Analyze Diet
Journal of animal science2025; 103; skaf375; doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf375

A comparison of fecal output determined by total fecal collection or titanium dioxide in horses.

Abstract: Total fecal collection studies to determine digestibility of nutrients are costly and laborious. The use of externally dosed indigestible markers, such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), to estimate digestibility using spot samples could be advantageous, but studies validating their use in horses are inadequate. Two experiments were conducted to determine if TiO2 in fecal spot samples effectively estimated fecal output in horses. In Exp. 1, four mature horses were fed a forage-based diet (85:15 forage: concentrate) split into two equal meals with 1.75 ± 0.03 g TiO2/kg DM (10 g TiO2) per day top-dressed on their daily ration. Horses were fed the marker for 10 d before a 4-d total fecal collection period. Fecal samples were collected every 4 h to examine TiO2 excretion and calculate fecal output (cFO), which was compared to actual total fecal output (aFO). In Exp. 2, 15 horses were split into three dietary treatments: low forage (LO, 45% forage), medium forage (MED, 73% forage), and high forage (HI, 95% forage) diets. Daily rations were divided into three equal meals with 2 g TiO2/kg dry matter per day thoroughly mixed in their feed. The marker was fed for at least 12 d before a 5-d total fecal collection period, with spot samples obtained similarly to Exp. 1. In Exp. 1, cFO overestimated aFO by 10% (P < 0.05) across all horses and days. The aFO and cFO determined by fecal spot samples were poorly correlated (P > 0.10; R2 = 0.148). In Exp. 2, cFO was not different from aFO when averaged across all horses and days (P > 0.10), but there were differences (P < 0.05) between cFO and aFO for 10 out of 15 individual horses. In addition, compared to the MED and LO diets, mean fecal output calculated from TiO2 underestimated aFO (P < 0.05) for horses fed the HI diet. Due to a large amount of variation within horses, the use of TiO2 in fecal spot samples to estimate fecal output needs to be better optimized before its use can be recommended as an alternative to total fecal collections. Using fecal spot samples and an indigestible marker to calculate fecal output (FO) is an attractive alternative to conducting total fecal collections, but the method needs to be validated in horses. In two experiments, horses were fed titanium dioxide (TiO2), then fecal spot samples were collected every 4 h to calculate FO, which was compared to actual total FO. In Exp. 1, when four horses were fed twice daily with TiO2 top-dressed on each meal, actual FO was overestimated by 10% when calculated from fecal TiO2 concentrations. In Exp. 2, we used 15 horses, mixed the TiO2 thoroughly into all feed, and divided the ration into three, evenly spaced daily meals. Actual FO was accurately calculated from spot samples when all samples were averaged. However, TiO2 failed to accurately calculate FO for 10 out of 15 horses. Also, FO calculated from TiO2 underestimated actual FO for horses fed a high-forage diet (93% forage) compared to horses fed lower-forage diets (45 and 73% forage). Due to the large variation in fecal TiO2 concentrations within horses and across diets, the method to calculate FO using TiO2 needs optimization before it can be recommended as a replacement for total fecal collections.
Publication Date: 2025-10-28 PubMed ID: 41148061PubMed Central: PMC12619977DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaf375Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Comparative Study

Cite This Article

APA
Fowler AL, Pyles MB, Hayes SH, Crum AD, Lawrence LM. (2025). A comparison of fecal output determined by total fecal collection or titanium dioxide in horses. J Anim Sci, 103, skaf375. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf375

Publication

ISSN: 1525-3163
NlmUniqueID: 8003002
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 103
PII: skaf375

Researcher Affiliations

Fowler, Ashley L
  • Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506.
Pyles, Morgan B
  • Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506.
Hayes, Susan H
  • Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506.
Crum, Andrea D
  • Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506.
Lawrence, Laurie M
  • Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • Titanium / chemistry
  • Titanium / metabolism
  • Feces / chemistry
  • Animal Feed / analysis
  • Diet / veterinary
  • Male
  • Female
  • Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
  • Digestion

References

This article includes 18 references
  1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). 2012. Toxicological profile for chromium. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.
  2. Alvarenga I. C., Aldrich C. G., Ou Z.  2019. Comparison of four digestibility markers to estimate fecal output of dogs. J. Anim. Sci. 97(3):1036–1041. 10.1093/jas/skz020
    doi: 10.1093/jas/skz020pmc: PMC6396234pubmed: 30753619google scholar: lookup
  3. Bland J. M., Altman D. G.  1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical assessment. Lancet. 8:307–310. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.001
  4. Campbell T. E., Doughty H., Harris P. A., de Laat M. A., Sillence M. N.  2020. Factors affecting the rate and measurement of feed intake for a cereal-based meal in horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 84:102869. 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.102869
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.102869pubmed: 31864455google scholar: lookup
  5. Fowler A. L., Hayes S. H., Crum A. D., Lawrence L. M.  2022a. A method for determination of titanium dioxide concentration in fecal samples. J. Anim. Sci. 100(3):skac074. 10.1093/jas/skac074
    doi: 10.1093/jas/skac074pmc: PMC9030201pubmed: 35263430google scholar: lookup
  6. Fowler A. L., Pyles M. B., Hayes S. H., Crum A. D., Harris P. A., Krotky A., Lawrence L. M.  2022b. Effect of weight change on markers of bone turnover and phosphorus excretion. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 118:104080. 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104080
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104080pubmed: 35843389google scholar: lookup
  7. Fowler A. L., Pyles M. B., Hayes S. H., Crum A. D., Lawrence L. M.  2020. Phosphorus excretion by mares post‐lactation. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 104(6):1912–1918. 10.1111/jpn.13251
    doi: 10.1111/jpn.13251google scholar: lookup
  8. Glindemann T., Tas B. M., Wang C., Alvers S., Susenbeth A.  2009. Evaluation of titanium dioxide as an inert marker for estimating faecal excretion in grazing sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 152(3–4):186–197. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.04.010
  9. Haenlein G. F. W., Smith R. C., Yoon Y. M.  1966. Determination of the fecal excretion rate of horses with chromic oxide. J. Anim. Sci. 25(4):1091–1095. 10.2527/jas1966.2541091x
    doi: 10.2527/jas1966.2541091xgoogle scholar: lookup
  10. Much M. L., Leatherwood J. L., Zoller J. L., Bradbery A. N., Martinez R. E., Keegan A. D., Lamprecht E. D., Wickersham T. A.  2020. Influence of diet fortification on body composition and ­apparent digestion in mature horses consuming a low-quality forage. Transl. Anim. Sci. 4(1):1–9. 10.1093/tas/txz137
    doi: 10.1093/tas/txz137pmc: PMC6994030pubmed: 32704961google scholar: lookup
  11. Myers W. D., Ludden P. A., Nayigihugu V., Hess B. W.  2006. Excretion patterns of titanium dioxide and chromic oxide in duodenal digesta and feces of ewes. Small Rumin. Res. 63(1–2):135–141. 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.02.010
  12. Ralston S. L.  1984. Controls of feeding in horses. J. Anim. Sci. 59(5):1354–1361. 10.2527/jas1984.5951354x
    doi: 10.2527/jas1984.5951354xpubmed: 6392275google scholar: lookup
  13. Schaafstra F., van Doorn D. A., Schonewille J. T., Van den Boom R., Verschuur M., Blok M. C., Hendriks W. H.  2019. Evaluation of titanium dioxide and chromic oxide as digestibility markers in ponies fed alfalfa hay in relation to marker dosing frequency. Animal. 13(4):702–708. 10.1017/S1751731118002112
    doi: 10.1017/S1751731118002112pubmed: 30175695google scholar: lookup
  14. Schaafstra F. J. W. C., van Doorn D. A., Schonewille J. T., Wartena F. C., Zoon M. V., Blok M. C., Hendriks W. H.  2015. Evaluation of methodological aspects of digestibility measurements in ponies fed different grass hays. J. Anim. Sci. 93(10):4742–4749. 10.2527/jas.2015-9240
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9240pubmed: 26523567google scholar: lookup
  15. Short F. J., Gorton P., Wiseman J., Boorman K. N.  1996. Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 59(4):215–221. 10.1016/0377-8401(95)00916-7
  16. Titgemeyer E. C., Armendariz C. K., Bindel D. J., Greenwood R. H., Löest C. A.  2001. Evaluation of titanium dioxide as a digestibility marker for cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 79(4):1059–1063. 10.2527/2001.7941059x
    doi: 10.2527/2001.7941059xpubmed: 11325180google scholar: lookup
  17. Wang T., Osho S. O., Adeola O.  2018. Additivity of apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acid determined by chromic oxide and titanium dioxide in mixed diets containing wheat and multiple protein sources fed to growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 96(11):4731–4742. 10.1093/jas/sky326
    doi: 10.1093/jas/sky326pmc: PMC6247831pubmed: 30107589google scholar: lookup
  18. Winsco K. N., Coverdale J. A., Wickersham T. A., Lucia J. L., Hammer C. J.  2013. Influence of maternal plane of nutrition on mares and their foals: determination of mare performance and voluntary dry matter intake during late pregnancy using a dual-marker system. J. Anim. Sci. 91(9):4208–4215. 10.2527/jas.2013-6373
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6373pubmed: 23825323google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.