FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2019; 9(12); 1119; doi: 10.3390/ani9121119

Trot Accelerations of Equine Front and Hind Hooves Shod with Polyurethane Composite Shoes and Steel Shoes on Asphalt.

Abstract: The present study investigated accelerations of the front and hind hooves of horses comparing two different shoe types. A standard steel shoe, with studs, pins, and in some instances with toe grabs, was compared to a steel shoe covered on the bottom with a layer of polyurethane. Four horses were used; they trotted in hand on an asphalt track at their self-selected speed. The results showed significantly reduced decelerations during the stance phase with the polyurethane-covered shoes (10th percentile median steel -2.77 g, polyurethane -2.46 g; 0.06) and significantly increased decelerations in front hooves compared to hind hooves with steel shoes (70th percentile median -1.04 g front hooves, 0.12 g hind hooves, = 0.04). Horses trotted faster using longer strides with the polyurethane-covered shoes compared to the steel shoes. The results show that effects of shoe types should be investigated simultaneously in front and hind hooves, and that PU shoes may aid in reducing the overload present in the front limbs of horses.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2019-12-11 PubMed ID: 31835771PubMed Central: PMC6940983DOI: 10.3390/ani9121119Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research looked into how different types of horse shoes affect the speed and stride of horses. Specifically, it compared a traditional steel horse shoe, which could have studs, pins or toe grabs, with a steel shoe that had a layer of polyurethane. The findings show that horses trot faster and with a wider stride when wearing the polyurethane shoes.

Research Design

  • The study used four horses for the experiment. Each of these horses was made to trot on an asphalt track at the speed they picked
  • Two different types of horse shoes were used – the standard steel shoe and the steel shoe covered at the bottom with a layer of polyurethane

Key Findings

  • The study found that there was a significant reduction in acceleration during the stance phase when the horses wore the polyurethane shoes as compared to the steel shoes
  • For example, the 10th percentile median decelerations for the steel and polyurethane shoes was -2.77g and -2.46g respectively.
  • The deceleration was also significantly greater in the front hooves as compared to the back hooves when the horses wore the steel shoes. The 70th percentile median deceleration for example was -1.04g for the front hooves and 0.12g for the hind hooves.
  • The study also found that the horses trotted faster and made longer strides when they were wearing the polyurethane-covered shoes as opposed to the steel shoes

Conclusion

  • The results of the study suggest the need for further research on the different shoe types for both the front and hind hooves of horses
  • The findings indicate that polyurethane shoes could be instrumental in reducing the overload that is present in the front limbs of horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Moore LV, Zsoldos RR, Licka TF. (2019). Trot Accelerations of Equine Front and Hind Hooves Shod with Polyurethane Composite Shoes and Steel Shoes on Asphalt. Animals (Basel), 9(12), 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9121119

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 9
Issue: 12
PII: 1119

Researcher Affiliations

Moore, Lauren Veneta
  • University Equine Hospital, Department for Companion Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, A-1210 Vienna, Austria.
Zsoldos, Rebeka Roza
  • University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, A-1190 Vienna, Austria.
Licka, Theresia Franziska
  • University Equine Hospital, Department for Companion Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, A-1210 Vienna, Austria.
  • Royal (Dick) school of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK.

Grant Funding

  • NA / City of Vienna : NA

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

This article includes 27 references
  1. Van Weeren P.R.. History. In: Back W., Clayton H.M., editors. Equine Locomotion. Elsevier Health Sciences; Edinburgh, UK: 2013. pp. 3–11.
  2. Muybridge E.. Animals in Motion. Dover Publications; New York, NY, USA: 1957.
  3. Alsaaod M, Huber S, Beer G, Kohler P, Schüpbach-Regula G, Steiner A. Locomotion characteristics of dairy cows walking on pasture and the effect of artificial flooring systems on locomotion comfort.. J Dairy Sci 2017 Oct;100(10):8330-8337.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12760pubmed: 28755930google scholar: lookup
  4. Barwick J, Lamb D, Dobos R, Schneider D, Welch M, Trotter M. Predicting Lameness in Sheep Activity Using Tri-Axial Acceleration Signals.. Animals (Basel) 2018 Jan 11;8(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani8010012pmc: PMC5789307pubmed: 29324700google scholar: lookup
  5. Leleu C, Gloria E, Renault G, Barrey E. Analysis of trotter gait on the track by accelerometry and image analysis.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2002 Sep;(34):344-8.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2002.tb05445.xpubmed: 12405713google scholar: lookup
  6. Barrey E., Hermelin M., Vaudelin J., Poirel D., Valette J.. Utilisation of an accelerometric device in equine gait analysis. Equine Vet. J. Suppl. 1994;17:7–12.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1994.tb04864.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  7. Ryan CT, Schaer BL, Nunamaker DM. A novel wireless data acquisition system for the measurement of hoof accelerations in the exercising horse.. Equine Vet J 2006 Nov;38(7):671-4.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406X156361pubmed: 17228584google scholar: lookup
  8. Kai M, Aoki O, Hiraga A, Oki H, Tokuriki M. Use of an instrument sandwiched between the hoof and shoe to measure vertical ground reaction forces and three-dimensional acceleration at the walk, trot, and canter in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2000 Aug;61(8):979-85.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.979pubmed: 10951994google scholar: lookup
  9. Pardoe CH, McGuigan MP, Rogers KM, Rowe LL, Wilson AM. The effect of shoe material on the kinetics and kinematics of foot slip at impact on concrete.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2001 Apr;(33):70-3.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2001.tb05363.xpubmed: 11721574google scholar: lookup
  10. Benoit P, Barrey E, Regnault JC, Brochet JL. Comparison of the damping effect of different shoeing by the measurement of hoof acceleration.. Acta Anat (Basel) 1993;146(2-3):109-13.
    doi: 10.1159/000147430pubmed: 8470451google scholar: lookup
  11. Chateau H, Holden L, Robin D, Falala S, Pourcelot P, Estoup P, Denoix JM, Crevier-Denoix N. Biomechanical analysis of hoof landing and stride parameters in harness trotter horses running on different tracks of a sand beach (from wet to dry) and on an asphalt road.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2010 Nov;(38):488-95.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00277.xpubmed: 21059050google scholar: lookup
  12. Gustås P, Johnston C, Roepstorff L, Drevemo S, Lanshammar H. Relationships between fore- and hindlimb ground reaction force and hoof deceleration patterns in trotting horses.. Equine Vet J 2004 Dec;36(8):737-42.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044848136pubmed: 15656507google scholar: lookup
  13. Keegan KG, Yonezawa Y, Pai PF, Wilson DA, Kramer J. Evaluation of a sensor-based system of motion analysis for detection and quantification of forelimb and hind limb lameness in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2004 May;65(5):665-70.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.665pubmed: 15141889google scholar: lookup
  14. Holden-Douilly L, Pourcelot P, Desquilbet L, Falala S, Crevier-Denoix N, Chateau H. Equine hoof slip distance during trot at training speed: comparison between kinematic and accelerometric measurement techniques.. Vet J 2013 Aug;197(2):198-204.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.02.004pubmed: 23489849google scholar: lookup
  15. Imhof U. [The history of horseshoing.].. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 2010 Jan;152(1):21-9.
    doi: 10.1024/0036-7281.a000005pubmed: 20033873google scholar: lookup
  16. Imhof U. [Chronology of horseshoes found in Switzerland].. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 2004 Jan;146(1):17-9, 21-5.
    doi: 10.1024/0036-7281.146.1.17pubmed: 15025201google scholar: lookup
  17. Brehm W.. Grundlagen der Hufpflege und des Hufbeschlags. In: Brehm W., Gehlen H., Ohnesorge B., Wehrend A., editors. Handbuch Pferdepraxis: Begründet von Olof Dietz und Bernhard Huskamp. 4th ed. Enke Verlag; Stuttgart, Germany: 2016. p. 1095.
  18. Harvey AM, Williams SB, Singer ER. The effect of lateral heel studs on the kinematics of the equine digit while cantering on grass.. Vet J 2012 May;192(2):217-21.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.06.003pubmed: 21752677google scholar: lookup
  19. Kane AJ, Stover SM, Gardner IA, Case JT, Johnson BJ, Read DH, Ardans AA. Horseshoe characteristics as possible risk factors for fatal musculoskeletal injury of thoroughbred racehorses.. Am J Vet Res 1996 Aug;57(8):1147-52.
    pubmed: 8836365
  20. Parkes RS, Witte TH. The foot-surface interaction and its impact on musculoskeletal adaptation and injury risk in the horse.. Equine Vet J 2015 Sep;47(5):519-25.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12420pubmed: 25640598google scholar: lookup
  21. Sprick M, Fürst A, Baschnagel F, Michel S, Piskoty G, Hartnack S, Jackson MA. The influence of aluminium, steel and polyurethane shoeing systems and of the unshod hoof on the injury risk of a horse kick. An ex vivo experimental study.. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2017 Sep 12;30(5):339-345.
    doi: 10.3415/VCOT-17-01-0003pubmed: 28763524google scholar: lookup
  22. Yoshihara E, Takahashi T, Otsuka N, Isayama T, Tomiyama T, Hiraga A, Wada S. Heel movement in horses: comparison between glued and nailed horse shoes at different speeds.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2010 Nov;(38):431-5.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00243.xpubmed: 21059041google scholar: lookup
  23. Caure S., Mortagne P., Leveillard D., Blanville F., Carro M., Cousty M., Salazar D., Weller R.. The Influence of Different Hind Shoes and Bare Feet on Horse Kinematics at a Walk and Trot on a Soft Surface. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2018;70:76–83.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.08.002google scholar: lookup
  24. Back W., van Schie M.H., Pol J.N.. Synthetic shoes attenuate hoof impact in the trotting warmblood horse. Equine Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2006;3:143–151.
    doi: 10.1017/ECP200691google scholar: lookup
  25. Gustås P., Johnston C., Drevemo S.. Ground reaction force and hoof deceleration patterns on two different surfaces at the trot. Equine Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2006;3:209–216.
    doi: 10.1017/S147806150667607Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  26. Duberstein K.J., Johnson E.L., Whitehead A.. Effects of shortening breakover at the toe on gait kinematics at the walk and trot. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2013;33:930–936.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2013.01.009google scholar: lookup
  27. Hobbs SJ, Nauwelaerts S, Sinclair J, Clayton HM, Back W. Sagittal plane fore hoof unevenness is associated with fore and hindlimb asymmetrical force vectors in the sagittal and frontal planes.. PLoS One 2018;13(8):e0203134.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203134pmc: PMC6114892pubmed: 30157249google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,850 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.