage and fracture. Bone 56(2), 363–374.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.06.028google scholar: lookup
  17. Hillman H. Limitations of clinical and biological histology. Medical Hypotheses 54(4), 553–564.
    doi: 10.1054/mehy.1999.0894google scholar: lookup
  18. Inai R, Nakahara R, Morimitsu Y, Akagi N, Marukawa Y, Matsushita T, Tanaka T, Tada A, Hiraki T, Nasu Y, Nishida K, Ozaki T, Kanazawa S. Bone microarchitectural analysis using ultra‐high‐resolution CT in tiger vertebra and human tibia. European Radiology Experimental 4(1), 4.
    doi: 10.1186/s41747-019-0135-0google scholar: lookup
  19. Komosa M, Lazowski S, Wlodarek J, Karolina K, Charuta A, Zdun M. Gross and histological evaluation of early lesions of navicular bone and deep digital flexor tendon in horses. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy 58, 87–91.
    doi: 10.2478/bvip-2014-0014google scholar: lookup
  20. McGuigan MP, Wilson AM. The effect of bilateral palmar digital nerve analgesia on the compressive force experienced by the navicular bone in horses with navicular disease. Equine Veterinary Journal 33(2), 166–171.
    doi: 10.2746/042516401778643363google scholar: lookup
  21. Mys K, Varga P, Stockmans F, Gueorguiev B, Wyers CE, van den Bergh JPW, van Lenthe GH. Quantification of 3D microstructural parameters of trabecular bone is affected by the analysis software. Bone 142, 115653.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115653google scholar: lookup
  22. Nagy A, Bodo G, Dyson SJ, Szabo F, Barr AR. Diffusion of contrast medium after perineural injection of the palmar nerves: An in vivo and in vitro study. Equine Veterinary Journal 41(4), 379–383.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409x372502google scholar: lookup
  23. Oftadeh R, Perez-Viloria M, Villa-Camacho JC, Vaziri A, Nazarian A. Biomechanics and mechanobiology of trabecular bone: A review. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 137(1), 108021–1080215.
    doi: 10.1115/1.4029176google scholar: lookup
  24. Osborn ML, Cornille JL, Blas-Machado U, Uhl EW. The equine navicular apparatus as a premier enthesis organ: Functional implications. Veterinary Surgery 50(4), 713–728.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.13620google scholar: lookup
  25. Parkes R, Newton R, Dyson S. Is there an association between clinical features, response to diagnostic analgesia and radiological findings in horses with a magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of navicular disease or other injuries of the podotrochlear apparatus?. Veterinary Journal 204(1), 40–46.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.12.038google scholar: lookup
  26. Pool RR, Meagher DM, Stover SM. Pathophysiology of navicular syndrome. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 5(1), 109–129.
    doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30606-5google scholar: lookup
  27. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (4.4.1). .
  28. Rijkenhuizen AB. Navicular disease: A review of what's new. Equine Veterinary Journal 38(1), 82–88.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406775374216google scholar: lookup
  29. Salinas P, Figueroa S, Carrasco C, Bañados R. Morfometría, planimetría y estereología en el hueso sesamoideo distal en manos de equinos con y sin síndrome navicular. International Journal of Morphology 32(1), 357–366.
    doi: 10.4067/s0717-95022014000100056google scholar: lookup
  30. Salinas P, Figueroa Vergara SA, Bañados Fernández R. Estudio Histoquímico de la Distribución de las Fibras de Colágeno en Hueso Sesamoídeo Distal de Equinos con y sin Síndrome Navicular. International Journal of Morphology 32(4), 1266–1270.
    doi: 10.4067/s0717-95022014000400023google scholar: lookup
  31. Salinas P, Lira‐Velásquez D, Bongiorno A, Sandoval C. Navicular syndrome‐related changes to collagen proportion of different cross‐sections of the flexor tendons in equine distal forelimb. Research in Veterinary Science 135, 106–112.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.01.002google scholar: lookup
  32. Sampson SN, Schneider RK, Gavin PR, Ho CP, Tucker RL, Charles EM. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in horses with recent onset navicular syndrome but without radiographic abnormalities. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 50(4), 339–346.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01547.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  33. Schumacher J, Schumacher J, de Graves F, Schramme M, Smith R, Coker M, Steiger R. A comparison of the effects of local analgesic solution in the navicular bursa of horses with lameness caused by solar toe or solar heel pain. Equine Veterinary Journal 33(4), 386–389.
    doi: 10.2746/042516401776249543google scholar: lookup
  34. Waguespack R, Hanson RR. Navicular syndrome in equine patients anatomy, causes, and diagnosis. Compendium 32(12), E7.
  35. Widmer WR, Buckwalter KA, Fessler JF, Hill MA, VanSickle DC, Ivancevich S. Use of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of navicular syndrome in the horse. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 41(2), 108–116.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2000.tb01463.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  36. Wright IM, Kidd L, Thorp BH. Gross, histological and histomorphometric features of the navicular bone and related structures in the horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 30(3), 220–234.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1998.tb04491.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  37. Yeni YN, Zinno MJ, Yerramshetty JS, Zauel R, Fyhrie DP. Variability of trabecular microstructure is age‐, gender‐, race‐ and anatomic site‐dependent and affects stiffness and stress distribution properties of human vertebral cancellous bone. Bone 49(4), 886–894.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.006google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,970 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.