Analyze Diet
The Journal of veterinary medical science2017; 79(3); 649-653; doi: 10.1292/jvms.16-0558

Update of inactivated equine influenza vaccine strain in Japan.

Abstract: Japan established a vaccine selection system, in which a committee evaluates veterinary influenza vaccines to determine if the vaccine should be updated. In 2013, it was concluded that the present equine influenza vaccine strains did not have to be updated, but clade 2 (Fc2) viruses of the Florida sublineage should be included. We collected three Fc2 viruses as candidates and conducted comparative tests. Results indicated that A/equine/Carlow/2011 (H3N8) is not suitable, because of its unstable antigenic characteristics. A comparison between A/equine/Richmond/1/2007 (H3N8) (Richmond/07) and A/equine/Yokohama/aq13/2010 (H3N8) (Yokohama/10) in eggs showed that they shared equal growth properties. Immunogenicity test in mice showed that Yokohama/10 induced higher HI antibody titers than Richmond/07. Therefore, we concluded that Yokohama/10 was the most suitable strain.
Publication Date: 2017-02-06 PubMed ID: 28163276PubMed Central: PMC5383192DOI: 10.1292/jvms.16-0558Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study details the process and conclusions of an evaluation conducted in Japan regarding the updating of inactivated equine influenza vaccines, focusing on the inclusion of viruses from the Florida clade 2 (Fc2). The research concluded that, among three candidate Fc2 viruses, the A/equine/Yokohama/aq13/2010 (H3N8) (Yokohama/10) strain was found to be the most suitable for inclusion in the vaccine.

Vaccine Selection System in Japan

  • Japan has an established system for selecting vaccine strains. This includes a committee that assesses veterinary influenza vaccines to determine whether the strains used in the vaccine need to be updated.
  • In 2013, the committee decided that the existing equine influenza vaccine strains did not require an update. However, they recommended including the Fc2 viruses from the Florida sublineage.

Selection of Fc2 Viruses

  • The researchers collected three Fc2 viruses as potential candidates for inclusion in the vaccine, and conducted comparative tests on these candidates.
  • The A/equine/Carlow/2011 (H3N8) strain was deemed unsuitable for use in a vaccine due to its unstable antigenic properties.

Comparison of Richmond/07 and Yokohama/10 Strains

  • A comparative study between the remaining two strains, A/equine/Richmond/1/2007 (H3N8) (Richmond/07) and A/equine/Yokohama/aq13/2010 (H3N8) (Yokohama/10), was performed using eggs.
  • The growth properties of the two strains were found to be the same when cultured in eggs.

Immunogenicity Test in Mice

  • The research performed an immunogenicity test using mice to determine which of the two strains was more likely to induce a higher immune response.
  • The results showed that Yokohama/10 elicited higher HI antibody titers than Richmond/07, suggesting a more robust immune response.
  • Based on these results, the researchers concluded that Yokohama/10 was the most suitable strain to include in the inactivated equine influenza vaccine.

Cite This Article

APA
Gamoh K, Nakamura S. (2017). Update of inactivated equine influenza vaccine strain in Japan. J Vet Med Sci, 79(3), 649-653. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.16-0558

Publication

ISSN: 1347-7439
NlmUniqueID: 9105360
Country: Japan
Language: English
Volume: 79
Issue: 3
Pages: 649-653

Researcher Affiliations

Gamoh, Koichiro
  • National Veterinary Assay Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 1-15-1 Tokura, Kokubunji, Tokyo 185-8511, Japan.
Nakamura, Shigeyuki

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Antibodies, Viral / blood
    • Antibodies, Viral / immunology
    • Antigens, Viral / immunology
    • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
    • Horse Diseases / immunology
    • Horse Diseases / virology
    • Horses
    • Influenza A Virus, H3N8 Subtype / immunology
    • Influenza Vaccines / immunology
    • Japan / epidemiology
    • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / epidemiology
    • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / veterinary
    • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / virology
    • Ovum / virology
    • Vaccines, Inactivated / immunology

    References

    This article includes 19 references
    1. Cooke G. Vaccination for equine influenza: the sports regulator's viewpoint.. Equine Vet J 2013 Nov;45(6):770-1.
      doi: 10.1111/evj.12151pubmed: 24117936google scholar: lookup
    2. Cullinane A, Elton D, Mumford J. Equine influenza - surveillance and control.. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2010 Nov;4(6):339-44.
    3. Daly JM, Yates RJ, Browse G, Swann Z, Newton JR, Jessett D, Davis-Poynter N, Mumford JA. Comparison of hamster and pony challenge models for evaluation of effect of antigenic drift on cross protection afforded by equine influenza vaccines.. Equine Vet J 2003 Jul;35(5):458-62.
      doi: 10.2746/042516403775600433pubmed: 12875323google scholar: lookup
    4. Daly JM, Yates PJ, Newton JR, Park A, Henley W, Wood JL, Davis-Poynter N, Mumford JA. Evidence supporting the inclusion of strains from each of the two co-circulating lineages of H3N8 equine influenza virus in vaccines.. Vaccine 2004 Sep 28;22(29-30):4101-9.
      doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.02.048pubmed: 15364463google scholar: lookup
    5. Gamoh K, Nakamura S. Introduction of an update system for vaccine strains of veterinary influenza vaccines in Japan.. Biologicals 2015 Mar;43(2):150-2.
    6. Ito M, Nagai M, Hayakawa Y, Komae H, Murakami N, Yotsuya S, Asakura S, Sakoda Y, Kida H. Genetic Analyses of an H3N8 Influenza Virus Isolate, Causative Strain of the Outbreak of Equine Influenza at the Kanazawa Racecourse in Japan in 2007.. J Vet Med Sci 2008 Sep;70(9):899-906.
      doi: 10.1292/jvms.70.899pubmed: 18840963google scholar: lookup
    7. Landolt GA. Equine influenza virus.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2014 Dec;30(3):507-22.
      doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2014.08.003pubmed: 25282321google scholar: lookup
    8. Miller GL, Stanley WM. QUANTITATIVE ASPECTS OF THE RED BLOOD CELL AGGLUTINATION TEST FOR INFLUENZA VIRUS.. J Exp Med 1944 Feb 1;79(2):185-95.
      doi: 10.1084/jem.79.2.185pmc: PMC2135446pubmed: 19871362google scholar: lookup
    9. Motoshima M, Okamatsu M, Asakura S, Kuribayashi S, Sengee S, Batchuluun D, Ito M, Maeda Y, Eto M, Sakoda Y, Sodnomdarjaa R, Kida H. Antigenic and genetic analysis of H3N8 influenza viruses isolated from horses in Japan and Mongolia, and imported from Canada and Belgium during 2007-2010.. Arch Virol 2011 Aug;156(8):1379-85.
      doi: 10.1007/s00705-011-1000-5pubmed: 21505822google scholar: lookup
    10. . Expert surveillance panel of equine influenza vaccine composition. O. I. E. Bulletin 2012: February 27, 2012, pp. 46–47.
    11. . Expert surveillance panel of equine influenza vaccine composition. O. I. E. Bulletin 2013: March 4, 2013, pp. 44–45.
    12. . Equine influenza vaccine composition. O. I. E. Bulletin 2014: March 4, 2014, pp. 77–78.
    13. . Chapter 2.5.7. Equine Influenza. O. I. E. Terrestrial Manual 2015, p.1.
    14. Park AW, Wood JL, Daly JM, Newton JR, Glass K, Henley W, Mumford JA, Grenfell BT. The effects of strain heterology on the epidemiology of equine influenza in a vaccinated population.. Proc Biol Sci 2004 Aug 7;271(1548):1547-55.
      doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2766pmc: PMC1691760pubmed: 15306299google scholar: lookup
    15. Reed LJ, Muench H. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am. J. Hyg. 1938;27: 493–497.
    16. Yamanaka T, Niwa H, Tsujimura K, Kondo T, Matsumura T. Epidemic of equine influenza among vaccinated racehorses in Japan in 2007.. J Vet Med Sci 2008 Jun;70(6):623-5.
      doi: 10.1292/jvms.70.623pubmed: 18628606google scholar: lookup
    17. Yamanaka T, Bannai H, Nemoto M, Tsujimura K, Kondo T, Matsumura T. Antibody responses induced by Japanese whole inactivated vaccines against equine influenza virus (H3N8) belonging to Florida sublineage clade2.. J Vet Med Sci 2011 Apr;73(4):483-5.
      doi: 10.1292/jvms.10-0408pubmed: 21099188google scholar: lookup
    18. Yamanaka T, Cullinane A, Gildea S, Bannai H, Nemoto M, Tsujimura K, Kondo T, Matsumura T. The potential impact of a single amino-acid substitution on the efficacy of equine influenza vaccines.. Equine Vet J 2015 Jul;47(4):456-62.
      doi: 10.1111/evj.12290pubmed: 24773030google scholar: lookup
    19. Yamanaka T, Nemoto M, Bannai H, Tsujimura K, Kondo T, Matsumura T, Gildea S, Cullinane A. Assessment of antigenic difference of equine influenza virus strains by challenge study in horses.. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2016 Nov;10(6):536-539.
      doi: 10.1111/irv.12418pmc: PMC5059955pubmed: 27465864google scholar: lookup

    Citations

    This article has been cited 4 times.
    1. Nemoto M, Reedy SE, Yano T, Suzuki K, Fukuda S, Garvey M, Kambayashi Y, Bannai H, Tsujimura K, Yamanaka T, Cullinane A, Chambers TM. Antigenic comparison of H3N8 equine influenza viruses belonging to Florida sublineage clade 1 between vaccine strains and North American strains isolated in 2021-2022.. Arch Virol 2023 Feb 19;168(3):94.
      doi: 10.1007/s00705-023-05720-xpubmed: 36806782google scholar: lookup
    2. Pavulraj S, Bergmann T, Trombetta CM, Marchi S, Montomoli E, Alami SSE, Ragni-Alunni R, Osterrieder N, Azab W. Immunogenicity of Calvenza-03 EIV/EHV(®) Vaccine in Horses: Comparative In Vivo Study.. Vaccines (Basel) 2021 Feb 17;9(2).
      doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020166pubmed: 33671378google scholar: lookup
    3. Singh RK, Dhama K, Karthik K, Khandia R, Munjal A, Khurana SK, Chakraborty S, Malik YS, Virmani N, Singh R, Tripathi BN, Munir M, van der Kolk JH. A Comprehensive Review on Equine Influenza Virus: Etiology, Epidemiology, Pathobiology, Advances in Developing Diagnostics, Vaccines, and Control Strategies.. Front Microbiol 2018;9:1941.
      doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01941pubmed: 30237788google scholar: lookup
    4. Yamanaka T, Nemoto M, Bannai H, Tsujimura K, Matsumura T, Kokado H, Gildea S, Cullinane A. Neutralization antibody response to booster/priming immunization with new equine influenza vaccine in Japan.. J Vet Med Sci 2018 Mar 2;80(2):382-386.
      doi: 10.1292/jvms.17-0538pubmed: 29237998google scholar: lookup