Abstract: Hendra virus causes sporadic zoonotic disease in Australia following spill over from flying foxes to horses and from horses to people. Prevention and risk mitigation strategies such as vaccination of horses or biosecurity and property management measures are widely publicised, but hinge on initiative and action taken by horse owners as they mediate management, care and treatment of their animals. Hence, underlying beliefs, values and attitudes of horse owners influence their uptake of recommended risk mitigation measures. We used a qualitative approach to investigate attitudes, perceptions and self-reported practices of horse owners in response to Hendra virus to gain a deeper understanding of their decision-making around prevention measures. Data presented here derive from a series of in-depth interviews with 27 horse owners from Hendra virus 'hot spot' areas in New South Wales and Queensland. Interviews explored previous experience, perceptions and resulting behaviour as well as communication around Hendra virus. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed in NVivo using thematic analysis. Analysis revealed four major themes: perception of Hendra virus as a risk and factors influencing this perception, Hendra virus risk mitigation strategies implemented by horse owners, perceived motivators and barriers of these strategies, and interaction of perceived risk, motivators and barriers in the decision-making process. Although Hendra virus disease was perceived as a serious threat to the health of horses and humans, individual risk perception diverged among horse owners. Perceived severity, likelihood and unpredictability as well as awareness and knowledge of Hendra virus, trust in information obtained and information pathways, demographic characteristics and personal experience were the main factors influencing Hendra virus risk perceptions. Other key determinants of horse owners' decision-making process were attitudes towards Hendra virus risk mitigation measures as well as perceived motivators and barriers thereof. Horse owners' awareness of the necessity to consider individual Hendra virus risk and adequate risk management strategies was described as a learning process, which changed over time. However, different perceptions of risk, barriers and motivators in combination with a weighing up of advantages and disadvantages resulted in different behaviours. These findings demonstrate the multifactorial determinants of cognitive mediating processes and facilitate a better understanding of horse owners' perspectives on preventive horse health measures. Furthermore, they provide valuable feedback to industry and government stakeholders on how to improve effective risk communication and encourage uptake of recommended risk mitigation measures.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research investigates the attitudes, perceptions, and practices of Australian horse owners towards Hendra virus and their decision-making around prevention measures. Data was gathered through in-depth interviews with horse owners from Hendra virus ‘hot spot’ areas and analyzed thematically to understand the major influences on their risk perceptions and decision-making.
Research Methodology
The researchers conducted a qualitative study by interviewing 27 horse owners from New South Wales and Queensland, known as Hendra virus ‘hot spot’ areas.
The interviews sought to understand the horse owners’ previous experiences with the virus, their perceptions of its risk, and their actions and communications in response to the disease.
The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis with NVivo, a qualitative data analysis software.
Key Findings
The researchers identified four main themes reflecting the horse owners’ responses to Hendra virus: their risk perceptions, the risk mitigation strategies they implemented, the motivators and barriers behind these strategies, and the interaction of perceived risk, motivators, and barriers in their decision-making process.
While all horse owners identified Hendra virus as a serious threat, individual risk perception varied significantly.
The main factors influencing risk perceptions included perceived severity of the virus, likelihood and unpredictability, knowledge and awareness of Hendra virus, trust in information sources, demographic characteristics, and personal experience with the virus.
Attitudes towards Hendra virus risk mitigation measures and the perceived benefits and obstacles of these strategies were other critical determinants in horse owners’ overall decision-making process.
Implications of the Study
This study provides a comprehensive understanding of how horse owners perceive and manage Hendra virus risk.
The insights obtained from the study could help industry and government stakeholders improve risk communication and encourage the uptake of recommended risk mitigation measures.
Understanding the cognitive processes influencing horse owners’ decisions can potentially lead to improvements in both horse and human health in relation to Hendra virus.
Cite This Article
APA
Wiethoelter AK, Sawford K, Schembri N, Taylor MR, Dhand NK, Moloney B, Wright T, Kung N, Field HE, Toribio JLML.
(2017).
“We’ve learned to live with it”-A qualitative study of Australian horse owners’ attitudes, perceptions and practices in response to Hendra virus.
Prev Vet Med, 140, 67-77.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.03.003
Farm Animal & Veterinary Public Health, The University of Sydney School of Veterinary Science, NSW 2006, Australia; Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia. Electronic address: anke.wiethoelter@unimelb.edu.au.
Sawford, Kate
Farm Animal & Veterinary Public Health, The University of Sydney School of Veterinary Science, NSW 2006, Australia.
Schembri, Nicole
Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Taylor, Melanie R
Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia; Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.
Dhand, Navneet K
Farm Animal & Veterinary Public Health, The University of Sydney School of Veterinary Science, NSW 2006, Australia.
Moloney, Barbara
New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
Wright, Therese
New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
Kung, Nina
Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.
Field, Hume E
Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia; EcoHealth Alliance, NY 10001, USA.
Toribio, Jenny-Ann L M L
Farm Animal & Veterinary Public Health, The University of Sydney School of Veterinary Science, NSW 2006, Australia.
Powell L, Lavender TM, Reinhard CL, Watson B. Pet Owners' Perceptions of COVID-19, Zoonotic Disease, and Veterinary Medicine: The Impact of Demographic Characteristics. Vet Sci 2022 Apr 19;9(5).
Hidano A, Gates MC, Enticott G. Farmers' Decision Making on Livestock Trading Practices: Cowshed Culture and Behavioral Triggers Amongst New Zealand Dairy Farmers. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:320.
Hidano A, Enticott G, Christley RM, Gates MC. Modeling Dynamic Human Behavioral Changes in Animal Disease Models: Challenges and Opportunities for Addressing Bias. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:137.
Walsh MG, Wiethoelter A, Haseeb MA. The impact of human population pressure on flying fox niches and the potential consequences for Hendra virus spillover. Sci Rep 2017 Aug 15;7(1):8226.