FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Equine Vet J / Turf track surface interaction with speed and musculoskeleta...
Equine veterinary journal2025; doi: 10.1111/evj.70003

Turf track surface interaction with speed and musculoskeletal injury risk in Thoroughbred racehorses.

Abstract: Injury modelling based on changes in speed and stride characteristics of racehorses has become a primary industry focus for the Thoroughbred racing industry. However, speed and stride characteristics are strongly associated with track condition; therefore, reliable quantification of surface variables for use in future models is imperative. Objective: This study aimed to understand the interaction of objective turf track condition score (TCS) measurement with racing speed and injury in flat racing Thoroughbred horses. Methods: Retrospective time series analysis. Methods: Race-day data from 16 flat racing seasons (2008/9-2023/24, n = 40,824 races) were used to compare monthly TCS (based on penetrometer measurements), the coefficient of variability (CV) for TCS, race speed (over the final 600 m) and the number of race starts. Injury data from 7 seasons (2015-17, 2019-24) were used to calculate the monthly incidence rate (IR per 1000 race starts) of musculoskeletal injury (MSI). A mixed effects linear model was used to assess the relationship between speed, TCS, race distance and horse rating. Results: Race starts (n = 437,506), TCS and speed showed strong seasonal fluctuations, with more starts, lower and more variable TCS (4, IQR 3-5, CV = 0.44) and higher race speed (16.7 m/s, IQR 16.1-17.2) in summer compared with winter (TCS 10, IQR 8-10, CV = 0.22, p < 0.001 and speed 15.1 m/s, IQR 14.3-15.8, p < 0.001). Race speed had a strong negative quadratic relationship with TCS (β₂ = -0.03, p < 0.001), a negative linear correlation with race distance and was positively correlated with horse rating. There were 433 MSI (IR = 2.22, 95% CI 2.20-2.44), with an immediate (0 lag time) positive association with seasonal changes in TCS (r = -0.28). Conclusions: Low monthly numbers of MSI constrained analysis of interaction with track variables. Conclusions: TCS provides a reliable quantitative measure of track condition which could be used to refine future models of injury risk in racing Thoroughbreds.
© 2025 The Author(s). Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-07-24 PubMed ID: 40704543DOI: 10.1111/evj.70003Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores how turf track conditions, horse speed, and injury risk interplay in thoroughbred horse racing. It assesses how these factors could potentially contribute to musculoskeletal injuries (MSIs) in racehorses.

Study Objectives and Methods

  • The objective of the study was to understand how an objective measurement of turf track condition (TCS), race speed, and injury risk interact.
  • To attain these objectives, the research employed a retrospective time series analysis.
  • It used race data, spanning 16 seasons, which included data on monthly TCS based on penetrometer measurements (a tool to measure the hardness of a surface), race speed over the final 600m, and the number of race starts.
  • To compare and establish correlations, injury data over 7 seasons was used to calculate the incidence rate (IR) of MSIs per 1000 race starts.
  • The researchers used a mixed effects linear model to assess relationships between speed, TCS, and factors like race distance and horse rating.

Key Findings

  • The study found that the number of race starts, TCS, and speed display strong seasonal differences.
  • These factors were more variable in summer compared to winter, with more race starts, lower but more variable TCS, and higher race speeds in the warmer season.
  • Race speed exhibited a strong negative quadratic relationship with TCS. This means that as the TCS value (indicating softness or hardness of the track) increases, the speed decreases.
  • Race speed also had a negative correlation with race distance and a positive correlation with horse rating.
  • There were 433 reported MSIs, with an immediate positive association found with seasonal changes in TCS.

Conclusions

  • Due to the small number of monthly MSI instances, the analysis of how they interact with track variables was limited.
  • Nonetheless, the TCS was identified as a reliable quantitative measure of track condition. This understanding contributes valuable insights that could be used to develop more refined models for predicting injury risks in racehorses in future studies.

Cite This Article

APA
Legg KA, Gibson MJ, Gee EK, Rogers CW. (2025). Turf track surface interaction with speed and musculoskeletal injury risk in Thoroughbred racehorses. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.70003

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Legg, K A
  • School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Gibson, M J
  • School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Gee, E K
  • School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Rogers, C W
  • School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Grant Funding

  • ET 2/2019 / New Zealand Equine Trust

References

This article includes 34 references
  1. American Association of Equine Practitioners. 2025 [cited 2025 Feb 25]. Available from: https://aaep.org/post/industry-funding-secured-for-wearable-biometric-sensor-research-project/
  2. Wong ASM, Morrice‐West AV, Whitton RC, Hitchens PL. Changes in Thoroughbred speed and stride characteristics over successive race starts and their association with musculoskeletal injury. Equine Vet J 2022;55:194–204.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13581google scholar: lookup
  3. Pfau T, Bruce OL, Sawatsky A, Leguillette R, Edwards WB. Dirt track surface preparation and associated differences in speed, stride length, and stride frequency in galloping horses. Sensors 2024;24:2441.
    doi: 10.3390/s24082441google scholar: lookup
  4. Thomas VJ, Murphy JW, Field TRO. Racetrack traction assessment by penetrometer. Part I. The model. J Turfgrass Manag 1996;1:37–49.
  5. New Zealand Throughbred Racing. NZTR minimum venue guidelines. 5th ed. Wellington: New Zealand Throughbred Racing; 2013.
  6. Blanco MA, Di Rado FN, Peterson M. Warm season turfgrass equine sports surfaces: an experimental comparison of the Independence of simple measurements used for surface characterization. Animals 2023;13:811.
  7. Murphy JW, Field TRO, Thomas VJ. Racetrack assessment by penetrometer. Part II. Application of the model. J Turfgrass Manag 1996;1:51–62.
  8. Legg KA, Gibson MJ, Rogers CW. 2024 track surfaces data workshop. Lexington, KY: Racing Surfaces Testing Laboratory; 2024.
  9. Ratzlaff MH, Wilson PD, Hutton DV, Slinker BK. Relationships between hoof‐acceleration patterns of galloping horses and dynamic properties of the track. Am J Vet Res 2005;66:589–595.
  10. Bolwell CF, Rogers C, Gee E, McIlwraith W. Epidemiology of musculoskeletal injury during racing on New Zealand racetracks 2005–2011. Animals (Basel) 2017;7:62.
    doi: 10.3390/ani7080062google scholar: lookup
  11. New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing. Handicapping guide. Wellington: New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing; 2019.
  12. New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing. Track ratings. New Zealand: New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing; 2022.
  13. Rogers CW, Bolwell CF, Gee EK, Peterson ML, McIlwraith CW. Profile and surface conditions of New Zealand Thoroughbred racetracks. J Equine Vet Sci 2014;34:1105–1109.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2014.06.017google scholar: lookup
  14. Gibson MJ, Bolwell CF, Gee EK, Legg KA, Rogers CW. Race‐level reporting of incidents during two seasons (2015/16 to 2016/17) of Thoroughbred flat racing in New Zealand. Animals (Basel) 2022;12:1033.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12081033google scholar: lookup
  15. Ratzlaff MH, Hyde ML, Hutton DV, Rathgeber RA, Balch OK. Interrelationships between moisture content of the track, dynamic properties of the track and the locomotor forces exerted by galloping horses. J Equine Vet Sci 1997;17:35–42.
  16. Legg KA, Gee EK, Cochrane DJ, Rogers CW. Preliminary examination of the biological and industry constraints on the structure and pattern of Thoroughbred racing in New Zealand over thirteen seasons: 2005/06–2017/18. Animals 2021;11:2807–2819.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11102807google scholar: lookup
  17. Horan K, Coburn J, Kourdache K, Day P, Harborne D, Brinkley L. Influence of speed, ground surface and shoeing condition on hoof breakover duration in galloping Thoroughbred racehorses. Animals 2021;11:2588.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11092588google scholar: lookup
  18. Barstow A, Bailey J, Campbell J, Harris C, Weller R, Pfau T. Does ‘hacking’ surface type affect equine forelimb foot placement, movement symmetry or hoof impact deceleration during ridden walk and trot exercise?. Equine Vet J 2019;51:108–114.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12952google scholar: lookup
  19. Witte TH, Hirst CV, Wilson AM. Effect of speed on stride parameters in racehorses at gallop in field conditions. J Exp Biol 2006;209:4389–4397.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.02518google scholar: lookup
  20. Williams RB, Harkins LS, Hammond CJ, Wood JLN. Racehorse injuries, clinical problems and fatalities recorded on British racecourses from flat racing and National Hunt racing during 1996, 1997 and 1998. Equine Vet J 2001;33:478–486.
  21. Hitchens PL, Morrice‐West AV, Stevenson MA, Whitton RC. Meta‐analysis of risk factors for racehorse catastrophic musculoskeletal injury in flat racing. Vet J 2019;245:29–40.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.11.014google scholar: lookup
  22. Oikawa M, Kusunose R. Fractures sustained by racehorses in Japan during flat racing with special reference to track condition and racing time. Vet J 2005;170:369–374.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.08.004google scholar: lookup
  23. Gibson MJ, Legg KA, Gee EK, Rogers CW. The reporting of racehorse fatalities in New Zealand Thoroughbred flat racing in the 2011/12–2021/22 seasons. Animals 2023;13:612.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13040612google scholar: lookup
  24. Pinchbeck GL, Clegg PD, Proudman CJ, Morgan KL, French NP. Risk factors for horse falls in hurdle and steeplechase racing in the UK: the results of a prospective cohort study. In: International Symposia on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics Proceedings (ISVEE 10). Vina del Mar, Chile: International Symposia on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics; 2003.
  25. Crawford KL, Finnane A, Phillips CJC, Greer RM, Woldeyohannes SM, Perkins NR. The risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in thoroughbred racehorses in Queensland, Australia: how these vary for two‐year‐old and older horses and with type of injury. Animals (Basel) 2021;11:270.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020270google scholar: lookup
  26. Perkins NR, Reid SWJ, Morris RS. Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries of the lower limbs in Thoroughbred racehorses in New Zealand. N Z Vet J 2005;53:171–183.
  27. Rosanowski SM, Chang YM, Stirk AJ, Verheyen KLP. Risk factors for race‐day fatality in flat racing Thoroughbreds in Great Britain (2000 to 2013). PLoS One 2018;13:e0194299.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194299google scholar: lookup
  28. Johnston AS, Riggs CM, Cogger N, Benschop J, Rogers CW, Rosanowski SM. Using time‐series analysis techniques to enhance the understanding of musculoskeletal injury in Thoroughbred racehorses. Equine Vet J 2020;52:699–708.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13220google scholar: lookup
  29. Wilson AM, McGuigan MP, Su A, van den Bogert AJ. Horses damp the spring in their step. Nature 2001;414:895–899.
    doi: 10.1038/414895agoogle scholar: lookup
  30. Murray RC, Walters J, Snart H, Dyson S, Parkin T. How do features of dressage arenas influence training surface properties which are potentially associated with lameness?. Vet J 2010;186:172–179.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.04.026google scholar: lookup
  31. Bardin AL, Taylor NC, Robert Colborne G. Response of the Thoroughbred forelimb to perturbations caused by a change in ground surface. J Equine Vet Sci 2022;103897:103897.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.103897google scholar: lookup
  32. McGuigan MP, Wilson AM. The effect of gait and digital flexor muscle activation on limb compliance in the forelimb of the horse Equus caballus. J Exp Biol 2003;206:1325–1336.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.00254google scholar: lookup
  33. Ryan K, Garruppo G, Alexander K, Hluchan CM, Lincoln AE. Injuries among Maryland jockeys during thoroughbred racing: 2015–2019. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2020;6:e000926.
    doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000926google scholar: lookup
  34. Gibson MJ, Legg KA, Rogers CW. Internal report—equine mortality review panel 2023/2024 Thoroughbred racing season. New Zealand: New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing; 2024.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.