FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Front Vet Sci / A comparison of different established and novel methods to d...
Frontiers in veterinary science2022; 9; 789260; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.789260

A comparison of different established and novel methods to determine horses’ laterality and their relation to rein tension.

Abstract: The present study aimed to assess an agreement between established and novel methods to determine laterality and to identify the distribution of laterality in warmbloods and Thoroughbreds. Nine different methods to investigate a horses' laterality outside a riding context and during riding were compared across two groups of horses (sample A: 67 warmblood- type horses, sample B: 61 Thoroughbreds). Agreement between any two methods was assessed by calculating Cohen's kappa with McNemar's test or Bowker's Test of Symmetry, and the deviation from equal distributions was assessed with chi2-tests. Continuous variables such as rein tension parameters were analyzed using ANOVA or linear mixed models. Generally, laterality test results obtained outside a riding context did not agree with laterality during riding or among each other (Bonferroni corrected p > 0.0018). However, the rider's assessment of her/his horse's laterality allowed conclusions on rein tension symmetry (p = 0.003), and it also agreed substantially with the lateral displacement of the hindquarters (p = 0.0003), a method that was newly developed in the present study. The majority of warmbloods had their hindquarters displaced to the right (73.1%, X2 = 14.3; p < 0.0001). The pattern of lateral displacement of the hindquarters was similar in the Thoroughbred sample (right: 60.7%, left: 39.3%), but did not deviate significantly from an equal distribution (X2 = 2.8; p > 0.05). Laterality seems to be manifested in different ways, which generally are not related to each other. Attention should be paid to the desired information when selecting methods for the assessment of laterality. Horses' laterality has an impact on the magnitude and symmetry of rein tension. Matching horses and riders according to their laterality might be beneficial for the stability of rein tension and thus improve training.
Copyright © 2022 Kuhnke and König von Borstel.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-09-15 PubMed ID: 36187838PubMed Central: PMC9521178DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.789260Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study focuses on comparing various established and new methods to determine ‘laterality’ in horses, and their relationship to rein tension. Laterality refers to a preference for using one side of the body, similar to right or left-handedness in humans. The stakes lie in its potential impact on rein tension, affecting stability and training effectiveness.

Study Objective and Methodology

  • The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement between various traditional and new methods to determine laterality in horses, and find the distribution pattern of laterality in warmbloods and Thoroughbreds.
  • Nine methods were used to study horses’ laterality outside a riding context and during riding. These methods were compared across two groups of horses – Sample A included 67 warmblood-type horses while Sample B included 61 Thoroughbreds.

Data Analysis

  • Agreement between different methods was established by calculating Cohen’s kappa with McNemar’s test or Bowker’s test of symmetry.
  • The deviation from equal distributions was evaluated using chi-tests.
  • Continuous variables such as rein tension parameters were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) or linear mixed models.

Results and Findings

  • The results revealed that laterality tests conducted outside a riding context did not concur with those conducted during riding.
  • Conversely, the rider’s judgement of their horse’s laterality permitted conclusions about rein tension symmetry and agreed significantly with the lateral displacement of the hindquarters. This was a method developed in this study.
  • Most warmbloods (73.1%) showed displacement of their hindquarters to the right.

Implications and Conclusion

  • The researchers concluded that laterality manifests in various forms that usually do not have any relationship with each other.
  • Care must be taken when selecting methods to evaluate laterality based on the desired information. This is due to the impact that a horse’s laterality has on the magnitude and symmetry of rein tension.
  • Hence, matching horses and riders according to their laterality could provide training benefits by improving rein tension stability.

Cite This Article

APA
Kuhnke S, König von Borstel U. (2022). A comparison of different established and novel methods to determine horses’ laterality and their relation to rein tension. Front Vet Sci, 9, 789260. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.789260

Publication

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 9
Pages: 789260

Researcher Affiliations

Kuhnke, Sandra
  • Department of Animal Breeding, Kassel University, Kassel, Germany.
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Group Animal Husbandry, Behaviour and Welfare, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
König von Borstel, Uta
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Group Animal Husbandry, Behaviour and Welfare, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
  • Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 74 references
  1. Ludwig W. Das Rechts-Links-Problem im Tierreich und beim Menschen. Berlin: Springer Verlag; (1932).
  2. Coren S, Porac C. Fifty centuries of right-handedness: the historical record. Science (1977) 198:631–2.
    doi: 10.1126/science.335510pubmed: 335510google scholar: lookup
  3. McManus IC. Right Hand, Left Hand. London: Widenfeld and Nicolson; (2002).
  4. Hammond G. Correlates of human handedness in primary motor cortex: a review and hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev (2002) 26:285–92.
    doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00003-9pubmed: 12034131google scholar: lookup
  5. Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL. Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. J Neurophysiol (2002) 88:2408–21.
    doi: 10.1152/jn.00901.2001pmc: PMC10709816pubmed: 12424282google scholar: lookup
  6. Kuhnke S. Horse's laterality: methods of determination, genetic aspects, interaction with human handedness and the influence on horse-rider- communication, horse's muscle status, sport success and risk of injury. [Dissertation]. Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen; (2020).
  7. de la Guérinère R. Reitkunst oder gründliche Anweisung zur Kenntniß der Pferde, deren Erziehung, Unterhaltung, Abrichtung, nach ihrem verschiedenen Gebrauch und Bestimmung. Olms Verlag, Documenta Hippologica, Reprint 2013 (1733).
  8. Steinbrecht G. Das Gymnasium des Pferdes. Berlin: Richard Schröder Verlagsbuchhandlung; (1901).
  9. Hopkins WD, Phillips KA, Bania A, Calcutt SE, Gardner M, Russell J. Hand preferences for coordinated bimanual actions in 777 great apes: implications for the evolution of handedness in Hominins. J Hum Evol (2011) 60:605–11.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.12.008pmc: PMC3068228pubmed: 21334723google scholar: lookup
  10. Christel MI. Grasping Techniques and Hand Preferences in Primates. Published in: Hands of Primates. Wien: Springer Verlag; (1993) 91–108.
  11. Dragovic M, Milenkovic S, Hammond G. The distribution of hand preference is discrete: a taxometric examination. Br J Psychol (2008) 99:445–59.
    doi: 10.1348/000712608X304450pubmed: 18447970google scholar: lookup
  12. Triggs WJ, Subramanium B, Rossi F. Hand preference and transcranial magnetic stimulation asymmetry of cortical motor representation. Brain Res (1999) 835:324–9.
    doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(99)01629-7pubmed: 10415389google scholar: lookup
  13. Volkmann J, Schnitzler A, Witte OW, Freund H-J. Handedness and asymmetry of hand representation in human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol (1998) 79:2149–54.
    doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.4.2149pubmed: 9535974google scholar: lookup
  14. Friedli WG, Fuhr P, Wiget W. Detection threshold for percutaneous electrical stimuli: asymmetry with respect to handedness. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychol (1987) 50:870–6.
    doi: 10.1136/jnnp.50.7.870pmc: PMC1032125pubmed: 3625210google scholar: lookup
  15. Sathiamoorthy A, Sathiamoorthy SS. Limb dominance and motor conduction velocity of median and ulnar nerves. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol (1990) 34:51–3.
    pubmed: 2361726
  16. Fugl-Meyer AR, Eriksson A, Sjostrom M, Soderstrom G. Is muscle structure influenced by genetical or functional factors? A study of three forearm muscles. Acta Physiol Scand (1982) 114:277–81.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1982.tb06983.xpubmed: 7136759google scholar: lookup
  17. Adam A, De Luca CJ, Erim Z. Hand dominance and motor unit firing behaviour. J Neurophysiol (1998) 80:1373–82.
    doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1373pubmed: 9744946google scholar: lookup
  18. Vallortigara G. The evolutionary psychology of left and right: costs and benefits of lateralization. Dev Psychobiol (2006) 48:418–27.
    doi: 10.1002/dev.20166pubmed: 16886183google scholar: lookup
  19. Provins KA, Magliaro J. Skill, strength, handedness, and fatigue. J Motor Behavior (1989) 21:113–21.
    doi: 10.1080/00222895.1989.10735469pubmed: 15132940google scholar: lookup
  20. Austin NP, Rogers LJ. Asymmetry of flight and escape turning responses in horses. Laterality (2007) 12:464–74.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500701495307pubmed: 17712716google scholar: lookup
  21. Osterholz J. Lateralität bei Pferden im Zusammenhang mit Flucht- und Erkundungsverhalten. Gießen: Deutsche Veterinärmedizinische Gesellschaft Service GmbH; (2016).
  22. Larose C, Rogers LJ, Richard-Yris M-A, Hausberger M. Laterality of horses associated with emotionality in novel situations. Laterality (2006) 11:355–67.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500600624221pubmed: 16754236google scholar: lookup
  23. de Boyer des Roches A, Richard-Yris MA, Henry S, Ezzaouïa M, Hausberger M. Laterality and emotions: visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) differs with objects' emotional value. Physiol Behav (2008) 94:487–90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.03.002pubmed: 18455205google scholar: lookup
  24. Lippolis G, Bisazza A, Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G. Lateralisation of predator avoidance responses in three species of toads. Laterality (2002) 7:163–83.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500143000221pubmed: 15513195google scholar: lookup
  25. Lippolis G, Westman W, McAllan BM, Rogers LJ. Lateralisation of escape responses in the stripe-faced dunnart, Sminthopsis macroura (Dasyuridae: Marsupialia). Laterality (2005) 10:457–70.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500442000210pubmed: 16191815google scholar: lookup
  26. Rogers LJ, Ward JP, Stafford D. Eye dominance in the small-eared bushbaby (Otolemur garnettii). Neuropsychologia (1994) 32:257–64.
    doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90011-6pubmed: 8190249google scholar: lookup
  27. Olmos G, Turner SP. The relationships between temperament during routine handling tasks, weight gain and facial hair whorl position in frequently handled beef cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2008) 115:25–36.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.05.001google scholar: lookup
  28. Grandin T, Deesing MJ, Struthers JJ, Swinker AM. Cattle with hair whorl patterns above the eyes are more behaviorally agitated during restraint. Appl Anim Behav Sci (1995) 46:117–23.
    doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)00638-9google scholar: lookup
  29. Swinker AM, Deesing MJ, Tanner M, Grandin T. Observation of normal and abnormal hair whorl patterning on the equine forehead. J Anim Sci (1994) 72:207.
  30. Randle H, Webb TG, Gill LJ. The relationship between facial hair whorls and temperament in Lundy ponies. In: Annual Report of the Lundy Field Society. (2003) 67–83.
  31. Gorecka A, Golonka M, Chruszczewski M, Jezierski T. A note on behaviour and heart rate in horses differing in facial hair whorl. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2007) 105:244–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.013google scholar: lookup
  32. McGreevy P, Rogers LJ. Motor and sensory laterality in thoroughbred horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2005) 92:337–52.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.012google scholar: lookup
  33. McGreevy PD, Thomson PC. Differences in motor laterality between breeds of performance horse. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2006) 99:183–90.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.09.010google scholar: lookup
  34. Warren-Smith A, McGreevy P. The use of pedometers to estimate motor laterality in grazing horses. J Vet Behav (2010) 5:177–9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2009.12.023google scholar: lookup
  35. Austin NP, Rogers LJ. Limb preferences and lateralization of aggression, reactivity and vigilance in feral horses, Equus caballus. Anim Behav (2012) 83:239–47.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.033google scholar: lookup
  36. Van Heel MCV, Kroekenstoel AM, Van Dierendonck MC, Van Weeren PR, Back W. Uneven feet in a foal may develop as a consequence of lateral grazing behaviour induced by conformational traits. Equine Vet J (2006) 38:646–51.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406X159070pubmed: 17228580google scholar: lookup
  37. Van Dierendonck M. How to Determine Idiopathic Limb Preference: A Validated Procedure, Equus Research Therapy. (unpublished; personal communication; ) (2014).
  38. Murphy J, Sutherland A, Arkins S. Idiosyncratic motor laterality in the horse. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2005) 91:297–310.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.001google scholar: lookup
  39. Siniscalchi M, Padalino B, Lusito R, Quaranta A. Is the left forelimb preference indicative of a stressful situation inhorses?. Behav Processes (2014) 107:61–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.07.018pubmed: 25108052google scholar: lookup
  40. Williams DE, Norris BJ. Laterality in stride pattern preferences in racehorses. Anim Behav (2007) 74:941–50.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.01.014google scholar: lookup
  41. Lerbs S, Raue T, Krüger K. Gibt es einen Zusammenhang zwischen natürlicher Schiefe und motorischer oder sensorischer Einseitigkeit bei Fohlen (Equus caballus)?. (2014). Available online at: https://pferdetage-baden-wuerttemberg.de/sites/default/files/pferdetage/abstracts/Pferdetage_Baden_Wuertemberg_Sara_Lerbs.pdf (accessed March 10, 2014).
  42. Lucidi P, Bacco G, Sticco M, Mazzoleni G, Benvenuti M, Bernabò N. Assessment of motor laterality in foals and young horses (Equus caballus) through an analysis of derailment at trot. Physiol Behav (2013) 109:8–13.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.11.006pubmed: 23201413google scholar: lookup
  43. Randle H, Elworthy E. The relationship between facial whorl direction and sidedness in ridden horses. BSAP Occasional Publication (2006) 35:247–50.
    doi: 10.1017/S0263967X00042828google scholar: lookup
  44. Murphy J, Arkins S. Facial hair whorls (trichoglyphs) and the incidence of motor laterality in the horse. Behav Processes (2008) 79:7–12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.03.006pubmed: 18511219google scholar: lookup
  45. Shivley C, Grandin T, Deesing M. Behavioral laterality and facial hair whorls in horses. J Equine Vet Sci (2016) 44:62–6.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.02.238pubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
  46. Whishaw IQ. Absence of population asymmetry in the American Quarter Horse (Equus ferus caballus) performing skilled left and right manoeuvres in reining competition. Laterality (2015) 20:604–17.
    doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2015.1023732pubmed: 25861972google scholar: lookup
  47. Whishaw IQ, Kolb B. The mane effect in the horse (Equus ferus caballus): right mane dominance enhanced in mares but not associated with left and right maneuvers in reining competition. Laterality (2017) 22:495–513.
    doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2016.1219740pubmed: 27535616google scholar: lookup
  48. Carey DP, Hutchinson CV. Looking at eye dominance from a different angle: is sighting strength related to hand preference?. Cortex (2013) 49:2542–52.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.11.011pubmed: 23357202google scholar: lookup
  49. Müseler W. Reitlehre. Berlin: Paul Parey Verlag; (1933).
  50. Podhajski A. Kleine Reitlehre. München: Nymphenburger Verlagshandlung; (1968).
  51. Klimke R. Basic Training of the Young Horse. London: J.A. Allen; (1985).
  52. Drevemo S, Fredricson I, Hjerten G, McMiken D. Early development of gait asymmetries in trotting standardbred colts. Equine Vet J (1987) 19:189–91.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1987.tb01373.xpubmed: 3608953google scholar: lookup
  53. Preuschoft H, Witte H, Recknagel S, Bar H, Lesch C, Wuthrich M. The effects of various head-gears on horses. Deutsche tierärztliche Wochenschrift (1999) 106:169–75.
    pubmed: 10354650
  54. Clayton HM, Singleton WH, Lanovaz JL, Cloud GL. Strain gauge measurement of rein tension during riding: a pilot study. Equine Compar Exercise Physiol (2005) 2:203–5.
    doi: 10.1079/ECP200553google scholar: lookup
  55. Warren-Smith AK, Curtis RA, McGreevy PD. A low cost device for measuring the tensions exerted on domestic horses by riders and handlers. In: McGreevy D, McLean AN, Warren-Smith AK, Goodwin D, Waran N, editors. Proceedings of the First International Equitation Science Symposium, Melbourne, Australia. (2005) 44–55.
  56. Kuhnke S, Dumbell L, Gauly M, Johnson JL, McDonald K, König von Borstel U. A comparison of rein tension of the rider's dominant and non-dominant hand and the influence of the horse's laterality. Compar Exercise Physiol (2010) 7:57–63.
    doi: 10.1017/S1755254010000243google scholar: lookup
  57. Randle H, Abbey A, Button L. The effect of different rein types on the rein tension applied when taking Up a ‘medium contact'. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res (2011) 6:295.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.05.012google scholar: lookup
  58. König von Borstel U, Glißmann C. Alternatives to conventional evaluation of rideability in horse performance tests: suitability of rein tension and behavioural parameters. PLoS ONE (2014) 9:87285.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087285pmc: PMC3906164pubmed: 24489890google scholar: lookup
  59. Stahlecker F. Wie straff dürfen die Zügel sein?. Reiterjournal (2007) 2007:118–9. Available online at: https://hsh-fritz-stahlecker.de/wp/wp-content/uploads/Stahlecker-Wie-straff-duerfen-die-Zuegel-sein.pdf (accessed August 27, 2022).
  60. Warren-Smith AK, Curtis RA, Greetham L, McGreevy PD. Rein contact between horse and handler during specific equitation movements. Appl Anim Behav Scince (2007) 108:157–69.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.11.017google scholar: lookup
  61. Eisersiö M, Rhodin M, Roepstorff L, Egenvall A. Rein tension in 8 professional riders during regular training sessions. J Vet Behav (2015) 10:419–26.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2015.05.004google scholar: lookup
  62. Miesner S, Putz M, Plewa M. Richtlinien für Reiten und Fahren, Band 1, Grundausbildung für Reiter und Pferd, 27th ed. Germany: FN Verlag Warendorf; (2000).
  63. Pywell K. Trichoglyphs in equines (equus caballus) and the relationship to laterality. (thesis), University of Plymouth, Plymouth: (2005).
  64. Lloyd AS, Martin JE, Bornett-Gauci HLI, Wilkinson RG. Horse personality: variation between breeds. Appl Anim Behav Sci (2008) 112:369–83.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.08.010google scholar: lookup
  65. Rogers LJ. Hand and paw preferences in relation to the lateralized brain. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci (2009) 364:943–54.
    doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0225pmc: PMC2666076pubmed: 19064357google scholar: lookup
  66. Hinnemann J, van Baalen C. The Simplicity of Dressage. London: J.A. Allen; (2004) 88ff.
  67. Goble DJ, Brown SH. The biological and behavioral basis of upper limb asymmetries in sensorimotor performance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev (2008) 32:598–610.
    doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.10.006pubmed: 18160103google scholar: lookup
  68. Rousson V, Gasser G, Caflisch J, Jenni OG. Neuromotor performance of normally developing left-handed children and adolescents. Hum Mov Sci (2009) 28:809–17.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2009.06.001pubmed: 19656585google scholar: lookup
  69. Hawson LA, Salvin HE, McLean AN, McGreevy PD. Riders' application of rein tension for walk-to-halt transitions on a model horse. J Vet Behav (2014) 9:164–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2014.04.001google scholar: lookup
  70. Annett M. A Single Gene Explanation of Right and Left Handedness and Brainedness. Coventry, UK: Lanchester Polytechnic; (1978) 1–20.
  71. McManus IC. Handedness, language dominance and aphasia: a genetic model. Psychol Med Monogr Suppl (1985) 8:3–40.
    doi: 10.1017/S0264180100001879pubmed: 3863155google scholar: lookup
  72. McKeever WF. An X-linked three allele model of hand preference and hand posture for writing. Laterality (2004) 9:149–73.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500244000292pubmed: 15382715google scholar: lookup
  73. Jones GV, Martin M. Seasonal anisotropy in handedness. Cortex (2008) 44:8–12.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2006.05.001pubmed: 18387526google scholar: lookup
  74. Kuhnke S, König von Borstel U. Horse's laterality: methods of determination, genetic aspects, interaction with rein tension and horse-rider communication. Züchtungskunde (2021) 93:337–45.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.