Analyze Diet
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024; 24(11); 3538; doi: 10.3390/s24113538

Three-Dimensional Segmentation of Equine Paranasal Sinuses in Multidetector Computed Tomography Datasets: Preliminary Morphometric Assessment Assisted with Clustering Analysis.

Abstract: The paranasal sinuses, a bilaterally symmetrical system of eight air-filled cavities, represent one of the most complex parts of the equine body. This study aimed to extract morphometric measures from computed tomography (CT) images of the equine head and to implement a clustering analysis for the computer-aided identification of age-related variations. Heads of 18 cadaver horses, aged 2-25 years, were CT-imaged and segmented to extract their volume, surface area, and relative density from the frontal sinus (FS), dorsal conchal sinus (DCS), ventral conchal sinus (VCS), rostral maxillary sinus (RMS), caudal maxillary sinus (CMS), sphenoid sinus (SS), palatine sinus (PS), and middle conchal sinus (MCS). Data were grouped into young, middle-aged, and old horse groups and clustered using the K-means clustering algorithm. Morphometric measurements varied according to the sinus position and age of the horses but not the body side. The volume and surface area of the VCS, RMS, and CMS increased with the age of the horses. With accuracy values of 0.72 for RMS, 0.67 for CMS, and 0.31 for VCS, the possibility of the age-related clustering of CT-based 3D images of equine paranasal sinuses was confirmed for RMS and CMS but disproved for VCS.
Publication Date: 2024-05-30 PubMed ID: 38894336PubMed Central: PMC11175080DOI: 10.3390/s24113538Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study developed a method to measure the size, shape, and density of different sinus cavities in horse heads using 3D CT imaging and analyzed how these features change with age using clustering techniques.

Study Background and Purpose

  • Equine paranasal sinuses consist of eight air-filled cavities arranged symmetrically on both sides of the horse’s head.
  • These sinuses are anatomically complex and difficult to study using traditional methods.
  • The goal was to use multidetector computed tomography (CT) to create three-dimensional segmentations of these sinuses for detailed morphometric measurements.
  • The study also aimed to explore whether age-related anatomical changes in these sinuses can be identified through computer-assisted clustering analysis.

Methods

  • Sample: Heads from 18 cadaver horses aged between 2 to 25 years were imaged using CT scans.
  • Segmentation: Each sinus cavity was segmented to isolate and extract data on volume, surface area, and relative density.
  • Sinuses analyzed included:
    • Frontal sinus (FS)
    • Dorsal conchal sinus (DCS)
    • Ventral conchal sinus (VCS)
    • Rostral maxillary sinus (RMS)
    • Caudal maxillary sinus (CMS)
    • Sphenoid sinus (SS)
    • Palatine sinus (PS)
    • Middle conchal sinus (MCS)
  • Age groupings: The horses were categorized into young, middle-aged, and old groups.
  • Clustering Analysis: K-means clustering was applied to the morphometric data to classify sinuses based on age-related characteristics.

Key Findings

  • Morphometric differences were present depending on:
    • Sinus position (which sinus was measured)
    • Age of the horse
  • No significant differences were found between the left and right sides of the head, indicating symmetry in sinus morphology.
  • The volume and surface area of three sinuses—the ventral conchal sinus (VCS), rostral maxillary sinus (RMS), and caudal maxillary sinus (CMS)—tended to increase with age.
  • Using K-means clustering:
    • The rostral maxillary sinus (RMS) showed good age classification accuracy (0.72), indicating morphometric measures here can help distinguish age groups.
    • The caudal maxillary sinus (CMS) showed moderate accuracy (0.67) for age-related clustering.
    • The ventral conchal sinus (VCS) showed poor clustering accuracy (0.31), suggesting less reliable age-related morphometric variation.

Implications and Conclusions

  • This research demonstrates the feasibility of using 3D CT segmentation combined with morphometric analysis for detailed study of equine sinus anatomy.
  • It identifies that specific sinuses change in size and surface area as horses age, reflecting age-related anatomical remodeling.
  • Computer-assisted clustering analysis can effectively differentiate age groups based on measurements from some sinuses, particularly RMS and CMS.
  • The approach may offer clinical and research benefits for diagnosing sinus-related conditions in horses and understanding how sinus morphology evolves with age.
  • Further studies with larger samples could refine these models and validate the utility of such computer-aided segmentation and classification methods.

Cite This Article

APA
Borowska M, Lipowicz P, Daunoravičienė K, Turek B, Jasiński T, Pauk J, Domino M. (2024). Three-Dimensional Segmentation of Equine Paranasal Sinuses in Multidetector Computed Tomography Datasets: Preliminary Morphometric Assessment Assisted with Clustering Analysis. Sensors (Basel), 24(11), 3538. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113538

Publication

ISSN: 1424-8220
NlmUniqueID: 101204366
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 24
Issue: 11
PII: 3538

Researcher Affiliations

Borowska, Marta
  • Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Białystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.
Lipowicz, Paweł
  • Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Białystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.
Daunoravičienė, Kristina
  • Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 03224 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Turek, Bernard
  • Department of Large Animal Diseases and Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.
Jasiński, Tomasz
  • Department of Large Animal Diseases and Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.
Pauk, Jolanta
  • Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Białystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.
Domino, Małgorzata
  • Department of Large Animal Diseases and Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Cluster Analysis
  • Paranasal Sinuses / diagnostic imaging
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional / methods
  • Multidetector Computed Tomography / methods
  • Algorithms

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

This article includes 40 references
  1. Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E, Sack WO. The Viscera of the Domestic Mammals. Cham, Germany: 1979. Respiratory system; pp. 211–281.
  2. McCann JL, Dixon PM, Mayhew IG. Clinical anatomy of the equine sphenopalatine sinus. Equine Vet. J. 2004;36:466–472.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044877404pubmed: 15460069google scholar: lookup
  3. Bahar S, Bolat D, Dayan MO, Paksoy Y. Two-and three-dimensional anatomy of paranasal sinuses in Arabian foals. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2014;76:37–44.
    doi: 10.1292/jvms.13-0172pmc: PMC3979937pubmed: 24004969google scholar: lookup
  4. Probst A, Henninger W, Willmann M. Communications of normal nasal and paranasal cavities in computed tomography of horses. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2005;46:44–48.
  5. Tatarniuk DM, Bell C, Carmalt JL. A description of the relationship between the nasomaxillary aperture and the paranasal sinus system of horses. Vet. J. 2010;186:216–220.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.07.023pubmed: 19716733google scholar: lookup
  6. Nickels FA, O’Neill H. Equine Surgery. Philadelphia, PA, USA: 2019. Nasal passages and paranasal sinuses; pp. 698–710.
  7. Freeman DE. Sinus disease. Vet. Clin. Equine Prac. 2003;19:209–243.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(02)00062-7pubmed: 12747669google scholar: lookup
  8. O’Leary JM, Dixon PM. A review of equine paranasal sinusitis. Aetiopathogenesis, clinical signs and ancillary diagnostic techniques. Equine Vet. Educ. 2011;23:148–159.
  9. Brinkschulte M, Bienert-Zeit A, Lüpke M, Hellige M, Staszyk C, Ohnesorge B. Using semi-automated segmentation of computed tomography datasets for three-dimensional visualization and volume measurements of equine paranasal sinuses. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2013;54:582–590.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12080pubmed: 23890087google scholar: lookup
  10. Liuti T, Reardon R, Dixon PM. Computed tomographic assessment of equine maxillary cheek teeth anatomical relationships, and paranasal sinus volumes. Vet. Rec. 2017;181:452.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.104185pubmed: 28893971google scholar: lookup
  11. Canright A, Bescoby S, Dickson J. Evaluation of a 3D computer model of the equine paranasal sinuses as a tool for veterinary anatomy education. JVME 2022;50:234–242.
    doi: 10.3138/jvme-2021-0134pubmed: 35324419google scholar: lookup
  12. Dixon PM, Barnett TP, Morgan RE, Reardon RJ. Computed tomographic assessment of individual paranasal sinus compartment and nasal conchal bulla involvement in 300 cases of equine sinonasal disease. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020;7:580356.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.580356pmc: PMC7652901pubmed: 33195594google scholar: lookup
  13. Köhler L, Schulz-Kornas E, Vervuert I, Gittel C, Winter K, Berner D, Gerlach K. Volumetric measurements of paranasal sinuses and examination of sinonasal communication in healthy Shetland ponies: Anatomical and morphometric characteristics using computed tomography. BMC Vet. Res. 2021;17:41.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02748-6pmc: PMC7818571pubmed: 33478485google scholar: lookup
  14. Goodarzi N, Zehtabvar O, Tohidifar M. Applied anatomy of the skull in the Arabian horse: A computed tomographic, cross-sectional, volumetric and morphometric study. Vet. Med. Sci. 2021;7:2225–2233.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.618pmc: PMC8604115pubmed: 34453414google scholar: lookup
  15. Dixon PM, Parkin TD, Collins N, Hawkes C, Townsend NB, Fisher G, Ealey R, Barakzai SZ. Historical and clinical features of 200 cases of equine sinus disease. Vet. Rec. 2011;169:439.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.d4844pubmed: 21868434google scholar: lookup
  16. Dixon PM, Head KW. Equine nasal and paranasal sinus tumours: Part 2: A contribution of 28 case reports. Vet. J. 1999;157:279–294.
    doi: 10.1053/tvjl.1999.0371pubmed: 10328839google scholar: lookup
  17. Kreeger JM, Templer A, Turnquist SE, Bailey KL, Johnson PJ, Wilson DA. Paranasal meningioma in a horse. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 2002;14:322–325.
    doi: 10.1177/104063870201400408pubmed: 12152812google scholar: lookup
  18. Montgomery JE, Carmalt JL. Radiographic appearance of maxillary sinus feed impaction in a horse. J. Vet. Dent. 2013;30:158–160.
    doi: 10.1177/089875641303000304pubmed: 24371923google scholar: lookup
  19. Solano M, Brawer RS. CT of the equine head: Technical considerations, anatomical guide, and selected diseases. Clin. Tech. Equine Prac. 2004;3:374–388.
  20. Kinns J, Pease A. Computed tomography in the evaluation of the equine head. Equine Vet. Educ. 2009;21:291–294.
    doi: 10.2746/095777309X423022google scholar: lookup
  21. Gibbs C, Lane JG. Radiographic examination of the facial, nasal and paranasal sinus regions of the horse. II. Radiological findings. Equine Vet. J. 1987;19:474–482.
  22. Park RD. Radiographic examination of the equine head. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 1993;9:49–74.
    doi: 10.1016/S0749-0739(17)30415-7pubmed: 8472205google scholar: lookup
  23. Henninger W, Mairi Frame E, Willmann M, Simhofer H, Malleczek D, Kneissl SM, Mayrhofer E. CT features of alveolitis and sinusitis in horses. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2003;44:269–276.
  24. De Zani D, Borgonovo S, Biggi M, Vignati S, Scandella M, Lazzaretti S, Modina S, Zani D. Topographic comparative study of paranasal sinuses in adult horses by computed tomography, sinuscopy, and sectional anatomy. Vet. Res. Commun. 2010;34:13–16.
    doi: 10.1007/s11259-010-9381-6pubmed: 20461459google scholar: lookup
  25. Bell C, Tatarniuk D, Carmalt J. Endoscope-guided balloon sinuplasty of the equine nasomaxillary opening. Vet. Surg. 2009;38:791–797.
  26. Hopfgartner T, Brown JA, Adams MN, Werre SR. Comparison of equine paranasal sinus trephination complications and outcome following standing computed tomography, radiography and sinoscopy guided approaches for the treatment of sinusitis. Vet. Surg. 2024;53:54–66.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.14013pubmed: 37602997google scholar: lookup
  27. Brinkschulte M, Bienert-Zeit A, Lüpke M, Hellige M, Ohnesorge B, Staszyk C. The sinonasal communication in the horse: Examinations using computerized three-dimensional reformatted renderings of computed-tomography datasets. BMC Vet. Res. 2014;10:72.
    doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-72pmc: PMC3995307pubmed: 24646003google scholar: lookup
  28. Noeller C, Nowak M, Hamann J, Fritsch G, Budras KD. Anatomy of the equine nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses and potential clinical applications as a basis for endoscopy, computed tomography and surgery. Pferdeheilkunde 2007;23:47–58.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20070105google scholar: lookup
  29. Brigham WH. 3D Slicer Image Computing Platform, version 4.10. Boston, MA, USA: 2019.
  30. Evans KE, McGreevy PD. Conformation of the equine skull: A morphometric study. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 2006;35:221–227.
  31. Heck L, Wilson LA, Evin A, Stange M, Sánchez-Villagra MR. Shape variation and modularity of skull and teeth in domesticated horses and wild equids. Front. Zool. 2018;15:14.
    doi: 10.1186/s12983-018-0258-9pmc: PMC5907714pubmed: 29713365google scholar: lookup
  32. Maśko M, Wierzbicka M, Zdrojkowski Ł, Jasiński T, Sikorska U, Pawliński B, Domino M. Comparison of donkey, pony, and horse dorsal profiles and head shapes using geometric morphometrics. Animals 2022;12:931.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12070931pmc: PMC8997093pubmed: 35405919google scholar: lookup
  33. Floyd MR. The modified Triadan system: Nomenclature for veterinary dentistry. J. Vet. Dent. 1991;8:18–19.
    doi: 10.1177/089875649100800402pubmed: 1815632google scholar: lookup
  34. Dixon PM, Hawkes C, Townsend N. Complications of equine oral surgery. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2008;24:499–514.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2008.10.001pubmed: 19203698google scholar: lookup
  35. Kirkland KD. The Morphology of the Endodontic System, Reserve Crown and Roots of Equine Mandibular Cheek Teeth. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Champaign, IL, USA: 1995.
  36. Carmalt JL, Henderson KV, Rawlinson JE, Waldner CL. Use of crown height of the maxillary first molar tooth to approximate the age of horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2018;79:867–873.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.79.8.867pubmed: 30058851google scholar: lookup
  37. Dixon PM, Parkin TD, Collins N, Hawkes C, Townsend N, Tremaine WH, Fisher G, Ealey R, Barakzai SZ. Equine paranasal sinus disease: A long-term study of 200 cases (1997–2009): Ancillary diagnostic findings and involvement of the various sinus compartments. Equine Vet. J. 2012;44:267–271.
  38. Kamio T, Suzuki M, Asaumi R, Kawai T. DICOM segmentation and STL creation for 3D printing: A process and software package comparison for osseous anatomy. 3d Print. Med. 2020;6:17.
    doi: 10.1186/s41205-020-00069-2pmc: PMC7393875pubmed: 32737703google scholar: lookup
  39. Brounts SH, Henry T, Lund JR, Whitton RC, Ergun DL, Muir P. Use of a novel helical fan beam imaging system for computed tomography of the head and neck in sedated standing horses: 120 cases (2019–2020). JAVMA 2022;260:1361–1368.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.21.10.0471pubmed: 35943950google scholar: lookup
  40. Stieger-Vanegas SM, Hanna AL. The role of computed tomography in imaging non-neurologic disorders of the head in equine patients. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022;9:798216.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.798216pmc: PMC8936190pubmed: 35321060google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Kozłowska N, Borowska M, Jasiński T, Wierzbicka M, Domino M. Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Equine Pharyngeal Lymphoid Hyperplasia Using the Object Detection-Based Processing Technique of Digital Endoscopic Images.. Animals (Basel) 2025 Sep 22;15(18).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15182758pubmed: 41008003google scholar: lookup
  2. Riahi Z, Naeini AT, Zare R. Evaluation of maturation-related changes in maxillary sinus diameter and cheek teeth positioning relative to the maxillary sinus in the Dareshuri horse.. J Equine Sci 2025;36(3):81-91.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.36.81pubmed: 40980337google scholar: lookup
  3. Turek B, Pawlikowski M, Jankowski K, Borowska M, Skierbiszewska K, Jasiński T, Domino M. Selection of density standard and X-ray tube settings for computed digital absorptiometry in horses using the k-means clustering algorithm.. BMC Vet Res 2025 Mar 13;21(1):165.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04591-5pubmed: 40082938google scholar: lookup