Analyze Diet

Time Attenuation Curves for Equine Intravenous Contrast Enhanced Skull CT Using the Medial Saphenous and Cephalic Veins.

Abstract: Intravenous (IV) contrast administration during computed tomography (CT) of the equine head is routinely performed to delineate the extent of disease and differentiate between vascular and nonvascular tissue. Current equine scan protocols are extrapolated from human and canine studies. There have been no prospective equine studies describing the optimal time to image the patient after administration of contrast or the optimal site of contrast administration. Therefore, the current postcontrast times to scan and sites of contrast administration may not be appropriate for use in horses. The objective of this prospective crossover pilot study was to generate contrast enhancement curves for IV contrast injection via the medial saphenous vein and the cephalic vein. Both medial saphenous and cephalic venous contrast administration sites are effective for contrast-enhanced CT of the equine skull, with no pooling artifacts. Peak carotid artery enhancement occurred earlier than in the maxillary veins (109.12 s vs. 173.82 s).
Publication Date: 2025-12-08 PubMed ID: 41358792PubMed Central: PMC12684315DOI: 10.1111/vru.70115Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Research Overview

  • This study investigated the timing and site of intravenous contrast administration for computed tomography (CT) scans of the horse’s head, focusing specifically on the medial saphenous and cephalic veins.
  • The goal was to determine how contrast flows and enhances various blood vessels over time to optimize imaging protocols for equine patients.

Background

  • Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT is widely used to clearly delineate diseased versus healthy tissue in the equine head by highlighting blood vessels and vascular structures.
  • Currently, protocols for timing the scans after contrast injection and choosing injection sites in horses are mostly based on studies done in humans and dogs, not horses.
  • This extrapolation may be inappropriate because horses have different vascular anatomy and physiology, which could influence the peak times and quality of contrast enhancement.

Study Objective

  • The primary aim was to prospectively collect data to characterize the attenuation or enhancement patterns (contrast enhancement curves) over time during CT scans after IV injection.
  • Specifically, the study compared two common IV injection sites in horses: the medial saphenous vein (in the hind limb) and the cephalic vein (in the forelimb).

Methodology

  • Prospective crossover pilot study design: the same horses likely received contrast injections through both veins at different times, enabling direct comparison.
  • Time-attenuation curves were generated by measuring the degree of enhancement (contrast intensity) in key blood vessels at multiple time points after injection.
  • The study focused on important vascular regions in the equine head, including the carotid artery and maxillary veins, which are relevant for head CT imaging.

Key Findings

  • Both medial saphenous and cephalic veins were effective for intravenous contrast administration with no issues of contrast pooling, indicating suitability for clinical use.
  • The carotid artery showed peak contrast enhancement earlier (approximately 109 seconds) compared to the maxillary veins (approximately 174 seconds).
  • This time difference suggests vascular transit time variances and should inform the timing of CT scanning to achieve optimal imaging contrast.

Clinical Implications

  • Current standard practice timing for postcontrast imaging in horses may not be optimized and is likely based on non-equine data; this study provides horse-specific data for the first time.
  • Choosing either of these two veins for contrast injection is viable, allowing flexibility depending on the clinical situation or vein accessibility.
  • Scanning should be timed to capture peak enhancement in the vessels of interest: earlier for arterial structures (like carotid artery) and later for venous structures (like maxillary veins).
  • This work helps improve diagnostic accuracy by refining CT timing protocols tailored to equine patients, potentially leading to better disease evaluation in the horse’s head.

Limitations and Future Directions

  • This was a pilot study with presumably a limited number of horses; larger studies are needed to confirm findings and establish definitive scanning protocols.
  • Additional research could explore other injection sites, different contrast doses, and their effects on enhancement curves.
  • The study did not address pathological cases, so future research could determine how disease states might alter contrast timing and distribution.

Cite This Article

APA
Frey K, Perlini M, Reed R. (2025). Time Attenuation Curves for Equine Intravenous Contrast Enhanced Skull CT Using the Medial Saphenous and Cephalic Veins. Vet Radiol Ultrasound, 67(1), e70115. https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.70115

Publication

ISSN: 1740-8261
NlmUniqueID: 9209635
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 67
Issue: 1
Pages: e70115
PII: e70115

Researcher Affiliations

Frey, Kahlina
  • OneVision Veterinary Radiology, PLLC, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
Perlini, Michael
  • Department of Large Animal Medicine, University of Georgia College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Reed, Rachel
  • Department of Large Animal Medicine, University of Georgia College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, Georgia, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Contrast Media / administration & dosage
  • Contrast Media / pharmacokinetics
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / veterinary
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods
  • Saphenous Vein / diagnostic imaging
  • Pilot Projects
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Skull / diagnostic imaging
  • Skull / blood supply
  • Prospective Studies
  • Female
  • Male
  • Injections, Intravenous / veterinary
  • Veins

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 17 references
  1. Bae KT. Intravenous Contrast Medium Administration and Scan Timing at CT: Considerations and Approaches. Radiology 256, no. 1 (2010): 32–61.
    doi: 10.1148/radiol.10090908pubmed: 20574084google scholar: lookup
  2. Cissell DD, Wisner ER, Textor J, Mohr FC, Scrivani PV, Théon AP. Computed Tomographic Appearance of Equine Sinonasal Neoplasia. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 53 (2012): 245–251.
  3. Lacombe VA, Sogaro‐Robinson C, Reed SM. Diagnostic Utility of Computed Tomography Imaging in Equine Intracranial Conditions. Equine Veterinary Journal 42 (2010): 393–399.
    pubmed: 20636774
  4. McKlveen TL, Jones JC, Sponenberg DP, Scarratt K, Ward DL, Aardema CH Jr. Assessment of the Accuracy of Computed Tomography for Measurement of Normal Equine Pituitary Glands. American Journal of Veterinary Research 64, no. 11 (2003): 1387–1394.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.1387pubmed: 14620775google scholar: lookup
  5. Nelson BB, Goodrich LR, Barrett MF, Grinstaff MW, Kawcak CE. Use of Contrast Media in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Horses: Techniques, Adverse Events and Opportunities. Equine Veterinary 49 (2017): 410–424.
    pubmed: 28407291
  6. Solano M, Brawer RS. CT of the Equine Head: Technical Considerations, Anatomical Guide and Selected Diseases. Clinical Techniques in Equine Practice 3 (2004): 374–388.
  7. Vanschandevijl K, Gielen I, Nollet H, Vlaminck L, Deprez P, van Bree H. Computed Tomography‐Guided Brain Biopsy for In Vivo Diagnosis of a Cholesterinic Granuloma in a Horse. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 233, no. 6 (2008): 950–954.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.233.6.950pubmed: 18795858google scholar: lookup
  8. Carmalt JL, Montgomery J. Intraarterial Injection of Iodinated Contrast Medium for Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography of The Equine Head. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound: The Official Journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association 56, no. 4 (2015): 384–390.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12252pubmed: 25782997google scholar: lookup
  9. Puchalski SM. Advances in Equine Computed Tomography and Use of Contrast Media. Veterinary Clinics of North America Equine Practice 28, no. 3 (2012): 563–581.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2012.08.002pubmed: 23177132google scholar: lookup
  10. Stieger‐Vanegas SM, Hanna AL. The Role of Computed Tomography in Imaging Non‐Neurologic Disorders of the Head in Equine Patients. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9 (2022): 798216.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.798216pmc: PMC8936190pubmed: 35321060google scholar: lookup
  11. Kinns J, Pease A. Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of the Equine Head. Equine Veterinary Education 21 (2009): 291–294.
    doi: 10.2746/095777309X423022google scholar: lookup
  12. Dakin SG, Lam R, Rees E, Mumby C, West C, Weller R. Standing CT of the Equine Head. Equine Veterinary Education 26 (2014): 208–215.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12127google scholar: lookup
  13. Pease AP, Schott HC II, Howey EB, Patterson JS. Computed Tomographic Findings in the Pituitary Gland and Brain of Horses With Pituitary Pars Intermedia Dysfunction. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 25 (2011): 1144–1151.
  14. Crijns CP, Baeumlin Y, De Rycke LD. Intra‐Arterial Versus Intravenous Contrast‐Enhanced Computed Tomography of the Equine Head. BMC Veterinary Research 12, no. 6 (2016): 1–13.
    pmc: PMC4704255pubmed: 26739315
  15. Porat‐Mosenco Y, Schwarz T, Kass PH. Thick‐Section Reformatting of Thinly Collimated Computed Tomography for Reduction of Skull‐Base‐Related Artifacts in Dogs and Horses. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound: The Official Journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association 45, no. 2 (2004): 131–135.
    pubmed: 15072144
  16. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and Hepatic Peak Enhancement at CT: Effect of Contrast Medium Injection Rate‐ Pharmacokinetic Analysis and Experimental Porcine Model. Radiology 206, no. 2 (1998): 455–464.
    pubmed: 9457200
  17. Bae K. Peak Contrast Enhancement in CT and MR Angiography: When Does It Occur and Why? Pharmacokinetic Study in a Porcine Model. Radiology 227, no. 3 (2003): 809–881.
    pubmed: 12702823

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.