FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Equine Vet J / Adaptation strategies of horses with induced forelimb lamene...
Equine veterinary journal2020; 53(3); 600-611; doi: 10.1111/evj.13344

Adaptation strategies of horses with induced forelimb lameness walking on a treadmill.

Abstract: There is a paucity of research describing the gait pattern of lame horses at the walk. Objective: To describe the changes in motion pattern and vertical ground reaction forces (GRFz) in horses with induced forelimb lameness at the walk and compare those changes with the changes observed at the trot. Methods: Experimental study. Methods: In 10 clinically sound Warmblood horses, moderate forelimb lameness was induced using a sole pressure model followed by trot and walk on a treadmill. Kinematic data were collected using 3D optical motion capture (OMC), and GRFz by an instrumented treadmill. Mixed models were used to compare sound baseline versus forelimb lameness (significance was set at P < .05). Results: Lameness induction significantly reduced peak GRFz on the second force peak, and vertical impulse in the lame limb. Stride and stance duration in all limbs were reduced. Lameness significantly affected the vertical movement symmetry of the head and withers. Maximum limb retraction angle, fetlock extension and protraction speed were reduced in the lame limb. Body centre of mass (COM) translation was reduced in the side-to-side direction and increased in the vertical and fore-aft directions. Several compensatory kinetic and kinematic changes were observed in the nonlame limbs. The observed changes in both kinetics and kinematics were generally smaller at walk with fewer variables being affected, compared to the trot. Conclusions: Only one degree and type of orthopaedic pain (sole pressure) was studied. Conclusions: Compensatory strategies of forelimb lameness at the walk include alteration of several kinetic and kinematic parameters and have some specific patterns and inter-individual differences that are not seen at the trot. However, much like at the trot, head movement and forelimb vertical force symmetry seem to be the most useful parameters to detect forelimb lameness at walk.
© 2020 The Authors. Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-09-24 PubMed ID: 32888199PubMed Central: PMC8048804DOI: 10.1111/evj.13344Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study provides an analysis of the motion patterns and ground reaction forces of horses with induced forelimb lameness at two different gaits, walk and trot. The findings indicate that these horses adopt different movement strategies at the walk, compared to the trot, and that the symmetry of head movement and forelimb force are key parameters for detecting lameness at both gaits.

Methodology

  • The researchers conducted an experimental study on 10 clinically sound Warmblood horses, inducing moderate forelimb lameness using a sole pressure model. After lameness was induced, the horses were made to trot and walk on a treadmill.
  • Gait analysis data was collected using a 3D optical motion capture system. Vertical ground reaction forces (GRFz), or the force exerted by the ground on a body in contact with it, were measured using an instrumented treadmill.
  • The team made comparisons between sound baseline and forelimb lameness using mixed models statistical approach, with the level of significance set at P < .05.

Findings

  • Lameness induction resulted in a significant reduction of the peak GRFz on the second force peak and vertical impulse in the affected limb. The stride and stance duration in all limbs were shown to be reduced.
  • Vertically, the lameness significantly altered the movement symmetry of the horse’s head and withers (the highest part of the back).
  • In regards to the lame limb, the maximum retraction angle, fetlock extension (joint angle in horse’s leg), and protraction speed (forward extension) were all reduced.
  • The body centre of mass (COM) translation was diminished in the side-to-side direction, but was augmented in both vertical and fore-aft (front and back) directions.
  • Several kinetic and kinematic changes were observed in the nonlame limbs as compensatory measures to the primary change in the lame limb.
  • The changes in kinetics and kinematics were generally less pronounced at walk with fewer variables being affected, in comparison to the trot.

Conclusions

  • The research only examined one type and degree of orthopaedic pain (sole pressure).
  • Forelimb lameness at the walk is countered by alteration of several kinetic and kinematic parameters, displaying unique patterns and individual differences that are not seen at the trot.
  • Similar to the trotting gait, head movement and forelimb vertical force symmetry appear to be the most reliable parameters for detecting forelimb lameness at walk.

Cite This Article

APA
Serra Bragança FM, Hernlund E, Thomsen MH, Waldern NM, Rhodin M, Byström A, van Weeren PR, Weishaupt MA. (2020). Adaptation strategies of horses with induced forelimb lameness walking on a treadmill. Equine Vet J, 53(3), 600-611. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13344

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 53
Issue: 3
Pages: 600-611

Researcher Affiliations

Serra Bragança, Filipe M
  • Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hernlund, Elin
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Thomsen, Maj H
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.
Waldern, Nina M
  • Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rhodin, Marie
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Byström, Anna
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
van Weeren, P René
  • Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Weishaupt, Michael A
  • Equine Department, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Forelimb
  • Gait
  • Hindlimb
  • Horse Diseases
  • Horses
  • Lameness, Animal / diagnosis
  • Walking

Grant Funding

  • Swedish Research Council Formas

Conflict of Interest Statement

No competing interests have been declared.

References

This article includes 31 references
  1. Serra Bragança FMM, Rhodin M, van Weeren PRR. On the brink of daily clinical application of objective gait analysis: What evidence do we have so far from studies using an induced lameness model?. Vet J 2018;234:11–23.
    pubmed: 29680381
  2. Weishaupt MA. Adaptation strategies of horses with lameness. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2008;24:79–100.
    pubmed: 18314037
  3. Buchner HHF, Savelberg HH, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Head and trunk movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore‐ or hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet J 1996;28:71–6.
    pubmed: 8565958
  4. Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, Hogg HP, Jordan P, Auer JA. Compensatory load redistribution of horses with induced weightbearing hindlimb lameness trotting on a treadmill. Equine Vet J 2010;36 ::727–33.
    pubmed: 15656505
  5. Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, Hogg HP, Jordan P, Auer JA. Compensatory load redistribution of horses with induced weight‐bearing forelimb lameness trotting on a treadmill. Vet J 2006;171:135–46.
    pubmed: 15974567
  6. Bell RP, Reed SK, Schoonover MJ, Whitfield CT, Yonezawa Y, Maki H. Associations of force plate and body‐mounted inertial sensor measurements for identification of hind limb lameness in horses. Am J Vet Res 2016;77:337–45.
    pubmed: 27027831
  7. Ross MW, Dyson SJ. Movement. 2011. p. 89–90.
  8. Barrey E, Desbrosse F. Lameness detection using an accelerometric device. Pferdeheilkunde 1996;12:617–22.
  9. Merkens HW, Schamhardt HC. Evaluation of equine locomotion during different degrees of experimentally induced lameness II: Distribution of ground reaction force patterns of the concurrently loaded limbs. Equine Vet J 1988;20:107–12.
    pubmed: 9079071
  10. Loscher DM, Meyer F, Kracht K, Nyakatura JA. Timing of head movements is consistent with energy minimization in walking ungulates. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 2016;283:20161908.
    pmc: PMC5136594pubmed: 27903873
  11. Merkens HW, Schamhardt HC, Hartman W, Kersjes AW. Ground reaction force patterns of Dutch Warmblood horses at normal walk. Equine Vet J 1986;18:207–14.
    pubmed: 3732241
  12. Geyer H, Seyfarth A, Blickhan R. Compliant leg behaviour explains basic dynamics of walking and running. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 2006;273:2861–7.
    pmc: PMC1664632pubmed: 17015312
  13. Rhodin M, Persson‐Sjodin E, Egenvall A, Serra Bragança FM, Pfau T, Roepstorff L. Vertical movement symmetry of the withers in horses with induced forelimb and hindlimb lameness at trot. Equine Vet J 2018;50:818–24.
    pmc: PMC6175082pubmed: 29658147
  14. Bächi B, Wiestner T, Stoll A, Waldern NM, Imboden I, Weishaupt MA. Changes of ground reaction force and timing variables in the course of habituation of horses to the treadmill. J Equine Vet Sci 2018;63:13–23.
  15. Merkens HW, Schamhardt HC. Evaluation of equine locomotion during different degrees of experimentally induced lameness. I: Lameness model and quantification of ground reaction force patterns of the limbs. Equine Vet J 1988;20:99–106.
    pubmed: 9079070
  16. Weishaupt MA, Hogg HP, Wiestner T, Denoth J, Stüssi E, Auer JA. Instrumented treadmill for measuring vertical ground reaction forces in horses. Am J Vet Res 2002;63:520–727.
    pubmed: 11939313
  17. Buchner HH, Savelberg HH, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Limb movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore‐ or hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet J 1996;28:63–70.
    pubmed: 8565956
  18. Merkens HW, Schamhardt HC. Evaluation of equine locomotion during different degrees of experimentally induced lameness. II: Distribution of ground reaction force patterns of the concurrently loaded limbs. Equine Vet J 1988;20:107–12.
    pubmed: 9079071
  19. Keegan KG. Evidence‐based lameness detection and quantification. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2007;23:403–23.
    pubmed: 17616320
  20. Buchner HHF, Savelberg HHCM, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Inertial properties of Dutch Warmblood horses. J Biomech 1997;30:653–8.
    pubmed: 9165402
  21. Buchner HH, Obermüller S, Scheidl M. Body centre of mass movement in the sound horse. Vet J 2000;160:225–34.
    pubmed: 11061959
  22. Ross MW. Movement. 2011. pp 65–7.
  23. Ishihara A, Bertone AL, Rajala‐Schultz PJ. Association between subjective lameness grade and kinetic gait parameters in horses with experimentally induced forelimb lameness. Am J Vet Res 2005;66:1805–15.
    pubmed: 16273915
  24. Morris E, Seeherman H. Redistribution of ground reaction forces in experimentally induced equine carpal lameness. Equine Exerc Physiol 1987;2:553–63.
  25. Keg PR, Barneveld A, Schamhardt HC, van den Belt AJM. Clinical and force plate evaluation of the effect of a high plantar nerve block in lameness caused by induced mid‐metatarsal tendinitis. Vet Q 1994;16:70–5.
    pubmed: 7801506
  26. Clayton HM, Schamhardt HC, Willemen MA, Lanovaz JL, Colborne GR. Kinematics and ground reaction forces in horses with superficial digital flexor tendinitis. Am J Vet Res 2000;61:191–6.
    pubmed: 10685692
  27. Khumsap S, Lanovaz JL, Rosenstein DS, Byron C, Clayton HM. Effect of induced unilateral synovitis of distal intertarsal and tarsometatarsal joints on sagittal plane kinematics and kinetics of trotting horses. Am J Vet Res 2003;64:1491–5.
    pubmed: 14672426
  28. Buchner HHF, Savelberg HHCM, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Temporal stride patterns in horses with experimentally induced fore‐ or hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet J 1995;27:161–5.
  29. Merkens HW, Schamhardt HC, Hartman W, Kersjes AW. The use of H(orse) INDEX: a method of analysing the ground reaction force patterns of lame and normal gaited horses at the walk. Equine Vet J 1988;20:29–36.
    pubmed: 3366102
  30. Pfau T, Noordwijk K, Sepulveda Caviedes MF, Persson‐Sjodin E, Barstow A, Forbes B. Head, withers and pelvic movement asymmetry and their relative timing in trot in racing Thoroughbreds in training. Equine Vet J 2018;50:117–24.
    pmc: PMC5724686pubmed: 28548349
  31. Byström A, Egenvall A, Roepstorff L, Rhodin M, Bragança FS, Hernlund E. Biomechanical findings in horses showing asymmetrical vertical excursions of the withers at walk. PLoS One 2018;13:e0204548.
    pmc: PMC6160136pubmed: 30261019

Citations

This article has been cited 14 times.
  1. Rhodin M, Serra Bragança FM, Persson-Sjodin E, Björnsdóttir S, Gunnarsdottir H, Gunnarsson V, Hernlund E, Smit IH. Adaptation strategies of Icelandic horses with induced transient hindlimb lameness at walk, trot and tölt. Equine Vet J 2026 Jan;58(1):230-242.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14525pubmed: 40371819google scholar: lookup
  2. Poizat E, Gérard M, Macaire C, De Azevedo E, Denoix JM, Coudry V, Jacquet S, Bertoni L, Tallaj A, Audigié F, Hatrisse C, Hébert C, Martin P, Marin F, Hanne-Poujade S, Chateau H. Discrimination of the Lame Limb in Horses Using a Machine Learning Method (Support Vector Machine) Based on Asymmetry Indices Measured by the EQUISYM System. Sensors (Basel) 2025 Feb 12;25(4).
    doi: 10.3390/s25041095pubmed: 40006323google scholar: lookup
  3. Khammesri S, Wantanajittikul K, Namwongprom K, Kittisirikul N, Ueangpaibool P, Thitaram C, Brown JL, Kongsawasdi S. Evaluating Gait Abnormalities in Asian Elephants Using Inertial Measurement Unit-Based Vertical Movement Symmetry Analysis: A Pilot Study. Vet Sci 2025 Feb 11;12(2).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci12020154pubmed: 40005914google scholar: lookup
  4. Haussler KK, le Jeune SS, MacKechnie-Guire R, Latif SN, Clayton HM. The Challenge of Defining Laterality in Horses: Is It Laterality or Just Asymmetry?. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jan 21;15(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15030288pubmed: 39943060google scholar: lookup
  5. Pedersen A, Hyytiäinen HK, Rhodin M, Forterre F, Penell J, Bergh A. Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Gait Parameters in Dogs with Osteoarthritis. Animals (Basel) 2024 May 30;14(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14111626pubmed: 38891673google scholar: lookup
  6. Larsen EA, Williams MR, Schoonover MJ, Jurek KA, Young JM, Duddy HR. Navicular bone fracture and severe deep digital flexor tendinopathy after palmar digital neurectomy in two horses. Open Vet J 2023 Dec;13(12):1752-1759.
    doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2023.v13.i12.24pubmed: 38292704google scholar: lookup
  7. Pfau T, Clark KS, Bolt DM, Lai JS, Perrier M, Rhodes JB, Smith RK, Fiske-Jackson A. Changes in Head and Pelvic Movement Symmetry after Diagnostic Anaesthesia: Interactions between Subjective Judgement Categories and Commonly Applied Blocks. Animals (Basel) 2023 Dec 6;13(24).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13243769pubmed: 38136806google scholar: lookup
  8. Egenvall A, Clayton HM, Byström A. Pilot study of locomotor asymmetry in horses walking in circles with and without a rider. PeerJ 2023;11:e16373.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.16373pubmed: 37933258google scholar: lookup
  9. Parmentier JIM, Bosch S, van der Zwaag BJ, Weishaupt MA, Gmel AI, Havinga PJM, van Weeren PR, Braganca FMS. Prediction of continuous and discrete kinetic parameters in horses from inertial measurement units data using recurrent artificial neural networks. Sci Rep 2023 Jan 13;13(1):740.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27899-4pubmed: 36639409google scholar: lookup
  10. Rhodin M, Smit IH, Persson-Sjodin E, Pfau T, Gunnarsson V, Björnsdóttir S, Zetterberg E, Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ, Serra Bragança F, Hernlund E. Timing of Vertical Head, Withers and Pelvis Movements Relative to the Footfalls in Different Equine Gaits and Breeds. Animals (Basel) 2022 Nov 7;12(21).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12213053pubmed: 36359178google scholar: lookup
  11. Luciano F, Ruggiero L, Minetti A, Pavei G. Comparison of three-dimensional body centre of mass trajectories during locomotion through zero- and one-dimensional statistics. Sci Rep 2022 Oct 22;12(1):17777.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22635-wpubmed: 36273024google scholar: lookup
  12. Hoffmann JR, Geburek F, Hagen J, Büttner K, Cruz AM, Röcken M. Bilateral Change in Vertical Hoof Force Distribution in Horses with Unilateral Forelimb Lameness before and after Successful Diagnostic Anaesthesia. Animals (Basel) 2022 Sep 19;12(18).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12182485pubmed: 36139345google scholar: lookup
  13. Briggs EV, Mazzà C. Automatic methods of hoof-on and -off detection in horses using wearable inertial sensors during walk and trot on asphalt, sand and grass. PLoS One 2021;16(7):e0254813.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254813pubmed: 34310630google scholar: lookup
  14. Tijssen M, Serra Braganςa FM, Ask K, Rhodin M, Andersen PH, Telezhenko E, Bergsten C, Nielen M, Hernlund E. Kinematic gait characteristics of straight line walk in clinically sound dairy cows. PLoS One 2021;16(7):e0253479.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253479pubmed: 34288912google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.