FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / An Ethnographic Account of the British Equestrian Virtue of ...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2021; 11(1); 188; doi: 10.3390/ani11010188

An Ethnographic Account of the British Equestrian Virtue of Bravery, and Its Implications for Equine Welfare.

Abstract: This article describes the virtue of bravery in British equestrian culture and suggests that riders' tactics for bolstering bravery may have negative implications on equine welfare. These observations are based on 14 months of ethnographic research among amateur riders and the professionals who support them (n = 35), utilising participant observation and Dictaphone recordings. Riders suffering from 'confidence issues' could be belittled and excluded. Instructors' approaches towards bolstering bravery involved encouraging riders to 'get tough'-on both themselves and on their horses. Narrative theory is employed in this article to show that riders could demonstrate their own bravery through describing the horse as defiant. Alternate narrative possibilities existed, including describing the horse as needy patient and the rider as care provider. Riders were critically aware that veterinary diagnoses could be sought or avoided in line with riders' own dispositions. 'Diagnoses-seeking' behaviours could be judged negatively by others and seen as evidence of unresolved fearfulness. In conclusion, the British equestrian cultural orientation towards bravery can be associated with stressful or painful training techniques, delayed or missed diagnoses of physiological pathologies, and poor training outcomes. Programs that aim to help riders to develop confidence without instilling a sense of 'battle' with the horse, and without ridiculing the rider, are likely to have positive implications on equine welfare and human safety.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-01-14 PubMed ID: 33466901PubMed Central: PMC7830721DOI: 10.3390/ani11010188Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article analyse the British equestrian culture and the impact of its value of bravery on the welfare of horses. The focus is on the ‘tough’ tactics riders employ that could potentially endanger their horses, as observed through a detailed 14-month study involving amateurs and professionals in the field.

Research Method and Participants

  • The article relies on a detailed ethnographic study spanning 14 months involving both amateur and professional horse riders, totalling an observing group of 35 members. This study aimed to provide an in-depth insight into the effects of equestrian methods on horse welfare.
  • Multiple methods, including participant observation and Dictaphone recordings, were used to acquire thorough and accurate data.

Narrative Theory Application

  • The narrative theory was employed as a tool to study the behavior and attitudes of the riders. It was found that some riders demonstrate bravery by depicting their horse as defiant, revealing their potential lack of sensitivity towards the horse’s overall well-being.
  • Alternate narratives were also explored, where the horse was viewed as a needy patient and the rider as the caregiver. This alternative narrative demonstrates an empathetic approach to the horse’s welfare but was found to be less prevalent.

Impact on Equine Welfare

  • Riders often appear to make decisions about seeking veterinary diagnoses based on their own projected fear or bravery, rather than the horse’s health needs. The study found that riders who sought diagnoses were often judged negatively, seen as demonstrating fearfulness rather than strength.
  • The emphasis on bravery and toughness was found to lead to stressful or painful training methods, missed or delayed diagnoses of physiological pathologies, and overall poor training outcomes. This orientation thus carries significant negative implications for equine welfare.

Conclusion and Recommendations

  • The article concludes that the British equestrian culture’s emphasis on bravery often comes at the cost of the welfare of the horse. Simultaneously, this culture can lead to exclusion and disparagement of riders who do not conform to these standards.
  • The paper recommends intervention programs that encourage rider confidence without promoting a ‘battle’ mentality with the horse and without demeaning the rider. Such programs would potentially improve equine care and enhance human safety within the sport.

Cite This Article

APA
Jones McVey R. (2021). An Ethnographic Account of the British Equestrian Virtue of Bravery, and Its Implications for Equine Welfare. Animals (Basel), 11(1), 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010188

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Issue: 1
PII: 188

Researcher Affiliations

Jones McVey, Rosalie
  • Social Anthropology Department, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3RF, UK.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

This article includes 67 references
  1. Endenburg N. Perceptions and attitudes towards horses in European societies.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1999 Apr;(28):38-41.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05154.xpubmed: 11314233google scholar: lookup
  2. Voigt MA, Hiney K, Richardson JC, Waite K, Borron A, Brady CM. Show Horse Welfare: Horse Show Competitors' Understanding, Awareness, and Perceptions of Equine Welfare.. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2016 Oct-Dec;19(4):335-52.
    doi: 10.1080/10888705.2016.1152190pubmed: 27029609google scholar: lookup
  3. McLean A.N., McGreevy P.D.. Horse-training techniques that may defy the principles of learning theory and compromise welfare.. J. Vet. Behav. 2010;5:187–195.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2010.04.002google scholar: lookup
  4. Hothersall B., Casey R.. Undesired behaviour in horses: A review of their development, prevention, management and association with welfare.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2012;24:479–485.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2011.00296.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  5. Hausberger M., Roche H., Henry S., Visser E.K.. A review of the human–horse relationship.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;109:1–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.015google scholar: lookup
  6. Visser E.K., Van Wijk-Jansen E.E.. Diversity in horse enthusiasts with respect to horse welfare: An explorative study.. J. Vet. Behav. 2012;7:295–304.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.10.007google scholar: lookup
  7. Collins JA, Hanlon A, More SJ, Wall PG, Kennedy J, Duggan V. Evaluation of current equine welfare issues in Ireland: causes, desirability, feasibility and means of raising standards.. Equine Vet J 2010 Mar;42(2):105-13.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X471458pubmed: 20156244google scholar: lookup
  8. The Brooke. [(accessed on 20 November 2020)]; Available online: https://www.thebrooke.org/about-us/theory-change.
  9. Reed K, Upjohn MM. Better Lives for Dogs: Incorporating Human Behaviour Change Into a Theory of Change to Improve Canine Welfare Worldwide.. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:93.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00093pmc: PMC5985712pubmed: 29892603google scholar: lookup
  10. Horseman SV, Buller H, Mullan S, Knowles TG, Barr AR, Whay HR. Equine Welfare in England and Wales: Exploration of Stakeholders' Understanding.. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2017 Jan-Mar;20(1):9-23.
    doi: 10.1080/10888705.2016.1197776pubmed: 27414640google scholar: lookup
  11. Horseman SV, Hockenhull J, Buller H, Mullan S, Barr AR, Whay HR. Equine Welfare Assessment: Exploration of British Stakeholder Attitudes Using Focus-Group Discussions.. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2017 Apr-Jun;20(2):176-191.
    doi: 10.1080/10888705.2017.1283226pubmed: 28375757google scholar: lookup
  12. Ohl F, van der Staay FJ. Animal welfare: at the interface between science and society.. Vet J 2012 Apr;192(1):13-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.05.019pubmed: 21703888google scholar: lookup
  13. White J., Rogers S.. Keynote Presentation: Making Animal Welfare Sustainable–Human Behaviour Change for Animal Behaviour: The Human Element.. In: Denenberg S., editor. Proceedings of the 11th International Veterinary Behaviour Meeting; Samorin, Slovakia. 14–16 September 2017; Wallingford, UK: CABI; 2017. pp. 54–59.
  14. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions.. Implement Sci 2011 Apr 23;6:42.
    doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42pmc: PMC3096582pubmed: 21513547google scholar: lookup
  15. Michie S., Atkins L., West R.. The Behaviour Change Wheel. A Guide to Designing Interventions.. 1st ed. Silverback Publishing; Sutton, UK: 2014.
  16. Birke L., Thompson K.. (Un)Stable Relations: Horses, Humans and Social Agency.. Routledge; London, UK: New York, NY, USA: 2017.
  17. Miriam A., Thompson K.. Equestrian Cultures in Global and Local Contexts.. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2017.
  18. Laidlaw J.. The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom.. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2013.
  19. Robbins J.. Beyond the suffering subject: Toward an anthropology of the good.. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 2013;19:447–462.
    doi: 10.1111/1467-9655.12044google scholar: lookup
  20. Keane W.. Ethical Life: Its Natural and Social Histories.. Princeton University Press; Princeton, NJ, USA: 2017.
  21. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.. Psychol Rev 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215.
    doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191pubmed: 847061google scholar: lookup
  22. Ellerman D.. Autonomy-respecting assistance: Toward an alternative theory of development assistance.. Rev. Soc. Econ. 2004;62:149–168.
    doi: 10.1080/00346760410001684424google scholar: lookup
  23. Heleski C.R., Anthony R.. Science alone is not always enough: The importance of ethical assessment for a more comprehensive view of equine welfare.. J. Vet. Behav. 2012;7:169–178.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.08.003google scholar: lookup
  24. Faubion J.D.. An Anthropology of Ethics.. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2011.
  25. Mattingly C.. Two virtue ethics and the anthropology of morality.. Anthropol. Theory. 2012;12:161–184.
    doi: 10.1177/1463499612455284google scholar: lookup
  26. Kirksey S.E., Helmreich S.. The emergence of multispecies ethnography.. Cult. Anthropol. 2010;25:545–576.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  27. Hamilton L., Taylor N.. Ethnography after Humanism: Power, Politics and Method in Multi-Species Research.. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2017.
  28. Jones McVey R.A.. Reasonable Creatures: British Equestrianism and Epistemological Responsibility in Late Modernity.. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Cambridge; Cambridge, UK: 2018.
  29. The Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK and Commonweath Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice. [(accessed on 10 April 2018)]; Available online: https://www.theasa.org/downloads/ASA%20ethics%20guidelines%202011.pdf.
  30. American Anthropological Association, Code of Ethics, Approved 1998. [(accessed on 10 April 2018)]; Available online: https://s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-aaa/files/production/public/FileDownloads/pdfs/issues/policy-advocacy/upload/ethicscode.pdf.
  31. Hurn S.. Humans and Other Animals: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Human-Animal Interactions.. Pluto Press; London, UK: 2012.
  32. Despret V.. The body we care for: Figures of anthropo-zoo-genesis.. Body Soc. 2004;10:111–134.
    doi: 10.1177/1357034X04042938google scholar: lookup
  33. Visser EK, Van Reenen CG, Rundgren M, Zetterqvist M, Morgan K, Blokhuis HJ. Responses of horses in behavioural tests correlate with temperament assessed by riders.. Equine Vet J 2003 Mar;35(2):176-83.
    doi: 10.2746/042516403776114108pubmed: 12638795google scholar: lookup
  34. Williams J., Greening L., Marlin D., Randle H.. Understanding whip use in riders in sports horse disciplines. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the International Society for Equitation Science 2019; Guelph, ON, Canada. 19–21 August 2019.
  35. Merkies K, Nakonechny L, DuBois C, Derisoud E. Preliminary study on current perceptions and usage of training equipment by horse enthusiasts in Canada.. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2018 Apr-Jun;21(2):141-152.
    doi: 10.1080/10888705.2017.1392301pubmed: 29172720google scholar: lookup
  36. Thompson K, McGreevy P, McManus P. A Critical Review of Horse-Related Risk: A Research Agenda for Safer Mounts, Riders and Equestrian Cultures.. Animals (Basel) 2015 Jul 17;5(3):561-75.
    doi: 10.3390/ani5030372pmc: PMC4598694pubmed: 26479374google scholar: lookup
  37. Birke L., Brandt K.. Mutual corporeality: Gender and human/horse relationships.. Women’s Stud. Int. Forum. 2009;32:189–197.
    doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2009.05.015google scholar: lookup
  38. Dashper K.. Strong, active women: (Re)Doing rural femininity through equestrian sport and leisure.. Ethnography. 2016;3:350–368.
    doi: 10.1177/1466138115609379google scholar: lookup
  39. Dashper K., St John M.. Clothes make the rider? Equestrian competition dress and sporting identity.. Ann. Leis. Res. 2016;19:235–250.
    doi: 10.1080/11745398.2015.1095103google scholar: lookup
  40. Dashper K.. Learning to Communicate: The Triad of (Mis)Communication in Horse Riding Lessons.. In: The Meaning of Horses: Biosocial Encounters. Davis D., Maurstad A., editors. Routledge; London, UK: 2016. pp. 101–115.
  41. Crossman G.K., Walsh R.. The Changing Role of the Horse: From Beast of Burden to Partner in Sport and Recreation.. Int. J. Sport Soc. 2011;2:2.
    doi: 10.18848/2152-7857/CGP/v02i02/54066google scholar: lookup
  42. Birke L.. Learning to speak horse: The culture of Natural Horsemanship.. Soc. Anim. 2007;15:217–239.
    doi: 10.1163/156853007X217177google scholar: lookup
  43. Roberts M.. The Man Who Listens To Horses.. Random House; Manhattan, NY, USA: 1997.
  44. Hedenborg S., Hedenborg White M.. From glamour to drudgery–changing gender patterns in the equine sector: A comparative study of Sweden and Great Britain in the twentieth century.. In: Adelman M., Knijnik J., editors. Gender and Equestrian Sport. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2013. pp. 15–36.
  45. Jones McVey R.. Responsible Doubt and Embodied Conviction: The Infrastructure of British Equestrian Horse/Human ‘Partnership’.. Camb. J. Anthropol. 2017;35:96–110.
    doi: 10.3167/cja.2017.350208google scholar: lookup
  46. Goodwin D, McGreevy P, Waran N, McLean A. How equitation science can elucidate and refine horsemanship techniques.. Vet J 2009 Jul;181(1):5-11.
    pubmed: 19394880doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.023google scholar: lookup
  47. Lortie F. Healing dramas and clinical plots: the narrative structure of experience.. BMJ 1999 May 1;318(7192):1219.
    pmc: PMC1115609pubmed: 10221969doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7192.1219google scholar: lookup
  48. Mattingly C. Reading Minds and Telling Tales in a Cultural Borderland.. Ethos 2008 Mar 1;36(1):136-154.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1352.2008.00008.xpmc: PMC2919771pubmed: 20706549google scholar: lookup
  49. Bruner J.. Self-making narratives. Autobiographical memory and the construction of a narrative self.. In: Fivush R., Haden C.A., editors. Autobiographical Memory and the Construction of a Narrative Self: Developmental and Cultural Perspectives. Psychology Press; London, UK: 2003. pp. 209–225.
  50. Bruner J.. Life as narrative.. Soc. Res. 1987;1:11–32.
  51. Burke K.. A Grammar of Motives.. University of California Press; Berkeley, CA, USA: 1969.
  52. Ashley FH, Waterman-Pearson AE, Whay HR. Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: application to clinical practice and future studies.. Equine Vet J 2005 Nov;37(6):565-75.
    doi: 10.2746/042516405775314826pubmed: 16295937google scholar: lookup
  53. Palmer S.. Understanding Horse Performance: Brain, Pain or Training.. J A Allen; London, UK: 2016.
  54. Humphrey C.. Reassembling individual subjects: Events and decisions in troubled times.. Anthropol. Theory. 2008;8:357–380.
    doi: 10.1177/1463499608096644google scholar: lookup
  55. Dashper K.. Tools of the trade or part of the family? Horses in competitive equestrian sport.. Soc. Anim. 2014;22:352–371.
    doi: 10.1163/15685306-12341343google scholar: lookup
  56. McLean A.N., McGreevy P.D.. Ethical equitation: Capping the price horses pay for human glory.. J. Vet. Behav. 2010;5:203–209.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2010.04.003google scholar: lookup
  57. Campbell ML. The role of veterinarians in equestrian sport: a comparative review of ethical issues surrounding human and equine sports medicine.. Vet J 2013 Sep;197(3):535-40.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.021pmc: PMC3898908pubmed: 23773811google scholar: lookup
  58. Chamove A.S., Crawley-Hartrick O.J., Stafford K.J.. Horse reactions to human attitudes and behavior.. Anthrozoös. 2002;15:323–331.
    doi: 10.2752/089279302786992423google scholar: lookup
  59. Sabiniewicz A., Tarnowska K., Świątek R., Sorokowski P., Laska M.. Olfactory-based interspecific recognition of human emotions: Horses (Equus ferus caballus) can recognize fear and happiness body odour from humans (Homo sapiens). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2020;230:105072.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105072google scholar: lookup
  60. Scopa C, Contalbrigo L, Greco A, Lanatà A, Scilingo EP, Baragli P. Emotional Transfer in Human-Horse Interaction: New Perspectives on Equine Assisted Interventions.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Nov 26;9(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9121030pmc: PMC6941042pubmed: 31779120google scholar: lookup
  61. Waran N.. Equestrianism and horse welfare: The need for an ‘equine-centred’ approach to training.. In: McGreevy P., McLean A., Warren-Smith A., Goodwin D., Waran N., editors. Proceedings of the 1st International Equitation Science Symposium 2005; Melbourne, Australia. 26–27 August 2005; Melbourne, Australia: Australian Equine Behaviour Centre; 2005. pp. 67–74.
  62. Odberg FO, Bouissou MF. The development of equestrianism from the baroque period to the present day and its consequences for the welfare of horses.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1999 Apr;(28):26-30.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05152.xpubmed: 11314231google scholar: lookup
  63. Horseman S, Whay H, Mullan S, Knowles T, Barr A, Buller H. Horses in our Hands. .
  64. Rioja-Lang FC, Connor M, Bacon H, Dwyer CM. Determining a Welfare Prioritization for Horses Using a Delphi Method.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Apr 9;10(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10040647pmc: PMC7222753pubmed: 32283607google scholar: lookup
  65. Marks K.. Perfect Confidence: Overcoming Fear, Gaining Confidence and Achieving Success with Horses.. Ebury; London, UK: 2007.
  66. MacIntyre A.. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.. University of Notre Dame; Chicago, IL, USA: 1981.
  67. Karlsson F.. Anthropomorphism and mechanomorphism.. Hum. J. Hum. Anim. Interface Stud. 2012;3:107–122.

Citations

This article has been cited 7 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.