Analyze Diet
Preventive veterinary medicine2017; 140; 67-77; doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.03.003

“We’ve learned to live with it”-A qualitative study of Australian horse owners’ attitudes, perceptions and practices in response to Hendra virus.

Abstract: Hendra virus causes sporadic zoonotic disease in Australia following spill over from flying foxes to horses and from horses to people. Prevention and risk mitigation strategies such as vaccination of horses or biosecurity and property management measures are widely publicised, but hinge on initiative and action taken by horse owners as they mediate management, care and treatment of their animals. Hence, underlying beliefs, values and attitudes of horse owners influence their uptake of recommended risk mitigation measures. We used a qualitative approach to investigate attitudes, perceptions and self-reported practices of horse owners in response to Hendra virus to gain a deeper understanding of their decision-making around prevention measures. Data presented here derive from a series of in-depth interviews with 27 horse owners from Hendra virus 'hot spot' areas in New South Wales and Queensland. Interviews explored previous experience, perceptions and resulting behaviour as well as communication around Hendra virus. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed in NVivo using thematic analysis. Analysis revealed four major themes: perception of Hendra virus as a risk and factors influencing this perception, Hendra virus risk mitigation strategies implemented by horse owners, perceived motivators and barriers of these strategies, and interaction of perceived risk, motivators and barriers in the decision-making process. Although Hendra virus disease was perceived as a serious threat to the health of horses and humans, individual risk perception diverged among horse owners. Perceived severity, likelihood and unpredictability as well as awareness and knowledge of Hendra virus, trust in information obtained and information pathways, demographic characteristics and personal experience were the main factors influencing Hendra virus risk perceptions. Other key determinants of horse owners' decision-making process were attitudes towards Hendra virus risk mitigation measures as well as perceived motivators and barriers thereof. Horse owners' awareness of the necessity to consider individual Hendra virus risk and adequate risk management strategies was described as a learning process, which changed over time. However, different perceptions of risk, barriers and motivators in combination with a weighing up of advantages and disadvantages resulted in different behaviours. These findings demonstrate the multifactorial determinants of cognitive mediating processes and facilitate a better understanding of horse owners' perspectives on preventive horse health measures. Furthermore, they provide valuable feedback to industry and government stakeholders on how to improve effective risk communication and encourage uptake of recommended risk mitigation measures.
Publication Date: 2017-03-12 PubMed ID: 28460752DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.03.003Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the attitudes, perceptions, and practices of Australian horse owners towards Hendra virus and their decision-making around prevention measures. Data was gathered through in-depth interviews with horse owners from Hendra virus ‘hot spot’ areas and analyzed thematically to understand the major influences on their risk perceptions and decision-making.

Research Methodology

  • The researchers conducted a qualitative study by interviewing 27 horse owners from New South Wales and Queensland, known as Hendra virus ‘hot spot’ areas.
  • The interviews sought to understand the horse owners’ previous experiences with the virus, their perceptions of its risk, and their actions and communications in response to the disease.
  • The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis with NVivo, a qualitative data analysis software.

Key Findings

  • The researchers identified four main themes reflecting the horse owners’ responses to Hendra virus: their risk perceptions, the risk mitigation strategies they implemented, the motivators and barriers behind these strategies, and the interaction of perceived risk, motivators, and barriers in their decision-making process.
  • While all horse owners identified Hendra virus as a serious threat, individual risk perception varied significantly.
  • The main factors influencing risk perceptions included perceived severity of the virus, likelihood and unpredictability, knowledge and awareness of Hendra virus, trust in information sources, demographic characteristics, and personal experience with the virus.
  • Attitudes towards Hendra virus risk mitigation measures and the perceived benefits and obstacles of these strategies were other critical determinants in horse owners’ overall decision-making process.

Implications of the Study

  • This study provides a comprehensive understanding of how horse owners perceive and manage Hendra virus risk.
  • The insights obtained from the study could help industry and government stakeholders improve risk communication and encourage the uptake of recommended risk mitigation measures.
  • Understanding the cognitive processes influencing horse owners’ decisions can potentially lead to improvements in both horse and human health in relation to Hendra virus.

Cite This Article

APA
Wiethoelter AK, Sawford K, Schembri N, Taylor MR, Dhand NK, Moloney B, Wright T, Kung N, Field HE, Toribio JLML. (2017). “We’ve learned to live with it”-A qualitative study of Australian horse owners’ attitudes, perceptions and practices in response to Hendra virus. Prev Vet Med, 140, 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.03.003

Publication

ISSN: 1873-1716
NlmUniqueID: 8217463
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 140
Pages: 67-77
PII: S0167-5877(17)30192-7

Researcher Affiliations

Wiethoelter, Anke K
  • Farm Animal & Veterinary Public Health, The University of Sydney School of Veterinary Science, NSW 2006, Australia; Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia. Electronic address: anke.wiethoelter@unimelb.edu.au.
Sawford, Kate
  • Farm Animal & Veterinary Public Health, The University of Sydney School of Veterinary Science, NSW 2006, Australia.
Schembri, Nicole
  • Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Taylor, Melanie R
  • Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia; Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.
Dhand, Navneet K
  • Farm Animal & Veterinary Public Health, The University of Sydney School of Veterinary Science, NSW 2006, Australia.
Moloney, Barbara
  • New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
Wright, Therese
  • New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
Kung, Nina
  • Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.
Field, Hume E
  • Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia; EcoHealth Alliance, NY 10001, USA.
Toribio, Jenny-Ann L M L
  • Farm Animal & Veterinary Public Health, The University of Sydney School of Veterinary Science, NSW 2006, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Animal Husbandry
  • Animals
  • Australia
  • Chiroptera / virology
  • Decision Making
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Hendra Virus
  • Henipavirus Infections / prevention & control
  • Henipavirus Infections / psychology
  • Henipavirus Infections / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Horse Diseases / psychology
  • Horse Diseases / virology
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • New South Wales / epidemiology
  • Queensland / epidemiology
  • Risk Factors
  • Vaccination / psychology
  • Young Adult

Citations

This article has been cited 17 times.
  1. Kropich-Grant JN, Wiley KE, Manyweathers J, Thompson KR, Brookes VJ. Communication Interventions and Assessment of Drivers for Hendra Virus Vaccination Uptake. Vaccines (Basel) 2023 May 4;11(5).
    doi: 10.3390/vaccines11050936pubmed: 37243040google scholar: lookup
  2. Thompson K, Taylor J, Mendez D, Chicken C, Carrick J, Durrheim DN. Willingness to adopt personal biosecurity strategies on thoroughbred breeding farms: Findings from a multi-site pilot study in Australia's Hunter Valley. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:1017452.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1017452pubmed: 36590817google scholar: lookup
  3. Powell L, Lavender TM, Reinhard CL, Watson B. Pet Owners' Perceptions of COVID-19, Zoonotic Disease, and Veterinary Medicine: The Impact of Demographic Characteristics. Vet Sci 2022 Apr 19;9(5).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9050195pubmed: 35622723google scholar: lookup
  4. Ward AB, Stephen K, Argo CM, Harris PA, Watson CA, Neacsu M, Russell W, Grove-White DH, Morrison PK. COVID-19 impacts equine welfare: Policy implications for laminitis and obesity. PLoS One 2021;16(5):e0252340.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252340pubmed: 34048478google scholar: lookup
  5. Hidano A, Gates MC, Enticott G. Farmers' Decision Making on Livestock Trading Practices: Cowshed Culture and Behavioral Triggers Amongst New Zealand Dairy Farmers. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:320.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00320pubmed: 31620458google scholar: lookup
  6. Spence KL, Cardwell JM, Slater J, Rosanowski SM. Preliminary insight into horse owners' perceptions of, and attitudes towards, exotic diseases in the United Kingdom. BMC Vet Res 2019 Oct 12;15(1):338.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2120-5pubmed: 31606050google scholar: lookup
  7. Degeling C, Gilbert GL, Annand E, Taylor M, Walsh MG, Ward MP, Wilson A, Johnson J. Managing the risk of Hendra virus spillover in Australia using ecological approaches: A report on three community juries. PLoS One 2018;13(12):e0209798.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209798pubmed: 30596719google scholar: lookup
  8. Hidano A, Enticott G, Christley RM, Gates MC. Modeling Dynamic Human Behavioral Changes in Animal Disease Models: Challenges and Opportunities for Addressing Bias. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:137.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00137pubmed: 29977897google scholar: lookup
  9. Lomas HR, Robinson PA. A Pilot Qualitative Investigation of Stakeholders' Experiences and Opinions of Equine Insect Bite Hypersensitivity in England. Vet Sci 2018 Jan 9;5(1).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci5010003pubmed: 29315275google scholar: lookup
  10. Walsh MG, Wiethoelter A, Haseeb MA. The impact of human population pressure on flying fox niches and the potential consequences for Hendra virus spillover. Sci Rep 2017 Aug 15;7(1):8226.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08065-zpubmed: 28811483google scholar: lookup
  11. White J, Thompson K, van den Berg D, O'Neill G, Mendez DH, Talwar J, Degeling C, Forsythe R, Durrheim DN. 'Pretty devastating': exploring horse owner and veterinarian lived experiences of the equine Hendra virus. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1661615.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1661615pubmed: 41357753google scholar: lookup
  12. Fiedler JM, Rosanowski S, Ayre ML, Slater JD. Horse Activity Participants' Perceptions About Practices Undertaken at Activity Venues, and Horse Welfare and Wellbeing. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jul 24;15(15).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15152182pubmed: 40804971google scholar: lookup
  13. Akinniyi OO, Lawal TR, Rufai N, Jolayemi KO, Amaje J. Horse handlers' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of African horse sickness in South-West, Nigeria. Sci Rep 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21880.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07991-7pubmed: 40596541google scholar: lookup
  14. Chapman M, Fenner K, Thomas MJW. Lessons learnt from horse-related human fatalities: Accident analysis using HFACS-Equestrianism. Heliyon 2025 Feb 15;11(3):e42276.
    doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42276pubmed: 39991252google scholar: lookup
  15. Germann JA, O'Sullivan TL, Greer AL, Spence KL. Biosecurity perceptions among Ontario horse owners during the COVID-19 pandemic. Equine Vet J 2025 Mar;57(2):459-470.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14115pubmed: 38934765google scholar: lookup
  16. Spence KL, Rosanowski SM, Slater J, Cardwell JM. 'I want to be the sort of owner that he wants me to be': Rationales for biosecurity implementation among British horse owners. Equine Vet J 2025 Jan;57(1):183-192.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14047pubmed: 38177092google scholar: lookup
  17. Brown B, Cardwell JM, Verheyen KLP, Campbell MLH. Testing and Refining the Ethical Framework for the Use of Horses in Sport. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 31;13(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13111821pubmed: 37889722google scholar: lookup