Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2026; doi: 10.1002/evj.70350

Anatomical and computed tomographic study of equine cervical spinal nerves and intervertebral foramina.

Abstract: Osseous enlargement of the cervical articular process joints due to osteoarthropathy or developmental hypertrophy can narrow the intervertebral foramen (IF), resulting in compression and neuritis of the exiting spinal nerves. Associated clinical signs may include neck pain, forelimb lameness or muscle atrophy. Computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for IF evaluation; however, to date, visualisation of the equine spinal nerves based on CT imaging is insufficient. Objective: To improve the diagnostic accuracy of foraminal stenosis and cervical spinal nerve (CSN) compression based on CT, this study aims to describe the anatomical size and position of the CSN at the level of the IF. Methods: Cadaveric study. Methods: Anatomical dissection was performed to expose the dorsal and ventral rami of CSN3-CSN8 in 10 cervical specimens (n = 88 IF and CSN). Barium sulfate was applied to the nerves, and CT imaging was performed. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the IF and CSN, the CSN shape and position within the foramen were quantified. Results: Both IF and CSN CSA significantly increased caudally, with the largest values identified at C7-Th1. The ratio of the spinal nerves CSA to IF CSA was significantly higher caudally, suggesting a greater risk of compression in this region. The CSN position within the IF varied between vertebral levels and was positioned in the mid-caudal third of the IF between C3 and C6 and more cranial in the IFs between C6 and Th1. Conclusions: Ex vivo character of the study and the relatively small sample size. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate significant anatomical variation in the size, shape and position of the CSN inside the IF depending on the vertebral level. Detailed knowledge of these patterns enables increased diagnostic precision and the development of targeted therapeutic interventions in equine CSN compression.
Publication Date: 2026-10-29 PubMed ID: 42952373DOI: 10.1002/evj.70350Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

An anatomical and computed tomography (CT) study was conducted to better understand the size, shape, and position of equine cervical spinal nerves (CSN) in relation to the intervertebral foramina (IF), aiming to improve diagnosis of nerve compression caused by foraminal narrowing.

Background and Purpose

  • Osteoarthropathy or developmental hypertrophy in horses can enlarge the cervical articular process joints, narrowing the intervertebral foramina (IF).
  • Narrowed IF may compress spinal nerves exiting the cervical spine, causing neck pain, forelimb lameness, or muscle atrophy.
  • Computed tomography (CT) is the standard imaging technique for evaluating IF stenosis but has limited ability to visualize cervical spinal nerves (CSN).
  • The study aimed to provide anatomical data on the size, shape, and position of CSNs relative to the IF to improve CT-based diagnoses of nerve compression.

Methods

  • The study was conducted using 10 cadaveric equine cervical spine specimens, focusing on cervical spinal nerves CSN3 through CSN8.
  • Anatomical dissection exposed dorsal and ventral rami of the CSNs at 88 IF and CSN sites.
  • Barium sulfate was applied to the nerves to enhance visibility on CT imaging.
  • Using CT scans, researchers measured the cross-sectional area (CSA) of both the IF and the CSNs.
  • The shape and exact positional relationship of the spinal nerves inside the IF were also recorded and quantified.

Results

  • The cross-sectional areas of both intervertebral foramina and spinal nerves increased moving caudally along the neck (from cervical vertebra 3 to thoracic vertebra 1).
  • The largest CSA values for both IF and CSN were found at the C7-Th1 level.
  • The ratio of spinal nerve CSA to IF CSA was significantly higher caudally, indicating that nerves in this region occupy more of the available space and are therefore at greater risk of compression.
  • The position of the spinal nerves within the foramina varied by vertebral level:
    • At C3 to C6, nerves tended to lie in the mid-caudal third of the IF.
    • At C6 to Th1, nerves were positioned more cranially within the IF.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The study demonstrated significant anatomical variation in the size, shape, and position of equine cervical spinal nerves relative to their foramina along different vertebral levels.
  • These variations indicate that certain regions of the cervical spine, especially caudal areas such as C7-Th1, are more susceptible to nerve compression due to smaller foraminal space relative to nerve size.
  • Understanding the precise anatomical relationships enhances the accuracy of CT diagnosis of foraminal stenosis and cervical spinal nerve compression in horses.
  • This knowledge facilitates more targeted and effective therapeutic interventions, such as surgical decompression or medical management of nerve compression syndromes.
  • Limitations include the ex vivo nature of the study and a relatively small sample size, which suggest further research may be necessary to generalize findings.

Cite This Article

APA
Stas EKL, Ehrle A, Lischer CJ. (2026). Anatomical and computed tomographic study of equine cervical spinal nerves and intervertebral foramina. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1002/evj.70350

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Stas, E K L
  • Equine Clinic, Veterinary Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ehrle, A
  • Equine Clinic, Veterinary Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Lischer, C J
  • Equine Clinic, Veterinary Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

References

This article includes 37 references
  1. Rovel T, Zimmerman M, Duchateau L, Delesalle C, Adriaensen E, Mariën T. Computed tomographic examination of the articular process joints of the cervical spine in Warmblood horses: 86 cases (2015–2017). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2021;259(10):1178–1187.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.20.03.0105google scholar: lookup
  2. Dyson SJ. Unexplained forelimb lameness possibly associated with radiculopathy. Equine Vet Educ 2020;32(S10):92–103.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12980google scholar: lookup
  3. Dyson S, Rasotto R. Idiopathic hopping‐like forelimb lameness syndrome in ridden horses: 46 horses (2002–2014). Equine Vet Educ 2016;28(1):30–39.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12411google scholar: lookup
  4. Beccati F, Pepe M, Santinelli I, Gialletti R, Di Meo A, Romero JM. Radiographic findings and anatomical variations of the caudal cervical area in horses with neck pain and ataxia: case‐control study on 116 horses. Vet Rec 2020;187(9):e79.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.105756google scholar: lookup
  5. Koenig JB, Westlund A, Nykamp S, Kenney DG, Melville L, Cribb N. Case‐control comparison of cervical spine radiographs from horses with a clinical diagnosis of cervical facet disease with normal horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2020;92:103176.
  6. Lindgren CM, Wright L, Kristoffersen M, Puchalski SM. Computed tomography and myelography of the equine cervical spine: 180 cases (2013–2018). Equine Vet Educ 2021;33(9):475–483.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13350google scholar: lookup
  7. Gough SL, Anderson JDC, Dixon JJ. Computed tomographic cervical myelography in horses: technique and findings in 51 clinical cases. J Vet Intern Med 2020;34(5):2142–2151.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15848google scholar: lookup
  8. Down SS, Henson FMD. Radiographic retrospective study of the caudal cervical articular process joints in the horse. Equine Vet J 2009;41(6):518–524.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409x391015google scholar: lookup
  9. Kernot N, Butler R, Randle H. A systematic review of clinical signs associated with degenerative conditions and morphological variations of the equine caudal neck. J Equine Vet Sci 2022;116:104054.
  10. Rovel T, Duchateau L, Saunders J, Vandenberghe F, Vanderperren K. CT measures of osseous cervicothoracic intervertebral foramina are repeatable and associated with CT measures of adjacent articular processes in horses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2023;64(1):61–68.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.13158google scholar: lookup
  11. Caridi JM, Pumberger M, Hughes AP. Cervical radiculopathy: a review. HSS J 2011;7(3):265–272.
    doi: 10.1007/s11420-011-9218-zgoogle scholar: lookup
  12. Swagemakers JH, Van Daele P, Mageed M. Percutaneous full endoscopic foraminotomy for treatment of cervical spinal nerve compression in horses using a uniportal approach: feasibility study. Equine Vet J 2023;55(5):788–797.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13919google scholar: lookup
  13. Tucker R, Schmidt SM, Hahn C. Disorders of the cervical vertebral column part 1: identification and diagnosis. Equine Vet Educ 2025;37(12):662–672.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.14216google scholar: lookup
  14. Brown KA, Engiles JB, de Solis CN, Bills KW, Johnson AL, Davidson EJ. A dorsal ultrasound‐guided approach to perineural injection of the sixth and seventh cervical spinal nerves in horses is accurate and does not result in epidural placement. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2025;263(8):1019–1026.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.25.02.0101google scholar: lookup
  15. Corraretti G, Vandeweerd JM, Hontoir F, Vanderperren K, Palmers K. Anatomy and ultrasound‐guided injection of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus of the cervical spinal nerves in the horse: a cadaveric study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2020;33(6):377–386.
    doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714301google scholar: lookup
  16. Fouquet G, Abbas G, Johnson JP, Pompermayer E, Harel C, Aldous E. Ultrasound‐guided injection technique of the equine cervical nerve roots. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:992208.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.992208google scholar: lookup
  17. Cruz‐Sanabria JA, Gaschen L, Bragulla HH, Mitchell M, Leise BS. A study of ultrasound‐guided perineural injection of the caudal cervical spinal nerve roots in equine cadavers. Vet Anaesth Analg 2021;48(4):603–611.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2021.04.002google scholar: lookup
  18. Touzot‐Jourde G, Geffroy O, Tallaj A, Gauthier O, Denoix JM. Ultrasonography‐guided perineural injection of the ramus ventralis of the 7 and 8th cervical nerves in horses: a cadaveric descriptive pilot study. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:102.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00102google scholar: lookup
  19. Wood AD, Sinovich M, Parker RA. Medication of the cervical spinal nerves for the treatment of equine cervical radiculopathy. Equine Vet Educ 2025;37(7):363–370.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.14060google scholar: lookup
  20. Wood AD, Sinovich M, Prutton JSW, Parker RA. Ultrasonographic guidance for perineural injections of the cervical spinal nerves in horses. Vet Surg 2021;50(4):816–822.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.13610google scholar: lookup
  21. Tucker R, Anderson J, Schmidt SM, Stavisky J. Disorders of the cervical vertebral column part 2: update on current surgical techniques. Equine Vet Educ 2026;38(1):46–57.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.14192google scholar: lookup
  22. Nelson BB, Easley JT. Current and future central nervous system surgery—part 2. Vet Clin N Am Equine Pract 2026;42(1):185–197.
  23. Previdelli RL, Dash RF, Rutland CS, Tucker R, Hawkins A. Anatomical insights into the equine cervical intervertebral foramina: implications for veterinary practice. Anat Histol Embryol 2026;55(4):e70154.
    doi: 10.1111/ahe.70154google scholar: lookup
  24. Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. Chapter 8: the nervous system. Textbook of veterinary anatomy 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier; 2010. p. 268–331.
  25. Barone R, Simoens P. Chapitre II: Nerfs Spinaux. Anatomie Comparée Des Mammifères Domestiques, Tome 7: Neurologie, II: Système Nerveux Périphérique; Glandes Endocrines; Esthésiologie Paris: Vigot; 2010.
  26. Budras KD, Sack WO, Röck S. Peripheral nervous system. Anatomy of the horse Hannover: Schlütersche Verlagsgesellschaft; 2009.
  27. Haussler K. Functional anatomy and clinical biomechanics of the equine cervical spine. 2016.
  28. Daniels AM, Morton AJ, Werpy NM, Biedrzycki AH, Tull TM, Denagamage TN. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for evaluation of cervical vertebral nerves and synovial tissues in horses with cervical spinal disease. Animals 2026;16(12):1759.
    doi: 10.3390/ani16121759google scholar: lookup
  29. McCosh KK, Selberg KT, Platt LA, Seabaugh KA. Ultrasonography accurately detects equine cervical articular process joint effusion with comparable performance to computed tomography. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2026;264(7):875–881.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.25.11.0762google scholar: lookup
  30. Claridge HAH, Piercy RJ, Parry A, Weller R. The 3D anatomy of the cervical articular process joints in the horse and their topographical relationship to the spinal cord. Equine Vet J 2010;42(8):726–731.
  31. Berg LC, Nielsen JV, Thoefner MB, Thomsen PD. Ultrasonography of the equine cervical region: a descriptive study in eight horses.. Equine Vet J 2003;35(7):647–655.
  32. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research.. J Chiropr Med 2016;15(2):155–163.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012google scholar: lookup
  33. Tang R, Perez R, Brogan DM, Berezin MY, McCarthy JE. Imaging peripheral nerves in vivo with CT neurogram using novel 2,4,6‐tri‐iodinated lidocaine contrast agent.. Bioengineering (Basel) 2025;12(4):422.
  34. Park CK, Lee HJ, Ryu KS. Comparison of root images between post‐myelographic computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar radiculopathy.. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2017;60(5):540–549.
  35. Woods BI, Hilibrand AS. Cervical radiculopathy epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment.. 2015.
  36. Giambuzzi S, Pancotto T, Ruth J. Perineural injection for treatment of root‐signature signs associated with lateralized disk material in five dogs (2009–2013).. Front Vet Sci 2016;3:1.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00001google scholar: lookup
  37. Mitchell CW, Nykamp SG, Foster R, Cruz R, Montieth G. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating horses with spinal ataxia.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2012;53(6):613–620.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.