Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2016; 6(1); 5; doi: 10.3390/ani6010005

Welfare Conditions of Donkeys in Europe: Initial Outcomes from On-Farm Assessment.

Abstract: This paper is a baseline study to present the initial outcomes of data collected in a sample of EU donkey farms using the AWIN welfare assessment protocol for donkeys, comprehensive of 22 valid, reliable and feasible animal-based indicators. A total of 20 donkey facilities (N = 12 in Italy and N = 8 in United Kingdom) were visited and 278 donkeys of different breed, aged 2-45 years, were assessed. Three assessors underwent a common training period to learn how to perform and score all the indicators included in the protocol. Data was collected using digitalized systems and downloaded to a database. A descriptive statistic for each welfare indicator was calculated. The authors found recurrent issues: 25% of donkeys were moderately over weight; although most of the assessed animals had good quality hoof care, 15.16% of them presented some signs of neglect, such as overgrowth and/or incorrect trimming; 18.05% of donkeys showed an avoidance reaction to an approaching human in the avoidance distance test. The protocol has proven to be applicable in different management conditions and for donkeys of different attitude.
Publication Date: 2016-01-08 PubMed ID: 26761034PubMed Central: PMC4730122DOI: 10.3390/ani6010005Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article examines the welfare of donkeys in Europe by using a standardized protocol to assess a number of indicators across 20 different facilities. The researchers found a number of recurring issues relating to the care and treatment of the animals.

Methodology

  • The researchers used the Animal Welfare Indicator (AWIN) welfare assessment protocol for donkeys, which involves studying 22 different factors related to the wellbeing of the animals. These factors are all based on observable characteristics of the animals and their environment.
  • The study took place at 20 different donkey facilities (donkey farms) in the European Union, specifically in Italy and the United Kingdom. The sample was made up of 278 donkeys of varying breeds and ages (from 2 up to 45 years).
  • Three trained assessors carried out the evaluations detailed in the protocol.
  • All data was digitised and stored in a database for further analysis and interpretation. A descriptive statistic for each welfare indicator was calculated.

Findings

  • The study identified several repeat issues across the surveyed facilities. These are areas where animal welfare could be improved.
  • One quarter of donkeys were considered to be moderately overweight, suggesting issues with diet or exercise regimes in the studied facilities.
  • The quality of hoof care was generally good. However, 15.16% of donkeys showed signs of neglect such as hoof overgrowth or incorrect trimming, signalling an area that needs better attention.
  • 18.05% of the donkeys demonstrated an avoidance reaction when humans approached. This could suggest potential issues with the human-animal interactions in the studied facilities.

Conclusion

  • This study demonstrated that the AWIN welfare assessment protocol is applicable in a variety of management conditions for different breeds and attitudes of donkeys.
  • The results indicate there are improvements to be made in the care and treatment of donkeys in European facilities.

Cite This Article

APA
Dai F, Dalla Costa E, Murray LM, Canali E, Minero M. (2016). Welfare Conditions of Donkeys in Europe: Initial Outcomes from On-Farm Assessment. Animals (Basel), 6(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6010005

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 6
Issue: 1
PII: 5

Researcher Affiliations

Dai, Francesca
  • Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie e Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 10, 20133 Milano, Italy. francesca.dai@unimi.it.
Dalla Costa, Emanuela
  • Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie e Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 10, 20133 Milano, Italy. emanuela.dallacosta@unimi.it.
Murray, Leigh Margareth Anne
  • Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie e Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 10, 20133 Milano, Italy. leigh_murray75@hotmail.co.uk.
Canali, Elisabetta
  • Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie e Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 10, 20133 Milano, Italy. elisabetta.canali@unimi.it.
Minero, Michela
  • Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie e Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 10, 20133 Milano, Italy. michela.minero@unimi.it.

References

This article includes 29 references
  1. Faostat. [(accessed on 20 November 2015)]. Available online: http//www.faostat.fao.org.
  2. Pritchard JC, Lindberg AC, Main DC, Whay HR. Assessment of the welfare of working horses, mules and donkeys, using health and behaviour parameters.. Prev Vet Med 2005 Jul 12;69(3-4):265-83.
  3. Mekuria S, Abebe R. Observation on Major Welfare Problems of Equine in Meskan District, Southern Ethiopia. .
  4. Leeb C, Henstridge C, Dewhurst K, Bazeley K. Welfare assessment of working donkeys: Assessment of the impact of an animal heahlthcare project in West Kenya. Anim. Welf. 2003;12:689–694.
  5. Arsenos G, Gelasakis AI, Papadopoulos E. The status of donkeys (Equus asinus) in Greece. J. Hell. Vet. Med. Soc. 2010;61:212–219.
  6. Cox R, Burden F, Proudman CJ, Trawford AF, Pinchbeck GL. Demographics, management and health of donkeys in the UK.. Vet Rec 2010 May 1;166(18):552-6.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.b4800pubmed: 20435979google scholar: lookup
  7. Passantino A. Welfare issues of donkey (Equus asinus): A checklist based on the five freedoms. J. Consum. Prot. Food Saf. 2011;6:215–221.
    doi: 10.1007/s00003-010-0638-3google scholar: lookup
  8. Burn CC, Pritchard JC, Whay HR. Observer reliability for working equine welfare assessment: Problems with high prevalences of certain results. Anim. Welf. 2009;18:177–187.
  9. Burn CC, Dennison TL, Whay HR. Relationships between behaviour and health in working horses, donkeys, and mules in developing countries. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2010;126:109–118.
  10. Regan FH, Hockenhull J, Pritchard JC, Waterman-Pearson AE, Whay HR. Behavioural repertoire of working donkeys and consistency of behaviour over time, as a preliminary step towards identifying pain-related behaviours.. PLoS One 2014;9(7):e101877.
  11. Pritchard JC, Barr AR, Whay HR. Validity of a behavioural measure of heat stress and a skin tent test for dehydration in working horses and donkeys.. Equine Vet J 2006 Sep;38(5):433-8.
    pubmed: 16986604doi: 10.2746/042516406778400646google scholar: lookup
  12. Regan Nee Ashley FH, Hockenhull J, Pritchard JC, Waterman-Pearson AE, Whay HR. Clinical abnormalities in working donkeys and their associations with behaviour.. Vet Rec Open 2015;2(1):e000105.
    doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2014-000105pmc: PMC4567160pubmed: 26392903google scholar: lookup
  13. Battini M, Stilwell G, Vieira A, Barbieri S, Canali E, Mattiello S. On-FarmWelfare Assessment Protocol for Adult Dairy Goats in Intensive Production Systems.. Animals (Basel) 2015 Sep 25;5(4):934-50.
    doi: 10.3390/ani5040393pmc: PMC4693197pubmed: 26479477google scholar: lookup
  14. Dalla Costa E, Dai F, Lebelt D, Scholz P, Barbieri S, Canali E, Zanella AJ, Minero M. Welfare assessment of horses: The AWIN approach. Anim. Welf. 2016 in press.
  15. AWIN. AWIN Welfare Assessment Protocol for Donkeys. AWIN; Edinburgh, UK: 2015.
  16. Dai F, Dalla Costa E, Battini M, Barbieri S, Minero M, Mattiello S, Canali E. An innovative tool for on-farm data collection and information sharing. In: Mounier L., Veissier I., editors. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level; Clermont-Ferrand, France. 3–5 September 2014; Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2014. p. 153.
  17. Pearson RA, Merritt JB. Intake, digestion and gastrointestinal transit time in resting donkeys and ponies and exercised donkeys given ad libitum hay and straw diets.. Equine Vet J 1991 Sep;23(5):339-43.
  18. Burn CC, Dennison TL, Whay HR. Environmental and demographic risk factors for poor welfare in working horses, donkeys and mules in developing countries.. Vet J 2010 Dec;186(3):385-92.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.09.016pubmed: 19926316google scholar: lookup
  19. Smith D, Wood S. Donkey nutrition. In: Svendsen E.D., Duncan J., Hadrill D., editors. The Professional Handbook of the Donkey. Whittet Books; Wiltshire, UK: 2008. pp. 10–27.
  20. Grove V. Hyperlipaemia. In: Svendsen E.D., Duncan J., Hadrill D., editors. The Professional Handbook of the Donkey. Whitted Books; Wiltshire, UK: 2008. pp. 52–61.
  21. Pritchard JC, Barr AR, Whay HR. Validity of a behavioural measure of heat stress and a skin tent test for dehydration in working horses and donkeys.. Equine Vet J 2006 Sep;38(5):433-8.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406778400646pubmed: 16986604google scholar: lookup
  22. Pritchard JC, Burn CC, Barr AR, Whay HR. Validity of indicators of dehydration in working horses: a longitudinal study of changes in skin tent duration, mucous membrane dryness and drinking behaviour.. Equine Vet J 2008 Sep;40(6):558-64.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X297462pubmed: 18356129google scholar: lookup
  23. Duffield H. Colic. In: Svendsen E.D., Duncan J., Hadrill D., editors. The Professional Handbook of the Donkey. Whitted Books; Wiltshire, UK: 2008. pp. 37–51.
  24. Popescu S, Diugan EA, Spinu M. The interrelations of good welfare indicators assessed in working horses and their relationships with the type of work.. Res Vet Sci 2014 Apr;96(2):406-14.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.12.014pubmed: 24461957google scholar: lookup
  25. Crane M. The donkey′s foot. In: Svendsen E.D., Duncan J., Hadrill D., editors. The Professional Handbook of the Donkey. Whitted Books; Wiltshire, UK: 2008. pp. 188–201.
  26. Thiemann A, Rickards K. Donkey hoof disorders and their treatment. Practice 2013;35:134–140.
    doi: 10.1136/inp.f1074google scholar: lookup
  27. Mills D, Riezebos M. The role of the image of a conspecific in the regulation of stereotypic head movements in the horse. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005;91:155–165.
  28. Costa ED, Dai F, Murray LAM, Guazzetti S, Canali E, Minero M. A study on validity and reliability of on-farm tests to measure human–animal relationship in horses and donkeys. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2015;163:110–121.
  29. Minero M, Costa ED, Dai F, Murray LAM, Canali E, Wemelsfelder F. Use of qualitative behaviour assessment as an indicator of welfare in donkeys. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;174:147–153.

Citations

This article has been cited 9 times.
  1. Dai F, Riva MG, Dalla Costa E, Pascuzzo R, Chapman A, Minero M. Application of QBA to Assess the Emotional State of Horses during the Loading Phase of Transport.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 19;12(24).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12243588pubmed: 36552507google scholar: lookup
  2. Kamran K, Akbar A, Naseem M, Samad A, Samiullah, Achakzai JK, Rehman ZU, Sohail Sajid M, Ali A. Participatory appraisal for healthcare and welfare management strategies of donkeys (Equus ascinus) in Balochistan, Pakistan.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:1005079.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1005079pubmed: 36118345google scholar: lookup
  3. Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, Garin-Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortázar Schmidt C, Michel V, Miranda Chueca MÁ, Padalino B, Pasquali P, Roberts HC, Spoolder H, Stahl K, Velarde A, Viltrop A, Winckler C, Earley B, Edwards S, Faucitano L, Marti S, Miranda de La Lama GC, Costa LN, Thomsen PT, Ashe S, Mur L, Van der Stede Y, Herskin M. Welfare of equidae during transport.. EFSA J 2022 Sep;20(9):e07444.
    doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7444pubmed: 36092762google scholar: lookup
  4. Alberghina D, Statelli A, Monteverde V, Vazzana I, Cascone G, Panzera M. Serum Cortisol and Its Correlation with Leucocyte Profile and Circulating Lipids in Donkeys (Equus asinus).. Animals (Basel) 2022 Mar 26;12(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12070841pubmed: 35405831google scholar: lookup
  5. Deng L, Shi S, Li J, Tang C, Han Y, Xie P. A Survey of Smallholder Farms Regarding Demographics, Health Care, and Management Factors of Donkeys in Northeastern China.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:626622.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.626622pubmed: 33937368google scholar: lookup
  6. Dai F, Mazzola S, Cannas S, Heinzl EUL, Padalino B, Minero M, Dalla Costa E. Habituation to Transport Helps Reducing Stress-Related Behavior in Donkeys During Loading.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:593138.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.593138pubmed: 33344531google scholar: lookup
  7. Dai F, Dalla Costa E, Cannas S, Heinzl EUL, Minero M, Mazzola SM. May Salivary Chromogranin A Act as a Physiological Index of Stress in Transported Donkeys? A Pilot Study.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jun 3;10(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10060972pubmed: 32503233google scholar: lookup
  8. Raw Z, Rodrigues JB, Rickards K, Ryding J, Norris SL, Judge A, Kubasiewicz LM, Watson TL, Little H, Hart B, Sullivan R, Garrett C, Burden FA. Equid Assessment, Research and Scoping (EARS): The Development and Implementation of a New Equid Welfare Assessment and Monitoring Tool.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Feb 13;10(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10020297pubmed: 32069910google scholar: lookup
  9. Raspa F, Cavallarin L, McLean AK, Bergero D, Valle E. A Review of the Appropriate Nutrition Welfare Criteria of Dairy Donkeys: Nutritional Requirements, Farm Management Requirements and Animal-Based Indicators.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jun 1;9(6).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9060315pubmed: 31159459google scholar: lookup