FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Equine Vet J / Three dimensional, radiosteriometric analysis (RSA) of equin...
Equine veterinary journal2013; 46(3); 364-369; doi: 10.1111/evj.12127

Three dimensional, radiosteriometric analysis (RSA) of equine stifle kinematics and articular surface contact: a cadaveric study.

Abstract: Studies examining the effect of stifle joint angle on tibial rotation, adduction-abduction angle and articular contact area are lacking. Objective: To test the hypothesis that tibial rotation, adduction-abduction angle and articular contact area change with stifle joint angle. Methods: Descriptive study of normal kinematics and articular contact patterns of the equine stifle through the functional range of motion using 3 dimensional (3D) radiosteriometric analysis (RSA) and equine cadaver stifles. Methods: Multiple, radiopaque markers were embedded in the distal femur and proximal tibia and sequential, biplanar x-rays captured as the stifle was passively extended from 110° to full extension. Computer-programmed RSA was used to determine changes in abduction-adduction and internal-external rotation angles of the tibia during stifle extension as well as articular contact patterns (total area and areas of high contact) through the range of motion. Results: The tibia rotated externally (P < 0.001) as the stifle was extended. Tibial abduction occurred from 110-135° of extension (P < 0.001) and tibial adduction occurred from 135° through full extension (P = 0.009). The centre of joint contact moved cranially on both tibial condyles during extension with the lateral moving a greater distance than the medial (P = 0.003). Articular contact area decreased (P = 0.001) in the medial compartment but not in the lateral compartment (P = 0.285) as the stifle was extended. The area of highest joint contact increased on the lateral tibial condyle (P < 0.001) with extension but decreased (P = 0.001) on the medial tibial condyle. Conclusions: Significant changes occur in tibial rotation, adduction-abduction angle and articular contact area of the equine stifle through the functional range of motion. Understanding the normal kinematics of the equine stifle and the relationship between joint positions and articular contact areas may provide important insight into the aetiology and location of common stifle joint pathologies (articular cartilage and meniscal lesions).
© 2013 EVJ Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2013-09-11 PubMed ID: 23802689PubMed Central: PMC3864602DOI: 10.1111/evj.12127Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • N.I.H.
  • Extramural
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article studies the effects of stifle joint angle on tibial rotation, adduction-abduction angle and articular contact area using equine cadaver stifles. It uses 3-dimensional radiosteriometric analysis to observe these changes and reveals the variations along the functional range of motion, providing insight into possible joint pathologies.

Research Methodology:

  • The researchers performed a descriptive study on normal kinematics and articular contact patterns of the equine stifle through a functional range of motion. This was achieved using 3-dimensional radiosteriometric analysis (RSA), which was applied to equine cadaver stifles.
  • Radiopaque markers were embedded in the distal femur and proximal tibia of the specimens. Sequential biplanar X-rays were captured as the stifle was passively extended from 110° to full extension.
  • The team used computer-programmed RSA to determine changes in the abduction-adduction and internal-external rotation angles of the tibia during stifle extension. The technique was also used to study articular contact patterns in terms of total area and regions of high contact throughout the range of motion.

Research Findings:

  • The analysis showed that the tibia rotated externally when the stifle was extended. Tibial abduction occurred from 110-135° of extension, and tibial adduction took place from 135° through full extension.
  • The joint contact centre relocated cranially on both tibial condyles during extension, with the lateral moving a greater distance than the medial. The articular contact area decreased in the medial compartment, but not in the lateral compartment as the stifle was extended.
  • The area of the highest joint contact increased on the lateral tibial condyle with extension but decreased on the medial tibial condyle.

Conclusions:

  • The study concluded that significant changes occur in tibial rotation, adduction-abduction angle and articular contact area of the equine stifle through the functional range of motion.
  • Understanding the normal kinematics of the equine stifle and the relationship between joint positions and articular contact areas may provide important insight into potential causes and locations of many stifle joint pathologies, such as articular cartilage and meniscal lesions.

Cite This Article

APA
Halley SE, Bey MJ, Haladik JA, Lavagnino M, Arnoczky SP. (2013). Three dimensional, radiosteriometric analysis (RSA) of equine stifle kinematics and articular surface contact: a cadaveric study. Equine Vet J, 46(3), 364-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12127

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 46
Issue: 3
Pages: 364-369

Researcher Affiliations

Halley, S E
  • Laboratory for Comparative Orthopaedic Research, Michigan State University, USA.
Bey, M J
    Haladik, J A
      Lavagnino, M
        Arnoczky, S P

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Biomechanical Phenomena
          • Cadaver
          • Horses / anatomy & histology
          • Horses / physiology
          • Radiostereometric Analysis / veterinary
          • Stifle / physiology

          Grant Funding

          • T35 RR017491 / NCRR NIH HHS
          • T35RR01749 / NCRR NIH HHS

          Conflict of Interest Statement

          . No competing interests have been declared.

          References

          This article includes 55 references
          1. Baxter GM. Subchondral cystic lesions in horses.. In: McIlwraith CW, Trotter GW, editors. Joint Disease in the Horse. WB Saunders, Elsevier; Philadelphia: 1996. pp. 384–397.
          2. Fowlie J, Arnoczky S, Lavagnino M, Maerz T, Stick J. Resection of Grade III cranial horn tears of the equine medial meniscus alter the contact forces on medial tibial condyle at full extension: an in-vitro cadaveric study.. Vet Surg 2011 Dec;40(8):957-65.
            pubmed: 22091489doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2011.00899.xgoogle scholar: lookup
          3. Fowlie JG, Stick JA, Nickels FA. Stifle.. In: Auer JA, Stick JA, editors. Equine Surgery. 4. Elsevier Inc; St. Louis: 2012. pp. 1419–1422.
          4. Hendrix SM, Baxter GM, McIlwraith CW, Hendrickson DA, Goodrich LR, Frisbie DD, Trotter GW. Concurrent or sequential development of medial meniscal and subchondral cystic lesions within the medial femorotibial joint in horses (1996-2006).. Equine Vet J 2010 Jan;42(1):5-9.
            pubmed: 20121906doi: 10.2746/042516409x454556google scholar: lookup
          5. Walmsley JP. Vertical tears of the cranial horn of the meniscus and its cranial ligament in the equine femorotibial joint: 7 cases and their treatment by arthroscopic surgery.. Equine Vet J 1995 Jan;27(1):20-5.
            pubmed: 7774542doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb03027.xgoogle scholar: lookup
          6. Walmsley JR, Phillips TJ, Townsend HG. Meniscal tears in horses: an evaluation of clinical signs and arthroscopic treatment of 80 cases.. Equine Vet J 2003 Jun;35(4):402-6.
            pubmed: 12880009doi: 10.2746/042516403776014163google scholar: lookup
          7. Walmsley JP. Diagnosis and treatment of ligamentous and meniscal injuries in the equine stifle.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2005 Dec;21(3):651-72, vii.
            pubmed: 16297726doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2005.08.003google scholar: lookup
          8. Trotter GW, McIlwraith CW. Clinical features and diagnosis of equine joint disease.. In: McIlwraith CW, Trotter GW, editors. Joint Disease in the Horse. WB Saunders, Elsevier; Philadelphia: 1996. pp. 120–144.
          9. Hurtig MB, Pool RR. Pathogenesis of Osteochondrosis.. In: McIlwraith CW, Trotter GW, editors. Joint Disease in the Horse. WB Saunders, Elsevier; Philadelphia: 1996. pp. 335–358.
          10. Taylor WR, Poepplau BM, König C, Ehrig RM, Zachow S, Duda GN, Heller MO. The medial-lateral force distribution in the ovine stifle joint during walking.. J Orthop Res 2011 Apr;29(4):567-71.
            pubmed: 20957731doi: 10.1002/jor.21254google scholar: lookup
          11. Arnoczky SP, Torzilli PA, Marshall JL. Biomechanical evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament repair in the dog: an analysis of the instant center of motion.. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1977;13:553–558.
          12. Frankel VH, Burstein AH, Brooks DB. Biomechanics of internal derangement of the knee. Pathomechanics as determined by analysis of the instant centers of motion.. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1971 Jul;53(5):945-62.
            pubmed: 5109122
          13. HELFET AJ. Mechanism of derangements of the medial semilunar cartilage and their management.. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1959 May;41-B(2):319-36.
            pubmed: 13641317doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.41b2.319google scholar: lookup
          14. Luther JK, Cook CR, Cook JL. Meniscal release in cruciate ligament intact stifles causes lameness and medial compartment cartilage pathology in dogs 12 weeks postoperatively.. Vet Surg 2009 Jun;38(4):520-9.
            pubmed: 19538675doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2009.00520.xgoogle scholar: lookup
          15. Rangger C, Klestil T, Gloetzer W, Kemmler G, Benedetto KP. Osteoarthritis after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.. Am J Sports Med 1995 Mar-Apr;23(2):240-4.
            pubmed: 7778712doi: 10.1177/036354659502300219google scholar: lookup
          16. Draganich LF, Andriacchi TP, Andersson GB. Interaction between intrinsic knee mechanics and the knee extensor mechanism.. J Orthop Res 1987;5(4):539-47.
            pubmed: 3681528doi: 10.1002/jor.1100050409google scholar: lookup
          17. Buckwalter JA, Lane NE. Athletics and osteoarthritis.. Am J Sports Med 1997 Nov-Dec;25(6):873-81.
            pubmed: 9397280doi: 10.1177/036354659702500624google scholar: lookup
          18. Setton LA, Elliott DM, Mow VC. Altered mechanics of cartilage with osteoarthritis: human osteoarthritis and an experimental model of joint degeneration.. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999 Jan;7(1):2-14.
            pubmed: 10367011doi: 10.1053/joca.1998.0170google scholar: lookup
          19. Hsieh YF, Draganich LF, Ho SH, Reider B. The effects of removal and reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on the contact characteristics of the patellofemoral joint.. Am J Sports Med 2002 Jan-Feb;30(1):121-7.
            pubmed: 11799008doi: 10.1177/03635465020300010601google scholar: lookup
          20. Tapper JE, Fukushima S, Azuma H, Thornton GM, Ronsky JL, Shrive NG, Frank CB. Dynamic in vivo kinematics of the intact ovine stifle joint.. J Orthop Res 2006 Apr;24(4):782-92.
            pubmed: 16514638doi: 10.1002/jor.20051google scholar: lookup
          21. Tashman S, Anderst W, Kolowich P, Havstad S, Arnoczky S. Kinematics of the ACL-deficient canine knee during gait: serial changes over two years.. J Orthop Res 2004 Sep;22(5):931-41.
            pubmed: 15304262doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.01.008google scholar: lookup
          22. Fowlie JG, Arnoczky SP, Stick JA, Pease AP. Meniscal translocation and deformation throughout the range of motion of the equine stifle joint: an in vitro cadaveric study.. Equine Vet J 2011 May;43(3):259-64.
            pubmed: 21492201doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00291.xgoogle scholar: lookup
          23. Fredricson I, Drevemo S. A new method of investigating equine locomotion.. Equine Vet J 1971 Oct;3(4):137-40.
            pubmed: 5161366doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1971.tb04456.xgoogle scholar: lookup
          24. Fredricson I. Thesis.. Stockholm University; 1972. Equine joint kinematics and coordination.
          25. Fredricson I, Drevemo S, Dalin G, Hjertën G, Björne K. The application of high-speed cinematography for the quantitative analysis of equine locomotion.. Equine Vet J 1980 Apr;12(2):54-9.
            pubmed: 7371610doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1980.tb02309.xgoogle scholar: lookup
          26. Crawford WH, Leach DH. The effect of racetrack design on gait symmetry of the pacer.. Can J Comp Med 1984 Oct;48(4):374-80.
            pmc: PMC1236088pubmed: 6509365
          27. Kobluk CN, Schnurr D, Horney FD, Sumner-Smith G, Willoughby RA, Dekleer V, Hearn TC. Use of high-speed cinematography and computer generated gait diagrams for the study of equine hindlimb kinematics.. Equine Vet J 1989 Jan;21(1):48-58.
            pubmed: 2920701doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb02089.xgoogle scholar: lookup
          28. Hodson E, Clayton HM, Lanovaz JL. The hindlimb in walking horses: 1. Kinematics and ground reaction forces.. Equine Vet J 2001 Jan;33(1):38-43.
            pubmed: 11191608doi: 10.2746/042516401776767485google scholar: lookup
          29. Back W, Schamhardt HC, Savelberg HH, van den Bogert AJ, Bruin G, Hartman W, Barneveld A. How the horse moves: 2. Significance of graphical representations of equine hind limb kinematics.. Equine Vet J 1995 Jan;27(1):39-45.
            pubmed: 7774545doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb03030.xgoogle scholar: lookup
          30. Menschik A. [Mechanics of the knee joint, part II, the final rotation (author's transl)].. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1975 Jun;113(3):388-400.
            pubmed: 1179807
          31. Anderst WJ, Tashman S. A method to estimate in vivo dynamic articular surface interaction.. J Biomech 2003 Sep;36(9):1291-9.
            pubmed: 12893037doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00157-xgoogle scholar: lookup
          32. Tashman S, Collon D, Anderson K, Kolowich P, Anderst W. Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.. Am J Sports Med 2004 Jun;32(4):975-83.
            pubmed: 15150046doi: 10.1177/0363546503261709google scholar: lookup
          33. Bey MJ, Kline SK, Zauel R, Kolowich PA, Lock TR. In Vivo Measurement of Glenohumeral Joint Contact Patterns.. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2010 Jan 1;2010.
            pmc: PMC3086287pubmed: 21546990doi: 10.1155/2010/162136google scholar: lookup
          34. Anderst W, Zauel R, Bishop J, Demps E, Tashman S. Validation of three-dimensional model-based tibio-femoral tracking during running.. Med Eng Phys 2009 Jan;31(1):10-6.
            pmc: PMC2668117pubmed: 18434230doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.03.003google scholar: lookup
          35. Goyal K, Tashman S, Wang JH, Li K, Zhang X, Harner C. In vivo analysis of the isolated posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee during functional activities.. Am J Sports Med 2012 Apr;40(4):777-85.
            pubmed: 22328708doi: 10.1177/0363546511435783google scholar: lookup
          36. Anderst WJ, Les C, Tashman S. In vivo serial joint space measurements during dynamic loading in a canine model of osteoarthritis.. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005 Sep;13(9):808-16.
            pubmed: 15964770doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.04.019google scholar: lookup
          37. Tashman S, Anderst W. In-vivo measurement of dynamic joint motion using high speed biplane radiography and CT: application to canine ACL deficiency.. J Biomech Eng 2003 Apr;125(2):238-45.
            pubmed: 12751286doi: 10.1115/1.1559896google scholar: lookup
          38. Deneweth JM, Bey MJ, McLean SG, Lock TR, Kolowich PA, Tashman S. Tibiofemoral joint kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee during a single-legged hop landing.. Am J Sports Med 2010 Sep;38(9):1820-8.
            pubmed: 20472756doi: 10.1177/0363546510365531google scholar: lookup
          39. Tashman S, Kolowich P, Collon D, Anderson K, Anderst W. Dynamic function of the ACL-reconstructed knee during running.. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007 Jan;454:66-73.
            pubmed: 17091011doi: 10.1097/blo.0b013e31802bab3egoogle scholar: lookup
          40. Frisbie DD, Cross MW, McIlwraith CW. A comparative study of articular cartilage thickness in the stifle of animal species used in human pre-clinical studies compared to articular cartilage thickness in the human knee.. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006;19(3):142-6.
            pubmed: 16971996
          41. Blankevoort L, Huiskes R, de Lange A. The envelope of passive knee joint motion.. J Biomech 1988;21(9):705-20.
            pubmed: 3182875doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90280-1google scholar: lookup
          42. Lafortune MA, Cavanagh PR, Sommer HJ 3rd, Kalenak A. Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking.. J Biomech 1992 Apr;25(4):347-57.
            pubmed: 1583014doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90254-xgoogle scholar: lookup
          43. Kenawey M, Liodakis E, Krettek C, Ostermeier S, Horn T, Hankemeier S. Effect of the lower limb rotational alignment on tibiofemoral contact pressure.. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011 Nov;19(11):1851-9.
            pubmed: 21448663doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1482-4google scholar: lookup
          44. Senter C, Hame SL. Biomechanical analysis of tibial torque and knee flexion angle: implications for understanding knee injury.. Sports Med 2006;36(8):635-41.
            pubmed: 16869706doi: 10.2165/00007256-200636080-00001google scholar: lookup
          45. Englund M. The role of biomechanics in the initiation and progression of OA of the knee.. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010 Feb;24(1):39-46.
            pubmed: 20129198doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.08.008google scholar: lookup
          46. Andriacchi TP, Briant PL, Bevill SL, Koo S. Rotational changes at the knee after ACL injury cause cartilage thinning.. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006 Jan;442:39-44.
            pubmed: 16394737doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000197079.26600.09google scholar: lookup
          47. Suganuma J, Ohkoshi T. Association of internal rotation of the knee joint with recurrent subluxation of the lateral meniscus.. Arthroscopy 2011 Aug;27(8):1071-8.
            pubmed: 21658897doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.029google scholar: lookup
          48. Kawashima K, Tomita T, Tamaki M, Murase T, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. In vivo three-dimensional motion analysis of osteoarthritic knees.. Mod Rheumatol 2013 Jul;23(4):646-52.
            doi: 10.1007/s10165-012-0703-0pubmed: 22772489google scholar: lookup
          49. Müller W. In: The Knee: form, function, and ligament reconstruction. Müller W, editor. Bermin, New York: Springer-Verlag; 1983. pp. 8–60.
          50. Torres BT, Punke JP, Fu YC, Navik JA, Speas AL, Sornborger A, Budsberg SC. Comparison of canine stifle kinematic data collected with three different targeting models.. Vet Surg 2010 Jun;39(4):504-12.
            pubmed: 20345524doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2010.00666.xgoogle scholar: lookup
          51. O’Connor JJ, Shercliff T, Fitzpatrick D, Bradley J, Daniel D, Biden E. Geometry of the knee.. In: Daniels D, Akeson W, O’Connor J, editors. Knee Ligaments: Structure. Function, Injury, and Repair. Raven Press; New York: 1990. pp. 163–199.
          52. Vasseur PB, Arnoczky SP. Collateral ligaments of the canine stifle joint: anatomic and functional analysis.. Am J Vet Res 1981 Jul;42(7):1133-7.
            pubmed: 7271030
          53. Changoor A, Hurtig MB, Runciman RJ, Quesnel AJ, Dickey JP, Lowerison M. Mapping of donor and recipient site properties for osteochondral graft reconstruction of subchondral cystic lesions in the equine stifle joint.. Equine Vet J 2006 Jul;38(4):330-6.
            pubmed: 16866200doi: 10.2746/042516406777749254google scholar: lookup
          54. Petersen MM, Olsen C, Lauritzen JB, Lund B, Hede A. Late changes in bone mineral density of the proximal tibia following total or partial medial meniscectomy. A randomized study.. J Orthop Res 1996 Jan;14(1):16-21.
            pubmed: 8618160doi: 10.1002/jor.1100140105google scholar: lookup
          55. Victor J, Labey L, Wong P, Innocenti B, Bellemans J. The influence of muscle load on tibiofemoral knee kinematics.. J Orthop Res 2010 Apr;28(4):419-28.
            pubmed: 19890990doi: 10.1002/jor.21019google scholar: lookup

          Citations

          This article has been cited 5 times.
          1. Bowers K, Weinhandl JT, Anderson DE. A review of equine tibial fractures. Equine Vet J 2023 Mar;55(2):171-181.
            doi: 10.1111/evj.13599pubmed: 35569040google scholar: lookup
          2. Rubio-Martínez LM, Redding WR, Bladon B, Wilderjans H, Payne RJ, Tessier C, Geffroy O, Parker R, Bell C, Collingwood FA. Fracture of the medial intercondylar eminence of the tibia in horses treated by arthroscopic fragment removal (21 horses). Equine Vet J 2018 Jan;50(1):60-64.
            doi: 10.1111/evj.12720pubmed: 28710893google scholar: lookup
          3. Shaffer SK, Medjaouri O, Swenson B, Eliason T, Nicolella DP. A Markerless Approach for Full-Body Biomechanics of Horses. Animals (Basel) 2025 Aug 5;15(15).
            doi: 10.3390/ani15152281pubmed: 40805071google scholar: lookup
          4. Lang JJ, Li X, Micheler CM, Wilhelm NJ, Seidl F, Schwaiger BJ, Barnewitz D, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Grosse CU, Burgkart R. Numerical evaluation of internal femur osteosynthesis based on a biomechanical model of the loading in the proximal equine hindlimb. BMC Vet Res 2024 May 10;20(1):188.
            doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04044-5pubmed: 38730373google scholar: lookup
          5. Ducrocq M, Kamus L, Richard H, Beauchamp G, Janvier V, Laverty S. Micro-computed tomography reveals high-density mineralised protrusions and microstructural lesions in equine stifle joint articular cartilage. Equine Vet J 2025 Jan;57(1):203-216.
            doi: 10.1111/evj.14100pubmed: 38720453google scholar: lookup
          Subscribe to our newsletter
          Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.