Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record2025; 197(10); e264-e270; doi: 10.1002/vetr.6021

Understanding the roles of equine veterinary nursing teams in UK practices: A cross-sectional study.

Abstract: Feeling undervalued, having limited opportunities to utilise clinical skills and lack of career progression have been identified as factors negatively affecting the job satisfaction and retention of small animal registered veterinary nurses (RVNs). The aim of this study was to explore the roles and activities of equine veterinary nurses, and the barriers and facilitators associated with their professional progression. Methods: An anonymous, cross-sectional online questionnaire was distributed to all RVNs and student veterinary nurses working with equids in VetPartners practices. The questions explored respondents' current roles and responsibilities, including Schedule 3 procedures and ambulatory nursing, and how their skills could be better utilised. Results: Most of the 89 respondents reported wanting more opportunities to carry out clinical tasks within the workplace, including wound management (57/76, 75%) and intramuscular injections (51/76, 67.1%). The most common barrier reported was lack of delegation (78.7%, 48/61). The most-identified factors that would make respondents feel more valued at work were more opportunities to utilise professional skills (22/53, 41.5%) and improved salary/benefits (13/53, 24.5%). Conclusions: This study was conducted in a single corporate group, so generalisability may be limited. Social acceptability bias could also have influenced respondents' answers, despite the anonymity of the questionnaire. Conclusions: Most respondents reported that they would highly value more opportunities for clinical progression and greater responsibilities, including within ambulatory services, with increased delegation of Schedule 3 procedures.
Publication Date: 2025-10-22 PubMed ID: 41122954PubMed Central: PMC12617466DOI: 10.1002/vetr.6021Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Cite This Article

APA
Saul A, Pritchard P, Shrubb J, Robinson N, Stavisky J. (2025). Understanding the roles of equine veterinary nursing teams in UK practices: A cross-sectional study. Vet Rec, 197(10), e264-e270. https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.6021

Publication

ISSN: 2042-7670
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 197
Issue: 10
Pages: e264-e270

Researcher Affiliations

Saul, Anna
  • Aireworth Vets, Keighley, UK.
Pritchard, Phillippa
  • Liphook Equine Hospital Forest Mere, Liphook, UK.
Shrubb, Julia
  • Three Counties Equine Hospital, Tewkesbury, UK.
Robinson, Natalie
  • Clinical Board Support Team, VetPartners, York, UK.
Stavisky, Jenny
  • Clinical Board Support Team, VetPartners, York, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Humans
  • United Kingdom
  • Animal Technicians / psychology
  • Animal Technicians / statistics & numerical data
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Female
  • Male
  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Adult
  • Job Satisfaction
  • Veterinary Medicine / organization & administration
  • Nurse's Role

Grant Funding

  • VetPartners

Conflict of Interest Statement

All the authors are employees of VetPartners and its veterinary practices.

References

This article includes 20 references
  1. nRoyal College of Veterinary Surgeons. RCVS workforce action plan [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Jul 3]. Available from: https://www.rcvs.org.uk/news‐and‐views/publications/rcvs‐workforce‐action‐plan/?destination=%2Fnews‐and‐views%2Fpublications%2Fn
  2. nCampbell B, Roberts CP, Robinson D. The 2024 survey of the veterinary nursing profession report [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Mar 5]. Available from: https://www.rcvs.org.uk/news‐and‐views/publications/the‐2024‐survey‐of‐the‐veterinary‐nursing‐profession‐report/?destination=%2Fnews‐and‐views%2Fpublications%2F%3Ffilter‐keyword%3Dnursing%26filter‐type%3D%26filter‐month%3D%26filter‐year%3Dn
  3. Hagen JR, Weller R, Mair TS, Batt‐Williams S, Kinnison T. Survey investigating factors affecting recruitment and retention in the UK veterinary nursing profession. Vet Rec. 2022;191(12):e2078.
    pubmed: 36082748
  4. Jeffery A, Taylor E. Veterinary nursing in the United Kingdom: identifying the factors that influence retention within the profession. Front Vet Sci. 2022;9:927499.
    pmc: PMC9728522pubmed: 36504871
  5. Schofield I, Jacklin BD. Identifying factors associated with UK veterinary nurse resignations through examination of veterinary practice data. Vet Rec. 2023;193(2):e3165.
    pubmed: 37349958
  6. Vivian SR, Holt SL, Williams J. What factors influence the perceptions of job satisfaction in registered veterinary nurses currently working in veterinary practice in the United Kingdom? J Vet Med Educ. 2022;49(2):249–259.
    pubmed: 34156909
  7. nBritish Equine Veterinary Associationn. Interpreting schedule three for equine practices [Internet]. 2024 Jan [cited 2025 Apr 2]. Available from: https://www.beva.org.uk/Career‐support/Nurses/Schedule‐Threen
  8. Pritchard P, Robinson N, Saul A, Shrubb J, Stavisky J, Dean R. Horse owner perceptions of equine veterinary nursing roles in the United Kingdom. Vet Rec. 2024;194(9):e4148.
    pubmed: 38659211
  9. McMillan MW, Lehnus K. Application of systems analysis to safety incident investigations in a single centre using anaesthesia as an example. Vet Rec. 2022;191(12):e2237.
    pubmed: 36195981
  10. Leicester L, Reid A, Gilbert S, Marshall R, O'Neill DG. Applying clinical audit for quality improvement in canine dystocia cases seen at a UK primary‐care emergency practice. Vet Rec. 2023;192(11):e2485.
    pubmed: 36628550
  11. Gandini M, Giusto G. Development of a classification system for equine postoperative complications and its application in a cohort of 190 horses undergoing emergency laparotomy. Vet Rec. 2023;192(11):e2782.
    pubmed: 36906909
  12. JASP Team . Jeffrey's Amazing Statistics Program (Version 0.19.3). 2024.
  13. Chapman AJ, Rohlf VI, Moser AY, Bennett PC. Organizational factors affecting burnout in veterinary nurses: a systematic review. Anthrozoos. 2024;37(4):651–686.
  14. Vardaman JM, Rogers BL, Marler LE. Retaining nurses in a changing health care environment: the role of job embeddedness and self‐efficacy. Health Care Manage Rev. 2020;45(1):52–59.
    pubmed: 29642088
  15. nGreenley R, Aiken LH, Sermeus W, McKee M. Strengthening Europe's nursing workforce: strategies for retention [Internet]. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2024. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK611119/n
    pubmed: 39836794
  16. Harvey L, Cameron K. Comparison of expectations between veterinarians and veterinary nurses in tasks and responsibilities in clinical practice. Vet Nurs. 2019;10(6):327–331.
  17. nBritish Veterinary Nursing Associationn. Maximising the RVN role under current legislation [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 May 6]. Available from: http://bvna.org.uk/wp‐content/uploads/2024/12/For‐veterinary‐professionals‐Maximising‐RVN‐role‐11.12.24.pdfn
  18. Farrant H. Roles and responsibilities of a consulting nurse in practice. In Pract. 2023;45(6):323–331.
  19. nBritish Veterinary Nursing Associationn. BVNA ‘Protect the Title’ campaign [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Apr 29]. Available from: https://bvna.org.uk/project/bvna‐protect‐the‐title‐campaign/n
  20. nVN Futures [Internet]. [cited 2025 Apr 29]. Available from: https://vnfutures.org.uk/n

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.