Benefit-cost analysis of vaccination of horses as a strategy to control equine monocytic ehrlichiosis.
Abstract: To determine whether horses in New York should be vaccinated against equine monocytic ehrlichiosis (EME). Methods: Decision-tree analyses of data from a cross-sectional study and a case-control study. Methods: Horses in New York. Methods: Annual expected monetary loss per horse attributable to EME was calculated for vaccinated and nonvaccinated horses in New York. Because risk of being seropositive was dependent on county in which the horse was located, farm elevation, and use of each horse, decision-tree analyses were stratified by these factors. Results: Annual expected monetary loss per horse attributable to EME for horses vaccinated by veterinarians ranged from $ 21 to $ 21.83/horse/y; for horses vaccinated by owners ranged from $ 10 to $ 10.83/horse/y; and for nonvaccinated horses ranged from $ 0 to $ 4.03/horse/y. Assuming 78% of vaccinated horses were protected and mean losses associated with EME included costs for horses that died, annual incidence density at which expected monetary loss for vaccinated horses was equal to that for nonvaccinated horses was 12 cases/1,000 horses/y and 25 cases/1,000 horses/y for horses vaccinated by owners or by veterinarians, respectively. Conclusions: Annual vaccination minimizes monetary losses attributable to EME only when the annual incidence density exceeds 12 to 25 cases/1,000 horses/y. In New York, expected monetary losses are minimized when horses are not vaccinated because of the low annual incidence density in most regions.
Publication Date: 1996-04-15 PubMed ID: 8635975
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
- Research Support
- U.S. Gov't
- Non-P.H.S.
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research analyzes the costs and benefits of vaccinating horses in New York against equine monocytic ehrlichiosis (EME). The study finds that because of the low incidence density of EME in most regions of the state, it’s actually less costly not to vaccinate the horses.
Research methodology
- Using decision-tree analysis, the researchers handled data from a cross-sectional study and a case-control study.
- The team calculated the annual expected monetary loss per horse attributable to EME for vaccinated and non-vaccinated horses in New York.
- Since the risk of becoming seropositive depends on the county in which the horse is located, farm elevation, and the purpose of each horse, the researchers stratified the decision-tree analyses by these factors.
Results and findings
- The annual anticipated monetary loss per horse due to EME for horses vaccinated by veterinarians was found to range from $21 to $21.83 per horse per year. For horses vaccinated by owners themselves, it ranged from $10 to $10.83 per horse per year, and for non-vaccinated horses, the range was from $0 to $4.03 per horse per year.
- Considering that 78% of vaccinated horses were protected, and average losses associated with EME included the costs for horses that died, the researchers arrived at an annual incidence density at which anticipated monetary loss for vaccinated horses equals that for non-vaccinated horses: 12 cases per 1,000 horses per year for horses vaccinated by owners, and 25 cases per 1,000 horses per year for horses vaccinated by veterinarians.
Conclusions
- The study concludes that annual vaccination lowers monetary losses due to EME only when the annual incidence density is more than 12 to 25 cases per 1,000 horses per year.
- Specifically, in New York, where the incidence density of EME is low in most regions, expected monetary losses are minimized when horses are not vaccinated.
Cite This Article
APA
Atwill ER, Mohammed HO.
(1996).
Benefit-cost analysis of vaccination of horses as a strategy to control equine monocytic ehrlichiosis.
J Am Vet Med Assoc, 208(8), 1295-1299.
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-6401, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Case-Control Studies
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Cross-Sectional Studies
- Decision Trees
- Ehrlichiosis / economics
- Ehrlichiosis / epidemiology
- Ehrlichiosis / prevention & control
- Ehrlichiosis / veterinary
- Horse Diseases / economics
- Horse Diseases / epidemiology
- Horse Diseases / prevention & control
- Horses
- New York / epidemiology
- Risk Factors
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Vaccination / economics
- Vaccination / veterinary
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists