Analyze Diet
Medical engineering & physics1999; 20(8); 588-593; doi: 10.1016/s1350-4533(98)00063-0

A comparison of porosity, fabric and fractal dimension as predictors of the Young’s modulus of equine cancellous bone.

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare the structural parameters of fabric and fractal dimension as predictors of the Young's modulus of equine cancellous bone. Eight 15 mm cubes of cancellous bone were obtained from three equine third metacarpal bones. Young's modulus was determined for the three orthogonal directions. The fabric and fractal dimension were calculated for each of the six exposed faces of each cube. Fractal dimension plus porosity provided a higher explanatory power for Young's modulus (R2 = 78.7%. P < 0.0001) than fabric plus porosity (R2 = 69.2%, P < 0.0001). Fractal dimension was also significantly correlated with fabric (R2 = 53.8%, P < 0.0001). Although this novel method for combining fractal dimension data into a pseudo-directionally dependent predictor of Young's modulus requires further validation over a greater range of porosities and differing cancellous bone tissues, its potential has been demonstrated.
Publication Date: 1999-01-15 PubMed ID: 9888237DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(98)00063-0Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study analyses the effectiveness of fabric and fractal dimension as predictors for the Young’s modulus of equine cancellous bone, and demonstrates that combining porosity and fractal dimension tends to provide a more accurate prediction.

Understanding the Research

  • The focus of this study is to ascertain how well the structural parameters of fabric (the spatial arrangement and orientation of different components within cancellous bone) and fractal dimension (a statistical quantity that shows how a fractal pattern’s scale changes with the scale factor) predict the Young’s modulus of equine cancellous bone.
  • The Young’s modulus is a measure of stiffness of an elastic material, and in this context, it’s used to represent the stiffness of the cancellous bone. Cancellous bone is one of the two types of osseous tissues forming bones, which is characterized by a sponge-like structure, highly vascularized, and filled with red bone marrow.

Methodology

  • To gather data, the researchers extracted 15mm cubes of cancellous bone from three equine third metacarpal bones. The Young’s modulus, fabric, and fractal dimension were calculated for each of the six exposed faces of these cubes. These data were then compared to determine how effectively these metrics could predict the Young’s modulus of the bone.

Findings

  • The data suggested that the combination of fractal dimension and porosity (the measure of the void spaces in a material) offered greater explanatory power for the Young’s modulus (78.7% accuracy), as compared to the combination of fabric and porosity (69.2% accuracy).
  • Fractal dimension was also found to be significantly correlated with fabric. This suggests that the fractal dimension and fabric are related, and changes to one might influence the other.

Implications and Conclusions

  • By indicating that fractal dimension plus porosity gives a higher accuracy in predicting Young’s modulus, this study suggests that these parameters could be useful in predicting aspects of bone health and strength in equine subjects.
  • The authors acknowledge that while this method of combining fractal dimension data into a directionally dependent predictor of Young’s modulus has demonstrated potential, it will still require further validations. This is particularly necessary across a wider range of porosities and varying cancellous bone tissues.

Cite This Article

APA
Haire TJ, Hodgskinson R, Ganney PS, Langton CM. (1999). A comparison of porosity, fabric and fractal dimension as predictors of the Young’s modulus of equine cancellous bone. Med Eng Phys, 20(8), 588-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1350-4533(98)00063-0

Publication

ISSN: 1350-4533
NlmUniqueID: 9422753
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 20
Issue: 8
Pages: 588-593

Researcher Affiliations

Haire, T J
  • Centre for Metabolic Bone Disease Hull, Royal Hull Hospitals Trust and University of Hull, UK.
Hodgskinson, R
    Ganney, P S
      Langton, C M

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Biomechanical Phenomena
        • Bone and Bones / anatomy & histology
        • Bone and Bones / physiology
        • Fractals
        • Horses
        • Porosity

        Citations

        This article has been cited 8 times.
        1. Magat G, Oncu E, Ozcan S, Orhan K. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and digital panoramic radiography for detecting peri-implant alveolar bone changes using trabecular micro-structure analysis. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022 Feb 28;48(1):41-49.
          doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.1.41pubmed: 35221306google scholar: lookup
        2. Olăreț E, Stancu IC, Iovu H, Serafim A. Computed Tomography as a Characterization Tool for Engineered Scaffolds with Biomedical Applications. Materials (Basel) 2021 Nov 10;14(22).
          doi: 10.3390/ma14226763pubmed: 34832165google scholar: lookup
        3. Veneziano A, Cazenave M, Alfieri F, Panetta D, Marchi D. Novel strategies for the characterization of cancellous bone morphology: Virtual isolation and analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 2021 Aug;175(4):920-930.
          doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24272pubmed: 33811768google scholar: lookup
        4. Chappard D, Terranova L, Mallet R, Mercier P. 3D Porous Architecture of Stacks of β-TCP Granules Compared with That of Trabecular Bone: A microCT, Vector Analysis, and Compression Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2015;6:161.
          doi: 10.3389/fendo.2015.00161pubmed: 26528240google scholar: lookup
        5. Wurnig MC, Calcagni M, Kenkel D, Vich M, Weiger M, Andreisek G, Wehrli FW, Boss A. Characterization of trabecular bone density with ultra-short echo-time MRI at 1.5, 3.0 and 7.0 T--comparison with micro-computed tomography. NMR Biomed 2014 Oct;27(10):1159-66.
          doi: 10.1002/nbm.3169pubmed: 25088271google scholar: lookup
        6. Amer ME, Heo MS, Brooks SL, Benavides E. Anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographs using fractal and particles count analyses. Imaging Sci Dent 2012 Mar;42(1):5-12.
          doi: 10.5624/isd.2012.42.1.5pubmed: 22474642google scholar: lookup
        7. Balbay H, Uysal S. Retrospective panoramic radiographic evaluation of acute leukemia patients with fractal analysis. BMC Oral Health 2025 Jul 26;25(1):1260.
          doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06625-8pubmed: 40713547google scholar: lookup
        8. Yurtoglu N, Tozum TF, Uysal S. Evaluation of Peri-Implant Bone Changes with Fractal Analysis. J Clin Med 2025 May 29;14(11).
          doi: 10.3390/jcm14113820pubmed: 40507583google scholar: lookup