Omneity® Pellets
All-In-One Vitamin & Mineral Pellet
Use of a poll-mounted accelerometer for quantification and characterisation of equine trigeminal-mediated headshaking.
Abstract: Equine trigeminal-mediated (TGM) headshaking (HS) is a neuropathic facial pain syndrome characterised by varying intensity and frequencies of head movements and signs of nasal irritation. An accurate method for quantification and/or characterisation of HS severity is lacking. Objective: To develop and validate an objective measure of TGMHS. Methods: Prospective case control study. Methods: Horses presenting for investigation of HS were recruited alongside those presenting for forelimb lameness (LAME) and pre-purchase examination as well as healthy controls (CONTROL). Head movement data were collected for 5 min whilst trotting on the lunge using a tri-axial accelerometer, with a range of ±16 g and sampling rate of 800 Hz, attached to the bridle headpiece. Recordings were exported for processing. Peak detection was performed using minimum and maximum thresholds of -1 g and +1 g (corrected for gravity) and a minimum peak width of 10 samples. Results: Fifty-six horses were included in the study; 18 TGMHS, 10 non-TGMHS, 12 LAME and 16 CONTROL. Characteristics and frequency of vertical (Z axis) head movements of TGMHS horses differed significantly from other horses. TGMHS horses had peaks with greater mean and maximum positive g-force (P < 0.005) and lower mean and minimum negative g-force (P < 0.001), greater frequency of peaks/min (P < 0.001) and over 12 times greater percentage of peaks >+2 g compared with other horses (P < 0.001). Receiver operator curve characteristics of percentage of peaks >+2 g (CI 0.72-0.95), percentage of peaks <-2 g (CI 0.66-0.92) and percentage of peaks <-2 g and >+2 g (CI 0.72-0.96) showed excellent discrimination of TGMHS horses from LAME, CONTROL and non-TGMHS horses. Conclusions: Referral population of horses, small sample size and control horses were not evaluated for orthopaedic disease. Conclusions: Accelerometer data from trotting exercise on the lunge provides an objective measure of HS and can differentiate between TGMHS, non-TGMHS, normal head movements and those associated with forelimb lameness. Accelerometer use may aid HS diagnosis and monitoring of management strategies. Unassigned: La sacudida de cabeza (HS) en equinos mediada por el nervio trigémino (TGM), es un síndrome de dolor facial neuropático caracterizado por movimientos de cabeza de intensidad y frecuencia variables y por síntomas de irritación nasal. No existe un método preciso para cuantificar y/o caracterizar la gravedad de HS. Objective: Desarrollar y validar una medida objetiva de TGMHS. DISEÑO DEL ESTUDIO: Estudio prospectivo de casos y controles. MÉTODOS: Caballos presentados para la investigación de HS fueron reclutados junto a aquellos presentados para cojera de mano (LAME) y examen de pre‐compra como controles saludables (CONTROL). Datos de los movimiento de la cabeza fueron recolectados durante cinco minutos mientras trotaban a la cuerda usando un acelerómetro tri‐axial, con un rango de ±16 g y frecuencia de muestreo de 800 Hz, ajustado a la testera de la cabezada. Las grabaciones se exportaron para ser procesadas. Detección de picos fue realizada usando umbrales mínimos y máximos de −1g y + 1g (corregidos para gravedad) y un muestreo mínimo de 10 picos de ancho. Results: Cincuenta y seis caballos fueron incluidos en el estudio; 18 TGMHS, 10 no‐TGMHS, 12 LAME y 16 CONTROL. Las características y la frecuencia de los movimientos de cabeza verticales (eje Z) de caballos TGMHS, difirieron significativamente de otros caballos. Los caballos TGMHS presentaron picos con una fuerza‐g positiva con mayor promedio y máxima (P < 0.005) y una fuerza‐g negativa con menor promedio y mínima (P < 0.001), con mayor frecuencia de picos/min (P < 0.001), y un porcentaje mas de doce veces mayor de picos >+2 g en comparación a los otros caballos (P < 0.001). Las características de las curvas del operador del receptor de los picos promedio >+2 g (CI 0.72–0.95), del porcentaje de picos <−2 g (CI 0.66–0.92), y del porcentaje de picos <−2 g y > +2 g (CI 0.72–0.96) mostraron una excelente discriminación de caballos TGMHS con respecto a caballos LAME, CONTROL y no‐TGMHS. Unassigned: Población de caballos derivados, numero de muestra pequeño, y los caballos control no fueron evaluados por enfermedades ortopédicas. Conclusions: Los datos de acelerómetros por trote a la cuerda, dan una medida objetiva de HS y permiten diferenciar entre TGMHS, no‐TGMHS, movimientos normales de cabeza y aquellos asociados a cojera de mano. El uso de acelerómetros puede ayudar en el diagnostico de HS y monitorear las estrategias de manejo.
© 2024 The Author(s). Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.
Publication Date: 2024-07-17 PubMed ID: 39020521PubMed Central: PMC11982430DOI: 10.1111/evj.14132Google Scholar: Lookup The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research article presents a study aimed at developing and validating an objective approach to measuring the severity of Trigeminal-Mediated Headshaking (TGMHS) in horses, a neuropathic facial pain condition, using a tri-axial accelerometer attached to the horses’ bridle while trotting.
Introduction and Objective
- The research focuses on an equine condition known as Trigeminal-Mediated Headshaking (TGMHS). This is a disorder in horses producing extreme facial pain illustrated by unexpected head movements and signals of nasal discomfort. Despite the well-defined symptoms, there is a lack of accurate methodology for quantification and characterisation of this condition.
- The main objective of the research was to create and validate a technique for objectively measuring TGMHS.
Methods
- The study was a prospective case control study, carried out using horses showing signs of headshaking, horses showing signs of forelimb lameness, horses presented for pre-purchase examination, and healthy horses (control group).
- The researchers attached a tri-axial accelerometer to the bridle of each horse. The accelerometer, which has a range of ±16 g and a sampling rate of 800 Hz, recorded the horses’ head movements while trotting for 5 minutes.
- The collected data was then exported and processed, with peak detection performed using minimum and maximum thresholds of -1g and +1 g (after being corrected for gravity) and a minimum peak width of 10 samples.
Results
- The study involved a total of fifty-six horses: 18 TGMHS, 10 non-TGMHS, 12 lame, and 16 controls.
- The findings showed that vertical (Z axis) head movements in TGMHS horses were significantly different from other groups of horses.
- TGMHS horses had peaks with more considerable mean and maximum positive g-force and lower mean and minimum negative g-force, a higher frequency of peaks per minute, and over 12 times greater percentage of peaks above +2 g compared with other horses.
- Using a Receiver Operator Curve, the characteristics of peak percentages above +2 g and below -2 g showed excellent discrimination between TGMHS horses and other horse categories such as lame, control, and non-TGMHS horses.
Conclusion
- The study does acknowledge some limitations such as the referral population of horses, small sample size, and that control horses were not evaluated for orthopaedic diseases.
- Nonetheless, the results indicate that data from the accelerometer provides objective measurement of HS and successfully differentiates between TGMHS, non-TGMHS, normal head movements, and movements linked with forelimb lameness.
- The application of an accelerometer could potentially be an aid in diagnosing HS and monitoring the effectiveness of management strategies.
Cite This Article
APA
Pickles KJ, Marlin DJ, Williams JM, Roberts VLH.
(2024).
Use of a poll-mounted accelerometer for quantification and characterisation of equine trigeminal-mediated headshaking.
Equine Vet J, 57(3), 645-653.
https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14132 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, UK.
- Animalweb Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
- Hartpury University, Gloucester, UK.
- Bristol Vet School, University of Bristol, Langford, UK.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Horses
- Accelerometry / veterinary
- Accelerometry / instrumentation
- Accelerometry / methods
- Horse Diseases / diagnosis
- Horse Diseases / physiopathology
- Case-Control Studies
- Male
- Female
- Head Movements / physiology
- Prospective Studies
- Lameness, Animal / diagnosis
Grant Funding
- The Langford Trust for Animal Health and Welfare
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
This article includes 22 references
- Pickles KJ, Madigan JE, Aleman M. Idiopathic headshaking: is it still idiopathic?. Vet J 2014;201(1):21–30.
- Aleman M, Williams DC, Brosnan RJ, Nieto JE, Pickles KJ, Berger J. Sensory nerve conduction and somatosensory evoked potentials of the trigeminal nerve in horses with idiopathic headshaking. J Vet Intern Med 2013;27(6):1571–1580.
- Fairburn AJ, Meehan LJ, Roberts VLH. Computed tomographic findings in 101 horses presented for the investigation of headshaking. Equine Vet Educ 2023;35:e339–e345.
- Talbot WA, Pinchbeck GL, Knottenbelt DC, Graham H, McKane SA. A randomised, blinded, crossover study to assess the efficacy of a feed supplement in alleviating the clinical signs of headshaking in 32 horses. Equine Vet J 2013;45:293–297.
- Roberts VLH, Bailey M, Patel NK. The safety and efficacy of neuromodulation using percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the management of trigeminal‐mediated headshaking in 168 horses. Equine Vet J 2020;52:238–243.
- Kloock T, Pickles KJ, Roberts V, Uhlendorf F, Twele L, Wilkens HL. History, rest and exercise score (HRE‐S) for assessment of disease severity in horses with trigeminal‐mediated headshaking. Equine Vet J 2024;56(3):464–474.
- Pickles KJ, Berger J, Davies R, Roser J, Madigan JE. Use of a gonadotrophin‐releasing hormone vaccine in headshaking horses. Vet Rec 2011;168(1):19.
- Ross SE, Murray JK, Roberts VLH. Prevalence of headshaking within the equine population in the UK. Equine Vet J 2018;50:73–78.
- Brown DD, Kays R, Wikelski M, Wilson R, Klimley AP. Observing the unwatchable through acceleration logging of animal behavior. Anim Biotelemetry 2013;1:20.
- Wernimont SM, Thompson RJ, Mickelsen SL, Smith SC, Alvarenga IC, Gross KL. Use of accelerometer activity monitors to detect changes in pruritic behaviors: interim clinical data on 6 dogs. Sensors 2018;18(1):249.
- den Uijl I, Gómez Álvarez CB, Bartram D, Dror Y, Holland R, Cook A. External validation of a collar‐mounted triaxial accelerometer for second‐by‐second monitoring of eight behavioural states in dogs. PLoS One 2017;12(11):e0188481.
- Mejia S, Duerr FM, Salman M. Comparison of activity levels derived from two accelerometers in dogs with osteoarthritis: implications for clinical trials. Vet J 2019;252:105355.
- Gladden N, Cuthbert E, Ellis K, McKeegan D. Use of a tri‐axial accelerometer can reliably detect play behaviour in newborn calves. Animals 2020;10(7):1137.
- DuBois C, Zakrajsek E, Haley DB, Merkies K. Validation of triaxial accelerometers to measure the lying behaviour of adult domestic horses. Animal 2015;9(1):110–114.
- Roberts VLH. Idiopathic headshaking: is it still idiopathic? Guest editorial. Vet J 2014;201:7–8.
- Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 1993;39(4):561–577.
- Greiner M, Pfeiffer D, Smith RD. Principles and practical application of the receiver‐operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Prev Vet Med 2000;45(1‐2):23–41.
- Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. Vol 398. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
- Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol 2010;5(9):1315–1316.
- Monaghan TF, Rahman SN, Agudelo CW, Wein AJ, Lazar JM, Everaert K. Foundational statistical principles in medical research: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Medicina 2021;57(5):503.
- Nurmikko TJ, Eldridge PR. Trigeminal neuralgia–pathophysiology, diagnosis and current treatment. Br J Anaesth 2001;87(1):117–132.
- Dziak JJ, Dierker LC, Abar B. The interpretation of statistical power after the data have been gathered. Curr Psychol 2020;39:870–877.
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists
