Analyze Diet
Veterinary sciences2025; 12(3); doi: 10.3390/vetsci12030262

A Retrospective Study on Pre- and Intraoperative Predictors on the Recovery Quality of Horses After General Anesthesia.

Abstract: Equine anesthesia is related to high morbidity and mortality rates and recent studies suggested that the period of recovery remains the phase associated with the greatest risk of mortality in horses. Intraoperative hypotension, hypoxemia, and hypercapnia are recognized as potential determinants of recovery quality. This study, conducted at the Equine University Hospital of Liege, aimed to explore how these factors influence recovery outcomes and compare complications between non-emergency and emergency procedures. We analyzed data from 1057 horses, with a mean weight of 498 kg (ranging from 150 to 850 kg) and a mean age of 10.7 (ranging from 0.5 to 37 years), undergoing standardized general anesthesia for non-emergency and emergency procedures to assess which factors influence recovery quality. Recoveries were graded as 'good' or 'bad' and age, sex, breed, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, weight, anesthesia duration, presence of hypotension, hypoxemia, and hypercapnia were compared with a logistic regression analysis. Our findings highlight the multifactorial nature of anesthetic recovery in horses, with breed, age, anesthesia and recovery duration, and emergency status emerging as significant influencing factors. Additionally, monitoring and managing hypoxemia and hypotension remain critical due to their recognized impact on recovery quality. However, despite their clinical relevance, the specific effects of these variables on anesthetic recovery in horses remain insufficiently studied, emphasizing the need for further research to refine perioperative management strategies and improve outcomes.
Publication Date: 2025-03-11 PubMed ID: 40266986PubMed Central: PMC11945850DOI: 10.3390/vetsci12030262Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores the factors influencing recovery quality in horses after general anesthesia, highlighting breed, age, anesthesia and recovery duration, and emergency status as significant determinants. It also points out the critical need for monitoring and managing hypoxemia and hypotension, given their impact on recovery quality. However, the specific effects of these variables on anesthetic recovery in horses need further study for improved perioperative management strategies and outcomes.

Study Overview

  • The study by the Equine University Hospital of Liege examined factors that predict the recovery quality of horses after general anesthesia. It aimed to find how these factors—hypotension, hypoxemia, and hypercapnia—affect post-anesthetic recovery and compared complications between non-emergency and emergency procedures.

Study Sample

  • To determine these factors, the researchers took data from 1057 horses, ranging from 0.5 to 37 years old and weighing between 150 kg and 850 kg. The horses underwent standardized general anesthesia for either routine or emergency procedures.

Analysis

  • The horses’ recoveries were graded as ‘good’ or ‘bad’, and variables, such as age, sex, breed, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, anesthesia duration, and the presence of intraoperative hypotension, hypoxemia, and hypercapnia were analyzed using logistic regression to see what influenced recovery quality.

Key Findings

  • The study found that the quality of anesthetic recovery in horses is influenced by a multitude of factors, with breed, age, duration of anesthesia and recovery, and emergency status emerging as significant predictors.
  • It further emphasized the vital role that managing and monitoring hypoxemia and hypotension have in enhancing recovery quality, as these factors are already recognized as potential determinants of recovery quality in horses.

Implications and Future Research

  • Despite these findings, the study did acknowledge that the specific effects these variables contribute to horses’ anesthetic recovery are still not well-researched, suggesting the need for further studies to refine perioperative management strategies and ultimately improve outcomes.

Cite This Article

APA
Román Durá B, Dunham O, Grulke S, Salciccia A, Dupont J, Sandersen C. (2025). A Retrospective Study on Pre- and Intraoperative Predictors on the Recovery Quality of Horses After General Anesthesia. Vet Sci, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12030262

Publication

ISSN: 2306-7381
NlmUniqueID: 101680127
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 3

Researcher Affiliations

Román Durá, Bienvenida
  • Department for Clinical Sciences of Equids, FARAH, ULiège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Dunham, Oliver
  • Department for Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, FARAH, ULiège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Grulke, Sigrid
  • Department for Clinical Sciences of Equids, FARAH, ULiège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Salciccia, Alexandra
  • Department for Clinical Sciences of Equids, FARAH, ULiège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Dupont, Julien
  • Department for Clinical Sciences of Equids, FARAH, ULiège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Sandersen, Charlotte
  • Department for Clinical Sciences of Equids, FARAH, ULiège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
  • Department for Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, FARAH, ULiège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 46 references
  1. Senior J.M.. Morbidity, Mortality, and Risk of General Anesthesia in Horses.. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2013;29:1–18.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2012.11.007pubmed: 23498043google scholar: lookup
  2. Gozalo-Marcilla M., Ringer S.K.. Recovery after General Anaesthesia in Adult Horses: A Structured Summary of the Literature.. Animals 2021;11:1777.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061777pmc: PMC8232193pubmed: 34198637google scholar: lookup
  3. Johnston G., Eastment J., Wood J., Taylor P.. The Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Equine Fatalities (CEPEF): Mortality Results of Phases 1 and 2.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2002;29:159–170.
  4. Gozalo-Marcilla M., Bettschart-Wolfensberger R., Johnston M., Taylor P.M., Redondo J.I.. Data Collection for the Fourth Multicentre Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Equine Fatalities (CEPEF4) Study: New Technology and Preliminary Results.. Animals 2021;11:2549.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11092549pmc: PMC8472153pubmed: 34573515google scholar: lookup
  5. Matthews N.S., Mohn T.J., Yang M., Spofford N., Marsh A., Faunt K., Lund E.M., Lefebvre S.L.. Factors Associated with Anesthetic-Related Death in Dogs and Cats in Primary Care Veterinary Hospitals.. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2017;250:655–665.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.250.6.655pubmed: 28263113google scholar: lookup
  6. Hubbell J.A.E., Muir W.W., Hopster K.. Rethinking Equine Anaesthetic Risk: Development of a Novel Combined Horse Anaesthetic Risk Identification and Optimisation Tool (CHARIOT). Equine Vet. Educ. 2022;34:134–140.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13563google scholar: lookup
  7. Santiago-Llorente I., López-San Román F.J., Villalba-Orero M.. Demographic, Preoperative and Anaesthesia-Related Risk Factors for Unsatisfactory Recovery Quality in Horses Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2021;48:882–890.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2021.04.013pubmed: 34642100google scholar: lookup
  8. Loomes K.. Evaluating Equine Anaesthetic Risk.. UK-Vet Equine 2022;6:151–158.
  9. Dugdale A.H., Taylor P.M.. Equine Anaesthesia-Associated Mortality: Where Are We Now?. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2016;43:242–255.
    doi: 10.1111/vaa.12372pubmed: 26970940google scholar: lookup
  10. Loomes K., Louro L.F.. Recovery of Horses from General Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review (2000–2020) of Risk Factors and Influence of Interventions during the Recovery Period.. Equine Vet. J. 2022;54:201–218.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13517pubmed: 34537994google scholar: lookup
  11. O’Donovan K.A., Aarnes T.K., Hubbell J.A., Parker E.M., Mollenkopf D., Lerche P., Ricco Pereira C.H., Bini G., Bednarski R.M.. Risk of Anesthesia-Related Complications in Draft Horses: A Retrospective, Single-Center Analysis.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2023;50:157–162.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2022.12.002pubmed: 36577561google scholar: lookup
  12. De Miguel Garcia C., Campoy L., Parry S.A., Martin-Flores M., Gleed R.D.. Retrospective Study of the Prevalence of Factors Contributing to Successful Standing at First Attempt in Horses Recovering from General Anesthesia.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2022;49:95–103.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2021.10.005pubmed: 34893433google scholar: lookup
  13. Meier M., Kazmir-Lysak K., Kälin I., Torgerson P.R., Ringer S.K.. The Influence of Hypoxaemia, Hypotension and Hypercapnia (among Other Factors) on Quality of Recovery from General Anaesthesia in Horses.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2023;51:135–143.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2023.10.032pubmed: 38331674google scholar: lookup
  14. Ruegg M., Bettschart-Wolfensberger R., Hartnack S., Junge H.K., Theiss F., Ringer S.K.. Comparison of Non-Assisted versus Head and Tail Rope-Assisted Recovery after Emergency Abdominal Surgery in Horses.. Pferdeheilkunde 2016;32:469–478.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20160508google scholar: lookup
  15. Laurenza C., Ansart L., Portier K.. Risk Factors of Anesthesia-Related Mortality and Morbidity in One Equine Hospital: A Retrospective Study on 1,161 Cases Undergoing Elective or Emergency Surgeries.. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020;6:514.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00514pmc: PMC6990105pubmed: 32039253google scholar: lookup
  16. Parviainen A.K.J., Trim C.M.. Complications Associated with Anaesthesia for Ocular Surgery: A Retrospective Study 1989–1996.. Equine Vet. J. 2000;32:555–559.
    doi: 10.2746/042516400777584659pubmed: 11093632google scholar: lookup
  17. Adami C., Westwood-Hearn H., Bolt D.M., Monticelli P.. Prevalence of Electrolyte Disturbances and Perianesthetic Death Risk Factors in 120 Horses Undergoing Colic Surgery.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020;84:102843.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.102843pubmed: 31864468google scholar: lookup
  18. Voulgaris D.A., Hofmeister E.H.. Multivariate Analysis of Factors Associated with Post-Anesthetic Times to Standing in Isoflurane-Anesthetized Horses: 381 Cases.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2009;36:414–420.
  19. Loomes K.. Anaesthesia for Colic Surgery in Horses.. UK-Vet Equine 2024;8:76–84.
    doi: 10.12968/ukve.2024.8.2.76google scholar: lookup
  20. Auckburally A., Nyman G.. Review of Hypoxaemia in Anaesthetized Horses: Predisposing Factors, Consequences and Management.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2017;44:397–408.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.06.001pubmed: 28385614google scholar: lookup
  21. Marchese G.A., Crystal J., Louro L.F.. Incidence of Severe Hypoxemia in Anesthetized Horses Undergoing Emergency Exploratory Laparotomy.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022;116:104026.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104026pubmed: 35659514google scholar: lookup
  22. Pascoe P.J., McDonell W.N., Trim C.M., Van Gorder J.. Mortality Rates and Associated Factors in Equine Colic Operations—A Retrospective Study of 341 Operations.. Can. Vet. J. 1983;24:76–85.
    pmc: PMC1790318pubmed: 17422234
  23. Hovda T., Love L., Chiavaccini L.. Risk Factors Associated with Hypoxaemia in Horses Undergoing General Anaesthesia: A Retrospective Study.. Equine Vet. J. 2022;54:1055–1063.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13541pubmed: 34796547google scholar: lookup
  24. Brosnan R.J., Steffey E.P., Escobar A.. Effects of Hypercapnic Hyperpnea on Recovery from Isoflurane or Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Horses.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2012;39:335–344.
  25. Loomes K., Louro L.F.. Recovery of Horses from General Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review (2000–2020) of the Influence of Anaesthetic Protocol on Recovery Quality.. Equine Vet. J. 2022;54:219–261.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13524pubmed: 34668220google scholar: lookup
  26. Vermedal H., Valverde A., Sears W.. Effect of Anesthesia Duration on the Quality of Recovery in Horses Undergoing Elective and Emergency Surgeries Using the Same Anesthetic Protocol.. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2021;85:193–200.
    pmc: PMC8243802pubmed: 34248263
  27. Brumund L., Wittenberg-Voges L., Rohn K., Kästner S.B.R.. Risk Assessment in Equine Anesthesia: A First Evaluation of the Usability, Utility and Predictivity of the Two-Part CHARIOT.. Froniers Vet. Sci. 2024;11:1384525.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1384525pmc: PMC11155666pubmed: 38846780google scholar: lookup
  28. Loomes K.. Increased Body Condition Score Has a Detrimental Effect on Arterial Oxygen Tension and Increases the Risk of Hypoxaemia in Anaesthetised Horses.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2024;36:403–409.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13903google scholar: lookup
  29. Aleman M., Watson J.L., Williams D.C., Le Couteur R.A., Nieto J.E., Shelton G.D.. Myopathy in Horses with Pituitary Pars Intermedia Dysfunction (Cushing’s Disease). Neuromuscul. Disord. 2006;16:737–744.
    doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2006.07.019pubmed: 17005399google scholar: lookup
  30. Bennell A.J., Wright R.J.H., Malalana F., Senior J.M.. An Analysis of Risk Factors for a Fracture or Luxation in Recovery From General Anesthesia in Horses: A Single Centre Study☆.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022;112:103914.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.103914pubmed: 35218904google scholar: lookup
  31. Young S.S., Taylor P.M.. Factors Influencing the Outcome of Equine Anaesthesia: A Review of 1,314 Cases.. Equine Vet. J. 1993;25:147–151.
  32. Niimura Del Barrio M., Bennett R.C., Hughes J.M.L.. Effect of Detomidine or Romifidine Constant Rate Infusion on Plasma Lactate Concentration and Inhalant Requirements during Isoflurane Anaesthesia in Horses.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2017;44:473–482.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.01.002pubmed: 28462846google scholar: lookup
  33. McFadzean W.J.M., Love E.J.. Perioperative Pain Management in Horses.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2019;31:374–383.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12880google scholar: lookup
  34. Boesch J.M.. Anesthesia for the Horse with Colic.. Vet. Clin. North Am. Equine Pract. 2013;29:193–214.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2012.11.005pubmed: 23498053google scholar: lookup
  35. Doherty T., Valverde A.. Manual of Equine Anesthesia and Analgesia.. 1st ed. Wiley; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2006.
  36. Loomes K.. Intra-Operative Hypotension in Anaesthetised Horses.. UK-Vet Equine 2023;7:86–93.
    doi: 10.12968/ukve.2023.7.3.86google scholar: lookup
  37. Dupont J., Serteyn D., Sandersen C.. Prolonged Recovery From General Anesthesia Possibly Related to Persistent Hypoxemia in a Draft Horse.. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018;5:235.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00235pmc: PMC6174201pubmed: 30327770google scholar: lookup
  38. Robertson S.A., Bailey J.E.. Aerosolized Salbutamol (Albuterol) Improves PaO2 in Hypoxaemic Anaesthetized Horses—A Prospective Clinical Trial in 81 Horses.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2002;29:212–218.
  39. Dupont J., Roman Dura B., Salciccia A., Serteyn D., Sandersen C.. Retrospective Study of the Changes in Dynamic Compliance and Ventilation/Perfusion Mismatch Following Salbutamol Inhalation in Hypoxaemic Mechanically Ventilated Anaesthetized Horses.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2024;51:465–474.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2024.06.008pubmed: 39142981google scholar: lookup
  40. Ambrisko T.D., Schramel J., Hopster K., Kästner S., Moens Y.. Assessment of Distribution of Ventilation and Regional Lung Compliance by Electrical Impedance Tomography in Anaesthetized Horses Undergoing Alveolar Recruitment Manoeuvres.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2017;44:264–272.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.03.001pubmed: 28237681google scholar: lookup
  41. Mosing M., Auer U., MacFarlane P., Bardell D., Schramel J.P., Böhm S.H., Bettschart-Wolfensberger R., Waldmann A.D.. Regional Ventilation Distribution and Dead Space in Anaesthetized Horses Treated with and without Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: Novel Insights by Electrical Impedance Tomography and Volumetric Capnography.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2018;45:31–40.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2017.06.004pubmed: 29222030google scholar: lookup
  42. Araos J., Kenny J.-E.S., Rousseau-Blass F., Pang D.S.. Dynamic Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness during Positive Pressure Ventilation: A Review of the Physiology Underlying Heart–Lung Interactions and a Critical Interpretation.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2020;47:3–14.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.08.004pubmed: 31831334google scholar: lookup
  43. Portela D.A., Di Franco C., Chiavaccini L., Araos J., Romano M., Otero P.E., Biedrzycki A.H., Schramel J.P.. Effect of End-Inspiratory Pause on Airway and Physiological Dead Space in Anesthetized Horses.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2023;50:363–371.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2023.03.002pubmed: 37055259google scholar: lookup
  44. Stefanik E., Drewnowska O., Lisowska B., Turek B.. Causes, Effects and Methods of Monitoring Gas Exchange Disturbances during Equine General Anaesthesia.. Animals 2021;11:2049.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11072049pmc: PMC8300395pubmed: 34359177google scholar: lookup
  45. Viterbo L., Hughes J., Milner P.I., Bardell D.. Arterial Blood Gas, Electrolyte and Acid-Base Values as Diagnostic and Prognostic Indicators in Equine Colic.. Animals 2023;13:3241.
    doi: 10.3390/ani13203241pmc: PMC10603645pubmed: 37893965google scholar: lookup
  46. Dugdale A.H., Obhrai J., Cripps P.J.. Twenty Years Later: A Single-Centre, Repeat Retrospective Analysis of Equine Perioperative Mortality and Investigation of Recovery Quality.. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. 2016;43:171–178.
    doi: 10.1111/vaa.12285pubmed: 26081190google scholar: lookup