Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2024; 11; 1424890; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1424890

An anatomical study of the subarachnoid space surrounding the trigeminal ganglion in horses-in preparation for a controlled glycerol rhizotomy in equids.

Abstract: Equine trigeminal-mediated headshaking is a painful neuropathic disorder comparable to trigeminal neuralgia in humans. The selective destruction of pain fibers within the trigeminal ganglion, called rhizotomy, is the surgical treatment of choice for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia refractory to medical treatment in humans. The human trigeminal ganglion is enclosed by a dural recess called the Meckel's or trigeminal cave, in which the ganglion is surrounded by a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-filled subarachnoid space. During glycerol rhizotomy, glycerol is percutaneously injected in this CSF-filled space. Until now, information about the anatomy of the dural recess and the subarachnoid space surrounding the trigeminal ganglion is lacking in horses. The aim of this study was to explore if a CSF-filled subarachnoid space around the trigeminal ganglion exists in horses. Unassigned: Six equine cadaver heads were investigated for CSF accumulation around the ganglion with a 3 Tesla MRI. After anatomical dissection to expose the trigeminal root, a polymer-based radiopaque contrast agent was injected through the porus trigeminus into the subarachnoid space (cisternography). The exact delineation and the volume of the contrast agent accumulation were determined on subsequent micro-computed tomographic scans and segmentation. Finally, the distribution of the contrast agent within the subarachnoid space was examined histologically in three specimens. Unassigned: In all 12 specimens included in this study, the trigeminal ganglion was surrounded by a subarachnoid space forming a trigeminal cistern. The mean volume of the trigeminal cave in this study was 0.31 mL (±SD: 0.11 mL). Distribution of the contrast agent along the peripheral nerves (i.e., ophthalmic, maxillary and/or mandibular nerve) was observed in 7 out of 12 specimens. Unassigned: A subarachnoid space surrounding the trigeminal ganglion exists in the horse and could be targeted for glycerol rhizotomy in horses suffering from trigeminal-mediated headshaking. However, the clinical relevance of contrast agent distribution along the peripheral nerves remains to be assessed.
Publication Date: 2024-07-18 PubMed ID: 39091385PubMed Central: PMC11291345DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1424890Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research focused on studying the anatomical structure of the subarachnoid space in horses as a means to prepare for a controlled glycerol rhizotomy treatment for headshaking in equids. The study’s findings show that a subarachnoid space indeed surrounds the trigeminal ganglion in horses and could be targeted for glycerol rhizotomy.

Context and Purpose of Study

  • The study was centered around a neurological condition in horses known as trigeminal-mediated headshaking, which is akin to trigeminal neuralgia in humans. This condition causes horses distress because it is a painful neuropathic disorder.
  • In human medicine, when this disorder is unresponsive to medication, a surgical procedure known as rhizotomy is undertaken. This process involves the selective destruction of pain fibres located in a cluster of nerve cells called the trigeminal ganglion.
  • The human trigeminal ganglion is situated in a fluid-filled space, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-filled subarachnoid space, which is within a cavity (Meckel’s or trigeminal cave). In performing a glycerol rhizotomy, glycerol is injected percutaneously into this space.
  • Before this study, there was limited knowledge about the structure of both the dural recess, a small cavity or depression, and the subarachnoid space around the trigeminal ganglion in equine anatomy.
  • The primary aim of the study was to ascertain if there is a CSF-filled subarachnoid space surrounding the trigeminal ganglion in horses.

Research Methodology

  • The heads of six equine cadavers were used in the study. The researchers explored CSF accumulation surrounding the ganglion using a 3 Tesla MRI.
  • The cadaver heads went through an anatomical dissection to expose the root of the trigeminal nerve, upon which radiopaque contrast agent was administered into the subarachnoid space.
  • Researchers used subsequent micro-computed tomographic scans and segmentation to ascertain the exact location and volume of the contrast agent accumulation.
  • The distribution pattern of the contrast agent within the subarachnoid space was subsequently analyzed histologically in three specimens.

Results of the Research

  • The research showed that in all 12 tested specimens, the trigeminal ganglion was surrounded by a CSF-filled subarachnoid space, referred to as a trigeminal cistern.
  • Research demonstrated the average volume of the trigeminal cave was approximately 0.31 mL.
  • Furthermore, distribution of the contrast agent followed along the peripheral nerves in seven out of 12 samples. These peripheral nerves include the ophthalmic, maxillary and/or mandibular nerve.

Conclusion and Implication of the Study

  • The study confirmed the existence of a subarachnoid space surrounding the trigeminal ganglion in the horse. This discovery is significant because it means that glycerol rhizotomy can be considered as a potential treatment method for horses suffering from trigeminal-mediated headshaking.
  • However, the distribution of contrast agent along the peripheral nerves’ clinical relevance is yet to be determined, thus further studies are needed.

Cite This Article

APA
Becker R, Haenssgen K, Precht C, Khoma OZ, Hlushchuk R, Koch C, Kaessmeyer S, de Preux M. (2024). An anatomical study of the subarachnoid space surrounding the trigeminal ganglion in horses-in preparation for a controlled glycerol rhizotomy in equids. Front Vet Sci, 11, 1424890. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1424890

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Pages: 1424890

Researcher Affiliations

Becker, Richard
  • Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse-Faculty, Swiss Institute of Equine Medicine (ISME), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Haenssgen, Kati
  • Division of Veterinary Anatomy, Department of Clinical Research and Veterinary Public Health, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Precht, Christina
  • Division of Clinical Radiology, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Khoma, Oleksiy-Zakhar
  • Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Hlushchuk, Ruslan
  • Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Koch, Christoph
  • Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse-Faculty, Swiss Institute of Equine Medicine (ISME), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Kaessmeyer, Sabine
  • Division of Veterinary Anatomy, Department of Clinical Research and Veterinary Public Health, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
de Preux, Mathieu
  • Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse-Faculty, Swiss Institute of Equine Medicine (ISME), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 34 references
  1. Lane JG, Mair TS. Observations on headshaking in the horse. Equine Vet J (1987) 19:331–6.
  2. Pickles K, Madigan J, Aleman M. Idiopathic headshaking: is it still idiopathic?. Vet J (2014) 201:21–30.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.03.031pubmed: 24821361google scholar: lookup
  3. Aleman M, Williams DC, Brosnan RJ, Nieto JE, Pickles KJ, Berger J. Sensory nerve conduction and somatosensory evoked potentials of the trigeminal nerve in horses with idiopathic headshaking. J Vet Intern Med (2013) 27:1571–80.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.12191pubmed: 24107198google scholar: lookup
  4. Newton SA. The fuctional anatomy of the trigeminal nerve of the horse. University of Liverpool; (2001).
  5. Jones MR, Urits I, Ehrhardt KP, Cefalu JN, Kendrick JB, Park DJ. A comprehensive review of trigeminal neuralgia. Curr Pain Headache Rep (2019) 23:74.
    doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0810-0pubmed: 31388843google scholar: lookup
  6. Youssef S, Kim E-Y, Aziz KMA, Hemida S, Keller JT, van Loveren HR. The subtemporal interdural approach to dumbbell-shaped trigeminal schwannomas: cadaveric prosection. Neurosurgery (2006) 59:ONS270-7; discussion ONS277-8.
  7. Bernard F, Mercier P, Sindou M. Morphological and functional anatomy of the trigeminal triangular plexus as an anatomical entity: a systematic review. Surg Radiol Anat (2019) 41:625–37.
    doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02217-8pubmed: 30923840google scholar: lookup
  8. Meckel JF. Tractatus anatomico physiologicus de quinto pare nervorum cerebri. Gottingae: Apud Abram Vanden - hoeck, Acad Typogr, (Thesis) (Gottingae, Germany: Abram Vandenhoeck; ) (1748).
  9. Ferner H. Zur Anatomie der intrakranialen Abschnitte des nervus trigeminus. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch (1948) 114:108–22.
    doi: 10.1007/BF00523558pubmed: 18884218google scholar: lookup
  10. Janjua RM, Al-Mefty O, Densler DW, Shields CB. Dural relationships of Meckel cave and lateral wall of the cavernous sinus. Neurosurg Focus (2008) 25:E2.
    doi: 10.3171/FOC.2008.25.12.E2pubmed: 19035700google scholar: lookup
  11. Liu G. The trigeminal nerve and its central connections. In: Miller NR, Newman NJ, editors. Walsh and Hoyt’s clinical neuro-ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; (2005). 1233–51.
  12. Håkanson S. Trigeminal neuralgia treated by the injection of glycerol into the trigeminal cistern. Neurosurgery (1981) 9:638–41.
  13. Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD. Percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia: technique and expectations. Neurosurg Focus (2005) 18:E7–4.
    doi: 10.3171/foc.2005.18.5.8pubmed: 15913283google scholar: lookup
  14. Winter JC, Haist V, Feige K. Examination on the effectiveness of a glycerol injection at the trigeminal nerve as a basis for the treatment of headshaking in the horse. Pferdeheilkunde (2014) 30:252–62.
    doi: 10.21836/pem20140301google scholar: lookup
  15. Uhlendorf F, Müller JMV, Winter JC, Feige K. Treatment of idiopathic headshaking with an injection of glycerol into the trigeminal ganglion in a 5 year old warmblood mare. Pferdeheilkunde (2011) 27:585–8.
    doi: 10.21836/pem20110602google scholar: lookup
  16. Newton SA, Knottenbelt DC, Eldridge PR. Headshaking in horses: possible aetiopathogenesis suggested by the results of diagnostic tests and several treatment regimes used in 20 cases. Equine Vet J (2000) 32:208–16.
    doi: 10.2746/042516400776563617pubmed: 10836475google scholar: lookup
  17. Wickham H. Getting started with ggplot 2. In: Wickham H, editor. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Cham: Springer International Publishing; (2016). 11–31.
  18. Joo W, Yoshioka F, Funaki T, Mizokami K, Rhoton AL Jr. Microsurgical anatomy of the trigeminal nerve. Clin Anat (2014) 27:61–88.
    doi: 10.1002/ca.22330pubmed: 24323792google scholar: lookup
  19. Bond JD, Xu Z, Zhang H, Zhang M. Meckel’s cave and Somatotopy of the trigeminal ganglion. World Neurosurg (2021) 148:178–87.
    doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.081pubmed: 33516868google scholar: lookup
  20. Cheng R, Wang T, Cai Y, Chai S, Shen L, Xu D. The consistency between the preoperative 3D-reconstructed Meckel’s cave and the intraoperative balloon results in percutaneous balloon compression. J Pain Res (2023) 16:2929–37.
    doi: 10.2147/JPR.S420283pmc: PMC10473426pubmed: 37664484google scholar: lookup
  21. Ziyal IM, Sekhar LN, Ozgen T, Söylemezoğlu F, Alper M, Beşer M. The trigeminal nerve and ganglion: an anatomical, histological, and radiological study addressing the transtrigeminal approach. Surg Neurol (2004) 61:564–73.
    doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2003.07.009pubmed: 15165800google scholar: lookup
  22. Jannetta PJ. Gross (mesoscopic) description of the human trigeminal nerve and ganglion. J Neurosurg (1967) 26:109–11.
  23. Kanpolat Y. Percutaneous approach to the trigeminal ganglion in dogs. J Neurosci Methods (1979) 1:375–81.
    doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(79)90026-8pubmed: 317507google scholar: lookup
  24. Işik N, Pamir MN, Benli K, Erbengi A, Erbengi T, Ruacan S. Experimental trigeminal glycerol injection in dogs: histopathological evaluation by light and electron microscopy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg (2002) 79:94–106.
    doi: 10.1159/000070105pubmed: 12743431google scholar: lookup
  25. Santifort KM, Glass EN, Pumarola M, Aige GV. Microanatomical findings with relevance to trigeminal ganglion enhancement on post-contrast T1-weighted magnetic resonance images in dogs. Front Vet Sci (2023) 10:1256947.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1256947pmc: PMC10533922pubmed: 37781281google scholar: lookup
  26. Lunsford LD, Bennett MH, Martinez AJ. Experimental trigeminal glycerol injection. Electrophysiol Morphol Effects. Arch Neurol (1985) 42:146–9.
  27. Herta J, Wang W-T, Höftberger R, Breit S, Kneissl S, Bergmeister H. An experimental animal model for percutaneous procedures used in trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (2017) 159:1341–8.
    doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3162-8pmc: PMC5486611pubmed: 28397136google scholar: lookup
  28. Li Y, Zhang X-A, Qi S. Anatomic characteristics of the dural sheath of the trigeminal nerve. Head Neck (2016) 38:E185–8.
    doi: 10.1002/hed.23968pubmed: 25537968google scholar: lookup
  29. Wysiadecki G, Tubbs RS, Iwanaga J, Radek M, Walocha J, Brzeziński P. Microanatomical study of arachnoid granulations and meningeal architecture around Meckel’s cave. Neurosurg Rev (2023) 46:50.
    doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-01954-0pmc: PMC9908694pubmed: 36754877google scholar: lookup
  30. Roberts VL, Fews D, McNamara JM, Love S. Trigeminal nerve root demyelination not seen in six horses diagnosed with trigeminal-mediated headshaking. Front Vet Sci (2017) 4:72.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00072pmc: PMC5431280pubmed: 28555189google scholar: lookup
  31. Beltran E, Grundon R, Stewart J, Biggi M, Holloway A, Freeman C. Imaging diagnosis-unilateral trigeminal neuritis mimicking peripheral nerve sheath tumor in a horse. Vet Radiol Ultrasound (2016) 57:E1–4.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12272pubmed: 26059945google scholar: lookup
  32. Kanpolat Y, Savas A, Bekar A, Berk C. Percutaneous controlled radiofrequency trigeminal Rhizotomy for the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: 25-year experience with 1600 patients. Neurosurgery (2001) 48:524–34.
  33. Kouzounias K, Lind G, Schechtmann G, Winter J, Linderoth B. Comparison of percutaneous balloon compression and glycerol rhizotomy for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg (2010) 113:486–92.
    doi: 10.3171/2010.1.JNS091106pubmed: 20187700google scholar: lookup
  34. Bender M, Pradilla G, Batra S, See A, Bhutiani N, James C. Effectiveness of repeat glycerol rhizotomy in treating recurrent trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery (2012) 70:1125–34.
    doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31823f5eb6pubmed: 22067421google scholar: lookup