A pilot in vitro biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and kerf-cut cylinder fixation for ventral fusion of fourth and fifth equine cervical vertebrae.
Abstract: The mechanical properties of equine cervical vertebrae joined by implants have not yet been reported. Locking compression plates (LCP) may provide a useful alternative system to the commonly used stainless steel kerf-cut cylinders (KCC) currently used for fixation of cervical vertebrae in horses. Objective: The objectives of this study were to establish a method for biomechanical testing of equine C4-C5 articulations and to compare the biomechanical properties of cadaveric spines stabilised with KCC and LCP. Methods: Twenty-four equine cadaveric cervical spines were size measured from radiographs, and then randomly allocated to four groups. The C4-C5 articulation for each group was treated in the following way: group 1: KCC implanted, group 2: 8-hole 4.5/5.0 LCP implanted, group 3: 11-hole 3.5 LCP implanted and group 4: No implant. The specimens were fixed in resin and tested under four-point bending in ventral flexion until failure. Stiffness, maximum moment to failure and mode of failure were recorded for all specimens. General linear models were performed to analyse associations. Results: All spines failed at the C4-C5 articulation. Failure however differed between groups with fractures in group 1, screw pull-out in groups 2 and 3, and disarticulation in group 4 being the common failure modes. The stiffness and maximum moment to failure of the KCC and LCP implanted spines were similar. Increasing age was significantly associated with decreasing moment to failure and increasing size was significantly associated with increasing moment to failure and stiffness. Conclusions: This study describes a successful technique for examining the biomechanical properties of equine cervical vertebrae. The LCP constructs had similar mechanical properties to the KCC which may justify their use in clinical cases.
Publication Date: 2009-08-28 PubMed ID: 19718487DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-08-10-0101Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research explores the comparative biomechanical properties of two types of implants used for fixation of horse cervical vertebrae – locking compression plates (LCP) and stainless steel kerf-cut cylinders (KCC). The study finds that LCP and KCC implants have similar biomechanical characteristics, thus presenting LCP as a potential alternative for use in clinical scenarios.
Objective and Methodology
- The main purpose of this research was to devise a method for testing the biomechanical characteristics of equine C4-C5 (fourth and fifth cervical vertebrae) articulations. Further, the study aimed to compare how these properties varied when the equine spines are stabilized using KCC and LCP.
- For the investigation, 24 equine cadaver cervical spines were used. These spines were measured using radiographs and subsequently divided into four groups.
- In the first group, KCC implants were used. For the second group, the researchers utilized an 8-hole 4.5/5.0 LCP, for the third group, an 11-hole 3.5 LCP was used, and the fourth group had no implants.
- All specimens were fixed in resin and subjected to testing under four-point bending until failure. Parameters like stiffness, maximum moment to failure, and the mode of failure were meticulously noted for all samples.
Findings
- All the tested spines, irrespective of the group they belonged to, failed at the C4-C5 junction. However, the way they failed showed differences among the groups. Group 1 (KCC insertions) showed fractures as the common mode of failure. For Group 2 and 3 (with 4.5/5.0 and 3.5 LCPs respectively), screw pullouts were more common. In Group 4 (with no implants), disarticulation was the primary method of failure.
- Importantly, the stiffness and maximum moment to failure of the spines where LCP or KCC was implanted were similar.
- The study also found that as the age of the specimen increased, the moment to failure decreased. Meanwhile, an increased size led to an increase in the moment to failure and stiffness.
Conclusion
- The research successfully established a methodology for studying the biomechanical characteristics of equine cervical vertebrae.
- Equally important, it found that the mechanical properties between both the KCC and the LCP implanted spines revealed comparable biomechanical properties.
- This suggests that LCPs can potentially be used as an alternative to KCCs in medical practice due to their similar mechanical properties.
Cite This Article
APA
Reardon R, Bailey R, Walmsley J, Heller J, Lischer C.
(2009).
A pilot in vitro biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and kerf-cut cylinder fixation for ventral fusion of fourth and fifth equine cervical vertebrae.
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol, 22(5), 371-379.
https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-08-10-0101 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Division of Companion Animal Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University ofGlasgow, Grasgow, UK. r.reardon@vet.gla.ac.uk
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Biomechanical Phenomena
- Bone Plates / veterinary
- Cervical Vertebrae / surgery
- Compressive Strength
- Fracture Fixation, Internal / instrumentation
- Fracture Fixation, Internal / methods
- Fracture Fixation, Internal / veterinary
- Horses
- Pilot Projects
- Spinal Fusion / methods
- Spinal Fusion / veterinary
Citations
This article has been cited 1 times.- Zedler S, Jukic C, van Eps A, Stefanovski D, Genton M, Rossignol F. Ex vivo biomechanical testing of a three-dimensional printed titanium plate and spacer construct and 4.5 mm locking compression plate for ventral cervical fusion of C4-C5 in the horse. Vet Surg 2025 Oct;54(7):1344-1352.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists
