Analyze Diet
International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance2026; 31; 100663; doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2026.100663

Three-year evaluation of anthelmintic treatment efficacy against equine strongyles in France using FECRT.

Abstract: Reduced anthelmintic efficacy against strongyles in equids is a widespread concern, but up-to-date field data are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate, over a three-year period, the efficacy of the anthelmintic (AH) molecules available in France (fenbendazole, pyrantel, ivermectin and moxidectin) against strongyles in equids using faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRTs). A total of 104 complete FECRTs (i.e., required sample size reached) were conducted in 98 groups, involving 749 equids kept in 70 facilities. Fenbendazole-resistant populations were detected in 8/9 groups (89%) from 7/8 facilities (88%; upper 90% CI range: 30.5%-83%) and pyrantel-resistant populations in 15/22 groups (68%) from 12/17 facilities (71%; upper 90% CI range: 56%-97%). Regarding macrocyclic lactone efficacy, ivermectin-resistant populations were identified in 14/51 groups (27%) kept in 11/41 facilities (27%; upper 90% CI range: 85.6%-99.9%) and moxidectin-resistant populations in 5/22 groups (23%) kept in 4/18 facilities (22%; upper 90% CI range: 85.3%-99.7%). Resistance was mainly detected in the Normandy region and in breeding farms (25/70), but also in riding schools offering boarding services (3/70), experimental platforms (2/70), and a zoological park (1/70). In conclusion, this study provides the first evidence in France of resistance to all four available AH molecules and documents the spread of these resistances across the facilities. It also highlights the urgent need for regulatory changes requiring the use of AH only after a diagnostic assessment (e.g., targeted selective treatment based on faecal egg count results) in order to reduce the selective pressure exerted on parasite populations.
Publication Date: 2026-07-24 PubMed ID: 42526293DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2026.100663Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study assessed the effectiveness of four anthelmintic drugs against equine strongyles in France over three years using fecal egg count reduction tests (FECRTs).
  • It revealed widespread resistance to all tested anthelmintics, highlighting the urgent need for improved parasite management strategies.

Background and Purpose

  • Strongyles are parasitic worms commonly infecting horses, controlled primarily via anthelmintic (AH) drugs.
  • Resistance to these drugs is a growing global concern, threatening effective parasite control.
  • Despite this, current data on drug efficacy and resistance in France were limited prior to this study.
  • The researchers aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of four commonly used AH drugs in France: fenbendazole, pyrantel, ivermectin, and moxidectin.
  • They used the fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT), a standard method to assess drug efficacy by comparing parasite egg shedding before and after treatment.

Methods

  • The study took place over three years across 70 equine facilities in France.
  • They performed 104 complete FECRTs on groups comprising 749 horses.
  • Facilities included breeding farms, riding schools, experimental research platforms, and even a zoological park.
  • Resistance was defined based on insufficient reduction in fecal egg counts after treatment with each AH drug.

Key Findings

  • Fenbendazole resistance:
    • Detected in 8 out of 9 tested groups (89%).
    • Found in 7 out of 8 facilities (88%) where fenbendazole was tested.
    • High upper confidence intervals suggest widespread prevalence.
  • Pyrantel resistance:
    • Identified in 15 out of 22 groups (68%).
    • Present in 12 out of 17 facilities (71%) using pyrantel.
  • Ivermectin resistance:
    • Found in 14 out of 51 groups (27%).
    • Detected in 11 out of 41 facilities (27%).
    • Although the prevalence is lower compared to other drugs, the upper confidence intervals indicate potential underestimation.
  • Moxidectin resistance:
    • Identified in 5 out of 22 groups (23%).
    • Found in 4 out of 18 facilities (22%).

Geographical and Facility-specific Patterns

  • Resistance was mainly observed in Normandy, a key equine breeding region.
  • Breeding farms had the greatest incidence of resistant populations (25 out of 70 facilities).
  • Riding schools that offer boarding (3 facilities), research experimental platforms (2 facilities), and even a zoological park showed some resistance, indicating spread across diverse settings.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The study provides the first comprehensive field evidence in France of resistance to all four major AH drug classes used against equine strongyles.
  • This widespread resistance poses a significant challenge to parasite control in horses.
  • It highlights the critical need for changes in regulatory policies to promote:
    • Diagnostic-based treatments such as targeted selective treatment guided by fecal egg counts, rather than routine blanket deworming.
    • Strategies that reduce selective pressure on parasite populations, which drive the development of resistance.
  • Ultimately, adopting evidence-based treatment protocols could help prolong the efficacy of existing drugs and sustain equine health.

Cite This Article

APA
(2026). Three-year evaluation of anthelmintic treatment efficacy against equine strongyles in France using FECRT. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist, 31, 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2026.100663

Publication

ISSN: 2211-3207
NlmUniqueID: 101576715
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 31
Pages: 100663
PII: S2211-3207(26)00033-3

Researcher Affiliations

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, publication of this article and/or financial and personal relationships that could inappropriately influence this work.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.